Summary
The dynamic wind-pollinated mating system in conifers is more than a random game of pitch and catch; orderly forces work towards maximizing chances of pollen capture while minimizing selfing and interspecific hybridization. Aerodynamics of moving branches, leaves and female strobili favor pollen movement into ovules while more cryptic molecular mechanisms influence paternal parent choice from pollination onward to seed maturity. Outcrossing is the general outcome for most conifers but a few interesting exceptions include mixed mating systems, selfing, hybridization, reproductive sterility and the singular case of paternal apomixis. Self-pollination occurs at moderate rates yet few selfed seed are recovered in some of the Pinaceae; most selfed embryos die before reaching maturity so this is known as the embryo lethal system. Hybrid matings can be blocked by a few pre-zygotic barriers but more often matings between close relatives produce viable, fertile F1 offspring without a change in ploidy. Conifer reproduction is often abundant to the point of nuisance; it is not unusual for a conifer's wind-pollinated mating system to have a genetic footprint extending tens or even hundreds of kilometres from adult trees. At the other extreme, rare cases of reproductive steri lity are reported for both the Pinaceae and the Cupressaceae.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boyle, T. and E. Morgenstern. 1986. Estimates of outcrossing rates in six populations of black spruce in central New Brunswick. Silvae Genetica 35: 102–106.
Brown, A. 1990. Genetic characterization of plant mating systems. Editor: B. Weir. In: Plant Populations, Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA, pp. 145–162.
Cresswell, J., K. Henning, et al. 2007. Conifer ovulate cones accumulate pollen principally by impaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 18141–18144.
Dyer, R. and V. Sork. 2001. Pollen pool heterogeneity in shortleaf pine, Pinus echinata Mill. Molecular Ecology 10: 859–866.
Edwards-Burke, M., J. Hamrick, et al. 1997. Frequency and direction of hybridization in sympatric populations of Pinus taeda and P. echinata (Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 879–886.
Erickson, V. and W. Adams. 1989. Mating success in a coastal Douglas-fir seed orchard as affected by distance and floral phenology. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19: 1248–1255.
Friedman, S. and W. Adams. 1985. Levels of outcrossing in two loblolly pine seed orchards. Silvae Genetica 34: 157–162.
Ge, S., D. Hong, et al. 1998. Population genetic structure and conservation of an endangered conifer, Cathaya argyrophylla (Pinaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 351–357.
Grant, V. 1981. Plant Speciation. Columbia Press, New York.
Greenwood, M. 1980. Reproductive development in loblolly pine. I. The early development of male and female strobili in relation to the long shoot growth behavior. American Journal of Botany 67: 1414–1422.
Greenwood, M. 1986. Gene exchange in loblolly pine: the relation between pollination mechanisms, female receptivity and pollen viability. American Journal of Botany 73: 1433–1451.
Hagman, M. 1975. Incompatibility in forest trees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 188: 313–326.
Hosoo, Y., E. Yoshii, et al. 2005. A histological comparison of the development of pollen and female gametophytes in fertile and sterile Cryptomeria japonica. Sexual Plant Reproduction 18: 81–89.
Innes, D. and G. Ringius. 1990. Mating system and genetic structure of two populations of white spruce (Picea glauca) in eastern Newfoundland. Canadian Journal Botany 68: 1661–1666.
Knowles, P., G. Furnier, et al. 1987. Significant levels of self-fertilization in natural populations of tamarack. Canadian Journal of Botany 65: 1087–1091.
Koski, V. 1971. Embryonic lethals of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris. Communicationes Instituti Forestalia Fennica 75: 1–30.
Krakowski, J., S. Aitken, et al. 2003. Inbreeding and conservation in whitebark pine. Conservation Genetics 4: 581–593.
Krutovskii, K., D. Politov, et al. 1995. Isozyme study of population genetic structure, mating system and phylogenetic relationships of the five stone pine species (subsection Cembrae, section Strobi, subgenus Strobus). Editors: P. Baradat, W.T. Adams, G. Muller-Starck. In: Population Genetics and Conservation of Forest Trees. Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 270–304.
Kuittinen, H. and O. Savolainen. 1992. Picea omorika is a self-fertile but outcrossing conifer. Heredity 68: 183–187.
Ledig, F., V. Jacob-Cervantes, et al. 1997. Recent evolution and divergence among populations of a rare Mexican endemic, Chihuahua spruce, following Holocene climatic warming. Evolution 51: 1815–1827.
Liu, Z.-L., D. Zhang, et al. 2003. Chromosomal localization of 5S and 18S-5.8S-25S ribosomal DNA sites in five Asian pines using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 198–204.
Ma, X.-F., A. Szmidt, et al. 2006. Genetic structure and evolutionary history of a diploid hybrid pine Pinus densata inferred from the nucleotide variation at seven gene loci. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 807–816.
Mason, H. 1949. Evidence of the genetic submergence of Pinus remorata. Editor: G. Simpson. In: Genetics, Speciation and Paleontology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 474 p.
Matos, J. and B. Schaal. 2000. Chloroplast evolution in the Pinus montezumae complex: a coalescent approach to hybridization. Evolution 54: 1218–1233.
McWilliam, J. 1959. Interspecific incompatibility in Pinus. American Journal of Botany 46: 425–433.
Mitton, J. 1992. The dynamic mating system of conifers. New Forests 6: 197–216.
Mitton, J., Y. Linhart, et al. 1977. Observations on the genetic structure and mating system of ponderosa pine in the Colorado Front Range. Theoretical Applied Genetics 7: 5–13.
Mitton, J., Y. Linhart, et al. 1981. Estimation of outcrossing in ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa Laws., from patterns of segregation of protein polymorphisms and from frequencies of albino seedlings. Silvae Genetica 30: 117–121.
Mitton, J. and C. Williams. 2006. Gene flow in conifers. pp. 147–168. Chapter 9. Editor: C.G. Williams. In: Landscapes, Genomics and Transgenic Conifers. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 270 p.
Moran, G., J. Bell, et al. 1980. The genetic structure and levels of inbreeding in a Pinus radiata seed orchard. Silvae Genetica 29: 190–193.
Morgante, M., G. Vendramin, et al. 1991. Effects of stand density on outcrossing rate in Norway spruce (Picea abies) populations. Canadian Journal Botany 69: 2704–2708.
Muona, O. and A. Harju. 1989. Effective population sizes, genetic variability and mating system in a natural stands and seed orchards of Pinus sylvestris. Silvae Genetica 38: 221–228.
Niklas, K. 1982. Simulated and empiric wind pollination patterns of conifer cones. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 79: 510–514.
Niklas, K. 1984. The motion of windborne pollen grains around conifer ovulate cones: implications on wind pollination. American Journal of Botany 71: 356–374.
Niklas, K. 1985. Wind pollination — a study in chaos. American Scientist 73: 462–470.
O'Connell, L. 2003. The evolution of inbreeding in western red cedar (Thuja plicata: Cupressaceae). Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Forestry. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, 162 p.
Perry, D. and P. Knowles. 1990. Evidence of high self- fertilization in natural populations of eastern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis). Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 663–668.
Pichot, C., M. El-Maataoi, et al. 2001. Surrogate mother for endangered Cupressus. Nature 412: 39.
Price, R., A. Liston, et al. 1998. Phylogeny and systematics of Pinus. Editor: D. Richardson. In: Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp. 49–68
Richards, A. 1997. Plant Breeding Systems. Chapman & Hall, London.
Righter, F. and J. Duffield. 1951. A summary of interspecific crosses in the genus Pinus made at the Institute of Forest Genetics. Journal of Heredity 42: 75–80.
Sax, H. 1932. Chromosome pairing in Larix species. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 13: 368–373.
Sax, K. 1960. Meiosis in interspecific pine hybrids. Forest Science 6: 135–138.
Sarvas, R. 1962. Investigations on the flowering and seed crop of Pinus silvestris. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fennica 53: 1–198.
Saylor, L. and B. Smith. 1966. Meiotic irregularity in species and interspecific hybrids of Pinus. American Journal of Botany 53: 453–468.
Schoeder, S. 1989. Outcrossing rates and seed characteristics in damaged natural populations of Abies alba. Silvae Genetica 38: 185–189.
Schuster, W. and J. Mitton. 2000. Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity 84: 348–361.
Shepherd, M. and C. Williams. 2008. Comparative mapping among subsection Australes (genus Pinus, family Pinaceae). Genome 51: 320–331.
Siegismund, H. and E. Kjaer. 1997. Outcrossing rates in two stands of noble fir (Abies procera Rehd.) in Denmark. Silvae Genetica 46: 144–146.
Stauffer, A. and W. Adams. 1993. Allozyme variation and mating system of three Douglas-fir stands in Switzerland. Silvae Genetica 42: 254–258.
Stone, E. and J. Duffield. 1950. Hybrids of sugar pine by embryo culture. Journal of Forestry 48: 200–201.
Takaso, T., P. von Aderkas, et al. 1996. Prefertilization events in ovules of Pseudotsuga: ovular secretion and its influence on pollen tubes. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 1214–1219.
von Aderkas, P., G. Rouault, et al. 2005a. Multinucleate storage cells in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco) and the effect of seed parasitism by the chalcid Megastigmus spermotrophus Wachtl. Heredity 94: 616–622.
von Aderkas, P., G. Rouault, et al. 2005b. Seed parasitism redirects ovule development in Douglas fir. Proceeding of the Royal Society B 272: 1491–1496.
Wang, X.-R., A. Szmidt, et al. 2001. Genetic composition and diploid speciation of a high mountain pine, Pinus densata, native to the Tibetan plateau. Genetics 159: 337–346.
Williams, C. 2006. The question of commercializing transgenic conifers. pp. 31–43. Editor: C.G. Williams. In: Landscapes, Genomics and Transgenic Conifers. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 270 p.
Williams, C. 2008. Selfed embryo death in Pinus taeda: a phenotypic profile. New Phytologist 178: 210–222.
Williams, C., K. Joyner, et al. 2002. Genomic consequences of interspecific Pinus spp. hybridisation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Socirty 75: 503–508.
Williams, C., S. LaDeau, et al. 2006. Modeling seed dispersal distances: implications for transgenic Pinus taeda. Ecological Applications 16: 117–124.
Wilson, V. and J. Owens. 2003. Histology of sterile male and female cones in Pinus monticola (western white pine). Sexual Plant Reproduction 15: 301–310.
Zobel, B. 1951. The natural hybrid between Coulter and Jeffrey pines. Evolution 5: 405–413.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). The Dynamic Wind-Pollinated Mating System. In: Conifer Reproductive Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9602-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9602-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9601-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9602-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)