Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Molecular Dna Marker Analysis to Assess the Genetic Fidelity of Micropropagated Woody Plants

  • Chapter
Micropropagation of Woody Trees and Fruits

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 75))

Abstract

Successful micropropagation of woody plants is relatively a recent phenomenon (Thorpe, 1990; Bajaj, 1997). Several woody species such as poplars, wild cherry, eucalypts, red wood, radiata pine and teak are at present commercially micropropagated (Thorpe, 1990; Bajaj, 1997), while for others, such as sandal wood, birch, loblolly pineShoreaand Dalbergia, the protocols are being standardized for mass multiplication. Very soon, standardized and efficient protocols for mass multiplication of a large number of diverse woody plant species would be available. From the practical standpoint, however, the maintenance of genetic integrity among micropropagated plants vis-à-vis explant source(s) will be one of the most crucial concerns for the reasons that advantages like high yield, uniform quality of commercial product and shorter rotation period, in the use of elite genotype(s) over natural seedlings are maintained, and no untoward mutation(s) creep in (Larkin and Scowcroft, 1983; D’Amato 1985; Scowcroft, 1985; Larkin, 1987; Karp and Bright, 1985; Peschke and Phillips, 1992; Cloutier and Landry, 1994; Karp, 1991,1995; Phillips et al., 1990, 1994; Kaeppler et al., 1998; Jain et al., 1998a,ó; Jain, 2001). This is all the more important for tree species and other perennial crops where the life span is long and the performance of invitro-derived plants can be ascertained only

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ammirato, P.V. and D.J. Styer. 1985. Strategies for large scale manipulation of somatic embryos in suspension cultures. In:Biotechnology in Plant Science:Relevance to agriculture in the Eighties.pp. 161–178 (eds. Zaitlin, M., P. Day and A. Hollaender) New York Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj, Y.P.S. 1997.Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry.vol. 39. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohanec, B., M. Jakse, A. Ihan and B. Juornik. 1995. Studies of gynogenesis in onion(Allium cepaL.): induction procedures and genetic analysis of regenerants.Plant Sci.104:215–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonga, J.M. and D.J. Durzan. 1987.Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry.vol 1. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brar, D.S. and S.M. Jain.. 1998. Somaclonal variation: mechanism and applications in crop improvement. In:Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Impovement.pp. 15–37 (eds. Jain, S..M.., D.S. Brar and B.S. Ahloowalia) Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretteil, R.I.S., M.A. Palota. and J.P. Gustafson. 1986. Variation at the Nor loci intriticalederived from tissue culture.T heorAppl Genet. 71:637–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.T.H. 1989. DNA methylation in plants and its role in tissue culture.Genome.31:717–729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.T.H., F.D. Lange, E. Kranz and H. Lorz. 1993. Analysis of single protoplasts and and regenerated plants by PCR and RAPD technology.Mol Gen Genet.237:311–317.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.T.H. and H. Lorz. 1986. Molecular changes and possible origin of somaclonal variation. In:Somaclonal variation and crop improvementpp. 138–159 (ed. J. Semai). Dordrecht: Martinus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.L. and H.E. Sommer. 1982. Vegetative propagation of dicotyledonous trees. In:Tissue culture in forestrypp. 109–149 (eds. Bongs, J.M. and D.J. Durzan). Dordrecht: Martinus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caetano-Annolles, G., B.J Bassam and P.M. Gresshoff 1991. DNA amplification fingerprinting using very short arbitrary oligonucleotide primers.Biotechnology.9:553–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, B.E and B.B. Johnson. 1989, Partitioning of variation derived from tissue culture of winter wheat.TheorAppl Genet.78:405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandelier, A.P., D.U. Jardin, C. Avril and M. Paques. 1999. Identification of mitochondria) plasmid-like DNAs inPicea abies(L.) Karst.Plant Cell Rep.18:841–847.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, M.K.U., V. Vasil and I.K. Vasil. 1994. Molecular analysis of plants regenerated from embryogenic cultures of wheat(Triticum aestivumL.).Theor App! Genet.87:821–828.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier, S and B.S. Landry. 1994. Molecular markers applied to plant tissue culture.In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant.30 P:32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, R.H.V., C.H. Lee, Law, I.H. and C.Y. Wong. 1986. Abnormal flower development in oil palm clones.Planter.62:233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato, F. 1985. Cytogenetics of plant cell and tissue cultures and their regenerants.CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci.3:73–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasco, O.P., G.C. Graham, R.J. Henry, S.W. Adkins and I.D. Godwin. 1996. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) detection of dwarf offtypes in micropropagated Cavendish (Musa spp. AAA) bananas.Plant Cell Rep.16:118–123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Damasco, O.P., S.W. Adkins and I.D.Godwin. 2000. Use of a SCAR-based marker for the early detection of dwarf off-types in micropropagated Cavendish Bananas.Acta Hort.461:157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debergh, P.C. and P.E. Read. 1990. Micropropagation. In:Micropropagtion Technology and Application. pp 1–13 (eds. Debergh, P.C. and R.H. Zimmerman) Dordrecht:Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Buyser, J., C. hartmann, Y. Henry and A. Rode. 1988. Variation in long-term wheat somatic tissue culture:chromosomal number, plant morphologym, and mitochondria) DNA.Can JBot.66:1891–1895.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeVemo, L.L., P.J. Charest and L. Bonen. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA variation in somatic embryogenic cultures ofLarix. Theor App! Genet.88:727–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVerno, L.L. 1995. An evaluation of somaclonal variation during somatic embryogenesis. In:Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants.Vol 1, pp. 361–377 (eds. Jain, S.M., P. Gupta and R. Newton) Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVerno, L.L., Y.S. Park, J.M. Bonga and J.D. Barrett. 1999. Somaclonal variation in cryopreserved embryogenic clones of white spruce(Picea glauca(Moench) Voss.).Plant Cell Rep.18:948–953.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunstan, D.I. and T.A. Thorpe. 1986 Regeneration in forest trees. In:Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants.Vol 3, pp. 223–241 (ed. Vasil, I. K) Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourre, J.L., P. Berger, I. Niquet and P. Andre. 1997. Somatic embryogenesis and somaclonal variation in Norway spruce: morphogenetic, cytogenetic and molecular approaches.Theor Appl Genet.94:159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg, O.L. 1993 Potentials of biotechnology in micropropagation and genetic improvement of woody species. pp. 8–11, In:Proc Intl Symp Appl Plant In Vitro TechUniversity of Agriculture Malaysia, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coto, S., R.C. Thakur and K. Ishii. 1998. Determination of genetic stability in long-term micropropagated shoots ofPinus thunbergiiParl. using RAPD markers.Plant Cell Rep.18:193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez, C., E.D. Garcia, N.X.D. Enrech and I. Blanca. 2001. Somaclonal variation in banana: cytogenetic and molecular characterization of somaclonal variant CIEN BTA03.In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant.37:217–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M.R. 1984. Stability, variation and recombination in plant mitochondrial genomes via tissue culture and somatic hybridization.Oxf Sury Plant Mol Cell Biol.1:33–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, C., H. Recipin, M. Jubier, C. Valor, B. Delcher, Y. Henry, J. DeBuyser, B. Lejeune and A. Rode. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA variability in a single wheat regenerant involves a rare recombination event across a short repeat.Curr Genet.25:456–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hashmi, G., R. Huettel, R. Meyer, L. Krusberg and P. Hammerschlag. 1997. RAPD analysis of somaclonal variants derived frm embryo callus cultures of peach.Plant Cell Rep.6:624–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hague, N.S., N.W. Fish and M. Keil. 1992. Assessment of somaclonal variation inEucalyptususing random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Proceedings: Fifth Wkshp. IUFRO Wk. Party S2.04.06. Carcans-Maubisson, June 15–18, 1992. INRA, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, B. and J. Schmidt. 1995. Monitoring genetic fidelity vs somaclonal variation in Norway Spruce(Picea abies)somatic embryogenesis by RAPD analysis.Euphytica.85:341–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, R.J. 1998. Molecular and biochemical characterization of somaclonal variation. In:Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Impovement.pp. 485–499 (eds. Jaïn, S.M., D.S. Brar and B.S. Ahloowalia) Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Y., J.L. Marcotte and J De Buyser. 1996. The effect of aneuploidy on karyotype abnormality in wheat plants regenerated from short and long-erm somatic embryogenesis.Plant Sei.114:101–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isabel, N., L. Tremblay, M. Michaud, F..M. Tremblay and J. Bousquet. 1993. RAPDs as an aid to evaluate the genetic intergrity of somatic embryogenesis derived populations ofPicea mariana(Mill.) B.S.P.TheorAppl Genet.86:81–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isabel, N., R. Bovin, C. Levasseur, P.M. Charest, J. Bousquet and F.M. Tremblay. 1996. Occurrence of somaclonal variation among somatic embryo-derived white spruces(Picea glaucaPinaceae).AmJBot. 83:1121–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S..M. 2001. Tissue-culture derived variation in crop improvement.Euphytica118:153–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S.M., B.S. Ahloowalia and R.E. Vielleux. 1998a. Somaclonal variation and crop improvement. hi:Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Impovement. pp.203–218(eds.Jain, S.M., D.S. Brar and B.S. Ahloowalia)Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S.M., D.S. Brar and B.S. Ahloowalia. 1998b.Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement.Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaligot, E., A. Rival, T. Beule, S. Dussert and J.L. Verdeil. 2000. Somaclonal variation in oil palm(Elaeis guineensisJacq.): the DNA methylation hypothesis.Plant Cell Rep.19:684–690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P., C. Lister, V. Szabo and C. Dean. 1994. Integration of CAPs markers into RFLP map generated using recombinant inbred lines of.4rabidopsis thaliana. Pl Mol Bioi.24:685–687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Javouhey, M., F. Daguin and R. Letouze. 2000. Somatic embryogenesis, an efficient tool for date palm(Phoenix dactylifera L.)industrial micropropagation, characterization and genetic stability of original offshoots and regenerated plantlets by RAPD markers. Acta Hort.530:237–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayasankar, S., R.E. Litz, R.J. Schenell and A.C. Hernandez 1998. Embryogenic mango cultures selected for resistance toColletolrichum gloeosporiodescultures filtrare show variation in random amplified polymorphic DNA markers.In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant.34:112–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeppler, S.M. and R.L. Phillips. 1993. Tissue culture-induced DNA methylation in maize.Proc Nall Acad Sci.90:8773–8776.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeppler, S.M., R.L. Phillips and P. Olhoft. 1998. Molecular basis of heritable tissue culture-induced variation in plants. In:Somaclonal variation and induced mutations in crop improvement. pp. 465–484 (eds. Jain, S.M., P.S. Brar and D.S. Ahloowalia) Dordrecht:Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, A. 1991. On the current understanding of somaclonal variation.Oxf Sury Plant Mol Cell Biol.7:1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, A. 1995. Somaclonal variation as a tool for crop improvement.Euphylica85:295302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, A. and S.W.J. Bright. 1985. On the causes and origins of somaclonal variations.Oxf Sury Plant Mol Cell Biol.2:199–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawata, M., A. Ohmiya, Y. Shimamoto, K. Oono and F. Takaiwa. 1995. Structural changes in the plastid DNA of rice(Oryza sativaL.) during tissue culture.Theor Appt Genet.90:364–371.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konieczny, A. and M.A. Ausubel. 1993. A procedure for mappingArabidopsismutations using eodominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers.Plant J.4:403–410.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J. 1987. Somaclonal variation:history, method and meaning.Iowa State J61:393–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J. and W.R. Scoweroft. 1983. Somaclonal variation and crop improvement.In: Genetic engineering of plants.pp 289–314 (eds Konsuge, T., C. Meredith and A, Holloender) New York:Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M and R.L. Phillips. 1997. Genetic variants in the progeny of regenerated maize.Genome.29:834–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litt, M and J. A. Lutty. 1989. A hypervariable microsatellite revealed byin vitroamplification of a di-nucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle action genes.Am. hum Genet.44:397–401.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang. P and A.B. Pardee. 1992. Differential display of eukaryotic messenger RNA by means of the polymerase chain reaction.Science.257:967–971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, J.D., J.R. Wong, J. Rowe, D..M. Trieoli, R.H.Jr. Lawrence. 1985. Somatic embryogenesis for mass cloning of crop plants. In:Tissue Culture in Forestay and Agriculturepp.105–116 (eds. Henke, R.R., K.W. Hughes, M.P. Constantin and A. Hollaender). New York:Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin. G. B., J.G.K. Williams and S.D. Tanksley. 1991. Rapid identification of markers linked to aPseudomonasresistance gene in tomato by using random primers and near isogenic lines.Proc Nall Acad Sci USA.88:2336–2340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matthes, M., R. Singh, S.C. Cheah and A. Karp. 2001. Variation in oil palm(Elaeis guineensisJacq.) tissue culture-derived regenerants revealed by AFLPs with methylation-sensitive enzymes. iheor Appl Genet.102:971–979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merkle, S.A., P.L. Chou and H.E. Sommer. 1998. Stability of highly repeated sequences in the DNA of embryogenic cultures of yellow poplar. In:Molecular Genetics of Forest Treespp. 85–88 (eds. Cheliak, W.M. and A.C. Yapa). Petwawa National Forestry Institute Information Report PI-X-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelmore, R. W., I. Paran and R.V. Kesseli. 1991. Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis:a rapid method to detect the markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.88:9828–9832.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohmand, A.S and M.W. Nabors. 1990. Somaclonal variant plants of wheat derived from mature embryo eplants of three genotypes.Plant Cell Rep.8:558–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morere-Le payen, M.C., J. De Buyser, Y. Henry, F. Corre, C. Harmann and A. Rode. 1992. A multiple pattern of mtDNA reorganization in plants regenerated from differentin vitrocultured explants of a single wheat variety.Theor Appl Genet.85:914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgante, M and J, Vogel. 1994. Compound microsatellite primers for the detection of genetic polymorphisms. US Patent Appl 08/326–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parani, M., A. Anand and A. Parida. 1997. Application of RAPD fingerprinting in selection of micropropagated plants ofPiper longumfor conservation.Current Sci.73:81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschke, V.M. and R.L. Phillips. 1992. Genetic implications of somaclonal variation in plants.Adv Genet.30:41–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R.L., S.M. Kaeppler and V.M. Peschke. 1990. Do we understand somaclonal variation? In:Progress in Plant Cellular and Molecular Biologypp. 131–141 (eds Nijkamp, H.J.J., L.H.W. VanderPlas and J. Van Aartrijk). Proceedings, Sixth International Congress on Plant Tissue and Cell Culture. Dordrecht:Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R.L., S.M. Kaeppler and P. Olhoft. 1994. Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.91:5222–5226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierik, R.L.M. 1987.In VitroCulture of Higher Plants. Dordrecht:Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierik, R.L.M. 1991. Commercial aspects of micropropagation. In:Horticulture-new technologies and applicationspp.141–153 (eds Prakash, J. and R.L.M. Pierik). Dordrecht:Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M.H. and O.P. Rajora. 2001. Microsatellie DNA somaclonal variation in micropropagated trembling aspen(Populus tremuloides) Plant Cell Rep.20:531–536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, V. 1995. Potential use of molecular markers in the genetic analysis ofin vitropropagated tree systems. Ph. D. thesis, Department of Botany, Univ. of Delhi, Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rani, V., A. Parida and S.N. Raina. 1995. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers for genetic analysis in micropropagated plants ofPopulus deltoidesMarsh.Plant Cell Rep.14:459–462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, V and S.N. Raina. 1998a. Genetic fidelity and molecular diagnostics in micropropagation system. In:Genetics and Biotechnology in Crop Improvement.pp. 370–388 (eds. Gupta, P. K., S. P. Singh, H. S. Balyan, P. C. Sharma and B. Ramesh) India: Rastogi Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rani, V and S.N. Raina. 1998b. Genetic analysis of enhanced axillary branching derivedEucalyptus tereticornisandE. camaldulensisplants.Plant Cell Rep.17:236–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, V. and S. N. Raina. 2000. Genetic fidelity of organized meristem-derived micropropagated plants: A critical reappraisal.In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant.36:319–330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, V., K.P. Singh, M. Shiran, S. Nandy, S. Goel, R.M. Devarumath, H. Sreenath and S.N. Raina. 2000. Evidence for new nuclear and mitochondria] genome organizations among high frequency somatic embryogenesis-derived plants of allotetraploidCoffea arabicaL. (Rubiaceae).Plant Cell Rep.19:1013–1020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rani, V., A. Parida and S.N. Raina. 2001. Chromosome number dependent genome size and RAPD fingerprinting diagnostics for genetic integrity of enhanced axillary branching-derived plants of ten forest tree species.Acta Hort.560:531–534.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redenbaugh, K., P. Viss, D. Slade and J.A. Fujii. 1987. Scale up:artificial seeds. In:Plant Cell and Tissue Culture.pp 473–493 (eds. Green, C.E., D.A. Somers, W.P. Hackett and D.D. Bisboer). New York: A.R.Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rival, A., J. Tregear, J.L. Verdeil, F. Richard, T. Beale, C. Hartmann, and A. Rode A. 1998a. Molecular search for mRNA and genomic markers of the oil palm “mantled” somaclonal variants.ActaHort.461:165–171.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rival, A., L. Bertrand, T. Beale, M.C. Combes, P. Trouslot and P. Leshermes. 1998b. Similarity of RAPD analysis for detection of somaclonal variation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.)Plant Breed117:73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rival, A., E. Jaligot, T. Beale, J.L. Verdeil and J. Tregear. 2000. DNA methylation and somaclonal variation in oil palm.Acta Hort.530:447–454.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saiki, R., S. Scharf, F. Faloona, K.B. Mullis, G.T. Horn, H.A. Erlich and N. Arnheim. 1988. Enzymatic amplification of ¡3-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cellanemia. Science.230,1350–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoofs, J. 1992. Rapid clonal propagation, storage and exchange ofMusaspecies. In:Rapid Propagation of Fast Growing Woody Species.pp. 29–41 (ed. Baker, F.W.G.) Wallingford: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scowcroft, W. R. 1985.Somaclonal variation: the myth of clonal uniformity. In:Genetic Flux in Plants.pp. 217–245 (eds. Hohn, B., E.S. Dennis) Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, F.H., O. Rashid, A.J. Simons and A. Dunson. 1994. The utility of RAPD markers for the determination of genetic variation in oil palm(Elaeis guineensis). Theor App! Genet.89:713–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimron-Abarbanell, D. and A. Breiman. 1991. Comprehensive molecular characterization of tissue-culture-derivedHordeum marinumplants.Theor Appl Genet.83:71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirzadegan, M., J.D. Palmer, M. Christey and E.D. Earle. 1991. Patterns of mitochondrial DNA instability inBrassica campestriscultured cells.Plant Mol Biol.16:21–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shoseyov, O., G. Tsabary and O. Reuveni. 1998. Detection of dwarf somaclones of banana cultivars(Musa)by RAPD markers. In:Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutation in Crop Improvement.pp. 595–601 (eds. Jain, S.M., D.S. Brar and B.S. Ahloowalia) Kluwer: Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, W. 2001.In vitroregeneration of loblolly pine and random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses of regenerated plantlets.Plant Cell Rep.20:163–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R.C., S. Goto, K. Ishii and S. M. Jain. 1999. Monitoring genetic stability inQuercus serrataThunb. somatic embryogenesis using RAPD markers.J For Res.4:157–160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, T.A. 1988.In vitrosomatic embryogenesis.ISI Atlas of Science Animal and Plant Sciences.1:81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, T.A. 1990. The current status of plant tissue culture. In:Plant tissue culture: applications and limitations.pp.1–33 (ed. Bhojwani, S.S.) Elsevier:Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil, I.K. 1994. Automation of plant propagation.Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.39:105–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, J.M. and P.A. Scolnik. 1998. Direct amplification from microsatellites: detection of simple repeat-based polymorphisms without cloning. In:DNA markers: Protocols Applications and overviews. pp. 33–150 (eds. Caetano Annolles, G and P. M. Gresshoff) New York: Wiley-Liss Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Reijnans, T. vande Lee, M. Homes, A. Friters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kupier and M. Zebeau. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.Nucleic Acids Res.23:4407–4414.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vuylsteke, D., R. Swennen, G.F. Wilson, and E. DeLanghe. 1998. Phenotypic variation amongin vitropropagated plantain(Musasp cultivar AAB).Sci Hort.36:79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P.J. and Charles A. 1991. Micropropagation through meristem culture. In:Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry-Hightech and Micropropagation I.vol 17, pp32–52 (ed Bajaj, Y.P.S.) NewYork: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J and M, McClelland. 1990. Figerprinting gcnomes using PCR with arbitrary primers.Nucleic Acids. Res. 18:7213–7218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.L. and P.E. May.1989.Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction.AmJHum Genet.44:388–396.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, E. 2000. Somatic embryogenesis in oak.In Vitro Cell Dev Biel- Plant.36:349–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.G.K., A.R. Kubelik, K.J. Livak, J.A. Rafalski and S.V. Tingey. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.Nucleic Acids Res.18:6531–6535.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallner, E., K. Weising, R. Rompf, G. Kahl and B. Kopp. 1996. Oligomucleotide and RAPD analysis ofAchilleaspecies: characterization and long-term monitoring of micropropagated clones.Plant Cell Rep.15: 647–652.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, L.Z., C.G. Xu, M.A. Saghai-Maroof and Q, Zhang. 1999. Patterns of cytosine methylation in an elite rice hybrid and its parental line, detection by a methylation sensitive amplification polymorphism technique.Mol Gen Genet.261:431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, B.E., M.E. Williams and R.D. Widholm. 1987. Somaclonal variation among the progeny of plants regenerated from callus cultures of seven inbred lines of maize.Can JBot.65:491–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zictkiwicz, E., A. Rafalski and D. Labvada. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeats (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction.Genomics.20:176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Cytogenetics, Department of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India

    Vijay Rani & S. N. Raina

Authors
  1. Vijay Rani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. N. Raina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. FAO/IAEA Joint Division, International Atomic Agency, Vienna, Austria

    S. Mohan Jain

  2. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan

    Katsuaki Ishii

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rani, V., Raina, S.N. (2003). Molecular Dna Marker Analysis to Assess the Genetic Fidelity of Micropropagated Woody Plants. In: Jain, S.M., Ishii, K. (eds) Micropropagation of Woody Trees and Fruits. Forestry Sciences, vol 75. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0125-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0125-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3964-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0125-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation