Abstract
The twenty-first century is the era of omics technologies which is mainly focused on generation and analysis of molecular data present within the organisms. In the last two decades, enormous data were generated by researchers in laboratories, due to the rapid developments of high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies. These data generated by these technologies can directly be applied to the agricultural developments. The agriculture system which is directly connected to soil can act as plant growth promoters in free-living state or either associated with the rhizospheric region. Whole-genome sequences of the microorganisms are available in the database which is useful for genome-wide identification of specific genes, proteins, ESTs, ORFs, etc. Identification through DNA barcoding in soil microorganism is also a new avenue where various bioinformatic tool assisted the process like MUSCLE, BRONX, ecoPrimers, etc. Microbial system biology is another way to explore the data from different metabolic pathways, genes, and proteins for the valid conclusion of the microbial activity. In totality, the in silico tools comprised of databases and softwares that can assist to reduce the “sequence-function gap” and help in the broad-spectrum study of soil microorganisms and their application toward sustainable agriculture.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brendel V, Xing L, Zhu W (2004) Gene structure prediction from consensus spliced alignment of multiple ESTs matching the same genomic locus. Bioinformatics 20:1157–1169. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth058
Brown SDJ, Collins RA, Boyer S et al (2012) Spider: an R package for the analysis of species identity and evolution, with particular reference to DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 12:562–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03108.x
Coleman AW, Vacquier VD (2002) Exploring the phylogenetic utility of ITS sequences for animals: a test case for abalone (Haliotis). J Mol Evol 54:246–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-001-0006-0
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
Faiza M (2017) Ab-initio prediction of protein structure: an introduction. Bioinforma Rev 2:4
Hiraoka S, Yang C-C, Iwasaki W (2016) Metagenomics and bioinformatics in microbial ecology: current status and beyond. Microbes Environ 31:204–212. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME16024
Jain A, Bacolla A, Chakraborty P et al (2010) Human DHX9 helicase unwinds triple-helical DNA structures. Biochemistry 49:6992–6999. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi100795m
Kress WJ, Erickson DL (2012) DNA barcodes: methods and protocols. In: Methods in molecular biology. Clifton, pp 3–8
Krieger E, Nabuurs SB, Vriend G (2003) Homology modeling. In: Bourne P, Weissig H (eds) Structural bioinformatics. Wiley-Liss, Hoboken, pp 507–521
Kumar S, Carlsen T, Mevik BH et al (2011) CLOTU: an online pipeline for processing and clustering of 454 amplicon reads into OTUs followed by taxonomic annotation. BMC Bioinforma 12:182. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-182
Kustrin AS, Beresford R (2000) Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research. J Pharm Biomed Anal 22:717–727
Little DP (2011) DNA barcode sequence identification incorporating taxonomic hierarchy and within taxon variability. PLoS One 6:e20552. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020552
Mishra J, Prakash J, Arora NK (2014) Role of beneficial soil microbes in sustainable agriculture and environmental management. Clim Chang Environ Sustain 4:137–149
Negi G, Pankaj, Srivastava A, Sharma A (2014) In situ biodegradation of endosulfan, imidacloprid, and carbendazim using indigenous bacterial cultures of agriculture fields of Uttarakhand, India. Int J Bioeng Life Sci 8:973–981
Negi G, Srivastava A, Sharma A (2016) Optimization of endosulfan biodegradation using indigenous bacterial isolate bacillus Aryabhatti through response surface methodology. J Ind Pollut Control 32:638–644
Nielsen UN, Wall DH (2013) The future of soil invertebrate communities in polar regions: different climate change responses in the Arctic and Antarctic? Ecol Lett 16:409–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12058
O’Donnell AG, Young IM, Rushton SP et al (2007) Visualization, modelling and prediction in soil microbiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:689–699. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1714
Ogram A (2000) Soil molecular microbial ecology at age 20: methodological challenges for the future. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1499–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00088-2
Orgiazzi A, Dunbar MB, Panagos P et al (2015) Soil biodiversity and DNA barcodes: opportunities and challenges. Soil Biol Biochem 80:244–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2014.10.014
Pankaj, Nailwal TK, Singh L, Panwar A (2014) Isolation and characterization of rhizobial isolates from the rhizospheric soil of an endangered plant meizotropis pellita. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci Pap 16:301–306
Pankaj, Negi G, Gangola S et al (2016a) Differential expression and characterization of cypermethrin-degrading potential proteins in Bacillus thuringiensis strain, SG4. 3 Biotech 6:225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0541-4
Pankaj, Sharma A, Gangola S et al (2016b) Novel pathway of cypermethrin biodegradation in a Bacillus sp. strain SG2 isolated from cypermethrin-contaminated agriculture field. 3 Biotech 6:45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0372-3
Pathak RK, Baunthiyal M, Pandey N et al (2017) Modeling of the jasmonate signaling pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana with respect to pathophysiology of alternaria blight in brassica. Sci Rep 7:16790. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16884-3
Probandt D, Eickhorst T, Ellrott A et al (2017) Microbial life on a sand grain: from bulk sediment to single grains. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.197
Riaz T, Shehzad W, Viari A et al (2011) ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 39:e145. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr732
Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y (2010) I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 5:725–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2010.5
Santos EC, Armas ED, Crowley D, Lambais MR (2014) Artificial neural network modeling of microbial community structures in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Soil Biol Biochem 69:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2013.10.049
Seibel PN, Müller T, Dandekar T et al (2006) 4SALE – a tool for synchronous RNA sequence and secondary structure alignment and editing. BMC Bioinforma 7:498. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-498
Steinke D, Vences M, Salzburger W, Meyer A (2005) TaxI: a software tool for DNA barcoding using distance methods. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 360:1975–1980. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1729
Wang Z, Chen Y, Li Y (2004) A brief review of computational gene prediction methods. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-0229(04)02028-5
Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ (1998) Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:6578–6583
Wolf M, Friedrich J, Dandekar T, Müller T (2005) CBCAnalyzer: inferring phylogenies based on compensatory base changes in RNA secondary structures. In Silico Biol 5:291–294
Zhang Y, Kolinski A, Skolnick J (2003) TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction. Biophys J 85:1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74551-2
Acknowledgment
Authors P.B and A.B are thankful for all the researchers for their contribution. Their contribution cited in reference section.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhatt, P., Barh, A. (2018). Bioinformatic Tools to Study the Soil Microorganisms: An In Silico Approach for Sustainable Agriculture. In: Choudhary, D., Kumar, M., Prasad, R., Kumar, V. (eds) In Silico Approach for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0347-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0347-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0346-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0347-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)