Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar and methods of mitigation in a giant panda reserve

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In China, following the introduction of protection measures, wild boar (Sus scrofa) are returning to forested mountains they previously inhabited and conflict in villages near or within areas under protection has intensified. We studied this phenomenon around a giant panda nature reserve in the Qinling Mountains, China to determine the incidence and frequency of wild boar damage and methods of mitigation. Over a 3-year period, we found that almost half of households in the local village sustained crop damage, that wild boar frequently raided maize (Zea mays), potato (Ipomoea batatas), and wheat (Triticum aestivum) adjoining the reserve, and that boar usually raided croplands at night and preferred the actual crops. The distance between maize fields and mountains or a stream predicted the probability of a field being raided and also the severity of the damage. Local farmers used many methods to protect their crops; however, all were ineffective except increasing the presence of humans in fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker SE, Ellwood SA, Watkins RW, Madonald DW (2005) Non-lethal control of wildlife: using chemical repellents as feeding deterrents for the European badger Meles meles. J Appl Ecol 42:921–931, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01069.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Moore JL, Streams T, Burgess N, Hansen LA, Williams P et al (2001) Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291:2616–2619, doi:10.1126/science.291.5513.2616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berrutti MA, Frade J, Amorin O (1998) Wild Boar status in Uruguay. Third workshop of the European wild boar research group. Insituto Pirenaico de Ecología (CSIC), Zaragoza

  • Borg WR, Gall MD (1989) Educational research. Longman, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock J (1996) Plants. In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Ecological census technique: a hand book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 111–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Jiang Z (2006) Human–large mammals conflicts: a new challenge of wildlife conservation. Acta Theriol Sin 26:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Calenge C, Maillard D, Fournier P, Fouque C (2004) Efficiency of spreading maize in the garigues to reduce wild boar (Sus scrofa) damage to Mediterranean vineyards. Eur J Wildl Res 50:112–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquenot D, McIlroy J, Korn T (1996) Managing vertebrate pests: feral pigs. Bureau of Resource Sciences, Australian Government, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover MR, Decker DJ (1991) Wildlife damage to crops: perceptions of agricultural and wildlife professionals in 1957 and 1987. Wildl Soc Bull 19:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Fall MW, Jackson WB (1998) A new era of vertebrate pest control? An introduction special issue. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 42:85–91, doi:10.1016/S0964-8305(98)00058-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Llario P, Mateos-Quesada P, Silvério CA, Évora PS (2003) Habitat effects and shooting techniques on two wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations in Spain and Portugal. Z Jagdwiss 49:120–129, doi:10.1007/BF02190452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier CC, Maillard D, Foumi P (1996) Variability of the diet of wild boars (Sus Scrofa) in the Montpellier garrigue arrigue (Herault). Gibier Faune Sauvage 13:1457–1476

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruziński B, Poznań LŁ (2002) Management of wild boar in Poland. Z Jagdwiss 48(Supplement):201–207 doi:10.1007/BF02192409

    Google Scholar 

  • Fwenández-llario P, Maeos-quesada P (1998) Body size and reproductive parameters in the wild boar. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 43:439–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisser H (1998) The wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Thurgau (Northeastern Switzerland): population status, damage and the influence of supplementary feeding on damage frequency. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15:547–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisser H (2000) Das Wildschwein (Sus scrofa) im Kanton Thurgau (Schweiz): Analyse der Populationsdynamik, der Habitatansprüche und der Feldschäden in einem anthropogen beeinflussten Lebensraum. Thesis, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

  • Geisser H, Reyer H (2004) Efficiency of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crops damage by wild boars. J Wildl Manage 68:939–946, doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0939:EOHFAF]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genov PV, Tonini L, Massei G (1995) Crops damage by wild ungulates in a Mediterranean area. In: Botev N (ed) The game and the man. Proc IUGB, Sofia, pp 214–215

  • Herrero J, García-Serrano A, Couto S, Ortuño VM, García-González R (2006) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. Eur J Wildl Res 52:245–250, doi:10.1007/s10344-006-0045-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoare R (2000) African elephants and humans in conflict: the outlook for co-existence. Oryx 34:34–38, doi:10.1046/j.1365-3008.2000.00092.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hone J (2002) Feral pigs in Namadgi National Park, Australia: dynamics, impacts and management. Biol Conserv 105:231–242, doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00185-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z (2004) Behavioral interaction between wild animals and human beings. In: Jiang Z (ed) Animal behavior principles and species conservation methods. Science, Beijing, China, pp 327–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z (2005) On the upper limit of the protected areas in China. Acta Ecol Sin 25:14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z (2006) Biodiversity in the Shaanxi Laoxiancheng Nature Reserve. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansson H (1985) Crop damage by wild boars in Central Sweden. Proceedings of the XVIIth Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists, Brussels, Belgium, pp 605–609

  • Linkie M, Dinata Y, Nofrianto A, Leader-Williams N (2007) Patterns and perceptions of wildlife crop raiding in and around Kerinci Seblat National Park, Sumatra. Anim Conserv 10:127–135, doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00083.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackin R (1970) Dynamics of damage caused by wild boar to different agricultural crops. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 15:447–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Messmer TA (2000) The emergence of human–wildlife conflict management: turning challenges into opportunities. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 45:97–102, doi:10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00045-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messmer TA, George S, Copsicelli L (1997) Legal considerations regarding lethal and nonlethal approaches to managing urban deer. Wildl Soc Bull 25:424–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthmainnah RH, Supardi (1998) Integrated wild pig (Sus scrofa) control in Camming sugar manufacture. Ber Pus Penelit Perkeb Gula Indones 23:20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves L (1998) Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conserv Biol 12:156–158, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96346.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves L, Mena JL, Treves A, Alvares N, Radeloff VC (2003) Wildlife survival beyond park boundaries: the impact of slash-and-burn agriculture and hunting on mammals in Tambopata, Perú. Conserv Biol 17:1106–1117, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02045.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhus P, Tilson R (2004) Agroforestry, elephants, and tigers: balancing conservation theory and practice in human-dominated landscapes of Southeast Asia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:87–97, doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez E, Luis FP (2006) Damage by large mammals to subsistence crops within a protected area in a montane forest of Bolivia. Crop Prot 25:933–939, doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2005.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard H, Lamprey RH, Reid RS (2004) Expansion of human settlement in Kenya’s Maasai Mara: what future for pastoralism and wildlife? J Biogeogr 31:997–1032, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01062.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saj TL, Pascale SS, Paterson JD (2001) The conflict between vervet monkeys and farmers at the forest edge in Entebbe, Uganda. African wildlife society. J Afr Ecol 39:195–199, doi:10.1046/j.0141-6707.2000.00299.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schley L (2000) The badger Meles meles and the wild boar (Sus scrofa): distribution and damage to agricultural crops in Luxembourg. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

  • Schley L, Roper TJ (2003) Diet of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mamm Rev 33:43–56, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00010.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schley L, Roper TJ (2004) Distribution and population density of badgers Meles meles in Luxembourg. Mamm Rev 34:233–240, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.2004.00040.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siex KS, Struhsaker TT (1999) Colobus monkeys and coconuts: a study of perceived human–wildlife conflicts. J Appl Ecol 36:1009–1020, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00455.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitz F, Lek S (1999) Environmental impact prediction using neural network modeling: an example in wildlife damage. J Appl Ecol 36:317–326, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00400.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar R (1991) The management of large mammals in relation to male strategies and conflict with people. Biol Conserv 55:93–102, doi:10.1016/0006-3207(91)90007-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Zhang Z, Jin X (2005) The division of sub-population of giant panda in Qinling and its quantitative distribution. Chin Wildl 26:51–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Treves A, Karanth KU (2003) Human–carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore managements worldwide. Conserv Biol 17:1491–1499, doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00059.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassant J (1996) Evolution of wild boar populations and damage to crops in France between 1978 and 1993. In CIC, Proceeding of Schwarzwild Symposium, Sopron, Ungarn, pp 131–141

  • Vijayan S, Pati BP (2002) Impact of changing cropping patterns on man–animal conflicts around Gir Protected Area with specific reference to Talala Sub-District, Gujarat, India. Popul Environ 23:541–559, doi:10.1023/A:1016317819552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Chen H (2000) Preliminary study on the population structures and reproductive habit in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Dawuling nature reserve. Acta Theriol Sin 20:151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Wang N (2003) An initial study on habitat conservation of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), with a focus on human elephant conflict in Simao, China. Biol Conserv 112:453–459, doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00335-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Chinese Academy of Sciences Innovative Research International Partnership Project (CXTDS2005-4), Columbus Zoo and Aquarium, and UAS field conservation funds for financial support. Thank you to staff of Laoxiancheng Nature Reserve for their assistance and to Jing yu, Xueli Lu, and Yankuo Li for their help in the survey. Finally, we thank everyone living in the Laoxiancheng village that participated in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhigang Jiang.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cai, J., Jiang, Z., Zeng, Y. et al. Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar and methods of mitigation in a giant panda reserve. Eur J Wildl Res 54, 723–728 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0203-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0203-x

Keywords

Navigation