Skip to main content

Emergence of Intentional Procedures in Self-Organizing Neural Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Causality, Meaningful Complexity and Embodied Cognition

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library A: ((TDLA,volume 46))

  • 1122 Accesses

Abstract

We have used a neural network formalism in order to analyze under which conditions a positive answer could be given to the following question: can neural networks self-organize so that not only structures and functions not explicitly programmed emerge from their dynamics, but also goals for intentional actions, set up and achieved by themselves?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Let us recall the classical description of intentional actions by the practical syllogysm:

    • Agent A desires to be in state S.

    • A knows or believe that C is a cause for S.

    • Therefore A performs C.

    This description assumes intentional mental states from the beginning, such as desire, knowledge, belief. In our model, knowledge or belief are just retrieved memories of previous causal events. In addition, as Elizabeth Anscombe rightfully noticed, the first proposition of the syllogism may be conflated with the third. Contrary to the usual demonstrative syllogism (Men are mortal, Socrates is a man, etc.), the first proposition here does not add information: it is contained in the “therefore” of the third proposition. Our model may be seen as a computer simulation of this modified syllogism, where intentional mental states causing intentional actions and different from them are not needed.

References

  • Anscombe GEM (1957) Intention. Basic Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlan H (1998a) Immanent causality: a spinozist viewpoint on evolution and theory of action. In: Vijver GVd (ed) Evolutionary systems. Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp 215–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlan H (1998b) Intentional self-organization. Emergence and reduction. Towards a physical theory of intentionality, Thesis Eleven 52:5–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers DJ (1995) The puzzle of conscious experience. Scientific Am 12:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio A (2003) Looking for Spinoza. Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Harvest Books, Harvest edition, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson D (1970) Mental events experience and theory. In: Foster L, Swanson J (eds) University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp 79–81; reprinted in Davidson D (1980), Essays on actions and events. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson D (1991, 1999). Spinoza’s causal theory of the affects. In: Yovel Y (ed) Ethica III. Desire and affect. Spinoza as psychologist. Little Room, New York, pp 95–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor JA (1981) Representations. MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Eimer M (1999) On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res 126:128–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J (2002) Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat Neurosci 5(4):382–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libet B (1985) Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behav Brain Sci 8:529–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libet B (1992) Models of conscious timing and the experimental evidence (Commentary/Dennett and Kinsbourne: Time and the Observer). Behav Brain Sci 15:213–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Libet B, Gleason CA, Wright EW, Pearl DK (1983) Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness potential): the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain 106:623–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llinas RR (2001) I of the vortex: from neurons to self. MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Louzoun Y, Atlan H (2007) The emergence of goals in a self-organizing network: a non-mentalist model of intentional actions. Neural Networks 20:156–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam H (1981) Reason, truth and history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shanon B (1993) The representational and the presentational. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza B (1677) The Ethics (engl. translation H.M. Elwes 1955). Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henri Atlan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Atlan, H., Louzoun, Y. (2010). Emergence of Intentional Procedures in Self-Organizing Neural Networks. In: Carsetti, A. (eds) Causality, Meaningful Complexity and Embodied Cognition. Theory and Decision Library A:, vol 46. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3529-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics