Skip to main content

The Ecology and Evolution of Helping in Hover Wasps (Hymenoptera: Stenogastrinae)

  • Chapter
Ecology of Social Evolution

In this chapter, I discuss the ecology and evolution of helping in hover wasps (Stenogastrinae), a tropical group that is uniquely suited for experimental studies in the field. I first outline the ecological benefits of helping that have been tested for in hover wasps, such as insurance advantages and direct fitness for helpers. I then discuss explanations for individual variation in helping decisions –why only some female offspring become helpers; and why some helpers work harder than others. Most of the chapter focuses on the hairy-faced hover wasp, whose behavioral ecology is best known, but I also discuss reproductive skew and task allocation in other species, and draw comparisons with other wasps where appropriate. The chapter ends with a comparison of the ecology of helping in hover wasps and that in cooperatively breeding vertebrates. The conclusion is that although helping can be understood using Hamilton’s inclusive fitness framework in both of these major taxa, the critical ecological factors differ fundamentally between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balshine-Earn S, Neat FC, Reid H, Taborksy M (1998) Paying to stay or paying to breed? Field evidence for direct benefits of helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behav Ecol 9:432-438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton A, Sumner S, Shreeves G, Casiraghi M, Field J (2006) Colony genetic structure in a facul-tatively eusocial hover wasp. Behav Ecol 17:873-880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge CAL (2005) Rank and inheritance in a facultatively eusocial hover wasp. PhD Thesis, University College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge CAL, Field J (2007) Queuing for dominance: gerontocracy and queue-jumping in the hover wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1253-1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull NJ, Schwarz MP (1996) The habitat saturation hypothesis and sociality in an allodapine bee: cooperative nesting is not “making the best of a bad situation”. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:267-274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cant MA, Field J (2001) Helping effort and future fitness in cooperative animal societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1959-1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cant MA, Field J (2005) Helping effort in a dominance hierarchy. Behav Ecol 16:708-715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cant MA, Llop JB, Field J (2006) Individual variation in social aggression and the probability of inheritance: theory and a field test. Am Nat 167:837-852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter JM (1991) Phylogenetic relationships and the origin of social behavior in the Vespidae. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 7-32

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter JM (2003) On “Molecular phylogeny of Vespidae (Hymenoptera) and the evolution of sociality in wasps”. Am Museum Novitates 3389:1-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter JM, Starr CK (2000) A new genus of hover wasps from Southeast Asia (Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Stenogastrinae) Am Museum Novitates 3291:1-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (2002) Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative verte-brates. Science 296:69-72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, O’Riain MJ, Griffin AS (2000) Individual contributions to babysitting in a cooperative mongoose Suricata suricatta. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:301-305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coster-Longman C, Turillazzi S (1998) Leaving the nest and related behavioural strategies in a captive population of Parischnogaster mellyi (Stenogastrinae, Vespidae, Hymenoptera) Insect Social Life 2:37-44

    Google Scholar 

  • Coster-Longman C, Landi M, Turillazzi S (2002) The role of passive defence (selfish herd and dilution effect) in the gregarious nesting of Liostenogaster wasps (Vespidae, Hymenoptera, Stenogastrinae). J Insect Behav 15:331-350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig R (1983) Subfertility and the evolution of social behaviour by kin selection. J Theoret Biol 100:379-397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin A, Field J (2007a) Rank and colony defence in the facultatively eusocial hover wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata. Behav Ecol 18:331-336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin A, Field J (2007b) Social aggression in an age-dependent dominance hierarchy. Behaviour 144:753-765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuvillier-Hot V, Lenoir A, Crewe R, Malosse C, Peeters C (2004) Fertility signalling and repro-ductive skew in queenless ants. Anim Behav 68:1209-1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1992) Dunnock behaviour and social evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli D, Boomsma JJ, Turillazzi S (2005) Multiple reproductive strategies in a tropical hover wasp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:190-199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Cant MA (in press) Reproductive skew in primitively eusocial wasps: how useful are cur-rent models? In: Hager R, Jones CB (eds) Reproductive skew in vertebrates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Foster W (1999) Helping behaviour in facultatively eusocial hover wasps: an experimental test of the subfertility hypothesis. Anim Behav 57:633-636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Foster W, Shreeves G, Sumner S (1998a) Ecological constraints on independent nesting in facultatively eusocial hover wasps. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:973-977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Solis CR, Queller DC, Strassmann JE (1998b) Social and genetic structure of paper wasp cofoundress associations: tests of reproductive skew models. Am Nat 151:545-563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Shreeves G, Sumner S (1999) Group size, queuing and helping decisions in facultatively eusocial hover wasps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:378-385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Shreeves G, Sumner S, Casiraghi M (2000) Insurance-based advantage to helpers in a tropical hover wasp. Nature 404:869-871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Cronin A, Bridge C (2006) Future fitness and helping in social queues. Nature 441:214-217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francescato E, Massolo A, Landi M, Gerace L, Hashim R, Turillazzi S (2002) Colony membership, division of labour, and genetic relatedness among females of colonies of Eustenogaster fraterna (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Stenogastrinae). J Insect Behav 15:153-170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadagkar R (1990) Evolution of eusociality: the advantage of assured fitness returns. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 329:17-25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, West SA (2002) Kin selection: fact and fiction. Trends Ecol Evol 17:15-21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, West SA (2003) Kin discrimination and the benefits of helping in cooperatively breed-ing vertebrates. Science 302:634-636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I and II. J Theoret Biol 7:1-52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond RL, Keller L (2004) Conflict over male parentage in social insects. PloS Biol 2:e248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hannonen M, Sundström L (2003) Worker nepotism among polygynous ants. Nature 421:910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansell M (1982) Brood development in the subsocial wasp Parischnogaster mellyi (Saussure), (Stenogastrinae, Hymenoptera) Insectes Soc 29:3-14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansell M (1987a) Nest building as a facilitating and limiting factor in the evolution of eusociality in the Hymenoptera. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 4:155-181

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansell M (1987b) Elements of eusociality in colonies of Eustenogaster calyptodoma (Sakagami & Yoshikawa) (Stenogastrinae, Vespidae). Anim Behav 35:131-141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchwell B (1999) Investment strategies of breeders in avian cooperative breeding systems. Am Nat 154:205-219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinsohn R, Cockburn A (1994) Helping is costly to young birds in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Proc R Soc Lond B 256:293-298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines HM, Hunt JH, O’Connor TK, Gillespie JJ, Cameron SA (2007) Multigene phylogeny reveals eusociality evolved twice in vespid wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3295-3299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogendoorn K, Velthuis HHW (1999) Task allocation and reproductive skew in social mass provisioning carpenter bees in relation to age and size. Insectes Soc 46:198-207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes CR, Queller DC, Strassmann JE, Davis SK (1993) Relatedness and altruism in Polistes wasps. Behav Ecol 4:128-137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA (2000) Models of reproductive skew: a review and synthesis. Ethology 106:5-26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsai I, Penzes Z, Wenzel JW (1996) Dynamics of colony development in Polistes dominulus: a modeling approach. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:97-105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller L (1997) Indiscriminate altruism: unduly nice parents and siblings. Trends Ecol Evol 12:99-103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Johnstone RA (1999) Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:571-578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Sutherland WJ (1998) Optimal floating and queuing strategies: consequences for density dependence and habitat loss. Am Nat 152:354-366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Johnstone RA, Clutton-Brock TH (2001) The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:187-196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J (1992) Importance of habitat saturation and territory quality for evolution of cooperative breeding in the Seychelles warbler. Nature 358:493-495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landi M, Queller DC, Turillazzi S, Strassmann JE (2003) Low relatedness and frequent queen turnover in the stenogastrine wasp Eustenogaster fraterna favour the life insurance over the haplodiploid hypothesis for the origin of eusociality. Insectes Soc 50:262-267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langen TA (2000) Prolonged offspring dependence and cooperative breeding in birds. Behav Ecol 11:367-377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer P, Hogendoorn K, Keller L (2004) Tug-of-war over reproduction in a social bee. Nature 428:844-847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi MC, Turillazzi S (1986) Behavioural and ecological adaptations to the high mountain environment of Polistes biglumis bimaculatus. Ecol Entomol 11:199-204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrath RD, Heinsohn RG (2000) Reproductive skew in birds: models, problems and prospects. J Avian Biol 31:247-258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCorquodale DB (1989) Soil softness, nest initiation and nest sharing in the wasp, Cerceris antipodes (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Ecol Entomol 14:191-196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder R, Langmore NE (1993) Dominant males punish helpers for temporary defection in superb fairy-wrens. Anim Behav 45:830-833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P (1991) Alloparental care and eusocial evolution: the limits of Queller’s head start advan-tage. Oikos 61:122-125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruett-Jones SG, Lewis MJ (1990) Sex-ratio and habitat limitation promote delayed dispersal in superb fairy-wrens. Nature 348:541-542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1989) The evolution of eusociality: reproductive head starts of workers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:3224-3226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1996) The origin and maintenance of eusociality: the advantage of extended parental care. In: Turillazzi S, West-Eberhard MJ (eds) Natural history and evolution of paper-wasps. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 218-234

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Zacchi F, Cervo R, Turillazzi S, Henshaw MT, Santorelli LA, Strassmann JE (2000) Unrelated helpers in a social insect. Nature 405:784-787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ragsdale JE (1999) Reproductive skew theory extended: the effect of resource inheritance on social organisation. Evol Ecol Res 1:859-874

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Reeve HK (1992) Conflict in single-queen hymenopteran societies: the structure of conflict and processes that reduce conflict in advanced eusocial species. J Theoret Biol 158:33-65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK (1991) Polistes. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 99-148

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK, Keller L (2001) Tests of reproductive skew models in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:347-85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK, Nonacs P (1997) Within-group aggression and the value of group members: theory and a field test with social wasps. Behav Ecol 8:75-82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK, Ratnieks LW (1993) Queen-queen conflicts in polygynous societies: mutual tolerance and reproductive skew. In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 45-85

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK, Emlen ST, Keller L (1998a) Reproductive sharing in animal societies: reproductive incentives or incomplete control by dominant breeders? Behav Ecol 9:267-278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK, Peters JM, Nonacs P, Starks PT (1998b) Dispersal of first “workers” in social wasps: causes and implications of an alternative reproductive strategy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:13737-13742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK, Starks PT, Peters JM, Nonacs P (2000) Genetic support for the evolutionary theory of reproductive transactions in social wasps. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:75-79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross K, Carpenter JM (1991) Population genetic structure, relatedness, and breeding systems. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 451-479

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel CT (1987) Factors affecting colony size in the stenogastrine wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata (PhD dissertation). University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz J, Moritz RFA (1998) Molecular phylogeny of Vespidae (Hymenoptera) and the evolution of sociality in wasps. Molec Phylogenet Evol 9:183-191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz J, Moritz RFA (2000) Molecular evolution in social wasps. In: Austin AD, Downton M (eds) Hymenoptera: evolution, biodiversity and biological control, VIC: CSIRO Publishing, pp 84-89

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppa P, Queller DC, Strassmann JE (2002) Reproduction in foundress associations of the social wasp, Polistes carolina, conventions, competition, and skew. Behav Ecol 13:531-542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Lacey EA, Reeve HK, Keller L (1995) The eusociality continuum. Behav Ecol 6:102-108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shreeves G, Field J (2002) Group size and direct fitness in social queues. Am Nat 159:81-95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shreeves G, Cant MA, Bolton A, Field J (2003) Insurance-based advantages for subordinate co-foundresses in a temperate paper wasp Proc R Soc Lond B 270:617-1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sledge MF, Boscaro F, Turillazzi S (2001) Cuticular hydrocarbons and reproductive status in the social wasp Polistes dominulus Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:401-409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann JE, Meyer DC (1983) Gerontocracy in the social wasp, Polistes exclamans. Anim Behav 31:431-438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann JE, Queller DC (1989) In: Breed MD, Page RE (eds) The genetics of social evolution. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 81-101

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann JE, Hughes CR, Turillazzi S, Solis CR, Queller DC (1994) Genetic relatedness and incipient eusociality in stenogastrine wasps. Anim Behav 48:813-821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner S (1999) Conflicts over reproduction in facultatively eusocial hover wasps. PhD Thesis, University College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner S, Casiraghi M, Foster W, Field J (2002) High reproductive skew in tropical hover wasps. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:179-186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts EA (2002) Visual signs of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1423-1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji K, Tsuji N (2005) Why is dominance hierarchy age-related in social insects? The relative longevity hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:517-526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turillazzi S (1985) Brood rearing behaviour and larval development in Parischnogaster nigricans serrei (du Buysson) (Hymenoptera Stenogastrinae). Ins Soc 32:117-127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turillazzi S (1990) Notes on the biology, social behaviour and nest architecture of Metischnogaster drewseni (Saussure) (Hymenoptera, Stenogastrinae). Boll Zool 57:331-339

    Google Scholar 

  • Turillazzi S (1991) The Stenogastrinae. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 74-98

    Google Scholar 

  • Turillazzi S (1996) Polistes in perspective: comparative social biology and evolution in Belonogaster and Stenogastrinae. In: Turillazzi S, West-Eberhard MJ (eds) Natural history and evolution of paper-wasps. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 235-247

    Google Scholar 

  • Turillazzi S, Hansell MH (1991) Biology and social behaviour of three species of Anischnogaster (Vespidae, Stenogastrinae) in Papua New Guinea. Insectes Soc 38:423-437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turillazzi S, Sledge MF, Dapporto L, Landi M, Fanelli D, Fondeli L, Zanetti P, Dani FR (2004) Epicuticular lipids and fertility in primitively social wasps (Hymenoptera Stenogastrinae). Physiol Entomol 29:464-471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vehrencamp SL (1983) A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian species. Anim Behav 31:667-682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters JR, Copeyon CK, Carter JH (1992) Test of the ecological basis of cooperative breeding in red-cockaded woodpeckers. Auk 109:90-97

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenseleers T, Ratnieks FLW (2006) Comparative analysis supports worker policing theory. Am Nat 168:E163-E179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (1975) The evolution of social behaviour by kin selection. Q Rev Biol 50:1-33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright J (1997) Helping-at-the-nest in Arabian babblers: signalling social status or sensible investment in chicks? Anim Behav 54:1439-1448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Field, J. (2008). The Ecology and Evolution of Helping in Hover Wasps (Hymenoptera: Stenogastrinae). In: Korb, J., Heinze, J. (eds) Ecology of Social Evolution. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75957-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics