Abstract
This chapter explores how we use social media to communicate our experience of the world and bond with others by forming communities of shared values. Microblogging services such as Twitter and Weibo are a form of social media allowing users to publish streams of length-delimited posts to internet-mediated audiences. As such they afford new kinds of interpersonal interaction via the conversation-like exchanges that occur (Honeycutt & Herring, 2009). An example of a length-delimited post (hereafter ‘micropost’) is the following. It contains one of the most common patterns in microblogging, an expression of thanks for personal endorsement:
@Tim I love #coffee too
This post is addressed to Tim using the @ symbol before the name, a construction which can also function as a reference to the person (e.g. @Tim makes great coffee), and contains a hashtag, the # symbol, which acts as a form of metadata labelling the topic of the post so that it can be found by others. This chapter will consider microposts such as this in terms of how they illuminate the way microblogging as a practice creates alignments around shared quotidian experiences by conferring upon the private realm of daily experience a public audience. The kind of personal expression of the everyday that we see in microposts has never been subject to real-time mass dissemination in the way that we are currently witnessing on Twitter. This chapter focuses on one such personal domain, coffeetalk, that is, discourse relating to coffee as consumed in everyday life.1 I will consider this discourse from two
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (Austin: University of Texas Press).
Bernardo, H., Romero, D. M. & Wu, F. (2008) ‘Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope’, First Monday 14(1). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2317/2063 (accessed: 24 January 2013).
Bollen, J., Mao, H. & Xiao-Jun, Z. (2011) ‘Twitter mood predicts the stock market’, Journal of Computational Science, 2(1): 1–8.
Bosman, J. (2006) ‘This Joe’s for you?’ The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/08/business/media/08adco.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 (accessed: 24 January 2013).
Ellis, M. (2004) A Cultural History of Coffee (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson)
Firth, J. (1957) Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951 (London: Oxford University Press).
Gaudio, R. P. (2003) ‘Coffeetalk: StarbucksTM and the commercialization of casual conversation’, Language in Society, 32: 659–91.
Grosseck, G. & Holotescu, C. (2009) ‘Indicators for the analysis of learning and practice communities from the perspective of microblogging as a provocative sociolect in virtual space’. Paper presentend at the 5th International Scientific Conference eLSE — eLearning and Software for Education conference, Bucharest 9–10 April 2009.
Gruzd, A., Doiron, S. & Mai, P. (2011) ‘Is happiness contagious online? A case of Twitter and the 2010 Winter Olympics’. Paper presented at the the 44th Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Kauai, Hawai’i.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (London: Edward Arnold).
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Third edition (London: Arnold).
Hjelmslev, L. (ed.) (1961[1943]) Prolegomena to a Theory of Language (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press).
Honeycutt, C. & Herring, S. (2009) ‘Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration in Twitter’. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42), Los Alamitos, CA.
Hood, S. (2010) Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
Huang, J., Thornton, K. M. & Efthimiadis, E. N. (2010) ‘Conversational tagging in Twitter’. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (Toronto: ACM) pp 173–8.
Knight, N. (2008) ‘“Still cool…and american too!”: An SFL analysis of deferred bonds in internet messaging humour’. In N. Nergaard (ed.), Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication (Odense: University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Language and Communication), pp. 481–502.
Knight, N. (2010) ‘Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour’. In M. Bednarek & J. R. Martin (eds.), New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation (London: Continuum), pp. 35–58.
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H. & Moon, S. (2010) ‘What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?’ In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on the World Wide Web (Raleigh, NC: ACM), pp. 591–600.
Makice, K. (2009) ‘Phatics and the design of community’. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston: ACM), pp. 3133–6.
Malinowski, B. (2004[1948]) Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays (Lavergne, TN: Kessinger).
Martin, J. R. (2000) ‘Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English’. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 142–75.
Martin, J. R. (2002) ‘Blessed are the peacemakers: Reconciliation and evaluation’. In C. Candlin (ed.) Research and Practice in Professional Discourse (Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press), pp. 187–227.
Martin, J. R. (2004) ‘Mourning: How we get aligned’ Discourse and Society, 15(2–3): 321–44.
Martin, J. R. (2009) ‘Realisation, instantiation and individuation: Some thoughts on identity in youth justice conferencing’, DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 25: 549–83.
Martin, J. R. (2010) ‘Introduction: Semantic variation’. In M. Bednarek & J. R. Martin (eds.) New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation (London: Continuum), pp. 1–34.
Martin, J. R. (in press) ‘Heart from darkness: Apocalypse Ron’, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses (Special issue on Evaluative Uses of Langauage: the Appraisal System).
Martin, J. R. & White, P. R. R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
Martin, J. R., Zappavigna, M. & Dwyer, P. (in press) ‘Users in uses of language: Embodied identity in Youth justice conferencing’, Text & Talk.
Maton, K. (forthcoming) Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a Realist Sociology of Education. (Abingdon: Routledge).
Miller, V. (2008) ‘New media, networking and phatic culture’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14(4): 387–400.
Page, R. (2012) Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interactions (Abingdon: Routledge).
Ritter, A., Cherry, C. & Dolan, B. (2010) ‘Unsupervised modeling of Twitter conversations’. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Los Angeles: Association for Computational Linguistics).
Saussure, F. (1983) Course in General Linguistics (La Salle, IL: Open Court).
Starbird, K., Palen, L., Hughes, A. L. & Vieweg, S. (2010) ‘Chatter on the red: What hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information’. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work, pp. 241–50.
Stenglin, M. (2004) Packaging Curiosities: Towards a Grammar of Threedimensional Space. Unpublished manuscript, University of Sydney, Sydney.
Thelwall, M., Buckley, K. & Paltoglou, G. (2011) ‘Sentiment in Twitter events’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2): 406–18.
Vander Wal (2007) Folksonomy coinage and definition, http://vanderwal.net/folksonomy.html (accessed: 24 January 2013).
Zappavigna, M. (2011) ‘Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter’, New Media and Society, 13(5): 788–806.
Zappavigna, M. (2012) Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web (London: Continuum).
Zappavigna, M., Dwyer, P. & Martin, J. R. (2008) ‘Syndromes of meaning: Exploring patterned coupling in a NSW youth justice conference’. In A. Mahboob & N. Knight (eds) Questioning Linguistics (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), pp. 103–17.
Zhao, S. (2010) ‘Intersemiotic relations as logogenetic patterns: Towards the restoration of the time dimension in hypertext description’. In M. Bednarek & J. R. Martin (eds.), New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation (London: Continuum), pp. 195–218.
Zhao, S. (2011) Learning Through Multimedia Interaction: The Construal of Primary Social Science Knowledge in Web-based Digital Learning Materials. Unpublished manuscript, University of Sydney, Sydney.
Zhao, D. & Rosson, M. B. (2009) ‘How and why people Twitter: The role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work’. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Michele Zappavigna
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zappavigna, M. (2014). CoffeeTweets: bonding around the bean on Twitter. In: Seargeant, P., Tagg, C. (eds) The Language of Social Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029317_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44013-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02931-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)