Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 140))

Abstract

This chapter describes two different approaches to simplifying the complexities of courseware design. The first approach is called the Guided Approach to Instructional Design Advising (GAIDA). GAIDA provides general instructional design guidance based on Gagné’s (1985) nine events of instruction along with completely worked courseware exemplars to illustrate the guidance. The second approach is called the Experimental Advanced Instructional Design Advisor (XAIDA). XAIDA is more ambitious and offers automated instructional strategies in addition to the more general kind of guidance found in GAIDA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, A. (1989). Evaluating appropriate technology for development: Before and after. Evaluation Review, 13(3), 310–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S. (1989). A human activity approach to user interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 4(3), 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Nye, N. (1989). A perspective on cognitive research and its implications for instruction. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canfield, A. M., & Spector, J. M. (1991). A pilot study of the naming transaction shell (AL-TP-1991-006). Brooks AFB,TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, K., Lamb, T. A., & Bennett, W. R. (1992). Introduction to training decisions modeling technologies: The training decisions system (AL-TP-1992-0014). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchastel, P. C. (1990). Cognitive designs for instructional design. Instructional Science, 19, 437–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (1993). Designing graphics to support mental models. In J. M. Spector, M. C Poison, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1992). Tryout of an organizing strategy for lesson design: Maintenance procedure with checklist (AL-TP-1992-0016). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1993). Computer-based instructional guidance. In J. M. Spector, M. Ç.Poison, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Merrill, M. D. (1990). Integrative goals for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., Tennyson, R. D., & Gettman, D. J. (1991). Designing an advanced instructional design advisor: Conceptual frameworks (Vol 5 of 6) (AL-TP-1991-0017-Vol-5). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halff, H. M. (1993). Prospects for automating instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. C. Poison, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. M., Gott, S. P., & Pokorny, R. A. (in press). A procedural guide to cognitive task analysis: The PARI methodology (AL-TP-1992-xxxx). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, R. M. (1988). Moment by moment variation in expert’s analytic and intuitive cognitive activity. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18, 757–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, A. E., Spector, J. M., & Muraida, D. J. (1991). Design specifications for the advanced instructional design advisor (AIDA) (AL-TR-1991-0085). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S., Ward, T. J., Hannafin, M. J., & Clark M. B. (1985). Effect of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 668–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kageff, L. L., & Roberts, E. J. (1989). TIPS: An expert system with the user in mind. Ford Aerospace internal document.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61,(34) 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill. M. D. (1993). An integrated model for automating instructional design and delivery. In J. M. Spector, M. C Poison, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. Li, Z., & Jones, M. K. (1990). The second generation instructional design research program. Educational Technology, 30(3), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraida, D. J. (1994). Evaluating an instructional development system. In R. D. Tennyson (Ed.), Automating instructional design, development, and delivery. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraida, D. J., Spector, J. M., O’Neil, H. F., & Mariino, M. R. (1993). Evaluation issues in automating instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. C. Poison, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, W. A., Magliaro, S., & Sherman, T. M. (1988). The intellectual content of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 11(1), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, R. S., & Neiderman, E. C. (1992). Modeling the expert training developer. In R. J. Seidel & P. Chatelier (Eds.), Advanced training technologies applied to training design. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirolli, P. & Russell, D. M. (1990). The instructional design environment: Technology to support design problem solving. Instructional Science, 19, 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, E., & Knight, K. K. (1991). Artificial intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 65–86.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (1990). Designing and developing an advanced instructional design advisor (AFHRL-TP-90-52). Brooks AFB, TX: Human Resources Laboratory, Technical Training Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (1993). Approaches to automating instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. C. Poison, & D. J, Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., Gagné, R. M., Muraida, D. J., & Dimitroff, W. A. (1992, April). Intelligent frameworks for instructional design. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., & Muraida, D. J. (1991a, March). When CBT speaks: Guidelines for incorporating audio. Paper presented at the annual CBT Conference and Exposition, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., & Muraida, D. J. (1991b). Evaluating transaction theory. Education Technology, 31(10), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., & Muraida, D. J. (1992, November). An intelligent framework for the creation of effective computer-based instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Development of Computer-based Instructional Systems, Norfolk, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., Muraida, D. J., & Dallman, B. E. (1990). Establishing instructional strategies for advanced interactive technologies. Proceedings of the Psychology in the DoD Symposium (USAFA-TR-90-1). USAFA, CO: USAF Academy, Dep. of Behavioral Sciences & Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, R. D. (1991). Framework specifications for an instructional systems development expert system. In R. M. Gagné, R. D. Tennyson, & D. J. Gettman, Designing an advanced instructional design advisor: Conceptual frameworks (Vol 5 of 6) (AL-TP-1991-0017-Vol-5).Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, R. D. (1993). A framework for automating instructional design. In J. M. Spector, M. C Poison, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. (1992, April). The practice of instructional design: A survey of what designers do, don’t do, and why they don’t do it. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • vanMerrienboer, J. J., Krammer, H. P. M., & Maaswinkel, R. M. (1994). Automating the planning and construction of programming assignments for teaching introductory computer programming. In R. D. Tennyson (Ed.), Automating instructional design, development, and delivery. NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 119. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wipond, K. & Jones, M. (1990). Curriculum and knowledge representation in a knowledge-based system for curriculum development. Educational Technology, 30(3), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Spector, J.M., Song, D. (1995). Automated Instructional Design Advising. In: Tennyson, R.D., Barron, A.E. (eds) Automating Instructional Design: Computer-Based Development and Delivery Tools. NATO ASI Series, vol 140. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57821-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57821-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63366-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57821-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics