Skip to main content

Leadership Learning and Development: A Framework for Evaluation

  • Chapter
Leadership Learning

Abstract

This chapter promotes the effective evaluation of leadership learning and development interventions. An evaluation is the ‘systematic collection of information about the activities, characteristics, and outcomes of programs in order to make judgements about the program, to improve program effectiveness, and/or to inform decisions about future programming’ (Patton, 1997, p. 23). It is a fundamental step in the learning and development process. Evaluation should not be confused with assessment, which typically involves the measurement of how an individual learner performed on a learning task. In contrast, evaluation aims to improve (formative) or prove the worth and efficacy (summative) of programmes (Scriven, 1991). Many commentators have celebrated the importance of evaluation describing is as the ‘backbone of the learning and change process’ (Pym, 1968) since it ‘provides information for action’ (Weiss, 1972, p. 318). Companies, professional management associations, business schools and consultants assume that leadership development interventions will result in improved leadership (Collins and Holton, 2004, p. 218). However, on the whole organisations do not properly evaluate the impact of leadership learning and development — they fail to budget for it financially, make time available for a proper evaluation or employ the most effective evaluation practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • G. Alliger and E. Janak, ‘Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: Thirty years later’, Personnel Psychology, 42 (1989) 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.M. Alliger, S.I. Tannenbaum, W. Bennett, H. Traver and A. Shotland, ‘A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria’, Personnel Psychology, 50 (1997) 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Burgoyne, W. Hirsh and S. Williams, The Development of Management and Leadership Capability and its Contribution to Performance: The Evidence, the Prospects and the Research Need (London: DfES, DfES Research Report 560. Online at [http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR560.pdf], 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Burgoyne and R. Singh, ‘Evaluation of training and education’, Journal of European Industrial Training, 1 (1977) 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Collins and E. Holton, ‘The effectiveness of managerial leadership development programs: A meta-analysis of studies from 1982–2001’, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15 (2004) 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Conger and B. Benjamin, Building Leaders: How Successful Companies Develop the Next Generation (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • S.B. Craig and K. Hannum, ‘Chapter 1 experimental and quasi-experimental evaluations’, in K.M. Hannum, J.W. Martineau and C. Reinelt (eds), The Handbook of Leadership Development Evaluation (Jossey-Bass & Centre for Creative Leadership, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • L.J. Cronbach, ‘Course improvement through evaluation’, Teachers College Record, 64 (1963) 672–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Denyer, D. Tranfield and J. Ernst van Aken, ‘Developing design propositions through research syntheses’, Organization Studies, 29 (2008) 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Easterby-Smith, Evaluation of Management Education, Training and Development (Aldershot: Gower, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • I.L. Goldstein, ‘Training in work organizations’, Annual Review of Psychology, 31 (1980) 229–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Hamblin, The Evaluation and Control of Training (London: McGraw Hill, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • P.G.M. Hesseling, Strategy of Evaluation Research in the Field of Supervisory and Management Training (Amsterdam: Van Gorcum, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.F. Holton III, ‘The flawed four-level evaluation model’, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7 (1996) 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Kaufman and J. Keller, ‘Levels of evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick’, Human Resources Quarterly, 5 (1994) 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Kaufman, J. Keller and R. Watkins, ‘What works and what doesn’t: Evaluation beyond Kirkpatrick’, Performance and Instruction, 35 (1996) 8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Kirkpatrick, ‘Techniques for evaluating training programs’, Journal of the American Society for Training and Development, 13 (1959) 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Kirkpatrick, ‘Evaluation’, in R.L. Craig (ed.), Training and Development Handbook (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976) 301–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kirkpatrick, Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • M.Q. Patton, Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text (London: Sage, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Pawson, ‘Evidence-based policy: The promise of realist synthesis’, Evaluation, 8 (2002) 340–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Pawson and N. Tilley, ‘What works in evaluation research?’, British Journal of Criminology, 34 (1994) 291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Pawson and N. Tilley, Realistic Evaluation (London: Sage, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Phillips, Return on Investment in Training and Performance Programs (Houston: Gulf Publishing, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • D.L.A. Pym, ‘Organisation evaluation and management training’, Journal of Management Studies, 5 (1968) 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Research and Markets, ‘Training market report 2003’, Online at http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/39647/39647.htm, accessed 15 January 2008 (2004).

  • M. Scriven, Evaluation Thesaurus (London: Sage, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • N.L. Smith, ‘Evaluating evaluation methods’, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 7 (1981) 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Stufflebeam, ‘The CIPP model for program evaluation’, in G.F. Madaus, M.S. Striven and D.L. Stufflebeam (eds), Evaluation Models (Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Swanson and E.F. Holton, Results: How to Assess Performance, Learning, and Perceptions in Organizations (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • S.I. Tannenbaum and S.B. Woods, ‘Determining a strategy for evaluating training: Operating within organizational constraints’, Human Resource Planning, 15 (1992) 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Thomson, ‘Evaluating the power and impact of training’, in CIPD, Reflections: New Trends in Learning, Training and Development (2004) Download from www.cipd.co.uk/surveys

  • P.B. Warr, M.W. Bird and N. Rackham, Evaluation of Management Training. (Aldershot: Gower, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • C.H. Weiss, Evaluating Action Programs: Readings in Social Action and Education (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • C.H. Weiss, ‘Where politics and evaluation research meet’, Evaluation, 1 (1973) 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.H. Weiss, ‘Politics and evaluation: A reprise with mellower overtones’, Evaluation Practice, 14 (1993) 107–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 James Collins and David Denyer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collins, J., Denyer, D. (2008). Leadership Learning and Development: A Framework for Evaluation. In: James, K.T., Collins, J. (eds) Leadership Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584075_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics