Skip to main content

Measuring Permissiveness in Parity Games: Mean-Payoff Parity Games Revisited

  • Conference paper
Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis (ATVA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6996))

Abstract

We study nondeterministic strategies in parity games with the aim of computing a most permissive winning strategy. Following earlier work, we measure permissiveness in terms of the average number/weight of transitions blocked by a strategy. Using a translation into mean-payoff parity games, we prove that deciding (the permissiveness of) a most permissive winning strategy is in NP∩coNP. Along the way, we provide a new study of mean-payoff parity games. In particular, we give a new algorithm for solving these games, which beats all previously known algorithms for this problem.

Sponsored by ANR-06-SETI-003 DOTS, and by ESF-Eurocores LogICCC GASICS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernet, J., Janin, D., Walukiewicz, I.: Permissive strategies: from parity games to safety games. RAIRO – ITA 36(3), 261–275 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bloem, R., Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A., Jobstmann, B.: Better quality in synthesis through quantitative objectives. In: Bouajjani, A., Maler, O. (eds.) CAV 2009. LNCS, vol. 5643, pp. 140–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouyer, P., Duflot, M., Markey, N., Renault, G.: Measuring permissivity in finite games. In: Bravetti, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) CONCUR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5710, pp. 196–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouyer, P., Fahrenberg, U., Larsen, K.G., Markey, N., Srba, J.: Infinite runs in weighted timed automata with energy constraints. In: Cassez, F., Jard, C. (eds.) FORMATS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5215, pp. 33–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouyer, P., Markey, N., Olschewski, J., Ummels, M.: Measuring permissiveness in parity games: Mean-payoff parity games revisited. Research Report LSV-11-17, Laboratoire Spécification et Vérification, ENS Cachan, France (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chakrabarti, A., de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T.A., Stoelinga, M.: Resource interfaces. In: Alur, R., Lee, I. (eds.) EMSOFT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2855, pp. 117–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chatterjee, K., Doyen, L.: Energy parity games. In: Abramsky, S., Gavoille, C., Kirchner, C., Meyer auf der Heide, F., Spirakis, P.G. (eds.) ICALP 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6199, pp. 599–610. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Chatterjee, K., Doyen, L., Henzinger, T.A., Raskin, J.-F.: Generalized mean-payoff and energy games. In: FSTTCS 2010. LIPIcs, vol. 8, pp. 505–516. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A., Jurdziński, M.: Mean-payoff parity games. In: LICS 2005, pp. 178–187. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A., Piterman, N.: Generalized parity games. In: Seidl, H. (ed.) FOSSACS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4423, pp. 153–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ehrenfeucht, A., Mycielski, J.: Positional strategies for mean payoff games. Int. Journal of Game Theory 8(2), 109–113 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Emerson, E.A., Jutla, C.S.: Tree automata, mu-calculus and determinacy. In: FOCS 1991, pp. 368–377. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jurdziński, M.: Deciding the winner in parity games is in UP ∩ co-UP. Information Processing Letters 68(3), 119–124 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Karp, R.M.: A characterization of the minimum cycle mean in a digraph. Discrete Mathematics 23(3), 309–311 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kopczyński, E.: Half-positional determinacy of infinite games. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006, Part II. LNCS, vol. 4052, pp. 336–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Luttenberger, M.: Strategy iteration using non-deterministic strategies for solving parity games. Research Report cs.GT/0806.2923, arXiv (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martin, D.A.: Borel determinacy. Annals of Mathematics 102, 363–371 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mostowski, A.W.: Games with forbidden positions. Tech. Rep. 78, Instytut Matematyki, Uniwersytet Gdański, Poland (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pinchinat, S., Riedweg, S.: You can always compute maximally permissive controllers under partial observation when they exist. In: ACC 2005, pp. 2287–2292 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas, W.: Infinite games and verification (extended abstract of a tutorial). In: Brinksma, E., Larsen, K.G. (eds.) CAV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2404, pp. 58–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Zielonka, W.: Infinite games on finitely coloured graphs with applications to automata on infinite trees. Theoretical Computer Science 200(1-2), 135–183 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zwick, U., Paterson, M.: The complexity of mean payoff games on graphs. Theoretical Computer Science 158(1&2), 343–359 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bouyer, P., Markey, N., Olschewski, J., Ummels, M. (2011). Measuring Permissiveness in Parity Games: Mean-Payoff Parity Games Revisited. In: Bultan, T., Hsiung, PA. (eds) Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis. ATVA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6996. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24372-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24372-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24371-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24372-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics