Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

As is indicated by the Simon effect, choice reactions can be carried out faster when the response corresponds spatially to the stimulus, even if the stimulus location is irrelevant to the task. In Experiments 1–4 the relationships between the Simon effect and stimulus eccentricity, signal quality, and signal-background contrast are investigated. The Simon effect was found to interact with all of these factors, at least when manipulated blockwise. These results are at odds with previous results and are difficult to interpret from an additive-factor-method view. An alternative interpretation is suggested that attributes the results to the temporal relationship between the processing of the relevant stimulus information and stimulus location. The assumption is that a decrease in the Simon effect is caused by every experimental manipulation that markedly increases the temporal distance between the coding of the relevant stimulus information and that of the irrelevant stimulus location. This assumption was tested in Experiment 5 in a more direct way. The stimuli were built up on a screen over time, so that the temporal distance between the presence of location and identity information could be controlled experimentally. The results provide further support for a temporal-delay interpretation of interactions between irrelevant stimulus-response correspondence and factors that affect early stages of information processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta, E., & Simon, J. R. (1976). The effect of irrelevant information on the stages of processing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brebner, J., Shephard, M., & Cairney, P. (1972) Spatial relationships and S -R compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 36, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunia, H. (1987). Identifikation verschiedener Kompatibilitätstypen bei komplexen Wahlreaktionsexperimenten. Unpublished master's thesis, Darmstadt, Germany.

  • Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility — A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, D. G. (1979). Strategies, context, and the mechanism of response inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 382–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1988). Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: Theoretical distinctions and empirical results. Acta Psychologica, 67, 191–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, W. T., & Westberry, R. L. (1987). Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti, R., & Umilta, C. (1989). Splitting visual space with attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 164–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poffenberger, A. T. (1912). Reaction time to retinal stimulation with special reference to the time lost in conduction through nerve centers. Archives of Psychology, 23, 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1972). Reaktionszeit-Fraktionierung durch Varianzanalyse? Archiv für Psychologie, 124, 240–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbitt, P. M. (1967). Signal discriminability, S-R compatibility and choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 7, 419–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331–354). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A. F. (1990). Issues and trends in the debate on discrete vs. continuous processing of information. Acta Psychologica, 74, 123–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz, S. P., Pomerantz, J. R., & Egeth, H. E. (1977). State and process limitations in information processing: An additive factors analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 402–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R. (1982). Effect of an auditory stimulus on the processing of a visual stimulus under single- and dual-task conditions. Acta Psychologica, 51, 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., & Acosta, E. (1982). Effect of irrelevant information on the processing of relevant information: Facilitation and/or interference? The influence of experimental design. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., Acosta, E., Mewaldt, S. P., & Speidel, C. R. (1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., & Berbaum, K. (1990). Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: The ‘Stroop effect’ vs. the ‘Simon effect’. Acta Psychologica, 73, 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Effect of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 272–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., Craft, J. L., & Small, A. M. Jr., (1970). Manipulating the strength of a stereotype: Interference effects in an auditory information-processing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., Craft, J. L., & Small, A. M. Jr., (1971). Reactions toward the apparent source of an auditory stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., Mewaldt, S. P., Acosta, E., & Hu, J. (1976). Processing auditory information: Interaction of two population stereotypes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 354–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., & Pouraghabagher, A. R. (1978). The effect of aging on the stages of processing in a choice reaction time task. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 553–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & Pachella, R. G. (1977). Encoding, stimulus-response compatibility, and stages of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 411–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffels, E. J., Van der Molen, M. W., & Keuss, P. J. G. (1985). Intersensory facilitation and inhibition: Immediate arousal and location effects of auditory noise on visual choice reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 58, 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffels, E. J., Van der Molen, M. W., & Keuss, P. G. J. (1989). An additive factor analysis of the effect(s) of location cues associated with auditory stimuli on stages of information processing. Acta Psychologica, 70, 161–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffer, T. H. (1991). Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 53, 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. A. (1976). Stage analysis in reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 161–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S. P., MacQueen, G. M., & Brehaut, J. C. (1988). Negative priming between response modalities: Evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 523–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umilta, C., & Liotti, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S -R compatibility. Psychological research, 49, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1981). Short-term visual information forgetting. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Duren, L. L., & Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factor stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Acta Psychologica, 69, 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1988). Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Neuropsychologia, 26, 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachay, A. (1991). Diskrete und kontinuierliche Informationsverarbeitungsmodelle zur Erklärung von Reiz-Reactions-Inkompatibilitäten: Evidenz für einen Antwortkonflikt beim Simon-Effect. Unpublished master's thesis, Tübingen, Germany.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institut für Psychologische Forschung, Leopoldstrasse 24, D-80802, München, Germany

    Bernhard Hommel

Authors
  1. Bernhard Hommel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hommel, B. The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychol. Res 55, 280–290 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419688

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419688

Keywords

Search

Navigation