Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

Abstract

The design of screening-programs requires a careful evaluation of the screening population, its spectrum and prevalence of disease, the training level and motivation of the physician as well as the infrastructure for clinical and radiological work-flow, image analysis and reporting. In this respect, a close interaction between the screening participant, the radiologist and the referring partners is a key prerequisite. The design of the infrastructure has to aim at defining a consistent, reproducible and clinically practicable chain of screening recruitment, diagnostic procedures and follow-up as well as treatment recommendations (Fig. 5.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brant-Zawadski M (2006) Cancer detection: evaluation of whole-body MR imaging versus CT and PET/CT — whole-body CT. Annual Meeting of Radiologic Society of North America 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A et al. (2006) Reader variability in reporting breast imaging according to BI-RADS assessment categories (the Florence experience). Breast 15:44–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coldman AJ, Major D, Doyle GP et al. (2006) Organized breast screening programs in Canada: effect of radiologist reading volumes on outcomes. Radiology 238:809–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Hendriks JH et al. (2004) Independent double reading of screening mammograms in The Netherlands: effect of arbitration following reader disagreements. Radiology 231:564–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs B, Trousdale RT, Rock MG (2005) Solitary bony metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: significance of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Graser A, Wintersperger BJ, Suess C et al. (2006) Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:695–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grundy SM (2001) Coronary calcium as a risk factor: role in global risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1512–1515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF et al. (1999) Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354:99–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM et al. (2006) Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med 355:1763–1771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lam JS, Shvarts O, Leppert JT et al. (2005) Postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma based on a validated prognostic nomogram and risk group stratification system. J Urol 174:466–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman C, Holt S, Peacock S et al. (2002) Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:15–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Libby DM, Wu N, Lee IJ et al. (2006) CT screening for lung cancer: the value of short-term CT follow-up. Chest 129:1039–1042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Fagerstrom RM et al. (2000) Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1308–1316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry N (2001) Quality Assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. On behalf of EUSOMA Working Party. Eur J Cancer 37:159–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AJ, Chetner MP, Rourke K et al. (2004) Guidelines for the surveillance of localized renal cell carcinoma based on the patterns of relapse after nephrectomy. J Urol 172:58–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Kaick G (2006) Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Willgeroth F, Baumann M, Blaser D et al. (2005) Bavarian mammography screening program. Radiologe 45:264–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schoenberg, S.O., Reiser, M.F. (2008). Personnel and Structural Prerequisites for Screening-Programs. In: Reiser, M.F., van Kaick, G., Fink, C., Schoenberg, S.O. (eds) Screening and Preventive Diagnosis with Radiological Imaging. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49831-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49831-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23553-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49831-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics