Abstract
Spatial planning policies can create segmented sub-markets for land, leading to an artificial scarcity for certain types of land use (usually urban land use) and higher land prices in that submarket, which can eventually spillover to other sub-markets. In a spatial context, these spillover effects are mainly observed in the urban fringes, where rural land owners often ask a higher price for their rural land because of expectations that this will be converted into urban land. The price for rural parcels in the urban fringe is thus related to the probability that these parcels will be put to urban uses in the (near) future, which is referred to as the ‘transition probability’. Figure 9.1 describes this relation in more detail. Land prices decline as the distance from the city centre increases. In situations where there are no spatial planning constraints (Fig. 9.1a), there is no gap between land prices at the urban fringe. If there is a spatial planning policy being implemented that restricts building on the fringe of a city (Fig. 9.1b), a sudden change in land prices can be observed for rural parcels immediately bordering the city. When it is expected that these limitations along the fringe may be lifted, the market price for those rural parcels will be somewhere between the urban and the agricultural land price. If the market price is closer to the agricultural land price, there is a low transition probability, and if the market price is closer to the urban land price, there is a high transition probability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alonso, W. A. (1964). Location and land use: Toward a general theory of land rent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Borsboom-van Beurden, J. A. M., Boersma, W. T., Bouwman, A. A., Crommentuijn, L. E. M., Dekkers, J. E. C., & Koomen, E. (2005). Ruimtelijke Beelden – Visualisatie van een veranderd Nederland in 2030. Bilthoven: Milieu- en Natuurplanbureau.
Buurman, J. J. G. (2003). Rural land markets: A spatial explanatory model. PhD Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
CBS (2000). Statline, Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. http://www.statline.nl. Retrieved 15 June 2005.
Dekkers, J. E. C. (2010). Externalities, land use planning and urban expansion. PhD Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
Dekkers, J. E. C., Rietveld, P., Van den Brink, A., & Scholten, H. J. (2004). Exploring the land market in the province of Noord-Holland using a spatial regression model. Paper for the 44th ERSA-congress, Porto, Portugal, August 25–29.
De Nijs, T. C. M., De Niet, R., & Crommentuijn, L. E. M. (2004). Constructing land-use maps of The Netherlands in 2030. Journal of Environmental Management, 72(1), 35–42.
Gordon, R. J. (1990). The measurement of durable goods prices. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Griliches, Z. (Ed.). (1971). Price indexes and quality change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hilferink, M., & Rietveld, P. (1999). Land use scanner: An integrated GIS based model for long term projections of land use in urban and rural areas. Journal of Geographical Systems, 1(2), 155–177.
Koomen, E., Dekkers, J. E. C., & Van Dijk, T. (2008). Open space preservation in The Netherlands: Planning, practice and prospects. Land Use Policy, 25(3), 361–377.
Loonen, W., & Koomen, E. (2009). Calibration and validation of the land use scanner allocation algorithms. PBL Report No. 550026002. Bilthoven: PBL.
Luijt, J., Kuhlman, J. W., & Pilkes, J. (2003). Agrarische grondprijzen onder stedelijke druk – Stedelijke optiewaarde en agrarische gebruikswaarde afhankelijk van ligging. NPB Werkdocument 2003/15. Den Haag: LEI.
McFadden, D. (1978). Modelling the choice of residential location. In Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, In A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars & J. Weibull (Eds.), (pp. 75–96). Amsterdam: North Holland Publ.
MNP (2004). Milieu- en natuureffecten Nota Ruimte. Bilthoven: RIVM.
OCW, LNV, VROM, & V&W (1999). Nota Belvedere, Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap, Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu and Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, SdU, Den Haag.
RNP (1958). De ontwikkeling van het Westen des lands. Werkcommissie Westen des Lands van de Rijksdienst voor het Nationale Plan (RNP), Staatsdrukkerij, The Hague.
Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.
Segeren A. (2007). De grondmarkt voor woningbouwlocaties. Belangen en strategieën van grondeigenaren. The Hague/Rotterdam: Ruimtelijk Planbureau/NAi Uitgevers.
Segeren, A., Needham, B., & Groen, J. (2005). De markt doorgrond. Een institutionele analyse van de grondmarkten in Nederland. The Hague/Rotterdam: Ruimtelijk Planbureau/NAi Uitgevers.
Van Rij, E., Dekkers, J. E. C., & Koomen, E. (2008). Analysing the success of open space preservation in The Netherlands: The midden-Delfland case. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99(1), 115–124.
Verburg, P. H., Ritsema van Eck, J. R., De Nijs, T. C. M., Dijst, M. J., & Schot, P. (2004). Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 125–150.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the BSIK programmes ‘Ruimte voor Geo-Informatie’ (http://www.rgi.nl) and Habiforum (http://www.habiforum.nl) for partially funding this research. We extend, furthermore, our thanks to the Government Service for Land and Water Management of the Netherlands (DLG), a department of the Netherlands Ministry for Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (LNV), for supplying the land transaction data. Thanks are also due to Jan Luijt and Tom Kuhlman of the Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI) of Wageningen University and Research Centre for discussions about land sub-markets, modelling and data issues. And finally, we thank Gerard Kooman, Edwin Bleijinga, Rik Heskes and Ton van Bart of the Province of Noord-Holland for discussions about the land market in their province.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dekkers, J., Rietveld, P. (2011). Explaining Land-Use Transition in a Segmented Land Market. In: Koomen, E., Borsboom-van Beurden, J. (eds) Land-Use Modelling in Planning Practice. GeoJournal Library, vol 101. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1822-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1822-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1821-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1822-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)