Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Approaches to Language Ideology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language and Canadian Media

  • 707 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the methods that have traditionally been used to study language ideologies in the media, as well as the methods that have been applied more recently. Emerging from the rich findings of ethnographic data by linguistic anthropologists from the USA (e.g. Schieffelin et al. (Eds.). Language ideologies. Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), language ideology theory has since been applied in folk linguistics, language education, and language policy. More recently, researchers have begun applying language ideology theories in corpus linguistics research as a way of supplementing existing discourse analysis research (e.g. Fitzsimmons-Doolan 2009; Using lexical variables to identify language ideologies in a policy corpus 9(1): 57–82, 2014; Moschonas and Spitzmüller 2010). This chapter details how corpus linguistics and discourse analysis can be usefully combined in the study of language ideologies and the media across two languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitchison, J. (2007). The word weavers: Newshounds and wordsmiths. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hejin, B. (2012). Linking critical discourse analysis with translation studies: An example from BBC News. Language and Politics, 11(3), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Androutsopoulos, J. (2007). Bilingualism in the mass media and on the internet. In M. Heller (Ed.), Bilingualism: A social approach (pp. 207–230). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, D. (2009). Does frequency really matter? In D. Archer (Ed.), What’s in a word list? (pp. 1–16). Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2004). Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 32(4), 346–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2009a). “The question is, how cruel is it?” Keywords, fox hunting and the House of Commons. In D. Archer (Ed.), What’s in a word list? (pp. 125–136). Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2009b). Introduction. In P. Baker (Ed.), Contemporary corpus linguistics (pp. 1–8). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2009c). Issues arising when teaching corpus-assisted (critical) discourse analysis. In L. Lombardo (Ed.), Using corpora to learn about language and discourse (pp. 63–98). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2010). Sociolinguistics and corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in media discourse. Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarek, M. (2008). “An increasingly familiar tragedy”: Evaluative collocation and conflation. Functions of Language, 15(1), 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (1998). The discourse structure of news stories. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse (pp. 64–104). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berber Sardinha, T. (1999). Using key words in text analysis: Practical aspects (DIRECT Working Papers 42). São Paulo and Liverpool. Retrieved from http://www2.lael.pucsp.br/direct/DirectPapers42.pdf

  • Berber Sardinha, T. (2000). Semantic prosodies in English and Portuguese: A contrastive study. Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa, 9(1), 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G. (2002). Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge, A. (2002). “What sort of people can look at a chicken and think dofednod?”: Language, ideology and nationalism in public discourse. Multilingua, 21(2/3), 197–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge, A., & Pavlenko, A. (2002). Introduction. Multilingua, 21, 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (Ed.). (1999a). Language ideological debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2007). Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(2), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 447–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J. (1998). The role of language in European nationalist ideologies. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies. Practice and theory (pp. 189–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondi, M. (2010). Perspectives on keywords and keyness: An introduction. In M. Bondi & M. Scott (Eds.), Keyness in texts (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, A. (2008). Le français parlé en Acadie: idéologies, représentations et pratiques. In La langue française dans sa diversité (pp. 59–74). Government of Quebec. Available http://www.spl.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/medias/pdf/actes_colloque_langue_francaise_2008.pdf

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (Thompson, J. Ed., trans: Raymond, G., & Adamson, M.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, C. L. (1998). ‘You’re a liar—you’re just like a woman!’: Constructing dominant ideologies of language in Warao Men’s gossip. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 229–255). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Channell, J. (2000). Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 38–55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conboy, M. (2007). The language of the news. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (2000). Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 56–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, C. (2001). Discourse and media. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 416–436). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, C. (2010). News talk: Investigating the language of journalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, J. (2001). Domestic discord, rocky relationships: Semantic prosodies in representations of marital violence in the O. J. Simpson trial. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam-Jensen, H., & Korning Zethsen, K. (2008). Translator awareness of semantic prosodies. Target, 20(2), 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (2009). Word frequency in context: Alternative architectures for examining related words, register variation and historical change. In D. Archer (Ed.), What’s in a word list? (pp. 53–68). Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Costa, P. I. (2010). Language ideologies and standard English policy in Singapore: Responses of a ‘designer immigrant, student’. Language Policy, 9(3), 217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, L., LeBlanc, M., & Beaudin, M. (2006). La langue comme ressource productive et les rapports de pouvoir entre communautés linguistiques. Langage and société, 118(4), 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchêne, A. (2009). Marketing, management and performance: multilingualism as commodity in a tourism call centre. Language Policy, 8(1), 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eades, D. (2012). The social consequences of language ideologies in courtroom crossexamination. Language in Society, 41(4), 471–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. (2009). Is public discourse about language policy really public discourse about immigration? A corpus-based study. Language Policy, 8, 377–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. (2014). Using lexical variables to identify language ideologies in a policy corpus. Corpora, 9(1), 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. (2003[1996]). On critical linguistics. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 3–14). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freake, R., Gentil, G., & Sheyholislami, J. (2011). A bilingual corpus-assisted discourse study of the construction of nationhood and belonging in Quebec. Discourse & Society, 22(2), 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielatos, C., & Marchi, A. (2011). Keyness: Matching metrics to definitions. In Theoretical-methodological challenges in corpus approaches to discourse studies—And some ways of addressing them. University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth. Available http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/51449/

  • Gal, S. (2006). Migration, minorities and multilingualism: Language ideologies in Europe. In C. Mar-Molinero & P. Stevenson (Eds.), Language ideologies, policies, and practices: Language and the future of Europe (p. 1327). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. (Ed. & trans: Hoare, Q., & Nowell, G.). New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaves, C. (2009). ConcGram 1.0. A phraseological search engine. Available http://www.edict.com.hk/pub/concgram/

  • Gries, S. T. (2008). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, O. V. (2011). The English you need to know: Language ideology in a citizenship classroom. Linguistics and Education, 22(4), 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. (2002). Éléments d’une sociolinguistique critique. Paris: Didier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoey, M. (2006). Language as choice: What is chosen? In G. Thompson & S. Hunston (Eds.), System and corpus: Exploring connections (pp. 37–54). London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoey, M. (2007). Lexical priming and literary creativity. In M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs, & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis (pp. 7–30). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoey, M. (2011). Lexical priming and translation. In A. Kruger, K. Wallmach, & J. Munday (Eds.), Corpus-based translation studies: Research and applications (pp. 153–168). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann-Dilloway, E. (2011). Writing the smile: Language ideologies in, and through, sign language scripts. Language and Communication, 31(4), 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunston, S. (2007). Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(2), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2006). System and corpus: Two traditions with a common ground. In G. Thompson & S. Hunston (Eds.), System and corpus: Exploring connections (pp. 1–14). London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, A., Thurlow, C., Lawson, S., & Ylanne-McEwen, V. (2003). The uses and representations of local languages in tourist destinations: A view from British TV holiday programmes. Language Awareness, 12(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, S. (2007). Seeing through multilingual corpora: On the use of corpora in contrastive studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., & Ensslin, A. (2006). Language in the news: Some reflections on keyword analysis using WordSmith Tools and the BNC. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 11, 96–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemppanen, H. (2004). Keywords and ideology in translated history texts: A corpus-based analysis. Across Languages and Cultures, 5(1), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgarriff, A. (2009). Simple maths for keywords. Proceedings of the corpus linguistics conference 2009. University of Liverpool, UK. Retrieved from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/publications/CL2009/

  • Kirk, J. M. (2009). Word frequency use or misuse? In D. Archer (Ed.), What’s in a word list? (pp. 17–34). Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korning Zethsen, K. (2004). Latin-based terms. True or false friends? Target, 16(1), 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, S., & Nakamura, M. (2005). Translation or transformation? A case study of language and ideology in the Taiwanese press. Discourse & Society, 16(3), 393–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laihonen, P. (2008). Language ideologies in interviews: A conversation analysis approach. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(5), 668–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. Y. W. (2008). Corpora and discourse analysis: New ways of doing old things. In V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 86–99). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (1996). Cross-linguistic and language-specific aspects of semantic prosody. Language Sciences, 18(1–2), 153–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockerbie, I. (2005). The debate on l’amenagement du français in Québec. In I. Lockerbie, I. Molnaro, K. Larose, & L. Oakes (Eds.), French as the common language in Québec: History, debates and positions (pp. 15–65). Québec: Éditions nota bene.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manca, E. (2008). From phraseology to culture: Qualifying adjectives in the language of tourism. In U. Römer & R. Schulze (Eds.), Patterns, meaningful units and specialized discourses (pp. 368–385). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mautner, G. (2009). Corpora and critical discourse analysis. In P. Baker (Ed.), Contemporary corpus linguistics (pp. 32–46). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEnery, T., & Salama, A. (2011). De/victimizing Christian copts in/outside contemporary Egypt: A critical corpus-based study. Paper presented at the International Corpus Linguistics Conference, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milani, T. (2007). A language ideology in print: The case of Sweden. In S. Johnson & A. Ensslin (Eds.), Language in the media: Representations, identities, ideologies (pp. 111–129). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milani, T. M., & Johnson, S. (2008). CDA and language ideology: Towards a reflexive approach to discourse data. In I. H. Warnke & J. Spitzmuller (Eds.), Methoden der Diskurslinguistik Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugaenge zur transtextuellen Ebene (pp. 361–384). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Milizia, D., & Spinzi, C. (2008). The ‘terroridiom’ principle between spoken and written discourse. In U. Römer & R. Schulze (Eds.), Patterns, meaningful units and specialized discourses (pp. 322–350). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, J. (2009). Introduction: A description of CorDis. In J. Morley & P. Bayley (Eds.), Corpus-assisted discourse studies on the Iraq conflict: Wording the war (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, J., & Partington, A. (2009). A few frequently asked questions about semantic—Or evaluative—Prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschonas, S. & Spitzmuller, J. (2010). Prescriptivism in and about the media: A comparative analysis of corrective practices in Greece and Germany. In Language Ideologies and Media Discourse: Texts, Practices, Politics, S. Johnson & T.M. Milani (eds), 17–40. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munday, J. (2011). Looming large: A cross-linguistic analysis of semantic prosodies in comparable reference corpora. In A. Kruger & K. Wallmach (Eds.), Corpus-based translation studies: Research and applications (pp. 169–186). Manchester: St. Jerome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. (2006). Semantic associations in business English: A corpus-based analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partington, A. (1998). Patterns and meanings—Using corpora for English language research and teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Partington, A. (2004). Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast. In A. Partington, J. Morley, & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and discourse (pp. 11–20). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partington, A. (2008). Teasing at the white house: A corpus-assisted study of face work in performing and responding to teases. Text & Talk, 28(6), 771–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partington, A. (2009). Evaluating evaluation and some concluding thoughts on CADS. In J. Morley & P. Bayley (Eds.), Corpus-assisted discourse studies on the Iraq conflict: Wording the war (pp. 261–304). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partington, A. (2010). Modern diachronic corpus-assisted discourse studies (MD-CADS) on UK newspapers: An overview of the project. Corpora, 5(2), 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. U. (1998). Language ideologies in institutions of power: A commentary. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies. Practice and theory (pp. 211–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, D. R. (2004). Folk metalanguage. In A. Jaworski, N. Coupland, & D. Galasiński (Eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives (pp. 75–104). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y. (2010). Discursive construction around terrorism in the People’s Daily (China) and The Sun (UK) before and after 9.11. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, T. (2009). Language ideology, identity and the commodification of language in the call centres of Pakistan. Language in Society, 38(2), 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach. In M. Meyer & R. Wodak (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87–121). London/Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the ‘language-as-resource’ discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the U.S.A. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 348–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2006). Americanization, language ideologies, and the construction of European identities. In C. Mar-Molinero & P. Stevenson (Eds.), Language ideologies, policies, and practices: Language and the future of Europe (pp. 44–57). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieffelin, B. B., & Doucet, R. C. (1998). The “real” Haitian creole: Ideology, metalinguistics, and orthographic choice. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies. Practice and theory (pp. 285–316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of key words—And key key words. System, 25(1), 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. (2009). In search of a bad reference corpus. In D. Archer (Ed.), What’s in a word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction (pp. 79–92). Oxford: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. (2014). WordSmith Tools, Version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In P. Clyne, W. Hanks, & C. Hofbauer (Eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels (pp. 193–247). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. (1992). The uses and utility of ideology: Some reflections. Pragmatics, 2(3), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology and point of view. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (1996). The search for units of meaning. Textus, 9(1), 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. (2010). Semantic prosody: A critical evaluation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C. M. (2012). Mapping language ideologies in multi-ethnic urban Europe: The case of Parisian French. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(2), 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1997). Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis (CDA). In A. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving models of language: Papers from the annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics held at the University of Wales, Swansea, September 1996 (pp. 100–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (2003). Computer-assisted text and corpus analysis: Lexical cohesion and communicative competence. In D. Schriffen, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 305–320). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (2006). Corpus analysis: The state of the art and three types of unanswered questions. In G. Thompson & S. Hunston (Eds.), System and corpus: Exploring connections (pp. 15–36). London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (2007). An example of frequent English phraseology: Distributions, structures and functions. In R. Facchinetti (Ed.), Corpus linguistics: 25 years on (pp. 89–105). New York: Rodopi BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (2010). Three concepts of keywords. In M. Bondi & M. Scott (Eds.), Keyness in texts (pp. 21–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Subtirelu, N. C. (2013). ‘English… it’s part of our blood’: Ideologies of language and nation in United States Congressional discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(1), 37–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2008). What is corpus linguistics? What the data says. ICAME, 32, 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubert, W. (2007). Natural and human rights, work and property in the discourse of Catholic social doctrine. In M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs, & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis (pp. 89–126). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tognini-Bonelli, E. (1996). Corpus theory and practice. Birmingham: TWC Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the press. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Opinions and ideologies in the press. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse (pp. 21–63). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hout, T., & Macgilchrist, F. (2010). Framing the news: An ethnographic view of business newswriting. Text and Talk, 30(2), 168–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and racial studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassink, A. B., & Dyer, J. (2004). Language ideology and the transmission of phonological change changing indexicality in two situations of language contact. Journal of English Linguistics, 32(3), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitsitt, S. (2005). A critique of the concept of semantic prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(3), 283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1973). Base and superstructure in Marxist cultural theory. New Left Review, 82, 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.newleftreview.org/?getpdf=NLR08101&pdflang=en.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about—A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In M. Meyer & R. Wodak (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–13). London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2007). Language and ideology—Language in ideology. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2008). Introduction: Discourse studies—Important concepts and terms. In R. Wodak & M. Kryzanowsky (Eds.), Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences (pp. 1–29). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2nd Ed. (pp. 1–33). London: sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolard, K. A. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies. Practice and theory (pp. 3–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, R., & McEnery, T. (2006). Collocation, semantic prosody, and near synonymy: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 103–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. (2009). Semantic prosody and ESL/EFL vocabulary pedagogy. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 26(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK

    Rachelle Vessey

Authors
  1. Rachelle Vessey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vessey, R. (2016). Approaches to Language Ideology. In: Language and Canadian Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53001-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53001-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53000-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53001-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation