Skip to main content

Interregional Computable General Equilibrium Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tool Kits in Regional Science

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

The theory of general equilibrium in economics has its origin in the work of the classical economists. The perception of its most important implication, that competitive markets can achieve an allocation of resources that is efficient in some sense, is present in Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations, 1776. Although Leon Walras (1874) and Edgeworth (1881) are considered to be the precursors of the theory, as we know it today, many other authors are recognized to have contributed to its theoretical development. Thomas Malthus, David Ricardo and John Stuart Mill can be regarded as early expositors of general equilibrium theory while Stanley Jevons and Carl Menger also contributed to the development of important neoclassical elements present in the general equilibrium theory. Modern theorists of general equilibrium did not emerge until the 1930s. The main issues examined related to the existence, uniqueness and stability of equilibrium, and comparative statics. The classic works by Debreu (1959) and Arrow and Hahn (1971) formalized the main results of the field and established general equilibrium as a recognized field in economics. (For an historical introduction to the development of general equilibrium analysis, see Arrow & Hahn, 1971; for recent developments, see Eatwell, Milgate, & Newman, 1989; and Starr, 2001)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, P. D., & Dixon, P. B. (1995). prospects for Australian industries, states and regions: 1993–94 To 2001–02. Australian Bulletin of Labour, 21, 81–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, P. D., Horridge, M., & Parmenter, B. R. 2000. MMRF-GREEN: A dynamic, multi-sectoral, multi-regional model of Australia, Preliminary Working Paper no. OP-94, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman, I., & Robinson, S. (1978). Income distribution policy in developing countries: A case study of Korea. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agénor, P. R., Izquierdo A., & Fofack, H. (2000). IMMPA: A quantitative macroeconomic framework for the analysis of poverty reduction strategies. Mimeo, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, E. S. (2003). MINAS-SPACE: A spatial applied general equilibrium model for planning and analysis of transportation policies in Minas Gerais. Ph.D. Dissertation, Departamento de Economia/IPE, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo in Portuguese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., & Madden, M. (1990). New directions in regional analysis: Integrated and multi-regional approaches. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armington, P. S. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production, International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 16, 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, C. (1996). An Introduction to Systematic Sensitivity Analysis via Gaussian Quadrature, GTAP Technical Paper No. 2. West Lafayette, Indiana, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., & Hahn F. H. (1971). General competitive analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, D. F. (1982). The International linkages between National and regional input-output models, International Regional Science Review, 7, 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batten, D., & Westin, L. (1988). Modelling commodity flows on trade networks: Retrospect and prospect. Working Paper from CERUM, 1988:30, Umea, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgic, A., King, S., Lusby, A., & Schreiner, D. F. (2002). Estimates of U.S. Regional commodity trade elasticities. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 32, 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. (1985). Symposium on multiregional forecasting and policy simulation models. Journal of Regional Science, 20, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudeville, J.-R. (1961). Les Espaces Économiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bröcker, J. (1998a). Spatial effects of transport infrastructure: The role of market structure, Diskussionbeiträge aus dem Institut für Wirtschaft und Verkehr, 5/98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bröcker, J. (1998b). Operational computable general equilibrium modeling. Annals of Regional Science, 32, 367–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bröcker, J. (2002). Spatial effects of European transport policy: A CGE approach. In G. J. D. Hewings, M. Sonis, & D. Boyce (Eds.), Trade, network and hierarchies: Modeling regional and interregional economies, advances in spatial science. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casimiro F. F., Rocha, M. T., Lima, P. V. P. S., Miranda, S. H. G., & Guilhoto, J. J. M. 2000. MIBRA-USP, an interregional applied general equilibrium model for the Brazilian economy. Paper presented at 6th World Congress of the Regional Science Association International, Lugano, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, A. V., & Stern, R. M. (1986). The Michigan model of World production and trade. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A, & Muellbauer, J. (1980). Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of value. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Melo, J. (1988). Computable general equilibrium models For trade policy analysis in developing countries: A survey. The World Bank WP53, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervis, K J., de Melo, J., & Robinson, S. (1982). General equilibrium models for development policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despotakis, K. A. & Fisher, A. C. (1988). Energy in a regional economy: A computable general equilibrium model for California. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVuyst, E. A., & Preckel, P. V. (1997). Sensitivity analysis revisited: A quadrature-based approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 19, 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmoor, J., & Haddad, E. A. (1996). Brazil: The use of state fiscal data bases for financial projections. Region I Technical Note, Inter-American Development Bank, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. B., Madden, J. R., & Peter, M. W. (1993). The effects of reallocating general revenue assistance among the Australian states, The Economic Record, 69, 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. B., & Parmenter, B. R. (1994). Computable general equilibrium modelling. Preliminary Working Paper no. IP-65, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. B., Parmenter, B. R., Powell, A. A., & Wilcoxen, P. J. (1992). Notes and problems in applied general equilibrium economics. Advanced textbooks in economics 32, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. B., Parmenter, B. P. & Rimmer, M. T. (2000). Forecasting and policy analysis with a dynamic CGE model of Australia. In G.W. Harrison, S.E.H. Jensen, L.H. Pedersen, & T.F. Rutherford (Eds.) Using dynamic general equilibrium models for policy analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. B., Parmenter, B. R., Sutton, J., & Vincent, D. P. (1982). ORANI: A multisectoral model of the Australian economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domingues, E. P. (2002). Regional and sectoral dimensions of FTAA. Ph.D. Dissertation, Departamento de Economia/IPE, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo in Portuguese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domingues, E. P., Haddad, E. A., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2008). Sensitivity analysis in applied general equilibrium models: An empirical assessment for MERCOSUR free trade areas agreements, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48, 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., & Newman, P. (1989). The new palgrave: General equilibrium. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical psychics. London: C. Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emini, C. A. (2002). Designing the financial social accounting matrix underlying the ‘integrated macroeconomic model for poverty analysis:’ The Cameroon country-case. Mimeo. The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2002). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazel, R. C. (1994). Regional and interregional economic effects of the free trade agreement between the US and Canada. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, J. (2002). Explaining regional economic performance: An historical application of a dynamic-regional CGE model, Papers in Regional Science, 81, 247–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenewold, N., Hagger, A. J., & Madden, J. R. (2003). Interregional transfers: A political-economy CGE approach. Papers in Regional Science, 82, 535–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, E. A. (1999). Regional inequality and structural changes: Lessons from the Brazilian experience. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, E. A., & Azzoni, C. R. (2001). Trade liberalization and location: Geographical shifts in the Brazilian economic structure. In J. J. M. Guilhoto, & G. J. D. Hewings (Eds.), Structure and structural change in the Brazilian economy. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, E. A., & Domingues, E. P. (2003). Sectoral and regional projections for the Brazilian economy: 2001–2007. In J. P. Chahad, & P. Picchetti (Eds.) Labor market in Brazil: Behavior patterns and institutional transformations. São Paulo: LTR. (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, E. A., Domingues, E. P, & Perobelli, F. S. (2002). Regional effects of economic Integration: The case of Brazil. Journal of Policy Modeling, 24, 453–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, E. A., & Hewings, G. J. D. (1999). The short-run regional effects of new investments and technological upgrade in the Brazilian automobile industry: An interregional CGE analysis. Oxford Development Studies, 273, 359–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, E. A., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2001). Transportation costs and regional development: An interregional CGE analysis. In P. Friedrich, & S. Jutila (Eds.), Policies of regional competition Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgeselschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, E. A., Hewings, G. J. D., & Peter, M. (2002). Input–output systems in regional and Interregional CGE modeling. In G. J. D. Hewings, M. Sonis, & D. Boyce (Eds.), Trade, network and hierarchies: Modeling regional and interregional economies, Advances in Spatial Science. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, P. R, (1978). As políticas de desenvolvimento regional no Brasil: Notas para uma avaliação. In W. Baer, P. P. Geiger, & P. R Haddad (Eds.), Dimensões do Desenvolvimento Brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro, Editora Campus Ltda. (in Portuguese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. P., & Heckman, J. J. (1996). The empirical foundations of Calibration. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, F, & McGregor, P. G. (1988a). Recent advances in regional economic modelling. London Papers in Regional Science 19. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, F, & McGregor, P. G. (1988b). Price and quantity interaction in regional economic models: The importance of openness and closures. In F. Harrigan, & P. G. McGregor (Eds.): Recent advances in regional economic modelling, London Papers in Regional Science 19. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, F., & McGregor, P. G. (1989). Neoclassical and Keynesian perspectives on the regional macro-economy: A computable general equilibrium approach, Journal of Regional Science, 29, 555–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, F., McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., & Dourmashkin, N. (1992). Imperfect competition in regional labour markets: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Environment and Planning A, 24, 1463–1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris Jr., C. C. (1988). From general spatial equilibrium theory to multiregional operational models. In F. Harrigan, & P. G. McGregor (Eds.), Recent advances in regional economic modelling, London Papers in Regional Science 19. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, W. J., Pearson, K. R., & Powell, A. A. (1994). Multiregional and intertemporal AGE modelling via GEMPACK. Preliminary Working Paper no. IP-66, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewings, G. J. D. (1986). Problems of integration in the modelling of regional systems. In P. W. J. Batey and M. Madden (Eds.), Integrated analysis of regional systems. London Papers in Regional Science. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewings, G. J. D., & Jensen, R. C. (1986). Regional, interregional and multiregional input–output analysis. In P. Nijkamp (Ed.), Handbook of regional and urban economics, (vol. 1). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewings, G. J. D., Nazara, S., & Dridi, C. (2004). Channels of synthesis forty years on: Integrated analysis of spatial economic systems. Journal of Geographical Systems, 6, 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T. W. (1999). Future directions in global trade analysis, Staff Paper #99-8, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, P. J., Parmenter, B. R., & Rimmer, R. J. (1988). A hybrid top–down, bottom–up regional computable general equilibrium model. International Regional Science Review, 11, 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirte, G. (1998). Welfare effects of regional income taxes: results of an interregional CGE analysis for Germany. The Annals of Regional Science, 32, 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, D. (2002). Trade, rural-urban migration, and regional income disparity in developing countries: A spatial general equilibrium model inspired by the case of China. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32, 311–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horridge, J. M., Parmenter, B. R., Cameron, M., Joubert, R., Suleman, & De Jongh, D. (1995). The macroeconomic, industrial, distributional and regional effects of government spending programs in South Africa. General Paper no. G-109, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulu, E., & Hewings, G. J. D. (1993). the development and use of interregional input–output models for Indonesia under conditions of limited information. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 5, 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W., & Anselin, L. (1982). Integration of multiregional models for policy analysis. Environment and Planning A, 14, 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W., Azis, I. J., Drennan, M. P., Miller, R. E., Saltzman, S., & Thorbecke, E. (1998). Methods of interregional and regional analysi. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P., Hewings, G. J. D., Schindler, G. R., & Mahidhara, R. (1996). The choice of an input-output table embedded in regional econometric input–output models. Papers in Regional Science, 75, 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P., Hewings, G. J. D., Sonis, M., & Schindler, G. R. (1997). Forecasting structural change with a regional econometric input–output model. Journal of Regional Science, 37, 565–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, L. (1960). A multi-sectoral study of economic growth. Amsterdam: North Holland, Second Enlarged Edition 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R., & Whalley, J. (1988). Regional effects of taxes in Canada: An applied general equilibrium approach. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R., & Whalley, J. (1989). A Canadian regional general equilibrium model and some applications. Journal of Urban Economics, 25, 368–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilkenny, M. (1998). Transport costs and rural development. Journal of Regional Science, 382, 293–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2003). An application of integrated transport network-multiregional CGE model II: Calibration of network effects of highway, Discussion Paper REAL 03-T-24, Regional Economic Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2004). An application of integrated transport network-multiregional CGE model I: A framework for economic analysis of highway project. Economic Systems Research, 16, 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E., & Kim, K. (2002). Impacts of regional development strategies on growth and equity of Korea: a multiregional CGE model. The Annals of Regional Science, 36, 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E., & Kim, K. (2003). Impacts of the development of large cities on economic growth and income distribution in Korea: a multiregional CGE model. Papers in Regional Science, 82, 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, L. J., & Harrison, G. W. (1984). General equilibrium analysis of regional fiscal incidence. In H. E. Scarf, & J. B. Shoven (Eds.), Applied general equilibrium analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, B. (1990). What is a SAM? In G. Pyatt, & J. I. Round (Eds.), Social accounting matrices: a basis for planning. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, S. (1985). A regional computable general equilibrium model for Korea. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, S., & Hewings, G. J. D. (1986). A regional computable general equilibrium model for Korea. The Korean Journal of Regional Science, 2, 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, Y., Schreiner, D. F., & Shin, H. (1993). Comparisons of regional fixed price and general equilibrium models. Regional Science Perspectives, 23, 33–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraybill, D. S., Johnson, T. G., & Orden D. (1992). Macroeconomic imbalances: An multiregional general equilibrium analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74, 726–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W., Morgan, A., Polenske, K., Simpson, D., & Tower, E. (1965). The economic impact - industrial and regional - of an arms cut. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 217–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W., & Strout, A. (1963). Multiregional input-output analysis. In T. Barna (Ed.), Structural interdependence and economic development. London: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew, L. H. (1982). Regional disaggregation of a National Economic Model: The ‘Bottoms–Up’ Approach, Preliminary Working Paper no. OP-34, IMPACT Project, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew, L. H. (1984a). A Johansen model for regional analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 14, 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liew, L. H. (1984b). ‘Tops–down’ versus ‘bottoms–up’ approaches to regional modeling. Journal of Policy Modeling, 6, 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liew, L. H. (1995). Modelling inter-regional strategic interactions within a general equilibrium framework. In 1995 IFAC/IFIP/IFOR/SEDC Symposium on Modelling and Control in National and Regional Economies, preprint vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, J. R., & Pant, H. M. (1998). An analysis of the interdependence of regional economies. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 4, 113–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagi, T., Honbu, K., & Inoue, K. (1998). Validity and applicability of a spatial computable general equilibrium model. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 4, 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (1987). Regions: The economics and politics of territory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., & Yin, Y.-P. (1996). AMOS-RUK: An interregional computable general equilibrium model of Scotland and rest of the UK. Paper prepared for the 5 th World Congress of Regional Science Association, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKitrick, R. R. (1998). The econometric critique of computable general equilibrium modeling: The role of functional forms, Economic Modelling, 15, 543–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, D. K., Hewings, G. J. D., & Guo, D. (2007). The role of intraindustry trade in interregional trade in the Midwest of the US. In R. J. Cooper, K. P. Donaghy, & G. J. D. Hewings (Eds.), Globalization and regional economic modeling. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, W., Mutti, J. & Partridge, M. (1989). A regional general equilibrium model of the United States: Tax effects on factor movements and regional production. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 626–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. (1957). Rich lands and poor: The road to World prosperity. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi, F. & Peter, M. W. (1995). Notes on the implementation Of MONASH-MRF: A multiregional model of Australia, Working Paper no. OP-82, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi, F., & Peter, M. W. (1996). A multiregional, multisectoral model of the Australian economy with an illustrative application. Australian Economic Papers, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. & Snickars, F. (1986). Regional and multiregional economic models: A survey. In P. Nijkamp (Ed.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (vol. 1). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmenter, B. & Welsh, A. (2000). Historical simulations with the MONASH regional equation system. Preliminary Working Paper OP-95. Clayton, Center of Policy Studies and the Impact Project, Monash University, Clayton, VIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, M. D., & Rickman, D. S. (1998). Regional computable general equilibrium modeling: A survey and critical appraisal. International Regional Science Review, 21, 205–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmenter, B. R., Pearson, K. R. & Jagielski, R. (1985). Bottoms-up, tops-down and hybrid methods for regionalizing computable general equilibrium models: Some comparisons. Preliminary Working Paper no. OP-52, IMPACT Project, Melbourne, VIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, M. W. 1996. An illustrative application: The economic effects of a regional-government infrastructure project, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton, mimeo, 01/09/96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, M. W., Han, S. H. Meagher, G. A. & Naqvi, F. (1996a). The database Of MONASH-MRF, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton, mimeo, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, M. W., Horridge, M. Meagher, G. A. Naqvi, F. & Parmenter, B. R. (1996b). The theoretical structure Of MONASH-MRF, Preliminary Working Paper no. OP-85, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Clayton, VIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Round, J. I. (1978). An interregional input–output approach to the evaluation of nonsurvey methods, Journal of Regional Science, 18, 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Round, J. I. (1983). Nonsurvey techniques: A critical review of the theory and the evidence. International Regional Science Review, 8, 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, H. (1967). The approximation of fixed points of a continuous mapping. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 15, 1328–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, H. (1973). The computation of economic equilibria. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1984). Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and International trade: An introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 22, 1007–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1992). Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonis, M., & Hewings, G. J. D. (1992). Coefficient change in input-output models: Theory and applications. Economic Systems Research, 4, 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, J. E. (1988). Computable general equilibrium, trade, factor mobility, and the regions. In F. Harrigan, & P. G. McGregor (Eds.), London: Recent advances in regional economic modelling. London Papers in Regional Science 19. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, R. M. (2001). General equilibrium theory. Cambridge. Cambridge University Pres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Bergh, J. C. J., Nijkamp, P. & Rietveld, P. (1995). Recent advances in spatial equilibrium modelling. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walras, L. (1874). Éléments d'Économie Politique Pure. Paris, 4me Édition Définitive et Augmentée par l'Auteur 1926, (R. Pichon et R. Durand-Auzias Eds.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanuki, M. (1996). Regional development policy analysis of Indonesia: Interregional CGE modeling approach, Paper presented at the 43 rd North American Meeting of the Regional Science Association International, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, G. (1995). Comparison of input-output, input-output + econometric and computable general equilibrium impact models at the regional level. Economic Systems Research, 7, 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigle, R. (1991). The Pagan–Shannon approximation: Unconditional systematic sensitivity in minutes. Empirical Economics, 16, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, J., & Trela, I. (1986). Regional aspects of confederation. Toronto, Vol. 68 for the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada. University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Haddad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haddad, E. (2009). Interregional Computable General Equilibrium Models. In: Sonis, M., Hewings, G. (eds) Tool Kits in Regional Science. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00627-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00627-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00626-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00627-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics