Skip to main content

Object-Sensitive Action Patterns in Process Model Repositories

  • Conference paper
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 66))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Organizations maintain large repositories of business process models. While maintenance and management of these repositories are challenging, they also offer opportunities when used as a knowledge base systematically. For instance, repositories can be leveraged to provide modeling support and, therefore, help to assure the consistency of newly created models with the existing ones. In the previous work we have introduced action patterns as reusable blocks of process models that can be derived from a model repository. In this paper we advance the initial results interpreting the action concept as a composition of a verb and a business object. The subsequently identified action pattern types allow for fine-grained modeling support. We evaluate the novel concepts and compare them to the established action patterns using as a benchmark the SAP Reference Model, the real world process model collection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A Configurable Reference Modelling Language. IS 32(1), 1–23 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow Patterns. DPD 14(1), 5–51 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gschwind, T., Koehler, J., Wong, J.: Applying Patterns during Business Process Modeling. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 4–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Thom, L.H., Reichert, M., Iochpe, C.: Activity Patterns in Process-aware Information Systems: Basic Concepts and Empirical Evidence. IJBPIM 4(2), 93–110 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smirnov, S., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Action Patterns in Business Process Models. In: Baresi, L., Chi, C.-H., Suzuki, J. (eds.) ICSOC-ServiceWave 2009. LNCS, vol. 5900, pp. 115–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Keller, G., Teufel, T.: SAP(R) R/3 Process Oriented Implementation: Iterative Process Prototyping. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J.: Refactoring of Process Model Activity Labels. In: Hopfe, C.J., Rezgui, Y., Métais, E., Preece, A., Li, H. (eds.) NLDB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6177, pp. 268–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Efficient Consistency Measurement based on Behavioural Profiles of Process Models. IEEE TSE (2010) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., Swami, A.N.: Mining Association Rules between Sets of Items in Large Databases. In: COMAD 1993, Washington, D.C., pp. 207–216 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Decker, G., Mendling, J.: Instantiation Semantics for Process Models. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 164–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendling, J.: Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness. LNBIP, vol. 6. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Workflow Data Patterns. Technical Report FIT-TR-2004-01, Queensland University of Technology (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lonchamp, J.: Process Model Patterns for Collaborative Work. In: Telecoop (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tran, H.N., Coulette, B., Dong, B.T.: Broadening the Use of Process Patterns for Modeling Processes. In: SEKE, Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, pp. 57–62 (July 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lau, J.M., Iochpe, C., Thom, L., Reichert, M.: Discovery and Analysis of Activity Pattern Cooccurrences in Business Process Models. In: ICEIS 2009, pp. 83–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hornung, T., Koschmider, A., Lausen, G.: Recommendation Based Process Modeling Support: Method and User Experience. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 265–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Küster, J.M., Ryndina, K., Gall, H.: Generation of Business Process Models for Object Life Cycle Compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 165–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Koschmider, A., Song, M., Reijers, H.A.: Advanced Social Features in a Recommendation System for Process Modeling. In: Bauer, F.L., Griffiths, M., Hornig, J.J., McKeeman, W.M., Waite, W.M., DeRemer, F.L., Hill, U., Koster, C.H.A., Poole, P.C. (eds.) BIS 2009. LNBIP, vol. 21, pp. 109–120. Springer, Heidelberg (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kühne, S., Kern, H., Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: Business Process Modelling with Continuous Validation. In: MDE4BPM, pp. 37–48 (September 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, K.H., Won, J.K., Kim, C.M.: A Fragment-Driven Process Modeling Methodology. In: Gervasi, O., Gavrilova, M.L., Kumar, V., Laganá, A., Lee, H.P., Mun, Y., Taniar, D., Tan, C.J.K. (eds.) ICCSA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3482, pp. 817–826. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Weber, B., Reichert, M., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Change Patterns and Change Support Features - Enhancing Flexibility in Process-aware Information Systems. DKE 66(3), 438–466 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van Dongen, B., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 450–464. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Herwig, S., Lis, L., Stein, A.: Towards Increased Comparability of Conceptual Models - Enforcing Naming Conventions through Domain Thesauri and Linguistic Grammars. In: ECIS 2009 (June 2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Smirnov, S., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M. (2011). Object-Sensitive Action Patterns in Process Model Repositories. In: zur Muehlen, M., Su, J. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 66. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20511-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20511-8_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20510-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20511-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics