Abstract
The theory of general equilibrium in economics has its origin in the work of the classical economists. The perception of its most important implication, that competitive markets can achieve an allocation of resources that is efficient in some sense, is present in Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations, 1776. Although Leon Walras (1874) and Edgeworth (1881) are considered to be the precursors of the theory, as we know it today, many other authors are recognized to have contributed to its theoretical development. Thomas Malthus, David Ricardo and John Stuart Mill can be regarded as early expositors of general equilibrium theory while Stanley Jevons and Carl Menger also contributed to the development of important neoclassical elements present in the general equilibrium theory. Modern theorists of general equilibrium did not emerge until the 1930s. The main issues examined related to the existence, uniqueness and stability of equilibrium, and comparative statics. The classic works by Debreu (1959) and Arrow and Hahn (1971) formalized the main results of the field and established general equilibrium as a recognized field in economics. (For an historical introduction to the development of general equilibrium analysis, see Arrow & Hahn, 1971; for recent developments, see Eatwell, Milgate, & Newman, 1989; and Starr, 2001)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, P. D., & Dixon, P. B. (1995). prospects for Australian industries, states and regions: 1993–94 To 2001–02. Australian Bulletin of Labour, 21, 81–108
Adams, P. D., Horridge, M., & Parmenter, B. R. 2000. MMRF-GREEN: A dynamic, multi-sectoral, multi-regional model of Australia, Preliminary Working Paper no. OP-94, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton.
Adelman, I., & Robinson, S. (1978). Income distribution policy in developing countries: A case study of Korea. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Agénor, P. R., Izquierdo A., & Fofack, H. (2000). IMMPA: A quantitative macroeconomic framework for the analysis of poverty reduction strategies. Mimeo, The World Bank.
Almeida, E. S. (2003). MINAS-SPACE: A spatial applied general equilibrium model for planning and analysis of transportation policies in Minas Gerais. Ph.D. Dissertation, Departamento de Economia/IPE, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo in Portuguese.
Anselin, L., & Madden, M. (1990). New directions in regional analysis: Integrated and multi-regional approaches. London: Belhaven Press.
Armington, P. S. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production, International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 16, 159–178.
Arndt, C. (1996). An Introduction to Systematic Sensitivity Analysis via Gaussian Quadrature, GTAP Technical Paper No. 2. West Lafayette, Indiana, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.
Arrow, K. J., & Hahn F. H. (1971). General competitive analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Batten, D. F. (1982). The International linkages between National and regional input-output models, International Regional Science Review, 7, 53–68.
Batten, D., & Westin, L. (1988). Modelling commodity flows on trade networks: Retrospect and prospect. Working Paper from CERUM, 1988:30, Umea, October.
Bilgic, A., King, S., Lusby, A., & Schreiner, D. F. (2002). Estimates of U.S. Regional commodity trade elasticities. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 32, 79–98.
Bolton, R. (1985). Symposium on multiregional forecasting and policy simulation models. Journal of Regional Science, 20, 131–142.
Boudeville, J.-R. (1961). Les Espaces Économiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Bröcker, J. (1998a). Spatial effects of transport infrastructure: The role of market structure, Diskussionbeiträge aus dem Institut für Wirtschaft und Verkehr, 5/98.
Bröcker, J. (1998b). Operational computable general equilibrium modeling. Annals of Regional Science, 32, 367–387.
Bröcker, J. (2002). Spatial effects of European transport policy: A CGE approach. In G. J. D. Hewings, M. Sonis, & D. Boyce (Eds.), Trade, network and hierarchies: Modeling regional and interregional economies, advances in spatial science. Heidelberg: Springer.
Casimiro F. F., Rocha, M. T., Lima, P. V. P. S., Miranda, S. H. G., & Guilhoto, J. J. M. 2000. MIBRA-USP, an interregional applied general equilibrium model for the Brazilian economy. Paper presented at 6th World Congress of the Regional Science Association International, Lugano, Switzerland.
Deardorff, A. V., & Stern, R. M. (1986). The Michigan model of World production and trade. Cambridge: MIT.
Deaton, A, & Muellbauer, J. (1980). Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of value. New York: Wiley.
De Melo, J. (1988). Computable general equilibrium models For trade policy analysis in developing countries: A survey. The World Bank WP53, April.
Dervis, K J., de Melo, J., & Robinson, S. (1982). General equilibrium models for development policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Despotakis, K. A. & Fisher, A. C. (1988). Energy in a regional economy: A computable general equilibrium model for California. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15, 313–330.
DeVuyst, E. A., & Preckel, P. V. (1997). Sensitivity analysis revisited: A quadrature-based approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 19, 175–185.
Dinsmoor, J., & Haddad, E. A. (1996). Brazil: The use of state fiscal data bases for financial projections. Region I Technical Note, Inter-American Development Bank, August.
Dixon, P. B., Madden, J. R., & Peter, M. W. (1993). The effects of reallocating general revenue assistance among the Australian states, The Economic Record, 69, 367–381.
Dixon, P. B., & Parmenter, B. R. (1994). Computable general equilibrium modelling. Preliminary Working Paper no. IP-65, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton.
Dixon, P. B., Parmenter, B. R., Powell, A. A., & Wilcoxen, P. J. (1992). Notes and problems in applied general equilibrium economics. Advanced textbooks in economics 32, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dixon, P. B., Parmenter, B. P. & Rimmer, M. T. (2000). Forecasting and policy analysis with a dynamic CGE model of Australia. In G.W. Harrison, S.E.H. Jensen, L.H. Pedersen, & T.F. Rutherford (Eds.) Using dynamic general equilibrium models for policy analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dixon, P. B., Parmenter, B. R., Sutton, J., & Vincent, D. P. (1982). ORANI: A multisectoral model of the Australian economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Domingues, E. P. (2002). Regional and sectoral dimensions of FTAA. Ph.D. Dissertation, Departamento de Economia/IPE, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo in Portuguese.
Domingues, E. P., Haddad, E. A., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2008). Sensitivity analysis in applied general equilibrium models: An empirical assessment for MERCOSUR free trade areas agreements, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48, 287–306.
Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., & Newman, P. (1989). The new palgrave: General equilibrium. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical psychics. London: C. Kegan Paul.
Emini, C. A. (2002). Designing the financial social accounting matrix underlying the ‘integrated macroeconomic model for poverty analysis:’ The Cameroon country-case. Mimeo. The World Bank.
Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge: MIT.
Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2002). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gazel, R. C. (1994). Regional and interregional economic effects of the free trade agreement between the US and Canada. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Giesecke, J. (2002). Explaining regional economic performance: An historical application of a dynamic-regional CGE model, Papers in Regional Science, 81, 247–278.
Groenewold, N., Hagger, A. J., & Madden, J. R. (2003). Interregional transfers: A political-economy CGE approach. Papers in Regional Science, 82, 535–554.
Haddad, E. A. (1999). Regional inequality and structural changes: Lessons from the Brazilian experience. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Haddad, E. A., & Azzoni, C. R. (2001). Trade liberalization and location: Geographical shifts in the Brazilian economic structure. In J. J. M. Guilhoto, & G. J. D. Hewings (Eds.), Structure and structural change in the Brazilian economy. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Haddad, E. A., & Domingues, E. P. (2003). Sectoral and regional projections for the Brazilian economy: 2001–2007. In J. P. Chahad, & P. Picchetti (Eds.) Labor market in Brazil: Behavior patterns and institutional transformations. São Paulo: LTR. (in Portuguese).
Haddad, E. A., Domingues, E. P, & Perobelli, F. S. (2002). Regional effects of economic Integration: The case of Brazil. Journal of Policy Modeling, 24, 453–482.
Haddad, E. A., & Hewings, G. J. D. (1999). The short-run regional effects of new investments and technological upgrade in the Brazilian automobile industry: An interregional CGE analysis. Oxford Development Studies, 273, 359–383.
Haddad, E. A., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2001). Transportation costs and regional development: An interregional CGE analysis. In P. Friedrich, & S. Jutila (Eds.), Policies of regional competition Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgeselschaft.
Haddad, E. A., Hewings, G. J. D., & Peter, M. (2002). Input–output systems in regional and Interregional CGE modeling. In G. J. D. Hewings, M. Sonis, & D. Boyce (Eds.), Trade, network and hierarchies: Modeling regional and interregional economies, Advances in Spatial Science. Heidelberg: Springer.
Haddad, P. R, (1978). As políticas de desenvolvimento regional no Brasil: Notas para uma avaliação. In W. Baer, P. P. Geiger, & P. R Haddad (Eds.), Dimensões do Desenvolvimento Brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro, Editora Campus Ltda. (in Portuguese).
Hansen, L. P., & Heckman, J. J. (1996). The empirical foundations of Calibration. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 87–104.
Harrigan, F, & McGregor, P. G. (1988a). Recent advances in regional economic modelling. London Papers in Regional Science 19. London: Pion.
Harrigan, F, & McGregor, P. G. (1988b). Price and quantity interaction in regional economic models: The importance of openness and closures. In F. Harrigan, & P. G. McGregor (Eds.): Recent advances in regional economic modelling, London Papers in Regional Science 19. London: Pion.
Harrigan, F., & McGregor, P. G. (1989). Neoclassical and Keynesian perspectives on the regional macro-economy: A computable general equilibrium approach, Journal of Regional Science, 29, 555–573.
Harrigan, F., McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., & Dourmashkin, N. (1992). Imperfect competition in regional labour markets: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Environment and Planning A, 24, 1463–1481.
Harris Jr., C. C. (1988). From general spatial equilibrium theory to multiregional operational models. In F. Harrigan, & P. G. McGregor (Eds.), Recent advances in regional economic modelling, London Papers in Regional Science 19. London: Pion.
Harrison, W. J., Pearson, K. R., & Powell, A. A. (1994). Multiregional and intertemporal AGE modelling via GEMPACK. Preliminary Working Paper no. IP-66, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton, September.
Hewings, G. J. D. (1986). Problems of integration in the modelling of regional systems. In P. W. J. Batey and M. Madden (Eds.), Integrated analysis of regional systems. London Papers in Regional Science. London: Pion.
Hewings, G. J. D., & Jensen, R. C. (1986). Regional, interregional and multiregional input–output analysis. In P. Nijkamp (Ed.), Handbook of regional and urban economics, (vol. 1). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hewings, G. J. D., Nazara, S., & Dridi, C. (2004). Channels of synthesis forty years on: Integrated analysis of spatial economic systems. Journal of Geographical Systems, 6, 7–25.
Hertel, T. W. (1999). Future directions in global trade analysis, Staff Paper #99-8, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
Higgs, P. J., Parmenter, B. R., & Rimmer, R. J. (1988). A hybrid top–down, bottom–up regional computable general equilibrium model. International Regional Science Review, 11, 317–328.
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hirte, G. (1998). Welfare effects of regional income taxes: results of an interregional CGE analysis for Germany. The Annals of Regional Science, 32, 201–219.
Hu, D. (2002). Trade, rural-urban migration, and regional income disparity in developing countries: A spatial general equilibrium model inspired by the case of China. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32, 311–338.
Horridge, J. M., Parmenter, B. R., Cameron, M., Joubert, R., Suleman, & De Jongh, D. (1995). The macroeconomic, industrial, distributional and regional effects of government spending programs in South Africa. General Paper no. G-109, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton.
Hulu, E., & Hewings, G. J. D. (1993). the development and use of interregional input–output models for Indonesia under conditions of limited information. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 5, 135–153.
Isard, W., & Anselin, L. (1982). Integration of multiregional models for policy analysis. Environment and Planning A, 14, 359–376.
Isard, W., Azis, I. J., Drennan, M. P., Miller, R. E., Saltzman, S., & Thorbecke, E. (1998). Methods of interregional and regional analysi. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Israilevich, P., Hewings, G. J. D., Schindler, G. R., & Mahidhara, R. (1996). The choice of an input-output table embedded in regional econometric input–output models. Papers in Regional Science, 75, 103–119.
Israilevich, P., Hewings, G. J. D., Sonis, M., & Schindler, G. R. (1997). Forecasting structural change with a regional econometric input–output model. Journal of Regional Science, 37, 565–90.
Johansen, L. (1960). A multi-sectoral study of economic growth. Amsterdam: North Holland, Second Enlarged Edition 1974.
Jones, R., & Whalley, J. (1988). Regional effects of taxes in Canada: An applied general equilibrium approach. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 1–28.
Jones, R., & Whalley, J. (1989). A Canadian regional general equilibrium model and some applications. Journal of Urban Economics, 25, 368–404.
Kilkenny, M. (1998). Transport costs and rural development. Journal of Regional Science, 382, 293–312.
Kim, E., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2003). An application of integrated transport network-multiregional CGE model II: Calibration of network effects of highway, Discussion Paper REAL 03-T-24, Regional Economic Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Kim, E., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2004). An application of integrated transport network-multiregional CGE model I: A framework for economic analysis of highway project. Economic Systems Research, 16, 7–25.
Kim, E., & Kim, K. (2002). Impacts of regional development strategies on growth and equity of Korea: a multiregional CGE model. The Annals of Regional Science, 36, 165–180.
Kim, E., & Kim, K. (2003). Impacts of the development of large cities on economic growth and income distribution in Korea: a multiregional CGE model. Papers in Regional Science, 82, 101–122.
Kimbell, L. J., & Harrison, G. W. (1984). General equilibrium analysis of regional fiscal incidence. In H. E. Scarf, & J. B. Shoven (Eds.), Applied general equilibrium analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, B. (1990). What is a SAM? In G. Pyatt, & J. I. Round (Eds.), Social accounting matrices: a basis for planning. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Ko, S. (1985). A regional computable general equilibrium model for Korea. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Ko, S., & Hewings, G. J. D. (1986). A regional computable general equilibrium model for Korea. The Korean Journal of Regional Science, 2, 45–57.
Koh, Y., Schreiner, D. F., & Shin, H. (1993). Comparisons of regional fixed price and general equilibrium models. Regional Science Perspectives, 23, 33–80.
Kraybill, D. S., Johnson, T. G., & Orden D. (1992). Macroeconomic imbalances: An multiregional general equilibrium analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74, 726–736.
Leontief, W., Morgan, A., Polenske, K., Simpson, D., & Tower, E. (1965). The economic impact - industrial and regional - of an arms cut. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 217–241.
Leontief, W., & Strout, A. (1963). Multiregional input-output analysis. In T. Barna (Ed.), Structural interdependence and economic development. London: McMillan.
Liew, L. H. (1982). Regional disaggregation of a National Economic Model: The ‘Bottoms–Up’ Approach, Preliminary Working Paper no. OP-34, IMPACT Project, Melbourne.
Liew, L. H. (1984a). A Johansen model for regional analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 14, 129–146.
Liew, L. H. (1984b). ‘Tops–down’ versus ‘bottoms–up’ approaches to regional modeling. Journal of Policy Modeling, 6, 351–367.
Liew, L. H. (1995). Modelling inter-regional strategic interactions within a general equilibrium framework. In 1995 IFAC/IFIP/IFOR/SEDC Symposium on Modelling and Control in National and Regional Economies, preprint vol. 2.
Madden, J. R., & Pant, H. M. (1998). An analysis of the interdependence of regional economies. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 4, 113–142.
Miyagi, T., Honbu, K., & Inoue, K. (1998). Validity and applicability of a spatial computable general equilibrium model. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 4, 143–159.
Markusen, A. (1987). Regions: The economics and politics of territory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., & Yin, Y.-P. (1996). AMOS-RUK: An interregional computable general equilibrium model of Scotland and rest of the UK. Paper prepared for the 5 th World Congress of Regional Science Association, Tokyo.
McKitrick, R. R. (1998). The econometric critique of computable general equilibrium modeling: The role of functional forms, Economic Modelling, 15, 543–573.
Munroe, D. K., Hewings, G. J. D., & Guo, D. (2007). The role of intraindustry trade in interregional trade in the Midwest of the US. In R. J. Cooper, K. P. Donaghy, & G. J. D. Hewings (Eds.), Globalization and regional economic modeling. Heidelberg: Springer.
Morgan, W., Mutti, J. & Partridge, M. (1989). A regional general equilibrium model of the United States: Tax effects on factor movements and regional production. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 626–635.
Myrdal, G. (1957). Rich lands and poor: The road to World prosperity. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Naqvi, F. & Peter, M. W. (1995). Notes on the implementation Of MONASH-MRF: A multiregional model of Australia, Working Paper no. OP-82, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton.
Naqvi, F., & Peter, M. W. (1996). A multiregional, multisectoral model of the Australian economy with an illustrative application. Australian Economic Papers, June.
Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. & Snickars, F. (1986). Regional and multiregional economic models: A survey. In P. Nijkamp (Ed.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (vol. 1). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Parmenter, B. & Welsh, A. (2000). Historical simulations with the MONASH regional equation system. Preliminary Working Paper OP-95. Clayton, Center of Policy Studies and the Impact Project, Monash University, Clayton, VIC.
Partridge, M. D., & Rickman, D. S. (1998). Regional computable general equilibrium modeling: A survey and critical appraisal. International Regional Science Review, 21, 205–248.
Parmenter, B. R., Pearson, K. R. & Jagielski, R. (1985). Bottoms-up, tops-down and hybrid methods for regionalizing computable general equilibrium models: Some comparisons. Preliminary Working Paper no. OP-52, IMPACT Project, Melbourne, VIC.
Peter, M. W. 1996. An illustrative application: The economic effects of a regional-government infrastructure project, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton, mimeo, 01/09/96.
Peter, M. W., Han, S. H. Meagher, G. A. & Naqvi, F. (1996a). The database Of MONASH-MRF, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton, mimeo, July.
Peter, M. W., Horridge, M. Meagher, G. A. Naqvi, F. & Parmenter, B. R. (1996b). The theoretical structure Of MONASH-MRF, Preliminary Working Paper no. OP-85, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton, VIC.
Round, J. I. (1978). An interregional input–output approach to the evaluation of nonsurvey methods, Journal of Regional Science, 18, 179–194.
Round, J. I. (1983). Nonsurvey techniques: A critical review of the theory and the evidence. International Regional Science Review, 8, 189–212.
Scarf, H. (1967). The approximation of fixed points of a continuous mapping. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 15, 1328–1343.
Scarf, H. (1973). The computation of economic equilibria. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1984). Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and International trade: An introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 22, 1007–1051.
Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1992). Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sonis, M., & Hewings, G. J. D. (1992). Coefficient change in input-output models: Theory and applications. Economic Systems Research, 4, 143–157.
Spencer, J. E. (1988). Computable general equilibrium, trade, factor mobility, and the regions. In F. Harrigan, & P. G. McGregor (Eds.), London: Recent advances in regional economic modelling. London Papers in Regional Science 19. London: Pion.
Starr, R. M. (2001). General equilibrium theory. Cambridge. Cambridge University Pres.
Van der Bergh, J. C. J., Nijkamp, P. & Rietveld, P. (1995). Recent advances in spatial equilibrium modelling. Heidelberg: Springer.
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Walras, L. (1874). Éléments d'Économie Politique Pure. Paris, 4me Édition Définitive et Augmentée par l'Auteur 1926, (R. Pichon et R. Durand-Auzias Eds.)
Watanuki, M. (1996). Regional development policy analysis of Indonesia: Interregional CGE modeling approach, Paper presented at the 43 rd North American Meeting of the Regional Science Association International, Washington DC.
West, G. (1995). Comparison of input-output, input-output + econometric and computable general equilibrium impact models at the regional level. Economic Systems Research, 7, 209–227.
Wigle, R. (1991). The Pagan–Shannon approximation: Unconditional systematic sensitivity in minutes. Empirical Economics, 16, 35–49.
Whalley, J., & Trela, I. (1986). Regional aspects of confederation. Toronto, Vol. 68 for the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada. University of Toronto Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haddad, E. (2009). Interregional Computable General Equilibrium Models. In: Sonis, M., Hewings, G. (eds) Tool Kits in Regional Science. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00627-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00627-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00626-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00627-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)