Abstract
Epigenetics, a relatively young discipline in science, is expected to grow steadily and add a fund of knowledge to the life sciences in the future. Regarding the fields of biology and medicine, theoretical questions about epigenetics concern its status in the nexus between nucleotide sequence and gene regulation. Uncertainties for the social sciences relate to the absence of knowledge and the absence of abilities as sociological categories. Ethical problems particularly pertain to the topics of communication about scientific knowledge and about risk as well as to intergenerational justice, reproduction, and the responsibilities of governments and administrations in society. At the moment, a focus of ethical reflection is laid on the education of the public. Information in the media should be adapted to the knowledge that has already been achieved in the sciences. For this purpose, recommendations by learned societies and scholarly organizations can provide standards for orientation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bird, A. (2007). Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature, 447, 396–398.
Brukamp, K. (2013). Nichtwissen in der Neuromedizin: Wissenschaftliches Wissen und Nichtwissen bei gegenwärtigen Neurointerventionen im Gehirn. In C. Peter, & D. Funcke (Eds.), Wissen an der Grenze. Zum Umgang mit Ungewissheit und Unsicherheit in der modernen Medizin (pp. 309–338). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (Eds.), Rehaag, R., Tils, G., Röder, B., Ulbig, E., Kurzenhäuser-Carstens, S., Lohmann, M., Böl, G.-F. (2013). Zielgruppengerechte Risikokommunikation zum Thema Nahrungsergänzungsmittel. Abschlussbericht. Berlin: BfR-Wissenschaft 03/2013. www.bfr.bund.de/cm/350/zielgruppengerechte-risikokommunikation-zum-thema-nahrungsergaenzungsmittel.pdf. Last access March 2016.
Chadwick, R., & O’Connor, A. (2013). Epigenetics and personalized medicine: Prospects and ethical issues. Personalized Medicine, 10(5), 463–471.
Dolinoy, D. C. (2008). The agouti mouse model: An epigenetic biosensor for nutritional and environmental alterations on the fetal epigenome. Nutrition Reviews, 66(Suppl 1), 7–11.
Dupras, C., Ravitsky, V., & Williams-Jones, B. (2012). Epigenetics and the environment in bioethics. Bioethics, 28(7), 327–334.
Eccleston, A., DeWitt, N., Gunter, C., Marte, B., & Nath, D. (2007). Epigenetics. Nature, 447, 395.
Feil, R., & Fraga, M. F. (2012). Epigenetics and the environment: Emerging patterns and implications. Nature Reviews Genetics, 13, 97–109.
Feinberg, A. P. (2007). Phenotypic plasticity and the epigenetics of human disease. Nature, 447, 433–440.
Feldmann, R., Löser, H., & Weglage, J. (2007). Fetales Alkoholsyndrom (FAS). Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 9, 853–865.
Fraser, P., & Bickmore, W. (2007). Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. Nature, 447, 413–417.
Guibet Lafaye, C. (2013). Ethical issues raised by research in epigenetics. Presentation at the UNESCO Chair in Bioethics 9th World Conference (November 19–21, 2013). www.academia.edu/5161957/Ethical_issues_raised_by_research_in_epigenetics. Last access March 2016.
Hedlund, M. (2010). Epigenetic responsibility. Papper att presenteras på Statsvetenskapliga förbundets årsmöte Göteborg 30 september–2 oktober 2010. Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Lunds universitet. pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1315/1315810_maria-hedlund-epigenetic-responsibility.pdf. Last access March 2016.
Ito, T., Ando, H., & Handa, H. (2011). Teratogenic effects of thalidomide: Molecular mechanisms. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 68, 1569–1579.
Jirtle, R. L., & Skinner, M. K. (2007). Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 253–262.
Kay, M. A. (2011). State-of-the-art gene-based therapies: The road ahead. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12, 316–328.
Kerwin, A. (1993). None too solid: Medical ignorance. Science Communication, 15, 166–185.
Knoppers, B. M. (2009). Genomics and policymaking: From static models to complex systems? Human Genetics, 125(4), 375–379.
Koletzko, B. (2013). Ernährung in der Schwangerschaft. Für das Leben des Kindes prägend. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 110(13), A 612–A 613.
Landgraf, M., & Heinen, F. (2012). S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik des Fetalen Alkoholsyndroms. Kurzfassung. AWMF-Registernr.: 022–025. www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/022-025k_s3_Fetales_Alkohol-Syndrom_Diagnostik_Kurzfassung_2012-12.pdf. Last access March 2016.
Landgraf, M. N., Nothacker, M., Kopp, I. B., & Heinen, F. (2013). Diagnose des Fetalen Alkoholsyndroms. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 110(42), 703–710.
Loi, M., Del Savio, L., & Stupka, E. (2013). Social epigenetics and equality of opportunity. Public Health Ethics, 6(2), 142–153.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
Nicolosi, G., & Ruivenkamp, G. (2012). The epigenetic turn. Some notes about the epistemological change of perspective in biosciences. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 15(3), 309–319.
Pickersgill, M., Niewöhner, J., Müller, R., Martin, P., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2013). Mapping the new molecular landscape: Social dimensions of epigenetics. New Genetics and Society, 32(4), 429–447.
Portela, A., & Esteller, M. (2010). Epigenetic modifications and human disease. Nature Biotechnology, 28(10), 1057–1068.
Rodenhiser, D., & Mann, M. (2006). Epigenetics and human disease: Translating basic biology into clinical applications. CMAJ, 174(3), 341–348.
Rothstein, M. A. (2013). Legal and ethical implications of epigenetics. In R. L. Jirtle, & F. L. Tyson, Environmental epigenomics in health and disease. Epigenetics and complex diseases (pp. 297–308). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Rothstein, M. A., Cai, Y., & Marchant, G. E. (2009). The ghost in our genes: Legal and ethical implications of epigenetics. Health Matrix Clevel, 19(1), 1–62.
Tycko, J., Fields, D., Cabrera, D., Charawi, M., & Kaptur, B. (2013). The potential of epigenetic therapy and the need for elucidation of risks. Penn Bioethics Journal VII (ii): 1–4. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. 2013 http://igem.org/wiki/images/a/ae/Penn_iGEM_2013_PBJ_Article.pdf. Last access March 2016.
Wehling, P. (2006). Im Schatten des Wissens? Perspektiven der Soziologie des Nichtwissens. Konstanz: UVK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brukamp, K. (2017). Epigenetics: Biological, Medical, Social, and Ethical Challenges. In: Heil, R., Seitz, S., König, H., Robienski, J. (eds) Epigenetics. Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14460-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14460-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14459-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14460-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)