This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Barwise, J.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrases, Generalized Quantifiers and Anaphora’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.),Generalized Quantifiers, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–29.
Berg, M. van den: 1990, ‘A Dynamic Predicate Logic for Plurals’, in M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet (eds.),Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, Amsterdam.
Chierchia, G.: 1988, ‘Dynamic Generalized Quantifiers and Donkey Anaphora’, in M. Krifka (ed.),Genericity in Natural Language, SNS, Tübingen.
Chierchia, G.: 1990, ‘Anaphora and Dynamic Logic’. in J. Groenendijk, M. Stokhof, G. Chierchia and P. Dekker,Quantification and Anaphora 11, Dyama-deliverable R2.2.a. Centre for Cognitive Science, Edinburgh.
Dekker, P.: 1990, ‘Dynamic Interpretation, Flexibility, and Monotonicity’, in M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet (eds.),Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium, ITLI, Amsterdam.
Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1988, ‘Context and Information in Dynamic Semantics’, in B. Elsendoorn and H. Bouma (eds.),Working Models of Human Perception, Academic Press, New York, pp. 457–488.
Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1990, ‘Dynamic Montague Grammar’, in L. Kálmán et al. (eds.),Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, Budapest.
Harel, D.: 1984, ‘Dynamic Logic’, in: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.),Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 11, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Heim, I.: 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Heim, I.: 1983, ‘File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness’, in R. Bailerle, Ch. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin.
Janssen, T.: 1986,Foundations and Applications of Montague Grammar, CWI, Amsterdam.
Kadmon, N. 1987,On Unique and Non-Unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam, pp. 277–322 [reprinted in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, & M. Stokhof (eds.), 1984,Truth, Interpretation and Information, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 1–41].
Kamp, H.: 1983, ‘Situations in Discourse Without Time or Questions’, manuscript.
Lewis, D.: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in E. Keenan (ed.),Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–15.
Roberts, C.: 1987,Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity, dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst,
Roberts, C.: 1989, ‘Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora in Discourse’,Linguistics and Philosophy,12, 683–723.
Rooth, M.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.),Generalized Quantifiers, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 237–269.
Schubert, L. and F. J. Pelletier: 1989, ‘Generally Speaking, or, Using Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics’, in G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee, and R. Turner (eds.),Properties, Types and Meaning, Vol. 11, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 193–268.
Seuren, P.: 1986,Discourse Semantics, Blackwell, Oxford.
Zeevat, H.: 1989, ‘A Compositional Approach to Discourse Representation Theory’,Linguistics and Philosophy,12, 95–131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M. Dynamic predicate logic. Linguist Philos 14, 39–100 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628304
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628304