Abstract
This chapter is a case study of intercultural communication in a tertiary educational setting in Saudi Arabia. Given the fact that educational institutions adopt Western models of education and employ foreign professors, this study aims at shedding light on the patterns of communication in the classroom. The elements of Hofstede’s five dimensional model, namely, uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, and power distance dimensions were applied for the purpose of analysis. The study involved in-depth interviews with 17 female students of a private university in the Eastern Province. While assessing the perception of the students about the communication patterns, it provides recommendations on improving the educational experience of local students taught by Western professors. Ultimately, the findings will contribute in promoting a culturally responsible education characterized by critical thinking skills, individual creativity, and movement out of comfort zones, which will prepare students for the globalized job market’s challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
There is, however, a growing influx of foreign workers who currently constitute 31 % of the total population of Saudi Arabia.
- 2.
The study acknowledges the diversity among the group of Arab professors; the stress was put on Gulf Arabs (members of the Gulf Cooperation Council).
References
Abdelman, M., & Lustig, M. (1981). Intercultural communication problems as perceived by Saudi Arabian and American Managers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 5, 349–363.
Alsaggaf, Y., & Williamson, K. (2004). Online communities in Saudi Arabia: Evaluating the impact on culture through online semi-structured interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(3). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/564/1225. Accessed 3 July 2013.
Andersen, P. A. (2010). Nonverbal communication. In L. A. Samovar, R. E. Porter, & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (13th edn, pp. 293–312). Boston: Wadsworth.
Bloch, J. (2008). Plagiarism across cultures: Is there a difference? In C. Eisner & M. Vicinus (Eds.), In originality, imitation and plagiarism: Teaching writing in the digital age (pp. 219–230). The University of Michigan Press.
Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., & den Brok, P. (2002). Teacher experience and the teacher-student relationship in the classroom environment. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 73–99). Singapore: World Scientific.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. London: Harvard University Press.
den Brok, P. J., & Levy, J. (2005). Teacher–student relationships in multicultural classes: Reviewing the past, preparing the future. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 72–88.
den Brok, P. J., Levy, J., Rodriguez, R., & Wubbels, T. (2002). Perceptions of Asian-American and Hispanic-American teachers and their students on teacher interpersonal communication style. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 447–467.
Foppa, K. (Eds.) (1995). Mutualities in dialogue (pp. 101–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Glowacki-Dudka, M., & Treff, M. (2011). Forming an institutional culture with multinational administrators and teachers at Effat College, Saudi Arabia. Intercultural Education, 22(2), 207–222.
Gumperz, J. J. (1995). Mutual inferencing in conversation. In I. Markova, K. Fopp & K. Graumann (Eds.), in Mutualities in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, S. (1994). Cultural identity and diaspora. In P. Williams & C. Laura (Eds.), Colonial discourse & postcolonial theory: A reader. New York: Columbia University Press.
Heimburger, A. et al. (2010). Context-based knowledge creation and sharing in cross- cultural collaborative communities. Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XXI (pp. 76–88). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Hertog, S. (2010). The sociology of the Gulf Rentier systems: Societies of intermediaries. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 52(2), 1–37.
Hijab, N. (2002). Women are citizens too: The laws of the state, the lives of women. New York: Regional Bureau for Arab States, UNDP.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede Model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26.
Hofstede, G. (n.d.). What about Saudi Arabia? http://geert-hofstede.com/saudi-arabia.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2013.
Hofstede, H., & Hofstede, H. (2005). Cultures and organizations. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Rev. 3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Idris, A. (2007). Cultural barriers to improved organizational performance in Saudi Arabia. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 72(2), 36–54.
Jandt, F. E. (2012). An introduction to intercultural communication: Identities in a global community. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Kalliny, M., Cruthirds, K. W., & Minor, M. S. (2006). Differences between American, Egyptian and Lebanese humor styles: Implications for international management. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6, 121–134.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Lauring, J. (2011). Intercultural organizational communication: The social organizing of interaction in international encounters. Journal of Business Communication, 48(3), 231–255.
Lu, P., & Corbett, J. (2012). An intercultural approach to second language education and citizenship. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 325–339). New York: Routledge.
Mahon, J., & Cushner, K. (2012). The multicultural classroom. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 434–448). New York: Routledge.
McCabe, D. L., Fenghalli, T., & Abdallah, H. (2008). Academic dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and contextual factors. Research in Higher Education, 49, 451–467.
Noels, K. A., Yashima, T., & Zhang, R. (2012). Language, identity and intercultural communication. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 52–66). New York: Routledge.
O’Dowd, R. (2012). Intercultural communicative competence through telecollaboration. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (pp. 340–356). New York: Routledge.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Romani, V. (2009). The politics of higher education in the Middle East: Problems and prospects. Crown Centre for Middle Eastern Studies, Middle East Brief.
Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2010). Intercultural communication: A reader. Boston: Wadsworth.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 878–891.
Shifting Sands Documentary. (n.d.). http://insideout.wbur.org/documentaries/shiftingsands/part2.asp. Accessed 12 Oct 2013.
van Geel, A. (2012). Whither the Saudi woman? Gender mixing, empowerment and modernity. In R. Meijer & P. Aarts (Eds.), Saudi Arabia between conservatism, accommodation and reform. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.
Whiteoak, J., Crawford, N., & Mapstone, R. (2006). Impact of gender and generational differences in work values and attitudes in an Arab culture. Thunderbird International Business Review, 48(1), 77–91.
Yamani, M. (2000). Changed identities: The challenge of the new generation in Saudi Arabia. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Zafeirakou, A. (2007). Teacher policies for underserved populations: A synthesis of lessons learned and best practices. Paper commissioned for The EFA Global Monitoring Report 2008, Education for All by 2015 Will We Make it?. UNESCO retrieved from unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001555/155594e.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Conclusion
Conclusion
This chapter aimed at assessing the patterns of intercultural communication in the classrooms in tertiary education at one institution in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia . The data was drawn from in-depth interviews with 17 female students and used elements of Hofstede’s five dimensional model as the basis for analysis. The study uncovered specific patterns of intercultural communication, peculiar to a Saudi Arab classroom setting. Understanding of these elements and their inclusion in development of holistic academic agendas will be beneficial to educators and educational institutions alike. The analysis provides guidelines on how to enhance the educational experience of Saudi students and instill new skills necessary in the modern, globalized economy .
The findings of this chapter confirm that although “cultural identities come from somewhere, [and] have histories. But like everything which is historical, they undergo constant transformation” (Hall 1994, p. 394) . Although Saudi society can be classified as a collective society with high power distance and high degree of uncertainty avoidance according to Hofstede’s theory, it is apparent that in today’s globalized world cultures are more dynamic (Jandt 2012). Interactions between students and culturally diverse teachers, and the infusion of culturally responsible education could contribute to instilling critical thinking , individual creativity, and movement out of comfort zones , which will prepare students for the globalized job market’s challenges. Given the fact that the majority of Gulf Cooperation Council citizens display “low societal capacities” (Hertog 2010, p. 5), which translate into low productivity and high expectation of redistribution of state resources, overcoming the barriers that hinder the advancement of the learning process in Saudi universities is an essential step to a greater economic sustainability in the future. The advancement of intercultural competence among the young generation of Saudis will foster collaboration , competition and innovation promoting Saudi Arabia’s distinctiveness and contribution in a globalized world and will enable its citizens to become global citizens who understand and engage with other communities (Lu and Corbett 2012).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karolak, M., Guta, H. (2015). Intercultural Communication in the Context of Saudi Arab Tertiary Education. In: Raddawi, R. (eds) Intercultural Communication with Arabs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-254-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-254-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-253-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-254-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)