Abstract
Genetic engineering (GE) can target specific genetic improvements and allow for the development of novel, useful traits. In spite of the potential utility of GE for fruit tree improvement, the technology has not, to date, been widely exploited for variety development due, in part, to the reticence of researchers to become involved in the regulatory process. Over the past 20 years an intensive international research project focused on the development of GE resistance to Plum pox virus (PPV) the causative agent of Sharka, one of the most destructive diseases of plum and other stone fruits. This effort resulted in the development of ‘HoneySweet’ plum, a GE variety that has proven to be highly resistant to PPV, as demonstrated in over 15 years of field testing in the U.S. and Europe. In order to make this variety available to breeders and growers in the U.S., dossiers were submitted to the U.S. regulatory agencies. This process ultimately led to the regulatory approval of ‘HoneySweet’ in the U.S. The work with ‘HoneySweet’ demonstrates that the regulatory process, while a significant effort, can be successfully navigated by public institution researchers. Nevertheless, the few examples of such success demonstrate a need for public institutions to find ways to encourage, support and reward researchers who pursue deregulation efforts. The long-standing successes of virus control in squash and papaya, and the current work with plum demonstrate the power and the safety of GE for specialty crop improvement. The commitment of researchers, institutional support, clear, science-based regulatory frameworks that build upon a developing knowledge base, industry support, and public outreach are components that are now necessary to move this technology forward to improve agricultural production and its sustainability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atanassov D (1932) Plum pox. A new virus disease. Ann Univ Sofia, Fac Agric Silv 11:49–69
Beachy RN, Loesh-Fries S, Tumer NE (1990) Coat protein-mediated resistance against virus infection. Annu Rev Phytopathol 28:451–474
Cambra M, Capote N, Myrta A, Llácer G (2006) Plum pox virus and the estimated costs associated with sharka disease. OEPP/EPPO Bull 36:202–204
Capote N, Pérez-Panadés J, Monzó C, Carbonell E, Urbaneja A, Scorza R, Ravelonandro M, Cambra M (2008) Assessment of the diversity and dynamics of Plum pox virus and aphid populations in transgenic European plums under Mediterranean conditions. Transgenic Res 17:367–377
Damsteegt VD, Scorza R, Stone AL, Schneider WL, Webb K, Demuth M, Gildow FE (2006) Prunus host range of Plum pox virus (PPV) in the United States by aphid and graft inoculation. Plant Dis 91:18–23
Fitch MMM, Manshardt RM, Gonsalves D, Slightom JL, Sanford JC (1990) Stable transformation of papaya via microprojective bombardment. Plant Cell Rep 9:189–194
Fitch MMM, Manshardt RM, Gonsalves D, Slightom JL, Sanford JC (1992) Virus resistant papaya plants derived from tissues bombarded with the coat protein gene of papaya ringspot virus. Biotechnology 10:1466–1472
Fuchs M, Cambra M, Capote N, Jelkmann W, Kundu J, Laval J, Martelli GP, Minafra A, Petrovic N, Pfeifffer P, Pompe-Novak M, Ravelonandro M, Saldarelli P, Stussi-Garaud C, Vigne E, Zagrai I (2007) Safety assessment of transgenic plums and grapevines expressing viral coat protein genes: new insights into real environmental impact of perennial plants engineered for virus resistance. J Plant Pathol 89:5–12
Gonsalves D (1998) Control of papaya ringspot virus in papaya – a case study. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:415–437
Hartmann W, Petruschke M (2002) Sharka resistant plums and prunes by utilization of hypersensitivity. Acta Hortic 538:391–395
Hily J-M, Scorza R, Malinowski T, Zawadzka B, Ravelonandro M (2004) Stability of gene silencing-based resistance to Plum pox virus in transgenic plum (Prunus domestica L.) under field conditions. Transgenic Res 13:427–436
Hily J-M, Scorza R, Webb K, Ravelonandro M (2005) Accumulation of the long class of siRNA is associated eith resistance to Plum pox virus in a transgenic woody perennial plum tree. MPMI 18:794–799
Levy L, Damsteegt V, Welliver R (2000) First report of Plum Pox Virus (Sharka Disease) in Prunus persica in the United States. Plant Dis 8:202
Ling K, Namba S, Gonsalves C, Slightom JL, Gonsalves D (1991) Protection against detrimental effects of potyvirus infection in transgenic tobacco plants expressing the papaya ringspot virus coat protein. Biotechnology 9:752–758
Malinowski T, Cambra M, Capote N, Zawadzka B, Gorris MT, Scorza R, Ravelonandro M (2006) Field trials of plum clones transformed with the Plum pox virus coat protein (PPV-CP) gene. Plant Dis 90:1012–1018
Mante S, Morgens PH, Scorza R, Cordts JM, Callahan AM (1991) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of plum (Prunus domestica L.) hypocotyls slices and regeneration of transgenic plants. Biotechnology 9:853–857
Oliver JE, Tennant PF, Fuchs M (2011) Virus resistant transgenic horticultural crops: safety issues and lessons from risk assessment studies. In: Beiquan M, Scorza R (eds) Transgenic horticultural crops: challenges and opportunities EDS. Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 263–288
Polák J, Pívalová J, Svoboda J (2005) Prune cv. Jojo resistance to different strains of Plum pox virus. Plant Prot Sci 41:47–51
Ravelonandro M, Monsion M, Teycheney PY, Delbos R, Dunez J (1992) Construction of a chimeric viral gene expressing plum pox virus coat protein. Gene 120:167–173
Ravelonandro M, Scorza R, Bachelier JC, Labonne G, Levy L, Damsteegt V, Callahan AM, Dunez J (1997) Resistance of transgenic Prunus domestica to plum pox virus infection. Plant Dis 81:1231–1235
Ruiz EMV, Soriano JM, Romero C, Zhebentyayeva T, Terol J, Zuriaga E, Llácer G, Abbott AG, Badenes ML (2011) Narrowing down the apricot Plum pox virus resistance locus and comparative analysis with the peach genome syntenic region. Mol Plant Pathol 12:535–547
Scorza R, Levy L, Damsteegt V, Yepes LZ, Cordts J, Hadidi A, Slightom J, Gonsalves D (1995) Transformation of plum with the Papaya ringspot virus coat protein gene and reaction of transgenic plants to Plum pox virus. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 120:943–952
Scorza R, Callahan A, Levy L, Damsteegt V, Webb K, Ravelonandro M (2001) Post-transcriptional gene silencing in plum pox virus resistant transgenic European plum containing the plum pox potyvirus coat protein gene. Transgenic Res 10:201–209
Various authors (2006) Current status of Plum pox virus and sharka disease worldwide. OEPP/EPPO Bull 36:205–218
Zagrai I, Capote N, Ravelonandro M, Cambra M, Zagrai I, Scorza R (2008) Plum pox virus silencing of C5 transgenic plums is stable under challenge inoculation with heterologous viruses. J Plant Pathol 90:S1.63–S1.71
Zagrai I, Ravelonandro M, Gaboreanu I, Ferencz B, Scorza R, Zagrai L, Kelemen B,, Pamfil D, Popescu O (2011) Transgenic plums expressing the Plum Pox Virus coat protein gene do not assist the development of PPV recombinants under field conditions. J Plant Pathol 93:159–165
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 US Government
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scorza, R., Callahan, A., Ravelonandro, M., Braverman, M. (2012). Development and Regulation of the Plum Pox Virus Resistant Transgenic Plum ‘HoneySweet’. In: Wozniak, C., McHughen, A. (eds) Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology: The United States and Canada. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2156-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2156-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2155-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2156-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)