Skip to main content

Material Strain Tensor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Generalized Continua as Models for Materials

Part of the book series: Advanced Structured Materials ((STRUCTMAT,volume 22))

Abstract

The problem of description of large inelastic deformations of solids is considered. On a simple discrete model it is shown that the classical concept of deformations used in continuum mechanics can exhibit serious difficulties due to reorganizations of the internal structure of materials. The way of construction of constitutive equations in continuum mechanics aimed to avoid these problems is proposed. A method of introduction of material strain tensor for the inelastic continuum is suggested. The paper is based on the report: P. A. Zhilin, A.  Krivtsov: Point mass simulation of inelastic extension process. It was prepared for the ICIAM 95 (Third International Congress on Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Hamburg, Germany, July 3–7, 1995), but not accepted for publication.

P. A. Zhilin–deceased. The original text by \(\displaystyle \fbox {P. A. Zhilin (1942-2005)}\) is presented in Sects. 1, 3 and 4 with some explanatory addenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Among such theories probably the best results in explanation of experimental phenomena are given by the so-called “deformation theory” of H. Hencky, sometimes much better than the rate theory can do [13]. As it can be seen from below, there are serious reasons for that.

  2. 2.

    This model was proposed by P. A. Zhilin and analyzed by A. Krivtsov.

  3. 3.

    Here it is used: \(\displaystyle \dot{\varvec{Q}}\varvec{\!}\cdot \!\varvec{Q}^T\)—antisymmetric tensor, identity \(\displaystyle {\varvec{A}\varvec{\cdot \cdot }\varvec{B}\varvec{\!}\cdot \!\varvec{C} = \varvec{A}\varvec{\!}\cdot \!\varvec{B}\varvec{\cdot \cdot }\varvec{C}}\) and statement: \(\displaystyle {\varvec{A}\varvec{\cdot \cdot }\varvec{B}=\mathrm{0},\quad \forall \varvec{A}:\ \varvec{A}^T=-\varvec{A}\quad \Rightarrow \quad \varvec{B}^T = \varvec{B}}\).

  4. 4.

    This statement becomes more evident if we consider the linear theory. Indeed, in the linear theory the elasticity relations have the form \(\displaystyle \varvec{\tau }= \mathbf C \varvec{\cdot \cdot }\varvec{\varepsilon }\), where \(\displaystyle \mathbf C \) is the stiffness tensor and \(\displaystyle \varvec{\varepsilon }\) is the linear strain tensor, which has pure geometrical definition. In the case of an anisotropic material the principal axis of the tensors \(\displaystyle \varvec{\varepsilon }\) and \(\displaystyle \mathbf C \varvec{\cdot \cdot }\varvec{\varepsilon }\) have different orientations. In our case we have to introduce an alternative strain tensor \(\displaystyle \varvec{\mathcal{{E}}}\) in such way, that it should be coaxial to the tensor \(\displaystyle \mathbf C \varvec{\cdot \cdot }\varvec{\mathcal{{E}}}\). It is clear, that such a strain tensor should by some means take into account the anisotropy of the material.

  5. 5.

    This proof is suggested by A. Krivtsov, the original proof by P.A. Zhilin unfortunately is lost.

  6. 6.

    This result was obtained by P. A. Zhilin and it was explained in private communications to his pupils before 1995, however it was not officially published. In 1995 a short paper with this result was submitted to ICIAM 95 proceedings, however it was rejected. In 1997 a paper by other authors was published in Acta Mechanica [9], where the same result is presented as obtained for the first time.

  7. 7.

    Proof of these statements by P. A. Zhilin unfortunately is not preserved.

  8. 8.

    Frequently an alternative form of the corotational rate is used, where the difference is in the sign of \(\displaystyle \varvec{\Omega }\). This is because the definition of the gradient of a vector can be as in this chapter and [7] or in the transposed form. As a consequence the sign of the spin tensor can differ.

  9. 9.

    This formula for logarithmic rate differs from the one in [9] by the sign of \(\displaystyle \varvec{\Omega }^{log}\) (see the previous footnote).

  10. 10.

    For some particular strain fields (e.g. when all the tensors \(\displaystyle \varvec{H}\) are coaxial) the tensor \(\displaystyle \varvec{\Omega }^{\log }\) is reduced to the vorticity tensor \(\displaystyle (\varvec{\nabla }\varvec{v})^A\) and logarithmic rate became Jaumann’s rate. However in general case the representation for \(\displaystyle \varvec{\Omega }^{\log }\) is much more complex, which is connected with existence of two independent rotations—rotation of media and rotation of the main axis of the strain tensor.

  11. 11.

    Personal communication by O.T. Bruhns

  12. 12.

    Personal communication by O.T. Bruhns

References

  1. Truesdell, C.: First Course in Rational Continuum Mechanics: General Concepts (2nd edn.), vol. 1. Academic Press, San Diego (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Palmov, V.A.: Vibrations of Elasto-Plastic Bodies. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Altenbach, H.: Kontinuumsmechanik - Eine elementare Einführung in die materialunabhängigen und materialabhängigen Gleichungen. Springer-Vieweg, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morse, P.M.: Diatomic molecules according to the wave mechanics. II. Vibrational levels. Phys. Rev. 34(1), 57–64 (1929)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Krivtsov, A.: Deformation and Fracture of Solids with Microstructure (in Russ.). Fizmatlit, Moscow (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lurie, A.I.: Nonlinear Theory of Elasticity. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lurie, A.I.: Theory of Elasticity. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Lebedev, L.P., Cloud, M.J., Eremeyev, V.A.: Tensor Analysis with Applications to Mechanics. World Scientific, Singapore (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao, H., Bruhns, O.T., Meyers, A.: Logarithmic strain, logarithmic spin and logarithmic rate. Acta. Mech. 124, 89–105 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Palmov, V.A.: Fundamental Laws of Nature in Nonlinear Thermomechanics of Deformoble Bodies (in Russ.). SPbSTU Publishing, St. Petersburg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Golovanov, A.I.: Kinematics of finite deformations 3D isoparametrical finite elements for shells (in Russ.). Probl. Strength. Plast. 70, 109–122 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao, H., Bruhns, O.T., Meyers, A.: Existence and uniqueness of the integrable-exactly hypoelastic equation \({{\vec{\tau }} }^{\circ *} = \lambda ({\rm {tr}}{\bf {D}}){\bf {I}}+2\upmu {\bf {D}}\) and its significance to finite inelasticity. Acta. Mech. 138, 31–50 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao, H., Bruhns, O.T., Meyers, A.: Elastoplasticity beyond small deformations. Acta.Mech. 182, 31–111 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Korobeynikov, S.N.: Families of continuous spin tensors and applications in continuum mechanics. Acta. Mech. 216, 301–332 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiao, H., Bruhns, O.T., Meyers, A.: A new aspect in the kinematics of large deformations. In: Gupta, N.K. (ed.) Plasticity and Impact Mechanics, pp. 100–109. New Age International Ltd Publishing, New Delhi (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bruhns, O.T., Meyers, A., Xiao, H.: On non-corotational rates of Oldroyd’s type and relevant issues in rate constitutive formulations. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. A. 460, 909–928 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are deeply grateful to O.T. Bruhns for helpful discussions of the final version of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Krivtsov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhilin, P.A., Altenbach, H., Ivanova, E.A., Krivtsov, A. (2013). Material Strain Tensor. In: Altenbach, H., Forest, S., Krivtsov, A. (eds) Generalized Continua as Models for Materials. Advanced Structured Materials, vol 22. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36394-8_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics