Skip to main content

Refactoring of Process Model Activity Labels

  • Conference paper
Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (NLDB 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6177))

Abstract

Recently many companies have expanded their business process modeling projects such that thousands of process models are designed and maintained. Activity labels of these models are related to different styles according to their grammatical structure. There are several guidelines that suggest using a verb-object labeling style. Meanwhile, real-world process models often include labels that do not follow this style. In this paper we investigate the potential to improve the label quality automatically. We define and implement an approach for automatic refactoring of labels following action-noun style into verb-object labels. We evaluate the proposed techniques using a collection of real-world process models—the SAP Reference Model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Workflow Verification: Finding Control-Flow Errors Using Petri-Net-Based Techniques. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 161–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Modern Information Retrieval (May 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Herwig, S., Lis, L., Stein, A.: Towards Increased Comparability of Conceptual Models - Enforcing Naming Conventions through Domain Thesauri and Linguistic Grammars. In: Proceedings of ECIS (June 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, R.: Business Process Modelling with ARIS: A Practical Guide (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring Similarity between Semantic Business Process Models. In: Proceedings of APCCM, pp. 71–80 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fliedl, G., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C.: From Textual Scenarios to a Conceptual Schema. Data & Knowl. Eng. 55(1), 20–37 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frederiks, P., van der Weide, T.: Information Modeling: The Process and the Required Competencies of Its Participants. Data & Knowl. Eng. 58(1), 4–20 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stanford Natural Language Processing Group. Stanford Log-linear Part-of-speech Tagger, http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tagger.shtml (accessed April 4, 2010)

  9. Ingvaldsen, J.E., Gulla, J.A., Su, X., Rønneberg, H.: A Text Mining Approach to Integrating Business Process Models and Governing Documents. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM-WS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 473–484. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Keller, G., Teufel, T.: SAP(R) R/3 Process Oriented Implementation: Iterative Process Prototyping. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J.: On Labeling Quality in Business Process Models. In: EPK. CEUR, vol. 554, pp. 42–57 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malone, T.W., Crowston, K., Herman, G.A.: Organizing Business Knowledge: The MIT Process Handbook. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mendling, J.: Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness. LNBIP, vol. 6 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Cardoso, J.: What Makes Process Models Understandable? Business Process Management, 48–63 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Recker, J.: Activity Labeling in Process Modeling: Empirical Insights and Recommendations. Information Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, G.: WordNet: a lexical database for English. CACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosemann, M.: Potential Pitfalls of Process Modeling: Part A. Business Process Management Journal 12(2), 249–254 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smirnov, S., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Action Patterns in Business Process Models. In: Baresi, L., Chi, C.-H., Suzuki, J. (eds.) Service-Oriented Computing. LNCS, vol. 5900, pp. 115–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J. (2010). Refactoring of Process Model Activity Labels. In: Hopfe, C.J., Rezgui, Y., Métais, E., Preece, A., Li, H. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. NLDB 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13881-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13881-2_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13880-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13881-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics