Skip to main content

Crop Damage by Wild Animals in Thrissur District, Kerala, India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Indian Hotspots

Abstract

Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) is a contentious issue, and crop damage by wild animals is a major problem in Kerala, India. A study on crop damage by wild animals was carried out in Thrissur District, Kerala, India, from April 2009 to March 2012, to assess the crop damage by wild animals and the economic loss incurred to the farmers due to wild animals. For assessing the crop damage, quadrats of 10 m x 10 m were taken randomly in the fringe areas of eight Forest Ranges. Incidences of crop damage were recorded from the quadrat in each month (n = 36), and the species of crops damaged was quantified. Economic loss was estimated by multiplying the quantity of crops damaged within the quadrat, with the market value of crops which was collected from the Farm Information Bureau, Kerala. Ten species of wild animals damaged 11 species of crops in the District. Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) did the highest damage, and the economic loss was estimated as Rs.17,35,625/- per annum, followed by wild pig (Sus scrofa) (Rs. 3736/- per ha/annum) and Indian crested porcupine (Hystrix indica) (Rs. 615.47/- per ha/annum). Feeding on tender coconuts (Cocos nucifera) by Indian giant squirrel (Ratufa indica) was reported for the first time, and this feeding behaviour was reported from three Forest Ranges adjacent to the wildlife sanctuaries. Mean loss was Rs. 2247/- per annum. Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus) and other birds contributed to high economic loss in the paddy fields (Oryza sativa) near Chulanur Peafowl Sanctuary, Kerala, and the loss was Rs. 16,615.45/- per ha. The study indicated that crop damage by animals is causing severe economic loss to farmers in the District, and mitigation measures, namely, solar electric fence, chilli-rope fence, yellow-coloured plastic sheet fence and fishnet fence, are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ali R, Mahdi F, Khan MF (2003) Estimation of rodent damage on coconut plantations and sugarcane in Sindh. Pak J Biol Sci 6:1051–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkon PU, Saltz D (1985) Patterns of Indian crested porcupine (Hystrix indica) damage to cultivate potatoes. Agric Ecosys Environ 14:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Jiang Z, Zeng Y, Li C, Bravery BD (2008) Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar and methods of mitigation in a giant panda reserve. Eur J Wildl Res 54:723–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy AK, Girish AC, Sridhara S (2006) Pest status of the Indian crested porcupine, Hystrix indica. In: Sridhara S (ed) Vertebrate pests in agriculture: the Indian scenario, Jodhur Publishers, India, pp 287–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan NPS, Barwal KS, Kumar D (2009) Human-wild pig conflict in selected states in India and mitigation strategies. Acta Silv Lignaria Hung 5:189–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelliah K, Kannan G, Kundu S, Abilash N, Madhusudan A, Baskaran N, Sukumar R (2010) Testing the efficacy of chilli-tobacco rope fence as a deterrent against crop raiding elephants. Curr Sci 99:1239–1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover MR (2002) Resolving human-wildlife conflicts: the science of wildlife management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton 418 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dublin HT, Hoare RE (2004) Searching for solutions: the evolution of an integrated approach to understanding and mitigating human–elephant conflict in Africa. Hum Dimens Wildl 9:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill RMA (1992) A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests. Oxf J For 65:145–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Govind SK, Jayson EA (2013) Efficiency of chilli powder (Capsicum sp.) to deter wild elephants from the crop fields in a tropical area. Millenn Zool 14:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez S, Ashfaq M, Khan GS, Khan ZH (2012) Damage inflicted by the Indian crested porcupine, Hystrix indica on forestry and agricultural systems in Punjab, Pakistan. J Asian Afr Stud 47:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein TA (2004) ‘Fire in the Sistine chapel’: how Wisconsin responded to chronic wasting disease. Hum Dimens Wildl 9:165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill CM (2004) Farmers’ perspectives of conflict at the wildlife–agriculture boundary: some lessons learned from African subsistence farmers. Hum Dimens Wildl 9:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayson EA (1999) Studies on crop damage by wild animals in Kerala and evaluation of control measures. KFRI Research Report 169. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KK, Gopalaswamy AM, Defries R, Ballal N (2012) Assessing patterns of human-wildlife conflicts and compensation around a central Indian protected area. PLoS One 7:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madden F (2004) Creating co-existence between humans and wildlife: global perspectives on local efforts to address human–wildlife conflict. Hum Dimens Wildl 9:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo MJ, Zinn HC, Sikorowski L, Jones J (1998) Public acceptance of mountain lion management: a case study of Denver, Colorado, and nearby foothill areas. Wildl Soc Bull 26:964–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Marker LL, Mills MGL, Macdonald DW (2003) Factors influencing perceptions of conflict and tolerance toward cheetahs on Namibian farmlands. Conserv Biol 17:1290–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves L, Grossberg R, Treves A (2003) Paying for tolerance: the impact of livestock depredation and compensation payments on rural citizen’s attitudes towards wolves. Conserv Biol 17:1500–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhus PJ, Fischer H, Madden F, Osofsky S (2003) Taking the bite out of wildlife damage: the challenges of wildlife compensation schemes. Conser Pract 4:37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogra M, Badola R (2008) Compensating human-wildlife conflict in protected area communities: ground level perceptions from Uttarakhand, India. Hum Ecol 36:717–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan V, Dar MA, Rather MM, Panwar M, Pala NA (2012) Human-wildlife conflict in Kitam bird sanctuary: perceptions and possible solutions. Indian Forester 138:915–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Prater SH (1965) The book of Indian animals. 2nd rev edn. Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay, 324 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy PB, Sah R (2012) Economic loss analysis of crops yield due to elephant raiding: a case study of Buxa Tiger Reserve (west) West Bengal, India. J Econ Sustain Dev 3:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Schley L, Roper TJ (2003) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Rev 33:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sillero-Zubiri C, Sukumar R, Treves A (2007) Living with wildlife: the roots of conflict and the solutions. In: Key topics in conservation biology (Eds. D.W. MacDonald and K. Service), pp. 253–270. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava DC (2000) Porcupine damage in sugarcane. Pest Manag Econ Zool 8:185–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar R (1985) Ecology of the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) and its interaction with man in South India, PhD thesis, Vol.1&2. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyagaraj NE, Chakravarthy AK, Girish AC (2006) Feeding behavior of porcupine Hystrix indica Kerr in coconut plantations of Western Ghats of Karnataka. In: Advances in Indian entomology: productivity and health, vol 2, pp 169–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeramani A, Jayson EA (1995) A survey of crop damage by wild animals in Kerala. Indian Forester 121:949–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SW, Curtis PD, Lassoie JP (2006) Farmers perceptions of crop damage by wildlife in Jigme Singye Wangchuck National park, Bhutan. Wildl Soc Bull 34:359–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb SL, Gee KL, Strickland BK, DeYoung RW (2009) Efficacy of a 15-strand high tensile electric fence to control white-tailed deer movements. Wildl Biol Pract 5:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson CJ, Britton AM, Symes RG (2009) An assessment of agriculture damage caused by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) and fallow deer (Dama dama L.) in Southwest England. Wildl Biol Pract 5:104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Director, Dr. K.V. Sankaran (Retd.), Kerala Forest Research Institute, for providing necessary facilities for the study. Forest officials of Thrissur District and farmers in the fringe areas of the forest gave all co-operation needed for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. A. Jayson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Govind, S.K., Jayson, E.A. (2018). Crop Damage by Wild Animals in Thrissur District, Kerala, India. In: Sivaperuman, C., Venkataraman, K. (eds) Indian Hotspots. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6983-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics