Skip to main content

Changing Ethnobotanical Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Living with Biodiversity in an Island Ecosystem

Part of the book series: Ethnobiology ((EBL))

Abstract

This chapter examines the acculturation of individuals to ethnobotanical knowledge in association with the effects of modernization. I examined the effect of modernity, which was measured as a first principal component; the variation in this principal component was tied to the cash economy, demographics, and contacts with Western materials. Complex intervillage differences in knowledge were correlated with modernity, in complex ways, as follows. The differences in knowledge were correlated with modernity when the villages were referenced to the least-modernized village. Contrary to our expectations, this did not occur when villages were referenced to the village with the highest modernity score. These results implicated that modern Western knowledge is easily integrated into the ethnobotanical knowledge system and is related to the loss of diverse botanical knowledge. An increase of Western knowledge may bring a more accurate level of biological knowledge to the villagers, but this new knowledge may not be adaptive to those living in the local environment. Even worse, Western knowledge may be biased in that villagers only gain knowledge related to how they can gain short-term for-profit-related benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    From July to November 2003.

  2. 2.

    From December 2003 to February 2004.

  3. 3.

    Note that at least one of the heads was born in the village, because, customarily, couples from outside the village do not hold rights to use the land and those people are not allowed to settle in the area.

  4. 4.

    All cultural consensus analyses were performed using ANTHROPAC 4.0 (Analytic Technologies).

  5. 5.

    In calculating the modernity score , categorical variables were quantified and then used as variables for principal component analysis. The first eigenvector was defined as the modernity score when the first eigenvector was large and positive to all modernization variables but negative to the distance to the nearest town. The PROC PRINQUAL procedure of SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute, Inc.) was used for quantification of categorical variables.

  6. 6.

    First, the dates of births and marriage (beginning years of the household s) were obtained; official documents of birth and marriage were referred to during the interviews. Additionally, consumer unit (CU) was defined as the sum of each member’s energy requirements based on body weight (Chap. 4); the producer unit (PU) was defined as the number of adults (18 years of age or older) in the household. Every evening, participating households were visited, and all members were asked to report all cash income and its source for 24 h during a 28-day period. Net income was calculated based on the amounts earned and the amounts expended for necessities. Everyday for 14 days, the participating households were visited every 1–2 h from 6 AM to 10 PM, all crop yields brought to the households were measured, and the total energy obtained per day was calculated in MJ (Chap. 4 for detailed methods). During the same period, the garden s cultivated by each household were visited and measured using a tape measure and clinometer.

  7. 7.

    This model is based on a model proposed by Reyes-Garcia et al. (2007).

  8. 8.

    Both significant level of entry (SLE) and significant level of staying (SLS) were fixed at 0.15.

References

  • Aswani S (1999) Common property models of sea tenure: a case study from the Roviana and Vonavona Lagoons, New Georgia, Solomon Islands. Human Ecology 27(3):417–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aswani S (2000) Changing identities: the ethnohistory of Roviana predatory head-hunting. Journal of the Polynesian Society 109(1):39–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran S, Medin D, Ross N, Lynch E, Coley J, Ek’ EU, Vapnarsky V (1999) Folkecology and commons management in the Maya Lowlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96(13):7598–7603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Atran S, Medin D, Ross N, Lynch E, Vapnarsky V, Ek’ EU, Coley J, Timura C, Baran M (2002) Folkecology, cultural epidemiology, and the spirit of the commons: a garden experiment in the Maya Lowlands, 1991–2001. Current Anthropology 43(3):421–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balick MJ, Cox PA (1996) Plants, people, and culture: the science of ethnobotany. Scientific American Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett BC, Prance GT (2000) Introduced plants in the indigenous Pharmacopoeia of Northern South America. Economic Botany 54(1):90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz BF et al (2000) Losing knowledge about plant use in the Sierra de Manantlan biosphere reserve, Mexico. Economic Botany 54(2):183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP (1996) ANTHROPAC 4.0. Analytic Technologies, Natick

    Google Scholar 

  • Boster JS (1986) Exchange of varieties and information between Aguaruna Manioc cultivators. American Anthropologist 88(2):428–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caniago I, Siebert Stephen F (1998) Medicinal plant ecology, knowledge and conservation in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Economic Botany 52(3):229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case RJ, Pauli GF, Doel Soejarto D (2005) Factors in maintaining indigenous knowledge among ethnic communities of Manus Island. Economic Botany 59(4):356–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett G, Connell J (1988) Acculturation and health in the highlands of Papua New Guinea: dissent on diversity, diets, and development. Current Anthropology 29(2):273–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge AM, Dowse GK, Koki G, Mavo B, Alpers MP, Zimmet PZ (1995) Modernity and obesity in coastal and highland Papua New Guinea. International Journal of Obesity 19(3):154–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King H, Collins AM (1989) A modernity score for individuals in Melanesian society. Papua New Guinea Medical Journal 32(1):11–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis WH (2003) Pharmaceutical discoveries based on ethnomedicinal plants: 1985 to 2000 and beyond. Economic Botany 57:126–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perz SG (2003) Social determinants and land use correlates of agricultural technology adoption in a forest frontier: a case study in the Brazilian Amazon. Human Ecology 31(1):133–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prance GT, Balee W, Boom BM (1987) Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1(4):296–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragone D, Lorence DH, Flynn T (2001) History of plant introductions to Pohnpei, Micronesia and the role of the Pohnpei agriculture station. Economic Botany 55(2):290–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Garcia V, Godoy R, Vadez V, Apaza L, Byron E, Huanca T, Leonard WR, Pérez E, Wilkie D (2003) Ethnobotanical knowledge shared widely among Tsimane’ Amerindians, Bolivia. Science 299(5613):1707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Garcia V, Vadez V, Huanca T, Leonard WR, McDade T (2007) Economic development and local ecological knowledge: a deadlock? Quantitative research from a native Amazonian society. Human Ecology 35(3):371–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanucci-Ross L, Moerman DE, Tancredi LR (1997) The anthropology of medicine: from culture to method. Bergin and Garvey, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney AK (1999) Cultural consensus as a statistical model. Current Anthropology 40(S1):93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romney AK, Weller SC, Batchelder WH (1986) Culture as consensus: a theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist 88(2):313–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard PJ, Walter R, Nagaoka T (2000) The archaeology of head–hunting in Roviana Lagoon, New Georgia. The Journal of the Polynesian Society 109(1):9–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend PK (2000) Environmental anthropology: from pigs to policies. Waveland Press, Long Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Zent S (2001) Acculturation and ethnobotanical knowledge loss among the Piaroa of Venezuela: demonstration of a quantitative method for the empirical study of traditional ecological knowledge change. In: On biocultural diversity: linking language, knowledge, and the environment. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Furusawa, T. (2016). Changing Ethnobotanical Knowledge. In: Living with Biodiversity in an Island Ecosystem. Ethnobiology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-904-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics