Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Day Care Trends for Children under Three Years in Germany

  • Chapter
The Transformation of Care in European Societies

Abstract

To facilitate the combination of employment and family care for parents in Germany, the provision of state-subsidised Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) services for children aged under three years has expanded massively since 2005 (Spiess 2011). In combination with a new parental leave policy since 2007, this policy change suggests that Germany has been diverging from its previous trajectory as a conservative welfare state, in which family and labour market policies predominantly promoted a traditional or modified male breadwinner family model. This policy process has been subject to tensions and the individual policies have been shaped by party positions as well as intra-party conflicts (Leitner, 2010). In contrast to many other European countries, the economic crisis in 2008 has not undermined these policy developments. In this chapter, I provide an overview of developments in ECEC policy and associated trends in maternal employment and take-up of ECEC services. I extend the literature by complementing these with new analyses of trends in informal care for children under three and of temporal and regional variations in the structure and employment conditions of the ECEC workforce in Germany. This aims to improve our understanding of the extent to which care for young children is being shifted from parents — mainly mothers — or informal caregivers to formal providers and whether this may challenge the long established ideal of maternal care for young children in West Germany.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anders, Y. (2012) ‘Modelle professioneller Kompetenzen für frühpädago-gische Fachkräfte: Aktueller Stand und ihr Bezug zur Professionalisierung’ Expertise zum Gutachten ‘Professionalisierung in der Frühpädagogik’ im Auftrag des Aktionsrats Bildung, Munich: vbm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anders, Y., Rossbach, H.-G. Weinert, S. Ebert, S. Kuger, S. Lehrl, S. and von Maurice, J. (2012) ‘Home and preschool learning environments and their relations to the development of early numeracy skills’ Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27: 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anders, Y. Sammons, P. Taggart, B. Sylva, K. Melhuish, E. and Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2011) ‘The influence of child, family home factors and pre-school education on the identification of special educational needs at age 10’ British Educational Research Journal, 37: 421–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. M. Shinn, C. Fullilove, M. L. Scrimshaw, S. C. Fielding, J. E. Normand, J. and Carande-Kulis, V. G. (2003) ‘The effectiveness of early childhood development programs. A systematic review’ American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24: 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauchmüller, R., Gørtz, M. & Rasmussen, A. W. (2011) Long-run benefits from universal high-quality pre-schooling. AKF Working Paper. Danish Institute of Governmental Research. ISBN: 978-87-7509-999-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J. Vandell, D. Burchinal, M. Clarke-Stewart, K. A. McCartney, K. Owen, M. and the NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2007) ‘Are there long-term effects of early child care?’ Child Development, 78: 681–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H. P. Bos, W. Daniel, H.-D. Hannover, B. Lenzen, D. Prenzel, M. Roßbach, H.-G. Tippelt, R. and Wößmann, L. (2012) Professionalisierung in der Frühpädagogik: Qualifikationsniveau and -bedingungen des Personals in Kindertagesstätten. Gutachten für Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMFSFJ (2012) ‘Ausgeübte Erwerbstätigkeit von Müttern: Erwerbstätigkeit, Erwerbsumfang und Erwerbsvolumen 2010’ Berlin: Bundesministerium fuer Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock-Famulla, K. (2009) Länderreport Frühkindliche Bildungssysteme 2008: Transparenz schaffen — Governance stärken. Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock-Famulla, K. & Lange, J. (2011) Länderreport Frühkindliche Bildungssysteme 2011: Transparenz schaffen — Governance stärken Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, K. (2010) ‘How does early childhood care and education affect cognitive development? An international review of the effects of early intervention for children from different social backgrounds’ Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25: 140–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camilli, G. Vargas, S. Ryan, S. and Barnett, W. S. (2010). ‘Meta-analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development’ Teachers College Record, 112.3, 579–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, L. P. (2007) ‘Persistent policy effects on the division of domestic tasks in reunified Germany’ Journal of Marriage and Family, 69: 930–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R. and Harris, F. (1999) ‘Employment, careers and families: The significance of choice and constraint in women’s lives’ in Crompton, R. (ed.) Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 128–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher Bundestag (2004) Entwurf eines Gesetzes zum qualitätsorientierten und bedarfsgerechten Ausbau der Tagesbetreuung und zur Weiterentwicklung der Kinder — und Jugendhilfe (Tagesbetreuungsausbaugesetz — TAG). Bundestags-Drucksache Nr. 15/3676 vom 6. September 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher Bundestag (2008a) Bericht über die Auswirkungen des Bundeselterngeld — und Elternzeitgesetzes sowie über die gegebenenfalls not-wendige Weiterentwicklung. Nr. 16/10770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher Bundestag (2008b) Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Förderung von Kindern unter drei Jahren in Tageseinrichtungen und in der Kindertagespflege (Kinderförderungsgesetz — KiföG). Bundestags-Drucksache Nr. 16/9299 vom 27.Mai 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diskowski, D. (2008) ‘Bildungspläne für Kindertagesstätten — ein neues und noch unbegriffenes Steuerungsinstrument’ Zeitschrift für Erzehungswissenschaften, Sonderheft 11: 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DJI (2012) Erste Befunde der DJI-Länderstudie im Rahmen der KIFÖG-Evaluation, Munich: Deutsches Jugendinstitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drobnič, S. and León, M. (2012) ‘Agency freedom for worklife balance in Germany and Spain’ in Hobson, B. (ed.) Worklife Balance. The Agency and Capabilities Gap, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs-Rechlin, K. (2008) ‘Soziale Hintergründe der Inanspruchnahme von Kindertagesbetreuung und finanzieller Aufwand der Eltern — Auswertungen des Sozio-ökonomischen Panels’ in DJI (ed.) Zahlenspiegel 2007, Munich: Deutsches Jugendinstitut, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs-Rechlin, K. (2011) ‘Es wird eng — zur aktuellen Dynamik der Kitas’ KomDat, 3/2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam, W. S. and Zigler, E. F. (2001). ‘A Critical Meta-analysis of All Evaluations of State-Funded Pre-School from 1977 to 1998: Implications for Policy, Service Delivery and Program Evaluation’ Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15: 441–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. Kreyenfeld, M. Huinink, J. Konietzka, D. and Trappe, H. (2010) Familie und Partnerschaft in Ost — und Westdeutschland, Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorey, K. M. (2001) ‘Early Childhood Education: A Meta-Analytic Affirmation of the Short — and Long-Term Benefits of Educational Opportunity’ School Psychology Quarterly, 16: 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan, P. and Wrohlich, K. (2009) ‘Can Child Care Policy Encourage Employment and Fertility? Evidence from a Structural Model’ IZA Discussion Paper No. 4503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, C. D. Palmer, J. L. and Zaslow, M. L. (1990) Who cares for America’s children? Child care policy for the 1990s. Washington, DC: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotz, V. J. and Xiao, M. (2011) ‘The impact of regulations on the supply and quality of care in child care markets’ American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 101: 1775–1805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüsken, K. (2011) Kita vor Ort. Betreuungsatlas auf Ebene der Jugendamtsbezirke 2010, Munich: Deutsches Jugendinstitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüsken, K. and Riedel, B. (2012) ‘Kommunen im Endspurt’ DJI Impulse, 2/2012, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immervoll, H. and Barber, D. (2005) ‘Can parents afford to work?: Childcare costs, tax-benefit policies and work incentives’ OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M. (2007) How Welfare States Care. Culture, Gender and Parenting in Europe, Utrecht: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuger, S. and Kluczniok, K. (2008) ‘Prozessqualität im Kindergarten — Konzept, Umsetzung und Befunde’ Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 10.Jahrg., Sonderheft 11/2008, 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, S. (2010). ‘Germany outpaces Austria in childcare policy: The historical contingencies of “conservative” childcare policy’ Journal of European Social Policy, 20: 456–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (1992) ‘Gender and the development of welfare regimes’ Journal of European Social Policy, 2: 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. Knijn, T. Martin, C. and Ostner, I. (2008) ‘Patterns of development in work/family reconciliation: Policies for parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s’ Social Politics, 15: 261–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, J., Budig, M. & Böckmann, I. (2010) Cross-national patterns in individual and household employment and work hours by gender and parenthood. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morabito, C. Vandenbroeck, M. and Roose, R. (2013) ‘The greatest of equalisers: A critical review of international organisations’ views on early childhood education and care’ Journal of Social Policy, 42: 541–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K.-U. Tsiasioti, C. Spieß, C. K. Wrohlich, K. Bügelmayer, E. Haywood, L. Peter, F. Ringmann, M. and Witzke, S. (2013) ‘Förderung und Wohlergehen von Kindern’in Politikberatung kompakt Nr.73, Berlin: DIW Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2002a) ‘Child care structure — process — outcome: Direct and indirect effects of child care quality on young children’s development’ Psychological Science, 13: 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2002b) ‘Early child care and children’s development prior to school entry. Results from the NICHD Study of early child care’ American Educational Research Journal, 39: 133–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NICHD Early Child Care Research Network and Duncan, G. J. (2003) ‘Modeling the impacts of child care quality on children’s preschool cognitive development’ Child Development, 74: 1454–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberhuemer, P. Schreyer, I. and Neuman, M. J. (2010) Professionals in Early Childhood Education and Care Systems, Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2006) Starting Strong II. Early Childhood Education and Care, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauschenbach, T. Schilling, M. and Strunz, E. (2012) ‘Der U3-Ausbau im Endspurt — und danach’ KomDat, 3/2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz-Yurovich, L. (2012) ‘Normative and allocation role strain: Role incompatibility, outsourcing, and the transition to a second birth in Eastern and Western Germany’ MPIDR Working Paper WP-2012-024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, E. Ryan, R. M. and Brooks-Gunn, J. (2007) ‘Child care quality in various state policy contexts’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26: 887–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R. A. Trappe, H. and Gornick, J. C. (2004) ‘Gender and work in Germany: Before and after reunification’ Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M. (2008) ‘Kosten für Kindertageseinrichtungen und Kindertagespflege und ihre Finanzierung’ in DJI (ed.) Zahlenspiegel 2007, Munich: Deutsches Jungendinstitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmucker, A. and Seth, S. (2009) ‘BA-Beschäftigtenpanel 1998–2007: Codebuch’ FDZ Datenreport 01/2009(DE), Federal Employment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel Online (2013) Rechtsanspruch ab 1. August: Schröder erleichtert über Kita-Ausbau, http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/rechtsanspruch-fuer-kleinkinder-kristina-schroeder-lobt-kita-ausbau-a-910584.html, accessed on 30 August 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, C. K. (2011) ‘Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf — wie wirksam sind deutsche “ Care Policies”?’ Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Special Issue 12: 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, C. K. and Wrohlich, K. (2008) ‘The parental leave benefit reform in Germany: Costs and labour market outcomes of moving towards the Nordic model’ Population Policy and Research Review, 27: 575–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, C. K. Berger, E. M. and Groh-Samberg, O. (2008) ‘Die öffentlich geförderte Bildungs — und Betreuungsinfrastruktur in Deutschland: Eine ökonomische Analyse regionaler und nutzergruppenspezifischer Unterschiede’ Innocenti Working Paper 2008–03. UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder (2006) Kindertagesbetreuung regional 2006, Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder (2007) Kindertagesbetreuung regional 2007, Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder (2008) Kindertagesbetreuung regional 2008, Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder (2009) Kindertagesbetreuung regional 2009, Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder (2010) Kindertagesbetreuung regional 2010, Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder (2011) Kindertagesbetreuung regional 2011: Ein Vergleich aller 412 Kreise in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2012) Kindertagesbetreuung in Deutschland 2012, Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Coram Research Unit (2002) Research on Ratios, Group Size and Staff Qualifications and Training in Early Years and Childcare Settings, Research Report No. 320. Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietze, W. (1998) Wie gut sind unsere Kindergärten? Eine Untersuchung zur pädago-gischen Qualität in deutschen Kindergärten, Berlin: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietze, W., Becker-Stoll, F., Bensel, J., Eckhardt, A., Haug-Schnabel, G., Kalicki, B., Keller, H. & Leyendecker, B. (2013). Nationale Untersuchung zur Bildung, Betreuung und Erziehung in der frühen Kindheit (NUBBEK), Weimar/Berlin: Verlag das Netz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandell, D. Belsky, J. Burchinal, M. Steinberg, L. Vandergrift, N. and the NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2010) ‘Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development’ Child Development, 81: 737–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G. G. Frick, J. R. and Schupp, J. (2007) ‘The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) — Scope, Evolution and Enhancements’ Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127: 139–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel, J. (2006) What Children Need, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiemert, H. (2010) Tagesmutter als Beruf: Eine Untersuchung über die prekäre Anerkennung der Kindertagespflege als Beschäftigungsfeld und das Arbeits — und Selbstverständnis von Tagesmüttern. Unpublished dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Pia S. Schober
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain

    Margarita León (Senior Research Fellow) (Senior Research Fellow)

Copyright information

© 2014 Pia S. Schober

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schober, P.S. (2014). Day Care Trends for Children under Three Years in Germany. In: León, M. (eds) The Transformation of Care in European Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326515_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation