Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Handlungssteuerung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Allgemeine Psychologie

  • 60k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Entsprechend der Bedeutung der Planung und exekutiven Steuerung zielgerichteter Handlungen für das Verständnis unseres kognitiven Systems haben wir jetzt der Handlungssteuerung ein eigenes Kapitel gewidmet. Besprochen werden Steuerung, Regelung und Programmierung von einfachen Handlungsverläufen auch in Wechselwirkung zu ihren sensorischen Konsequenzen, sowie Ansätzen zu Mehrfachtätigkeiten, Aufgabenwechseln und der Überwachung der Handlungsdurchführung.

Movement provides the only means we have to interact with both the world and other people. (Wolpert et al. 2001)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679–685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, D. A., & Wylie, G. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan & A. Treisman (Hrsg.), Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (S. 273–296). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In E. Meyer & S. Kornblurn (Hrsg.), Synergies in Eperimental Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Neuroscience Attention and performance, (Bd. XVI, S. 182–218). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Hrsg.), Conscious and nonconscious information processing Attention and performance, (Bd. XV, S. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschersleben, G. (2008). Handlung und Wahrnehmung. In J. Müsseler (Hrsg.), Allgemeine Psychologie (S. 766–793). Berlin, Heidelberg: Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer (2011). Warum ich fühle was du fühlst. München: Heyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 539–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braver, T. S., Cohen, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., & Noll, D. C. (1997). A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. Neuroimage, 5, 49–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, B., Peery, S., & Anand, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 456–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1982). Task combination and selective intake of information. Acta Psychologica, 50, 253–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing model of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R., Wieda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682–686.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 423–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. (1979). Divided attention: The whole is more than the sum of its parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 216–228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., & Owen, A. M. (2000). Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 475–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, B., & Prinz, W. (2012). Psychologische Modelle der Handlungssteuerung. In H.-O. Karnath & P. Thier (Hrsg.), Kognitive Neurowissenschaften (S. 367–375). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 249–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1991). Effects of crossmodel divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 447–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954). S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Bülthoff, H. H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & McCabe, G. (1991). Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychologica, 77, 137–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gegenfurtner, et al. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, W. J., Coles, M., Meyer, D., & Donchin, E. (1990). The error-related negativity: an event-related brain potential accompanying errors. Psychophysiology, 27, 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M. A., & Humphrey, G. K. (1998). The objects of action and perception. Cognition, 67, 181–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, M. A., Pélisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748–750.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, G., Bosco, C. M., Kramer, A. F., Coles, M. G. H., Wickens, C. D., & Donchin, E. (1990). Eventrelated brain potentials as indices of information extraction and response priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75, 419–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1970). A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 20–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagendorf, H., Krummenacher, J., Müller, H.-J., & Schubert, T. (2011). Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hellige, J. B., Cowin, E. L., & Eng, T. (1995). Recognition of CVC syllables from LVF, RVF, and central locations: Hemispheric differences and interhemispheric interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 258–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hellige, J. B., Taylor, A. K., & Eng, T. L. (1989). Interhemispheric interaction when both hemispheres have access to the same stimulus information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 711–722.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a memory drum theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 31, 448–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J., Butz, M. V., Herbort, O., Kiesel, A., & Lenhard, A. (2007). Spekulationen zur Struktur ideo-motorischer Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 14, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1993a). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1993b). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC) A framework for perception and action planning. Behavior and Brain Science, 24, 849–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Hoopen, G., Akerboom, S., & Raaymakers, J. (1982). Vibrotactile choice reaction time, tactile receptor systems, and ideomotor compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 50, 143–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jolicoeur, P., & Dell’Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching – A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, I., & Rumiati, R. I. (2006). Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks. Psychological Research, 70, 448–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 284, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387–394.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lépine, D., Glencross, D., & Requin, J. (1989). Some experimental evidence for and against a parametric conception of movement programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 347–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J., Pashler, H., & Boer, E. (2006). Central interference in driving – is there any stopping the psychological refractory period? Psychological Science, 17, 228–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Randerath, J., Bauer, H., Marquardt, C., Goldenberg, G., & Hermsdörfer, J. (2009). Object properties and cognitive load in the formation of associative memory during precision lifting. Behavioural Brain Research, 196, 123–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald 3rd, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulated cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P. D. (1977). A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechsner, F., Kerzel, D., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature, 414, 69–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273–296.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, B. (1963). Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Archives of Neurology, 9, 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, P., & Pollmann, S. (2003). Division of labor between the hemispheres for complex but not simple tasks: An implemented connectionist model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S., Yeung, N., & Azuma, R. (2000). Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task? Psychological Research, 63, 250–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human information processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D., & Miller, J. O. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 438–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, O. (1992). Theorien der Aufmerksamkeit: Von Metaphern zu Mechanismen. Psychologische Rundschau, 43, 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Hrsg.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (S. 1–18). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prablanc, C., & Pélisson, D. (1990). Gaze saccade orienting and hand pointing are locked to their goal by quick internal loops. In M. Jeannerod (Hrsg.), Attention and performance (Bd. XIII, S. 653–676). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Hrsg.), Relationships between perception and action: current approaches. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbitt, P. (1966). How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. The New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 453–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Galese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci, 2, 661–670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Time course of movement planning: Selection of handgrips for object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1058–1073.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandson, J., & Albert, M. L. (1984). Varieties of perseveration. Neuropsychologia, 22, 715–732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandson, J., & Albert, M. L. (1987). Perseveration in behavioral neurology. Neurology, 37, 1736–1741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, S. J., & Fusella, V. (1970). Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 458–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, L. H. (1975). Multiple attention in continuous verbal tasks. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Hrsg.), Attention and Performance (Bd. V, S. 157–167). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T., & Burges, P. (1996). The domain of supervisory process and temporal organization of behavior. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 351, 1405–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 433–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C., & Read, L. (2003). Speech shadowing while driving: On the difficulty of splitting attention between eye and ear. Psychological Science, 14, 251–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Hrsg.), Information processing in motor control and learning (S. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. L., & Drews, F. A. (2007). Cell-phone-induced driver distraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 128–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12, 462–466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, L. (1976). Selective attention and secondary message analysis: A reconsideration of Broadbent’s filter model of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task Switching: Interplay of Reconfiguration and Interference Control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (2010). The Student’s Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, D. H., & Banich, M. (2000). The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. Neuropsychology, 14, 41–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. S. Nickerson (Hrsg.), Attention and Performance Bd. VIII Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., & Gopher, D. (1977). Control theory measures of tracking as indices of attention allocation strategies. Human Factors, 19, 249–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 487–494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3(Monograph Suppl), 1–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, N., & Monsell, S. (2003). Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 455–469.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111, 931–959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelaznik, & McCabe (1991). Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychologica, 77, 137–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Allgemeine Psychologie I und II, Universität Münster, Münster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Deutschland

    Christian Becker-Carus

  2. Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Mike Wendt

Authors
  1. Christian Becker-Carus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mike Wendt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Becker-Carus .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Becker-Carus, C., Wendt, M. (2017). Handlungssteuerung. In: Allgemeine Psychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53006-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53006-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53005-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53006-1

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation