Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adaptive and intelligent energy efficient routing for transparent heterogeneous ad-hoc network by fusion of game theory and linear programming

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the modern era, the use of transparent Heterogeneous Ad-Hoc NETwork (HANET) has increased due to the numerous two-tier applications. It provides cross platform services. In this network, the concept of energy efficient routing is a vital issue due to the limited energy capacity of batteries. In response to this, the proposed work introduces an adaptive and intelligent energy efficient routing technique based on the fusion of game theory and linear programming methods. The combination of these two help to analyze multi-person decision making in the network, where each decision maker tries to maximize its own utility. The proposed model is simulated using the LINGO optimization software. The performance of the proposed model is validated with the existing approaches in several passes to justify its effectiveness in term of performance metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borrego C, Garcia G, Robles S (2017) Softwarecast: a code-based delivery manycast scheme in heterogeneous and opportunistic ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw 55:72–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li Z, Dong C, Fan W, Wang H, Zhao W (2017) Delay constraint energy efficient broadcasting in heterogeneous mrmc wireless networks. Comput Commun 97:120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. He Z, Cao J, Liu X (2016) Sdvn: enabling rapid network innovation for heterogeneous vehicular communication. IEEE Netw 30(4):10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Das SK, Tripathi S, Burnwal AP (2015) Fuzzy based energy efficient multicast routing for ad-hoc network. In: 2015 Third international conference on computer, communication, control and information technology (C3IT). IEEE, New York, pp 1–5

  5. Das SK, Kumar A, Das B, Burnwal A (2013) Ethics of reducing power consumption in wireless sensor networks using soft computing techniques. Int J Adv Comput Res 3(1):301–304

    Google Scholar 

  6. Das SK, Kumar A, Das B, Burnwal AP (2013) Ethics of e-commerce in information and communications technologies. Int J Adv Comput Res 3(1):122–124

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cao J, Chan GH, Dillon TS et al (2001) Checkpointing and rollback of wide-area distributed applications using mobile agents. In: Proceedings 15th international on parallel and distributed processing symposium. IEEE, New York, pp 1–6

  8. Godo L, Zapico A (2001) On the possibilistic-based decision model: characterization of preference relations under partial inconsistency. Appl Intell 14(3):319–333

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Benferhat S, Dubois D, Prade H (1998) Practical handling of exception-tainted rules and independence information in possibilistic logic. Appl Intell 9(2):101–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Das SK, Mandal T, Edalatpanah SA (2017) A mathematical model for solving fully fuzzy linear programming problem with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Appl Intell 46(3):509–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-016-0779-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu J, Wang X (2011) Model and protocol for energy-efficient routing over mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 10(11):1546–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sridhar S, Baskaran R, Chandrasekar P (2013) Energy supported aodv (en-aodv) for qos routing in manet. Procedia-Social Behav Sci 73:294–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chao G, Qi Z (2014) An energy-aware routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks based on route energy comprehensive index. Wirel Pers Commun 79(2):1557–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravi G, Kashwan KR (2015) A new routing protocol for energy efficient mobile applications for ad hoc networks. Comput Electric Eng 48:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarkar S, Datta R (2016) A secure and energy-efficient stochastic multipath routing for self-organized mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw 37:209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. He S, Li X, Chen J, Cheng P, Sun Y, Simplot-Ryl D (2013) Emd: energy-efficient p2p message dissemination in delay-tolerant wireless sensor and actor networks. IEEE J Selected Areas Commun 31(9):75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun B, Gui C, Liu P (2010) Energy entropy multipath routing optimization algorithm in manet based on ga. In: 2010 IEEE Fifth international conference on bio-inspired computing: theories and applications (BIC-TA). IEEE, New York, pp 943–947

  18. Abirami S, Bhanumathi V, Dhanasekaran R (2012) A balanced approach for power aware routing in manet using fuzzy logic. In: IJCA Proceedings on international conference in recent trends in computational methods, communication and controls (ICON3C 2012), number 5. Foundation of Computer Science (FCS)

  19. Hiremath PS, Joshi SM (2012) Energy efficient routing protocol with adaptive fuzzy threshold energy for manets. Int J Comput Netw Wireless Commun (IJCNWC) 2(3):402–407

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chettibi S, Chikhi S (2013) Fea-olsr: an adaptive energy aware routing protocol for manets using zero-order sugeno fuzzy system. Int J Comput Sci Issues (IJCSI) 10(2):136–141

    Google Scholar 

  21. Das SK, Tripathi S, Burnwal AP (2015) Intelligent energy competency multipath routing in wanet. In: Information systems design and intelligent applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 535–543

  22. Sadou M, Bouallouche-Medjkoune L (2016) Efficient message delivery in hybrid sensor and vehicular networks based on mathematical linear programming. Comput Electric Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2016.11.032

  23. Das SK, Tripathi S, Burnwal AP (2015) Design of fuzzy based intelligent energy efficient routing protocol for wanet. In: 2015 Third international conference oncomputer, communication, control and information technology (C3IT), New York, pp 1–4

  24. Zarifzadeh S, Yazdani N (2013) Neighbor selection game in wireless ad hoc networks. Wireless Personal Commun 70(2):617–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Das SK, Tripathi S (2015) Energy efficient routing protocol for manet based on vague set measurement technique. Procedia Comput Sci 58:348–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Das SK, Tripathi S (2016) Energy efficient routing protocol for manet using vague set. In: Proceedings of Fifth international conference on soft computing for problem solving. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–245

  27. Siddiqui F, Zeadally S (2006) Mobility management across hybrid wireless networks: trends and challenges. Comput Commun 29(9):1363–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Amah TE, Kamat M, Moreira W, Bakar KA, Mandala S, Batista MA (2016) Towards next-generation routing protocols for pocket switched networks. J Netw Comput Appl 70:51–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xie B, Yingbing Y, Kumar A, Agrawal DP (2008) Load-balanced mesh router migration for wireless mesh networks. J Parallel Distrib Comput 68(6):825–839

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Vazifehdan J, Venkatesha Prasad R, Niemegeers I (2012) On the lifetime of node-to-node communication in wireless ad hoc networks. Comput Netw 56(6):1685–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zúñiga M, Krishnamachari B (2005) Optimal transmission radius for flooding in large scale sensor networks. Cluster Comput 8(2–3):167–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-005-6182-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Das SK, Tripathi S (2017) Energy efficient routing formation technique for hybrid ad hoc network using fusion of artificial intelligence techniques. Int J Commun Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3340

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the associate editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions that helped us to improve the content of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sachin Tripathi.

Appendices

Appendix A

Lemma 1

The Player A is the CH based on strategy hop-count with respect to parameter energy.

Proof

Let probability of CH and CM selection of Player A nodes are p and (1-p). The expected utility of Player A nodes whenselecting CH is \(U_{M_{CH}}\)and selecting CM is \(U_{M_{CM}}\).These expected utilities are expressed with the help of (39) and (40) are given as:

$$ \begin{array}{lllllll} & U_{M_{CH}}=H_{a} + r_{1} \times \delta_{1} - q \times r_{1} \times \delta_{1} \end{array} $$
(39)
$$ \begin{array}{lllllll} & U_{M_{CM}}=q \times H_{a} - \delta_{1} \end{array} $$
(40)

The average profit of Player A is denoted as in (41).

$$ \begin{array}{lllllll} & \overline{U}_{M}=p \times H_{a} + p \times r_{1} \times \delta_{1} - p \times q \times r_{1} \times \delta_{1}\\ & \qquad \;\; + q \times H_{a} - \delta_{1} - p \times q \times H_{a} + p \times \delta_{1} \end{array} $$
(41)

The dynamic replicator equation of Player A is obtained from (42) given as:

$$ \begin{array}{lllllll} & \frac{dp}{dt}=\overline{\Delta}_{1}(p)=p \times (U_{M_{CH}} - \overline{U}_{M})\\ & \qquad=p (1-p)[H_{a} + r_{1} \times \delta_{1} + \delta_{1} -q(r_{1} \times \delta_{1} + H_{a})] \end{array} $$
(42)

Appendix B

Lemma 2

The Player B is the CM based on strategy hop-count with respect to parameter energy.

Proof

Let probability of CH and CM selection of Player B nodes are q and (1-q). The expected utility of Player B nodes whenselecting CH is \(U_{L_{CH}}\)and selecting CM is \(U_{L_{CM}}\).These expected utilities are expressed with the help of (43) and (44) are given as:

$$ \begin{array}{lllllll} & U_{L_{CH}}=H_{b} + \delta_{1} - p \times \delta_{1} \end{array} $$
(43)
$$ \begin{array}{lllllll} & U_{L_{CM}}=p \times H_{b} + p \times r_{1} \times \delta_{1} - \delta_{1} + p \times \delta_{1} \end{array} $$
(44)

The average profit of Player B is denoted as in (45).

$$ \begin{array}{lllllll} & \overline{U}_{L}=q \times H_{b} + 2 \times q \times \delta_{1} + p \times H_{b} + p \times r_{1} \times \delta_{1}\\ & \qquad \;\; - \delta_{1} \,-\, p \!\times\! q \times H_{b} \,-\, p \times q \times r_{1} \times \delta_{1} - p \times q \times \delta_{1} \end{array} $$
(45)

The dynamic replicator equation of Player B is obtained from (46) given as:

$$ \begin{array}{lllllll} & \frac{dq}{dt}=\overline{\Delta}_{2}(q)=q \times (U_{L_{CH}} - \overline{U}_{L})\\ & \qquad =q(1-q)[H_{b} + 2 \times \delta_{1} - p(\delta_{1} + H_{b} + r_{1} \times \delta_{1})] \end{array} $$
(46)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, S.K., Tripathi, S. Adaptive and intelligent energy efficient routing for transparent heterogeneous ad-hoc network by fusion of game theory and linear programming. Appl Intell 48, 1825–1845 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1061-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1061-6

Keywords

Navigation