Skip to main content
Log in

Application of Bayesian inference to characterize risks associated with low doses of low-LET radiation

  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improved risk characterization for stochastic biological effects of low doses of low-LET radiation is important for protecting nuclear workers and the public from harm from radiation exposure. Here we present a Bayesian approach to characterize risks of stochastic effects from low doses of low-LET radiation. The stochastic effect considered is neoplastic transformation of cells because it relates closely to cancer induction. We have used a published model of neoplastic transformation called NEOTRANS1. It is based on two different classes of cellular sensitivity for asynchronous, exponentially growing populations (in vitro). One sensitivity class is the hypersensitive cell; the other is the resistant cell. NEOTRANS1 includes the effects of genomic damage accumulation, DNA repair during cell cycle arrest, and DNA misrepair (non-lethal repair errors). The model-associated differential equations are solved for conditions of in vitro irradiation at a fixed rate. Previously published solutions apply only to high dose rates and were incorrectly assumed to apply to only high-LET radiation. Solutions provided here apply to any fixed dose rate and to both high-and low-LET radiations. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods are used to carry out the Bayesian inference of the low-dose risk for neoplastic transformation of aneuploid C3H 10T1/2 cells for X-ray doses from 0 to 1000 mGy. We have assumed that for this low-dose range only the hypersensitive fraction of the cells are affected. Our results indicate that the initial slope of the risk vs dose relationship for neoplastic transformation is as follows: (1) directly proportional to the fraction, f 1, of hypersensitive cells; (2) directly proportional to the radiosensitivity of the genomic target; and (3) inversely proportional to the rate at which hypersensitive cells with radiation-induced damage are committed to undergo correct repair of genomic damage. Further, our results indicate that very fast molecular events are associated with the commitment of cells to the correct repair pathway. Results also indicate a relatively large probability for misrepair that leads to genomic instability. Our results are consistent with the view that for very low doses, dose rate is not an important variable for characterizing low-LET radiation risks so long as age-related changes in sensitivity do not occur during irradiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balcer-Kubiczek, E. K. and G. H. Harrison (1988). Effect of X-ray dose protraction and a tumor promoter on transformation induction in vitro. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 54, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, D. J., P. Hahnfeldt, S. A. Amundson and R. K. Sachs (1996). Interpretation of inverse dose-rate effects for mutagenesis by sparsely ionizing radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 70, 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S. P. and A. Gelman (1998). Alternative methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 7, 434–455.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, B. P. and R. A. Louis (1996). Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis, London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, E. L., F. A. Davis and M. W. Maxfield (Eds) (1960). Statistics Manual, New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, J. E., D. M. Gay and R. E. Welsch (1981). An adaptive nonlinear least-squares algorithm. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Vol. 7, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. and R. J. Tibshirani (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap, London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamerman, D. (1997). Markov Chain Monte Carlo, London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilks, W. R., S. Richardson and D. J. Spiegelhalter (Eds) (1997). Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, A. and M. M. Elkind (1979). Transformation of mouse C3H/10T1/2 cells by single and fractionated doses of X-rays and fission-spectrum neutrons. Cancer Res. 39, 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloek, J. and H. K. van Dijk (1978). Bayesian estimates of equation system parameters: an application of integration by Monte Carlo. Econometrica 46, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P. and J. A. Nelder (1998). Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn, Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. C., C. R. Geard, D. J. Brenner, K. Komatsu, S. A. Marino and E. J. Hall (1989). Neutron-energy-dependent oncogenic transformation of C3H 10T1/2 mouse cells. Radiat. Res. 117, 114–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. C., C. R. Geard, S. A. Marino, M. Richards and G. Randers-Pehrson (1991). Oncogenic transformation following sequential irradiations with monoenergetic neutrons and X-rays. Radiat. Res. 125, 338–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. C. and E. J. Hall (1978). X-ray dose fractionation and oncogenic transformations in cultured mouse embryo cells. Nature 272, 58–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. C., E. J. Hall and H. H. Rossi (1979). Oncogenic transformation of mammalian cells in vitro with split doses of x-rays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 5755–5758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. and W. C. Inkret (1996a). Bayesian maximum posterior probability method for interpreting plutonium urinalysis data, in Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. and W. C. Inkret (1996b). Bayesian maximum posterior probability method for interpreting plutonium urinalysis data. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 63, 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. C., S. A. Marino, D. R. Brenner, S. G. Martin, M. Richards, G. Randers-Pehrson and E. J. Hall (1995). The biological effectiveness of radon-progeny alpha particles. II. Oncogenic transformation as a function of linear energy transfer. Radiat. Res. 142, 54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raaphorst, G. P. and E. I. Azzam (1986). Fixation and repair by anisotonic treatment of radiation damage leading to oncogenic transformation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med. 49, 383–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöllnberger, H., M. Kotecki, D. J. Crawford-Brown, W. Hofmann and P. M. Eckl (1999). Adaptive response and dose-response plateaus for initiation in a state-vector model of carcinogenesis. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 75, 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöllnberger, H., B. R. Scott, M. Stafford and S. Osovets (2000). Analytical solutions for a mechanistic model for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation. http://www.idealibrary.com/links/toc/bulm/63/5/0

  • Scott, B. R. (1997). A mechanistic model for neoplastic transformation of cells by high LET radiation and its implications for low dose, low dose rate, risk assessment. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 72, 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivia, D. S. (1998). Data Analysis, A Bayesian Tutorial, New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skilling, J. (Ed.) (1989). Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., A. Thomas and N. G. Best (Eds) (1999). WinBUGS Version 1.2 User Manual, Cambridge, GB: MRC Biostatistics Unit.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Schöllnberger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schöllnberger, H., Scott, B.R. & Hanson, T.E. Application of Bayesian inference to characterize risks associated with low doses of low-LET radiation. Bull. Math. Biol. 63, 865–883 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2001.0243

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2001.0243

Keywords

Navigation