Skip to main content

Summary

Genetics-based methodologies for the design of physical artifacts offer great promise but are also fraught with several hazards. This chapter serves to illuminate some of these hazards in the hope that researchers can use this as a starting point for further work in this burgeoning field. Although the hazards are illustrated with a particular genetics-based methodology, these hazards are present in most, if not all, computational design methodologies, of which genetics-based methodologies are a particularly interesting subset. This chapter briefly outlines the generic process employed by genetics-based design methodologies and the particular methodology employed for illustration. The remainder of the chapter explores some of the hazards associated with these methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Buckley. Multicriteria evaluation: measures, manipulation, and meaning. Environment and Planning B, 15 (1) : 55–64, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jonathan Cagan and Alice M. Agogino. Innovative design of mechanical structures from first principles. AI EDAM, 1(3):169–189, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. L. Dym. Representation and problem-solving: the foundations of engineering design. Environment and Planning B, 19(1):97–105, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Eschanauer, J. Koski, and A. Osyczka, editors. Multicriteria Design Optimization. Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Susan Finger and John R. Dixon. A review of research in mechanical engineering design. part I: Descriptive, prescriptive and computer-based models of design processes. Research in Engineering Design, 1:51–67, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Susan Finger and John R. Dixon. A review of research in mechanical engineering design. part II: Representations, analysis and design for the life cycle. Research in Engineering Design, 1:121–137, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Finger and J. R. Rinderle. A transformational approach to mechanical design using a bond graph grammar. In Design Theory and Methodology, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carlos M. Fonseca and Peter J. Fleming. Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Formulation, discussion and generalization. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 416–423, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John Gero, ed. Microcomputers in Civil Engineering: Special Issue: Evolutionary Systems in Design, May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Gips and G. Stiny. Production Systems and Grammars. Environment and Planning B. 7:399–408. 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ralph L. Keeney and Howard Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scott Mullins and James R. Rinderle. Grammatical approaches to engineering design, part 1: An introduction and commentary. Research in Engineering Design, 2:121–135, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Pahl and W. Beitz. Engineering Design. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poli, Riccardo. Discovery of Symbolic, Neuro-Symbolic and Neural Networks with Parallel Distributed Genetic Programming. University of Birmingham, School of Computer Science, CSRP-96–12, August, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Reddy and J. Cagan. An improved shape annealing method for truss topology generation. Accepted in ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. James R. Rinderle. Grammatical approaches to engineering design, part II: Melding configuration and parametric design using attribute grammars. Research in Engineering Design, 2:137–146, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerald P. Roston. A Genetic Methodology for Configuration Design. Ph.D. Thesis (also available as a technical report — CMU-RI-TR-94–42), Carnegie Mellon University, December 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T.L. Saaty. Decision Making for Leaders. Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, CA, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. George N. Sandor and Arthur G. Erdman. Advanced Mechanism Design: Analysis and Synthesis, Volume 2. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.C. Schmidt and J. Cagan. Recursive annealing: A computational model for machine design. Accepted in Research in Engineering Design, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Joseph E. Shigley and John J. Uicker. Theory of Machines and Mechanisms. McGraw Hill Book Company, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Simon, H. A. Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley, 1957.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Stiny. Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars. Environment and Planning B. 7:343–351, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. H. Sturges, K. O’Shaughnessy and R. G. Reed. A systematic approach to conceptual design based on function logic. International Journal of Concurrent Engineering, 1(2):93–106, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D. G. Ullman, T. G. Dietterich, and L. A. Stauffer. A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data. AI EDAM, 2(1):33–52, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Voogd. Multicriteria evaluation: measures, manipulation, and meaning — a reply. Environment and Planning B, 15 (1) :65–72, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roston, G.P. (1997). Hazards in Genetic Design Methodologies. In: Dasgupta, D., Michalewicz, Z. (eds) Evolutionary Algorithms in Engineering Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03423-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03423-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08282-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03423-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics