Abstract
We review the engineering of passive quantum networks for performing fundamental quantum communications tasks, such as the transfer, routing, and splitting of signals that are associated with quantum states. After an introduction to fundamental concepts and notions, the problem of quantum state transfer is discussed for networks of various physical and logical topologies. The discussion is cast in terms of a unified theoretical formalism, which is perfectly suited to addressing the problem in the context of various physical realizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For a d-dimensional system the unit of quantum information is the qudit.
- 2.
The energy separation of successive orbitals in a node is assumed to be much larger than the coupling constants between adjacent nodes, as well as than the typical energy scales of various excitation mechanisms.
- 3.
It should be sufficiently large with respect to decoherence mechanisms, but at the same time sufficiently small with respect to other system parameters e.g., the energy separation between successive orbitals, so that the dynamics are restricted to equivalent orbitals only.
- 4.
In a classical setting, this can be achieved by means of the so-called internet-protocol (IP) addresses. As the message arrives at each node, the corresponding device checks the destination address contained in the message to see if it matches its own address. If the two addresses match the device processes the message, otherwise it does nothing. Clearly, no addressing is required in a PP topology since any data transmitted from one node is intended for the other node.
- 5.
For instance, if the network is viewed as part of a larger fault-tolerant quantum-information processor, the probability of errors at the end of the transfer must be below ≈10−4 [1].
- 6.
- 7.
For more general mappings, one has to relax the constraint of the evolution operator being a permutation (e.g., see [13]).
- 8.
A closed cycle is a permutation or sub-permutation, which cannot be decomposed further.
- 9.
Clearly, the labelling of the basis states in \(\mathbb{B}_{j}\) is to some extent ambiguous. One may consider any ordering for which Eq. (2.33) yields a complete set of eigenstates of \(\hat{\mathcal{P}}_{j}\). In this case, the ambiguity is unimportant, and does not affect our approach.
- 10.
Thereby the notation (2, 3) means that starting from the original site ordering of the sites {1, 2, 3, 4}, the second site is replaced by the third and the third site by the second.
- 11.
We have simplified the notation relative to the previous section, but the overall approach remains the same.
- 12.
We focus on the case of Hamiltonians with non-degenerate spectrum. The case of degenerate spectrum can be treated similarly and leads to NN-type Hamiltonians with vanishing couplings i.e., to a broken network and thus QST from the first to the last site is impossible.
- 13.
Recall here that, in view of the previous discussion, it is sufficient to consider the transformation of the basis states for our purposes.
- 14.
In the same fashion (i.e., by setting U j, ξ j, ξ →∞) one can formally describe the Pauli principle, which does not allow two electrons with the same state, to occupy the same site.
- 15.
As long as we are interested in networks that are insensitive to different degrees of freedom, the subspaces \(\mathbb{H}_{2}^{(<)}\) and \(\mathbb{H}_{2}^{(>)}\) are equivalent, and the case of s 1 > s 2 is covered by the present discussion on the case s 1 < s 2.
- 16.
By contrast to passive networks of logical bus topology where the state is transferred successively to different destination nodes, here the transfer pertains to one of the two available output nodes, and the choice is performed in a controlled manner.
- 17.
As we have seen, the main effect of the unperturbed Hamiltonians \(\hat{\mathcal{H}}_{k}^{(0)}\) is the introduction of an accumulated phase at the end of the transfer which, however, is fixed and known in the absence of disorder and other imperfections. Hence, for the time being we focus on the interaction part of the Hamiltonian.
References
M.A. Nielsen, I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)
A.B. Kuklov, B.V. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 100401 (2003)
L.M. Duan, E. Demler, M.D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 090402 (2003)
S.R. Clark, C.M. Alves, D. Jaksch, New J. Phys. 7, 124 (2005)
S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999)
P. Ciccarelli, P. Faulkner, Networking Foundations: Technology Fundamentals for IT Success (Sybex, San Francisco, 2004)
S. Steinke, Network Tutorial (CMP Books, San Francisco, 2003)
T. Brougham, G.M. Nikolopoulos, I. Jex, Phys. Rev. A 80, 052325 (2009)
S. Bose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 207901 (2003)
A. Kay, Phys. Rev. A 84, 022337 (2011)
G.M. Nikolopoulos, Phys. Rev. A 87, 042311 (2013)
V. Kostak, G.M. Nikolopoulos, I. Jex, Phys. Rev. A 75, 042319 (2007)
T. Brougham, G.M. Nikolopoulos, I. Jex, Phys. Rev. A 83, 022323 (2011)
P. Törmä, S. Stenholm, I. Jex, Phys. Rev. A 52, 4853 (1995)
G.M. Nikolopoulos, D. Petrosyan, P. Lambropoulos, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, 4991 (2004)
Z. Bialynicka-Birula, I. Bialynicka-Birula, J.H. Eberly, B.W. Shore, Phys. Rev. A 16, 2048 (1977)
R.J. Cook, B.W. Shore, Phys. Rev. A 20, 539 (1979)
J.H. Eberly, B.W. Shore, Z. Bialynicka-Birula, I. Bialynicka-Birula, Phys. Rev. A 16, 2038 (1977)
M. Christandl, N. Datta, A. Ekert, A.J. Landahl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 187902 (2004)
R. Gordon, Opt. Lett. 29, 2752 (2004)
M.B. Plenio, J. Hartley, J. Eisert, New J. Phys. 6(1), 36 (2004)
G.M. Nikolopoulos, D. Petrosyan, P. Lambropoulos, Europhys. Lett. 65, 297 (2004)
A. Kay, M. Ericsson, New J. Phys. 7, 143 (2005)
S. Yang, Z. Song, C. Sun, Eur. Phys. J. B 52, 377 (2006)
A. Kay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010501 (2007)
H.L. Haselgrove, Phys. Rev. A 72, 062326 (2005)
P. Kurzyński, A. Wójcik, Phys. Rev. A 83, 062315 (2011)
S. Bose, Contemp Phys. 48, 13 (2007)
M.H. Yung, S. Bose, Phys. Rev. A 71, 032310 (2005)
P. Karbach, J. Stolze, Phys. Rev. A 72, 030301 (2005)
A. Kay, Phys. Rev. A 73, 032306 (2006)
C. Albanese, M. Christands, N. Datta, A. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 230502 (2004)
T. Shi, Y. Li, Z. Song, C.P. Sun, Phys. Rev. A 71, 032309 (2005)
X.Q. Xi, J.B. Gong, T. Zhang, R.H. Yue, W.M. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. D 50, 193 (2008)
M.H. Yung, Phys. Rev. A 74, 030303(R) (2006)
R. Hanson, L.P. Kouwenhoven, J.R. Petta, S. Tarucha, L.M.K. Vandersypen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1217 (2007)
D. Petrosyan, B. Schmidt, J.R. Anglin, M. Fleischhauer, Phys. Rev. A 76, 033606 (2007)
A.J. Daley, A. Kantian, H.P. Büchler, P. Zoller, K. Winkler, G. Thalhammer, F. Lang, R. Grimm, J.H. Denschlag, in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 869, ed. by C. Roos, H. Häffner, R. Blatt (2006), vol. 869, p. 212
J.H. Denschlag, A.J. Daley, in Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, vol. 164, ed. by M. Inguscio, W. Ketterle, C. Salomon (2007), vol. 164, p. 677
D. Petrosyan, G.M. Nikolopoulos, P. Lambropoulos, Phys. Rev. A 81, 042307 (2010)
A. Yariv, P. Yue, Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications (Oxford University, New York, 2006)
N. Dagli, G. Snider, J. Waldman, E. Hu, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 1047 (1991)
J.A. del Alamo, C.C. Eugster, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 78 (1990)
S. Fan, P.R. Villeneuve, J.D. Joannopoulos, H.A. Haus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 960 (1998)
G.M. Nikolopoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 200502 (2008)
B.W. Shore, The Theory of Coherent Atomic Excitation (Wiley, New York, 1990)
Y. Li, Z. Song, C.P. Sun, Commun. Theor. Phys. 48, 445 (2007)
P.J. Pemberton-Ross, A. Kay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 020503 (2011)
I. D’Amico, B.W. Lovett, T.P. Spiller, Phys. Rev. A 76, 030302(R) (2007)
D. Zueco, F. Galve, S. Kohler, P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. A 80, 042303 (2009)
M.I. Makin, J.H. Cole, C.D. Hill, A.D. Greentree, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 017207 (2012)
T. Tufarelli, V. Giovannetti, Phys. Rev. A 79(2), 022313 (2009)
V. Karimipour, M.S. Rad, M. Asoudeh, Phys. Rev. A 85, 010302 (2012)
F.A.A. El-Orany, M.R.B. Wahiddin, Journal of Physics B: Atomic Mol Opt Phys 43, 085502 (2010)
G.M. Nikolopoulos, A. Hoskovec, I. Jex, Phys. Rev. A 85, 062319 (2012)
L. Banchi, T.J.G. Apollaro, A. Cuccoli, R. Vaia, P. Verrucchi, Phys. Rev. A 82, 052321 (2010)
L. Banchi, A. Bayat, P. Verrucchi, S. Bose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 140501 (2011)
M. Avellino, A.J. Fisher, S. Bose, Phys. Rev. A 74, 012321 (2006)
G. Gualdi, V. Kostak, I. Marzoli, P. Tombesi, Phys. Rev. A 78, 022325 (2008)
G. Burkard, D. Loss, D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. B 59, 2070 (1999)
S. Longhi, Phys. Rev. B 82, 041106 (2010)
M. Bellec, G.M. Nikolopoulos, S. Tzortzakis, Opt. Lett. 37, 4504 (2012)
Acknowledgements
I. J. received funding from MSM 6840770039, RVO 68407700 and GACR 13-33906S. A. H. was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague, grant No. SGS13/217/OHK4/3T/14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nikolopoulos, G.M., Brougham, T., Hoskovec, A., Jex, I. (2014). Communication in Engineered Quantum Networks. In: Nikolopoulos, G., Jex, I. (eds) Quantum State Transfer and Network Engineering. Quantum Science and Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39937-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39937-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39936-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39937-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)