Skip to main content

GA-Based Fault Diagnosis Technique for Enhancing Network Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Network

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nature Inspired Computing for Wireless Sensor Networks

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Nature-Inspired Computing ((STNIC))

  • 465 Accesses

Abstract

A wireless sensor network (WSN) is a collection of more than one sensor nodes which is used both collecting as well as sensing data from its environment (Rongbo in Int J Distrib Sens Netw 2010(1155):1–7, [1], Herbert and Donald in Schilling principles of communication systems. McGraw-Hill, New York, [2]). The main aim of this process is to achieve several operations efficiently in terms of different applications such as intelligent building, precise agriculture, medicine and health care, preventive maintenance, machine surveillance, disaster relief operation and biodiversity mapping. The stated applications are optimized efficiently in terms of cost, scalability and readiness. Although, there are so many fruitful advantages of WSN, but it consists of limited capacity of batteries which is insufficient during any operation. The sensor nodes are directly or indirectly connected with base station as well as sink node. Sometimes, due to network variation or failure of hardware sensor nodes fail to transmit the data packet. Moreover, due to limited energy, sometimes sensor node exhausts before the delivery of the data packet and gets converted into faulty node (Heinzelman, Chandrakasan and Balakrishnan in Energy efficient communication protocol for wireless micro sensor networks, pp. 8020–8030, [3], Bhajantri, Nalini in Int J Comput Netw Inf Secur 6(12):37–46, [4]). This faulty node treated as dead node during operation. So, there is need to design an effective algorithm for detecting as well as calculating total dead nodes and provide optimum solution. In this paper, an efficient technique is proposed based on the direct diffusion technique that aims to find optimum path by recovering dead nodes. The proposed algorithm enhances the network lifetime by reducing data packet loss as well as energy consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rongbo Z (2010) Efficient fault-tolerant event query algorithm in distributed wireless sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 2010(1155):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herbert T, Donald L (1986) Schilling principles of communication systems. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heinzelman W, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H (2000) Energy efficient communication protocol for wireless micro sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Hawaii international conference on system sciences, vol 8, pp 8020–8030

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bhajantri LB, Nalini N (2014) Genetic algorithm based node fault detection and recovery in distributed sensor networks. Int J Comput Netw Inf Secur 6(12):37–46

    Google Scholar 

  5. Raza HA, Sayeed G, Sajjad H (2010) Selection of cluster heads in wireless sensor networks using bayesian network. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer, electrical, systems, science and engineering, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iyengar SS, Ankit T, Brooks RR (2004) An overview of distributed sensors network. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London, pp 3–10. http://books.google.com/books/about/Distributed−sensor−networks.html?id=Nff5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Al Karaki JN, Kamal AE (2004) Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey. J IEEE Wirel Commun 11:6–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sitharam SI, Mohan BS, Kashyap RL (1992) Information routing and reliability issues in distributed sensor networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process 40(12):3012–3021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lilia P, Qi H (2007) A survey of fault management in wireless sensor networks. J Netw Syst Manage 15(2):171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mihaela C, Shuhui Y, Jie W (2007) Fault-tolerant topology control for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on mobile adhoc and sensor systems, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bhaskar K, Sitharama I (2004) Distributed bayesian algorithms for fault-tolerant event region detection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Comput 53(3):241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jilei L, Baochun L (2003) Distributed topology control in wireless sensor networks with asymmetric links. In: Proceedings of the IEEE globecom, wireless communications symposium, vol 3, pp 1257–1262

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arroyo VR, Marques AG, Vinagre-Diaz J, Cid-Sueiro JA (2006) Bayesian decision model for intelligent routing in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of 3rd international symposium on wireless communication systems, pp 103–107

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mihaela C, Shuhui Y, Jie W (2008) Algorithms for fault-tolerant topology control for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 19(4):545–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohammad M, Subhash C, Rami A (2010) Bayesian fusion algorithm for inferring trust in wireless sensor networks. J Netw 5(7):815–822

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shimamoto N, Hiramatsu A, Yamasaki K (1993) A dynamic routing control based on a genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks, vol 2, pp 1123–1128

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ayon C, Swarup Kumar M, Mrinal Kanti N (2011) A genetic algorithm inspired routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Int J Comput Intell Theory Pract 6(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bhattacharya R, Venkateswaran P, Sanyal SK, Nandi R (2005) Genetic algorithm based efficient routing scheme for multicast networks. In: Proceedings of international conference on personal wireless communications, pp 500–504

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hong-Chi S, Jiun-Huei H, Bin-Yih L (2013) Fault node recovery algorithm for wireless sensor network. IEEE Sens J 13(7):2683–2689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elmira MK, Sanam H (2012) Recovery of faulty cluster head sensor by using genetic algorithm. Int J Comput Sci Issues 9(1):141–145

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lokesh BB, Nalini N (2012) Energy aware based fault tolerance approach for topology control in distributed sensor networks. Int J High Speed Netw 18(3):197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alaa FO, Mohammed Al (2012) Improving the performance of the networks using genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of international conference of advances in computer networks and its security, vol 2, no 3, pp 117–120

    Google Scholar 

  23. Myeong HL, Yoon HC (2008) Fault detection of wireless sensor networks. J Comput Commun 31:3469–3475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiaofeng H, Xiang C, Lloyd LE, Chien-Chug S (2010) Fault-tolerant relay node placement in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 9(5):643–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Biao C, Ruixiang J, Kasetkasem T, Varshney PK (2004) Channel aware decision fusion in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process 52(12):3454–3458

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Darrell W (1994) A genetic algorithm tutorial. J Stat Comput 4:65–85

    Google Scholar 

  27. Karaa WBA, Ashour AS, Sassi DB et al (2016) Medline text mining: an enhancement genetic algorithm based approach for document clustering. In: Applications of intelligent optimization in biology and medicine. Springer, Cham, pp 267–287

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chatterjee S, Sarkar S, Hore S, Dey N, Ashour AS, Shi F, Le DN (2017) Structural failure classification for reinforced concrete buildings using trained neural network based multi-objective genetic algorithm. Struct Eng Mech 63(4):429–438

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fong S, Li J, Song W, Tian Y, Wong RK, Dey N (2018) Predicting unusual energy consumption events from smart home sensor network by data stream mining with misclassified recall. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 9(4):1197–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Das, SK, Samanta S, Dey N et al (2019) Design frameworks for wireless networks. Lecture Notes in Networks and System, ISBN: 978-981-13-9573-4, Springer, pp 1–439

    Google Scholar 

  31. Das SK, Yadav AK, Tripathi S (2017) IE2M: design of intellectual energy efficient multicast routing protocol for ad-hoc network. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 10(3):670–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Das SK, Tripathi S, Burnwal AP (2015, February) Fuzzy based energy efficient multicast routing for ad-hoc network. In: Proceedings of the 2015 third international conference on computer, communication, control and information technology (C3IT), IEEE, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  33. Das SK, Tripathi S (2018) Adaptive and intelligent energy efficient routing for transparent heterogeneous ad-hoc network by fusion of game theory and linear programming. Appl Intell 48(7):1825–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Das SK, Tripathi S (2016). Energy efficient routing protocol for manet using vague set. In: Proceedings of fifth international conference on soft computing for problem solving, Springer, Singapore, pp 235–245

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dey N, Ashour AS, Shi F, Fong SJ, Sherratt RS (2017) Developing residential wireless sensor networks for ECG healthcare monitoring. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 63(4):442–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sajid H, Abdul WM, Obidul I (2007) Genetic algorithm for hierarchical wireless sensor networks. J Netw 2(5):87–97

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruchika Padhi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Padhi, R., Gouda, B.S. (2020). GA-Based Fault Diagnosis Technique for Enhancing Network Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Network. In: De, D., Mukherjee, A., Kumar Das, S., Dey, N. (eds) Nature Inspired Computing for Wireless Sensor Networks. Springer Tracts in Nature-Inspired Computing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2125-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2125-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2124-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2125-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics