Abstract
The use of CAD/CAM is now commonplace in education. Whilst some systems are relatively easy to master, the teaching and learning of 3D CAD can be problematic. Infrequent use means teachers may lack the confidence to teach it, and the complexity of the programs means students struggle to use it or be creative when using it. My research explores alternative methods of teaching 3D CAD from the perspective of both students and teachers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An electronic copy of the PhD Thesis can be found at this url: http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.580671
Carter, J. (2010). What are the important gender-related issues in computing at present. Computer Science Education, 20(4), 261–263.
Chiu, M. M. (2004), Adapting teacher intervention to student needs during co-operative learning: How to improve student problem solving and time on task. American Educational Research Journal, 26(1).
Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational research, 64, 1–35.
Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 320–334.
Cox, G. (2005). Cox review of creativity in business: Building on the UK’s strengths. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/cox_review_creativity_business.html
Cox, S., in Livingstone, H. (2012) http://www.cadalyst.com/cad/get-‘em-while-they’re-young
Department for Education. (1997). Design and technology: The national curriculum for England. London: HMSO.
Musta’amal, A. H., Norman, E. W. L., & Hodgson, T. (2009). Gathering empirical evidence concerning links between computer aided design (CAD) and creativity. Design and Technology Education: An international Journal, 14(2), 53–66.
Nunes, P, & Downes, L. (2014). http://www.forbes.com/sites/bigbangdisruption/2014/01/10/the-five-most-disruptive-innovations-at-ces-2014/. Accessed 11 Mar 2015.
Pektas, S. T., & Erkip, F. (2006). Attitudes of design students toward computer usage in design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(1), 70–95.
Quigley, A. (2013). HuntingEnglish. Retrieved March 11, 2015, from http://www.huntingenglish.com/2013/01/12/top-ten-group-work-strategies2014
Siann, G. (1997). We can, but we don’t want to: Factors influencing women’s participation in computing. In R. Lander & A. Adam (Eds.), Women in computing. Exeter: Intellect.
Acknowledgement
I would like to express sincere gratitude to my supervisors during my PhD, Frank Banks and Steve Garner, in particular to Frank as I would not have been able to complete my studies without his insightful help and support, and also to Neale-Wade Academy, Richard Dunkerly from Ramsey Abbey school and Tim Brotherhood from PTC who assisted during the studies to various degrees. Finally, a thank you to friends and family who supported me through my PhD studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winn, D. (2017). CAD and Creativity at Key Stage 3. In: Williams, P., Barlex, D. (eds) Contemporary Research in Technology Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2819-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2819-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2817-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2819-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)