Skip to main content

Event in Compositional Dynamic Semantics

  • Conference paper
Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics (LACL 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6736))

Abstract

We present a framework which constructs an event-style discourse semantics. The discourse dynamics are encoded in continuation semantics and various rhetorical relations are embedded in the resulting interpretation of the framework. We assume discourse and sentence are distinct semantic objects, that play different roles in meaning evaluation. Moreover, two sets of composition functions, for handling different discourse relations, are introduced. The paper first gives the necessary background and motivation for event and dynamic semantics, then the framework with detailed examples will be introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asher, N.: Reference to abstract objects in discourse. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Asher, N., Pogodalla, S.: Sdrt and continuation semantics. Proceedings of LENLS, Tokyo, Japan VII (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asher, N., Vieu, L.: Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations. Lingua 115(4), 591–610 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bos, J.: Towards a large-scale formal semantic lexicon for text processing. In: Chiarcos, C., Eckart de Castilho, R., Stede, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Biennal GSCL Conference From Form to Meaning: Processing Texts Automatically, 2009, pp. 3–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davidson, D.: The logical form of action sentences. In: Rescher, N. (ed.) The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14(1), 39–100 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. de Groote, P.: Towards abstract categorial grammars. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 252–259. Association for Computational Linguistics (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Groote, P.: Towards a montagovian account of dynamics. In: Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XVI (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gruber, J.S.: Studies in lexical relations. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Modern Languages (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heim, I.: File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness. In: Bäuerle, R., Schwarze, C., von Stechow, A. (eds.) Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, pp. 164–189. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hobbs, J.R.: On the coherence and structure of discourse. CSLI, Center for the Study of Language and Information, US (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kamp, H.: A theory of truth and semantic representation. In: Groenendijk, J., Janssen, T., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Mathematical Centre Tracts, vol. 135, pp. 277–322. Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lascarides, A., Asher, N.: Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(5), 437–493 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lascarides, A., Asher, N.: Segmented discourse representation theory: Dynamic semantics with discourse structure. Computing Meaning, 87–124 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mann, W., Thompson, S.: Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 8(3), 243–281 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Montague, R.: English as A Formal Language. Linguaggi nella societae nella tecnica, 189–224 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Montague, R.: Universal Grammar. Theoria 36(3), 373–398 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Montague, R.: The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary english. In: Hintikka, J., Moravcsik, J., Suppes, P. (eds.) Approaches to Natural Language. Reidel, Dordrecht (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parsons, T.: Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Polanyi, L.: A formal model of the structure of discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 12(5-6), 601–638 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Qian, S., Amblard, M. (2011). Event in Compositional Dynamic Semantics. In: Pogodalla, S., Prost, JP. (eds) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LACL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6736. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22220-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22221-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics