Skip to main content

Evaluating the Quality of Clustering Algorithms Using Cluster Path Lengths

  • Conference paper
Advances in Data Mining. Applications and Theoretical Aspects (ICDM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6171))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Many real world systems can be modeled as networks or graphs. Clustering algorithms that help us to organize and understand these networks are usually referred to as, graph based clustering algorithms. Many algorithms exist in the literature for clustering network data. Evaluating the quality of these clustering algorithms is an important task addressed by different researchers. An important ingredient of evaluating these clustering techniques is the node-edge density of a cluster. In this paper, we argue that evaluation methods based on density are heavily biased to networks having dense components, such as social networks, but are not well suited for data sets with other network topologies where the nodes are not densely connected. Example of such data sets are the transportation and Internet networks. We justify our hypothesis by presenting examples from real world data sets.

We present a new metric to evaluate the quality of a clustering algorithm to overcome the limitations of existing cluster evaluation techniques. This new metric is based on the path length of the elements of a cluster and avoids judging the quality based on cluster density. We show the effectiveness of the proposed metric by comparing its results with other existing evaluation methods on artificially generated and real world data sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auber, D., Chiricota, Y., Jourdan, F., Melancon, G.: Multiscale visualization of small world networks. In: INFOVIS 2003: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pp. 75–81 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brandes, U., Erlebach, T.: Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg (March 2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandes, U., Gaertler, M., Wagner, D.: Engineering graph clustering: Models and experimental evaluation. ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics 12 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corneil, D.G., Gotlieb, C.C.: An efficient algorithm for graph isomorphism. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 17, 51–64 (1970)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gavin, A.-C., Bosche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., Schultz, J., Rick, J.M., Michon, A.-M., Cruciat, C.-M., Remor, M., Hofert, C., Schelder, M., Brajenovic, M., Ruffner, H., Merino, A., Klein, K., Hudak, M., Dickson, D., Rudi, T., Gnau, V., Bauch, A., Bastuck, S., Huhse, B., Leutwein, C., Heurtier, M.-A., Copley, R.R., Edelmann, A., Querfurth, E., Rybin, V., Drewes, G., Raida, M., Bouwmeester, T., Bork, P., Seraphin, B., Kuster, B., Neubauer, G., Superti-Furga, G.: Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415(6868), 141–147 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.J.: Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8271–8276 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Halkidi, M., Batistakis, Y., Vazirgiannis, M.: Cluster validity methods: Part i. ACM SIGMOD Record 31, 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Halkidi, M., Vazirgiannis, M.: Clustering validity assessment: Finding the optimal partitioning of a data set (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, A.K., Murty, M.N., Flynn, P.J.: Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput. Surv. 31(3), 264–323 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kannan, R., Vempala, S., Vetta, A.: On clusterings good, bad and spectral. Journal of the ACM 51(3), 497–515 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Lacroix, V., Fernandes, C., Sagot, M.-F.: Motif search in graphs: Application to metabolic networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 3(4), 360–368 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maimon, O., Rokach, L.: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook. Springer, Heidelberg (September 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mihail, M., Gkantsidis, C., Saberi, A., Zegura, E.: On the semantics of internet topologies, tech. rep. gitcc0207. Technical report, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Milligan, G.W.: A monte-carlo study of 30 internal criterion measures for cluster-analysis. Psychometrica 46, 187–195 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell, B., Mancoridis, S., Yih-Farn, C., Gansner, E.: Bunch: A clustering tool for the recovery and maintenance of software system structures. In: International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Newman, M.E., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 69(2 Pt. 2) (February 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Newman, M.E.J.: Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E 69, 066133 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Newman, M.E.J.: Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Physical Review E (Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics) 74(3) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen, Q.H., Rayward, Smith, V.J.: Internal quality measures for clustering in metric spaces. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min. 3(1), 4–29 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rand, W.M.: Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66(336), 846–850 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rozenblat, C., Melançon, G., Koenig, P.-Y.: Continental integration in multilevel approach of world air transportation (2000-2004). Networks and Spatial Economics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schaeffer, S.E.: Graph clustering. Computer Science Review 1(1), 27–64 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Steinbach, M., Karypis, G., Kumar, V.: A comparison of document clustering techniques. Technical report, Departement of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zaidi, F., Archambault, D., Melançon, G. (2010). Evaluating the Quality of Clustering Algorithms Using Cluster Path Lengths. In: Perner, P. (eds) Advances in Data Mining. Applications and Theoretical Aspects. ICDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6171. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14400-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14400-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14399-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14400-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics