Skip to main content
Log in

The choice of an input-output table embedded in regional econometric input-output models

  • Published:
Papers in Regional Science

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the role of input-output data sources in regional econometric input-output models. While there has been a great deal of experimentation focused on the accuracy of alternative methods for estimating regional inputoutput coefficients, little attention has been directed to the role of accuracy when the input-output system is nested within a broader accounting framework. The issues of accuracy were considered in two contexts, forecasting and impact analysis focusing on a model developed for the Chicago region. We experimented with three input-output data sources: observed regional data, national input-output, and randomly generated inputoutput coefficients. The effects of different sources of input-output data on regional econometric input-output models revealed that there are significant differences in results obtained in both forecast and impact analyses. The adjustment processes inherent in the econometric input-output system did not mask the differences imbedded in input-output tables derived from different data sources. Since applications of these types of models involve both impact and forecasting exercises, there should be strong motivation for basing the syste on the most accurate set of input-output accounts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Conway, R.S. 1990. The Washington Projection and Simulation Model: ten years of experience with a regional interindustry econometric model.International Regional Science Review 13: 141–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coomes, P., Olson, D. and Glennon, D. (1991) The interindustry employment demand variable: an extension of the I-SAMIS technique for linking input-output and econometric models.Environment and Planning A 23: 1063–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, R.L. 1976. A short-cut to estimates of regional input-output multipliers: methodology and evaluation.International Regional Science Review 1: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guccione, A., Gillen, W.J., Blair, P.D., and Miller, R.E. 1988. Interregional feedbacks in input-output models: the least upper bound.Journal of Regional Science 28: 397–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, F.J. 1982. The estimation of input-output type output multipliers when no input-output model exists: a comment.Journal of Regional Science 22: 375–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, F., McGregor, P., Dourmashkin, N., Swales, K. and Yin, Y.P. 1991. The sensitivity of output multipliers to alternative technology and factor market assumptions: a computable general equilibrium analysis. InRegional Input-Output Modeling: New Developments and Interpretations, eds. J.H.Ll. Dewhurst, G.J.D. Hewings, R.C. Jensen, pp. 210–228. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewings, G.J.D. 1977 Evaluating the possibilities for exchanging regional input-output coefficients.Environment and Planning A 9: 927–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewings, G.J.D. 1984. The role of prior information in updating regional input-output models.Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 18: 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewings, G.J.D., and Jensen, R.C. 1986. Regional, interregional and multiregional input-output analysis. InHandbook of Regional and Urban Economics, eds. P. Nijkamp and E.S. Mills, pp. 295–355. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, E.A., and Jorgenson, D.W. 1974. US energy policy and economic growth: 1975–2000.Bell Journal of Economics 5: 461–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P.R. 1991. The construction of input-output coefficients with flexible functional forms. InRegional Input-Output Modeling: New Developments and Interpretations, eds. J.H.Ll. Dewhurst, G.J.D. Hewings, R.C. Jensen, pp. 98–117. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich P.R., and Mahidhara R. 1991. Hog butchers no longer: 20 years of employment change in metropolitan Chicago.Economic Perspectives (Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago) 15: 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P.R., Hewings, G.J.D., Sonis, M., and Schindler, G.R. 1994. Forecasting structural change with a regional econometric input-output model.Discussion Paper 94-T-1 Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, Urbana, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R.C. 1980. The concept of accuracy in input-output.International Regional Science Review 5: 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz J.L., and Burford R.L. 1985. Shortcut formulas for output, income and employment multipliers.The Annals of Regional Science 19: 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraybill, D.S. 1991. Multiregional computable general equilibrium models: an introduction and survey. Unpublished paper, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia.

  • McGregor, P.G., Swales, J.K., and Yin, Y. Ping. 1995. Input-output analysis, labour scarcity and relative price endogeneity: aggregate demand disturbances in aflex-price Leontief system.Economic Systems Research (forthcoming).

  • Miller, R.E. 1986. Upper bounds on the sizes of interregional feedbacks in multiregional inputoutput models.Journal of Regional Science 26: 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phibbs P.J., and Holsman A.J. 1981. An evaluation of the Burford and Katz short cut technique for deriving input-output multipliers.The Annals of Regional Science 15: 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanoff, E., and Levine, S.H. 1986. Capacity limitations, inventory and time-phased production in the sequential interindustry model.Papers of the Regional Science Association 59: 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Round, J.I. 1983. Nonsurvey techniques: a critical review of the theory and the evidence.International Regional Science Review 8: 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonis, M., and Hewings, G.J.D. 1989. Error and sensitivity input-output analysis: a new approach. InFrontiers of Input-Output Analysis, eds. R.E. Miller, K.R. Polenske, A.Z. Rose, pp. 232–244. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonis, M., and Hewings, G.J.D. 1992. Coefficient change in input-output models: theory and applications.Economic Systems Research 4: 110–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B.H., and Trainer G.A. 1976. The generation of errors in regional input-output impact modelsWorking Paper. Regional Science Research Institute, Peace Dale, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treyz, G.I. 1993.Regional Economic Modeling. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treyz, G.I., and Stevens, B.H. 1985. The TFS Modeling Methodology.Regional Studies 19: 547–562.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Israilevich, P.R., Hewings, G.J.D., Schindler, G.R. et al. The choice of an input-output table embedded in regional econometric input-output models. Papers in Regional Science 75, 103–119 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404702

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404702

Keywords

Navigation