Skip to main content

Development and Regulation of the Plum Pox Virus Resistant Transgenic Plum ‘HoneySweet’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology: The United States and Canada

Abstract

Genetic engineering (GE) can target specific genetic improvements and allow for the development of novel, useful traits. In spite of the potential utility of GE for fruit tree improvement, the technology has not, to date, been widely exploited for variety development due, in part, to the reticence of researchers to become involved in the regulatory process. Over the past 20 years an intensive international research project focused on the development of GE resistance to Plum pox virus (PPV) the causative agent of Sharka, one of the most destructive diseases of plum and other stone fruits. This effort resulted in the development of ‘HoneySweet’ plum, a GE variety that has proven to be highly resistant to PPV, as demonstrated in over 15 years of field testing in the U.S. and Europe. In order to make this variety available to breeders and growers in the U.S., dossiers were submitted to the U.S. regulatory agencies. This process ultimately led to the regulatory approval of ‘HoneySweet’ in the U.S. The work with ‘HoneySweet’ demonstrates that the regulatory process, while a significant effort, can be successfully navigated by public institution researchers. Nevertheless, the few examples of such success demonstrate a need for public institutions to find ways to encourage, support and reward researchers who pursue deregulation efforts. The long-standing successes of virus control in squash and papaya, and the current work with plum demonstrate the power and the safety of GE for specialty crop improvement. The commitment of researchers, institutional support, clear, science-based regulatory frameworks that build upon a developing knowledge base, industry support, and public outreach are components that are now necessary to move this technology forward to improve agricultural production and its sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atanassov D (1932) Plum pox. A new virus disease. Ann Univ Sofia, Fac Agric Silv 11:49–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Beachy RN, Loesh-Fries S, Tumer NE (1990) Coat protein-mediated resistance against virus infection. Annu Rev Phytopathol 28:451–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cambra M, Capote N, Myrta A, Llácer G (2006) Plum pox virus and the estimated costs associated with sharka disease. OEPP/EPPO Bull 36:202–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Capote N, Pérez-Panadés J, Monzó C, Carbonell E, Urbaneja A, Scorza R, Ravelonandro M, Cambra M (2008) Assessment of the diversity and dynamics of Plum pox virus and aphid populations in transgenic European plums under Mediterranean conditions. Transgenic Res 17:367–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Damsteegt VD, Scorza R, Stone AL, Schneider WL, Webb K, Demuth M, Gildow FE (2006) Prunus host range of Plum pox virus (PPV) in the United States by aphid and graft inoculation. Plant Dis 91:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch MMM, Manshardt RM, Gonsalves D, Slightom JL, Sanford JC (1990) Stable transformation of papaya via microprojective bombardment. Plant Cell Rep 9:189–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch MMM, Manshardt RM, Gonsalves D, Slightom JL, Sanford JC (1992) Virus resistant papaya plants derived from tissues bombarded with the coat protein gene of papaya ringspot virus. Biotechnology 10:1466–1472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs M, Cambra M, Capote N, Jelkmann W, Kundu J, Laval J, Martelli GP, Minafra A, Petrovic N, Pfeifffer P, Pompe-Novak M, Ravelonandro M, Saldarelli P, Stussi-Garaud C, Vigne E, Zagrai I (2007) Safety assessment of transgenic plums and grapevines expressing viral coat protein genes: new insights into real environmental impact of perennial plants engineered for virus resistance. J Plant Pathol 89:5–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gonsalves D (1998) Control of papaya ringspot virus in papaya – a case study. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:415–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann W, Petruschke M (2002) Sharka resistant plums and prunes by utilization of hypersensitivity. Acta Hortic 538:391–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Hily J-M, Scorza R, Malinowski T, Zawadzka B, Ravelonandro M (2004) Stability of gene silencing-based resistance to Plum pox virus in transgenic plum (Prunus domestica L.) under field conditions. Transgenic Res 13:427–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hily J-M, Scorza R, Webb K, Ravelonandro M (2005) Accumulation of the long class of siRNA is associated eith resistance to Plum pox virus in a transgenic woody perennial plum tree. MPMI 18:794–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levy L, Damsteegt V, Welliver R (2000) First report of Plum Pox Virus (Sharka Disease) in Prunus persica in the United States. Plant Dis 8:202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling K, Namba S, Gonsalves C, Slightom JL, Gonsalves D (1991) Protection against detrimental effects of potyvirus infection in transgenic tobacco plants expressing the papaya ringspot virus coat protein. Biotechnology 9:752–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski T, Cambra M, Capote N, Zawadzka B, Gorris MT, Scorza R, Ravelonandro M (2006) Field trials of plum clones transformed with the Plum pox virus coat protein (PPV-CP) gene. Plant Dis 90:1012–1018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mante S, Morgens PH, Scorza R, Cordts JM, Callahan AM (1991) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of plum (Prunus domestica L.) hypocotyls slices and regeneration of transgenic plants. Biotechnology 9:853–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver JE, Tennant PF, Fuchs M (2011) Virus resistant transgenic horticultural crops: safety issues and lessons from risk assessment studies. In: Beiquan M, Scorza R (eds) Transgenic horticultural crops: challenges and opportunities EDS. Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 263–288

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Polák J, Pívalová J, Svoboda J (2005) Prune cv. Jojo resistance to different strains of Plum pox virus. Plant Prot Sci 41:47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravelonandro M, Monsion M, Teycheney PY, Delbos R, Dunez J (1992) Construction of a chimeric viral gene expressing plum pox virus coat protein. Gene 120:167–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravelonandro M, Scorza R, Bachelier JC, Labonne G, Levy L, Damsteegt V, Callahan AM, Dunez J (1997) Resistance of transgenic Prunus domestica to plum pox virus infection. Plant Dis 81:1231–1235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz EMV, Soriano JM, Romero C, Zhebentyayeva T, Terol J, Zuriaga E, Llácer G, Abbott AG, Badenes ML (2011) Narrowing down the apricot Plum pox virus resistance locus and comparative analysis with the peach genome syntenic region. Mol Plant Pathol 12:535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scorza R, Levy L, Damsteegt V, Yepes LZ, Cordts J, Hadidi A, Slightom J, Gonsalves D (1995) Transformation of plum with the Papaya ringspot virus coat protein gene and reaction of transgenic plants to Plum pox virus. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 120:943–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Scorza R, Callahan A, Levy L, Damsteegt V, Webb K, Ravelonandro M (2001) Post-transcriptional gene silencing in plum pox virus resistant transgenic European plum containing the plum pox potyvirus coat protein gene. Transgenic Res 10:201–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Various authors (2006) Current status of Plum pox virus and sharka disease worldwide. OEPP/EPPO Bull 36:205–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagrai I, Capote N, Ravelonandro M, Cambra M, Zagrai I, Scorza R (2008) Plum pox virus silencing of C5 transgenic plums is stable under challenge inoculation with heterologous viruses. J Plant Pathol 90:S1.63–S1.71

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagrai I, Ravelonandro M, Gaboreanu I, Ferencz B, Scorza R, Zagrai L, Kelemen B,, Pamfil D, Popescu O (2011) Transgenic plums expressing the Plum Pox Virus coat protein gene do not assist the development of PPV recombinants under field conditions. J Plant Pathol 93:159–165

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Scorza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 US Government

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scorza, R., Callahan, A., Ravelonandro, M., Braverman, M. (2012). Development and Regulation of the Plum Pox Virus Resistant Transgenic Plum ‘HoneySweet’. In: Wozniak, C., McHughen, A. (eds) Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology: The United States and Canada. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2156-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics