Skip to main content

MRI of the Colon (Colonography): Results

  • Chapter
MRI of the Gastrointestinal Tract

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

Key Points

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly studied as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of the colon. Without the use of intralu-minal colonic distension methods or following colonic distension with the use of either positive or negative luminal contrast medium (MR colonogra-phy), cross-sectional images can be acquired of the entire abdomen. Subsequent evaluation of the complete colonic wall can be executed using multipla-nar reformations of the source data set with optional three dimensional (3D) rendering, in the case of a MR colonography data set. Although most investigators primarily focused on the ability of detecting colorectal polyps and masses using MR colonogra-phy, a wide spectrum of colorectal disorders can be evaluated by utilizing MRI to examine the colon.

Until now, no consensus has been reached regarding the technique and optimal bowel preparation of MR colonography. Current evidence suggests that MR colonography has sufficient accuracy for detecting colorectal cancer and clinical significant polyps. Efforts are made to replace rectal enemas by gaseous distension as in CT colonography, which may improve acceptance of MR colonogra-phy. The wide ranges of fecal tagging schemes give the possibility of limited bowel preparation in MR colonography. In addition, MR has a potential role in determining disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease of the colon and in incomplete colonoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achiam MP, Løgager VB, Chabanova E, et al (2008a) Diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography with fecal tagging. Abdom Imaging PMID:18452023

    Google Scholar 

  • Achiam MP, Løgager V, Chabanova E, et al (2008b) Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy. Eur J Radiol PMID: 19041207

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Langhorst J, et al (2005a) Small bowel hydro-MR imaging for optimized ileocecal distension in Crohn's disease: should an additional rectal enema fi lling be performed? J Magn Reson Imaging 22(1):92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al (2005b) MR colonogra-phy in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 234(2):452–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajaj WM, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al (2005c) Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of infl ammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the infl ammatory activity. Gut 54(2):257–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, et al (2003) Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 52(12):1738–1743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ajaj W, Ruehm SG, Lauenstein T, et al (2005d) Dark-lumen magnetic resonance colonography in patients with suspected sigmoid diverticulitis: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 15(11):2316–2322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosetti P, Becker C, Terrier F (2002) Colonic diverticulitis: impact of imaging on surgical management – a prospective study of 542 patients. Eur Radiol 12:1145–1149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley O, Geoghegan T, McAuley G, et al (2007) Pictorial review: magnetic resonance imaging of colonic diverticulitis Eur Radiol 17:221–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell CP, Setty BN, Holalkere N, et al (2008) Liver lesion detection and characterization in patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison of low radiation dose non-enhanced PET/CT, contrast-enhanced PET/CT, and liver MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(5):738–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dafnis G, Granath F, PÃ¥hlman L, et al (2005) Patient factors infl uencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 37(2):113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durno CA, Sherman P, Williams T, et al (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish the type and severity of pedi-atric infl ammatory bowel diseases. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 30(2):170–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ergen FB, Akata D, Hayran M, et al (2008) Magnetic resonance colonography for the evaluation of colonic infl ammatory bowel disease: correlation with conventional colonoscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(6):848–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Florie J, Birnie E, van Gelder RE, et al (2007a) MR colonogra-phy with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy. Radiology 245(1):150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florie J, Horsthuis K, Hommes DW, et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging compared with ileocolonoscopy in evaluating disease severity in Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3(12):1221–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Florie J, Jensch S, Nievelstein RA, et al (2007b) MR colonogra-phy with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Radiology 243(1):122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florie J, van Gelder RE, Haberkorn B, et al (2007c) Magnetic resonance colonography with limited bowel preparation: a comparison of three strategies. J Magn Reson Imaging 25(4):766–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasche C, Turetschek K (2005) Value of MR colonography for assessment of infl ammatory bowel disease? Believe what you see-see what you believe. Gut 54(2):181–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227(2):378–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goehde SC, Descher E, Boekstegers A, et al (2005) Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdom Imaging 30(5):576–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goh V, Halligan S, Taylor SA, et al (2007) Differentiation between diverticulitis and colorectal cancer: quantitative CT perfusion measurements versus morphologic criteria– initial experience. Radiology 242(2):456–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al (2005) CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237(3):893–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D, et al (2005) Incomplete conventional colonoscopy: magnetic resonance colonogra-phy in the evaluation of the proximal colon. Endoscopy 37(9):816–820

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D, et al (2006) Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 238(1):143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heverhagen JT, Sitter H, Zielke A, et al (2008) Prospective evaluation of the value of magnetic resonance imaging in suspected acute sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 51(12):1810–1815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Stokkers PC, et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn's disease: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 19(6):1450–1460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe TA, Gaca AM, Delaney S, et al (2007) Radiation doses from small-bowel follow-through and abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(5):1015–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensch S, de Vries AH, Peringa J, et al (2008) CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population. Radiology 247(1):122–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359(12):1207–1217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinner S, Kuehle CA, Langhorst J, et al (2007) MR colonography vs. optical colonoscopy: comparison of patients' acceptance in a screening population. Eur Radiol 17(9):2286–2293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koh DM, Brown G, Collins DJ (2009) Nanoparticles in rectal cancer imaging. Cancer Biomark 5(2):89–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJS, et al (2001) MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1325–1332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehle CA, Langhorst J, Ladd SC, et al (2007) Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population. Gut 56(8):1079–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laméris W, van Randen A, Bipat S, et al (2008) Graded compression ultrasonography and computed tomography in acute colonic diverticulitis: meta-analysis of test accuracy. Eur Radiol 18(11):2498–2511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laméris W, van Randen A, van Es HW, et al (2009) Imaging strategies for the detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain. BMJ 339:b2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langhorst J, Kühle CA, Ajaj W, et al (2007) MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of infl amma-tory bowel diseases: diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance. Infl amm Bowel Dis 13(8):1001–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, et al (2002) MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 223(1):248–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Vogt FM, et al (2001a) Dark lumen MR colonography: initial experience. Rofo 173(9):785–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lauenstein TC, Holtmann G, Schoenfelder D, et al (2001b) MR Colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am. J Roentgenol 177:823–827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58(3):130–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, et al (2008) Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 135(4):1100–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas DJ, Sood RR, Graves MJ, et al (2001) Colon carcinoma: MR imaging with CO2 enema–pilot study. Radiology 219 (2):558–562

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Low RN, McCue M, Barone R, et al (2003) MR staging of primary colorectal carcinoma: comparison with surgical and histopathologic fi ndings. Abdom Imaging 28(6):784–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, et al (1997) Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 349(9061):1288–1291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, et al (2000) Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 216(2):383–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luboldt W, Steiner P, Bauerfeind P, et al (1998) Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report. Radiology 207(1):59–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, et al (1999) Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(3):561–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, et al (2000) The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343(22):1603–1607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez F, Kondylis P, Reilly J (2005) Limitations of barium enema performed as an adjunct to incomplete colonos-copy. Dis Colon Rectum 48(10):1951–1954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al (2002) Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 223(3):615–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY, et al (2004) Colon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(19):1420–1425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM, et al (2000) Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenter-ology 119(2):300–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, et al (2008) Small and diminutive polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a decision analysis for referral to colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:136–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al (1998) Helical CT with only colonic contrast material for diagnosing diverticulitis: prospective evaluation of 150 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(6):1445–1449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rimola J, Rodríguez S, García Bosch O, et al (2009) Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in Crohn disease. Gut PMID 19136510

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez Gomez S, Pagés Llinas M, Castells Garangou A, et al (2008) Ark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms. Eur Radiol 18(7):1396–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saar B, Meining A, Beer A, et al (2007) Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy. Br J Radiol 80(952):235–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyer AG, Fürst A, Agha A, et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging based colonography for diagnosis and assessment of diverticulosis and diverticulitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 19(5):474–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyer AG, Gölder S, Scheibl K, et al (2005a) Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn's disease: fi rst clinical experience. Infl amm Bowel Dis 11(4):388–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, et al (2005b) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal infl ammation in patients with infl ammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut 54(2):250–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shinya S, Sasaki T, Nakagawa Y, et al (2009) The effi cacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection of colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 56(89):128–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shoenut J P, Semelka RC, Magro CM, et al (1994) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy in distinguishing the type and severity of infl ammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 19(1):31–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker J. (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging and the acute abdomen. Br J Surg 95(10):1193–1194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM, et al (2002) Minimizing post-colonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insuffl ation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc 56(2):190–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, et al (2007) European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17(2):575–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al (2004) Computed tomo-graphic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127(1):41–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weishaupt D, Patak MA, Froehlich J, et al (1999) Faecal tagging to avoid colonic cleansing before MRI colonography. Lancet 354(9181):835–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winawer SJ, Zauber AG (2002) The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 12(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236(1):3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zijta FM, Bipat S, Stoker J (2009) Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies. Eur Rad (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zijta, F.M., Stoker, J. (2010). MRI of the Colon (Colonography): Results. In: Stoker, J. (eds) MRI of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85532-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85532-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85531-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85532-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics