Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Queuing for dominance: gerontocracy and queue-jumping in the hover wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mechanisms through which dominance is inherited within social groups vary from direct interactions such as fighting to non-confrontational conventions. Liostenogaster flavolineata is a primitively eusocial hover wasp in which one female, the ‘dominant’, is the only reproductive upon the nest. The remaining females, although capable of reproduction, behave as helpers. In this study, we investigate the rules by which helpers inherit dominance. We removed successive dominants from 56 nests and recorded accession on un-manipulated nests. The results showed that L. flavolineata has a strict age-based inheritance queue: new dominants are the oldest female in their groups 87% of the time. Thirteen cases of queue-jumping were found in which young individuals were able to supplant older nestmates and inherit dominance precociously. Queue jumpers did not differ from other wasps in terms of relatedness to other group members or body size. Individuals that had previously worked less hard than other females of equivalent rank were significantly more likely to later jump the queue. Queue-jumping may represent a cheating strategy or could indicate that the rule for inheriting dominance is not based purely on relative age. We also discuss possible reasons why age-based queuing has evolved and its potential to promote the evolution of helping behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleby MC (1983) Competition in a red deer stag social group: rank, age and relatedness of opponents. Anim Behav 31:913–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buston PM (2004) Territory inheritance in clownfish anemonefish. Proc R Soc Lond B 271(Suppl):S252–S254

    Google Scholar 

  • Cant MA, Field J (2001) Helping effort and future fitness in cooperative animal societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1959–1964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter JM (2003) On “molecular phylogeny of Vespidae (Hymenoptera) and the evolution of sociality in wasps”. Am Mus Novitat 3389:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2005) Statistics: an introduction using R. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn PO, Cockburn A, Mulder RA (1995) Fairy-wren helpers often care for young to which they are unrelated. Proc R Soc Lond B 259:339–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Foster W (1999) Helping behaviour in facultatively eusocial hover wasps: an experimental test of the subfertility hypothesis. Anim Behav 57:633–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Foster W, Shreeves G, Sumner S (1998) Ecological constraints on independent nesting in facultatively eusocial hover wasps. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:973–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Shreeves G, Sumner S (1999) Group size, queuing and helping decisions in facultatively eusocial hover wasps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Shreeves G, Sumner S, Casiraghi M (2000) Insurance-based advantage to helpers in a tropical hover wasp. Nature 404:869–871

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Cronin A, Bridge C (2006) Future fitness and helping in social queues. Nature 441:214–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodnight KF, Queller DC (1999) Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers. Mol Ecol 8:1231–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA, Grafen A (1993) Dishonesty and the handicap principle. Anim Behav 46:759–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Johnstone RA (1999) Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi MC, Sledge MF, Laiolo P, Sturlini E, Turillazzi S (2004) Cuticular hydrocarbon dynamics in young adult Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) and the role of linear hydrocarbons in nestmate recognition systems. J Insect Physiol 50:935–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panek LM, George GJ, Espelie KE (2001) The effect of a wasp’s age on its cuticular hydrocarbon profile and its tolerance by nestmate and non-nestmate conspecifics (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ethology 107:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons J, Baptista LF (1980) Crown colouration and dominance in the white-crowned sparrow. Auk 97:807–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Zacchi F, Cervo R, Turillazzi S, Henshaw MT, Santorelli LA, Strassmann JE (2000) Unrelated helpers in a social insect. Nature 405:784–787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ragsdale JE (1999) Reproductive skew theory extended: the effect of resource inheritance on social organization. Evol Ecol Res 1:859–874

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer S (1985) Dyed birds achieve higher social status than controls in Harris’ sparrows. Anim Behav 33:1325–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel CT (1987) Factors affecting colony size in the stenogastrine wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Malaya

  • Schmitz J, Moritz RFA (1998) Molecular phylogeny of Vespidae (Hymenoptera) and the evolution of sociality in wasps. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:188–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppä P, Queller DC, Strassmann JE (2002) Reproduction in foundress associations of the social wasp, Polistes carolina: conventions, competition, and skew. Behav Ecol 13:531–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shreeves G, Field J (2002) Group size and direct fitness in social queues. Am Nat 159:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey PB, Koenig WD (1990) Cooperative breeding in birds: long term studies of ecology and behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann JE, Meyer DC (1983) Gerontocracy in the social wasp, Polistes exclamans. Anim Behav 31:431–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann JE, Solis CR, Peters JM, Queller DC (1996) Strategies for finding and using highly polymorphic DNA microsatellite loci for studies of genetic relatedness and pedigrees. In: Ferraris JD, Palumbi SR (eds) Molecular zoology: advances, strategies, and protocols. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 163–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner S, Field J (2001) Highly polymorphic microsatellite loci in the facultatively eusocial hover wasp, Liostenogaster flavolineata and cross-species amplification. Mol Ecol Notes 1:229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner S, Casiraghi M, Foster W, Field J (2002) High reproductive skew in tropical hover wasps. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The R project for statistical computing (2005) http://www.r-project.org/

  • Tibbetts EA (2002) Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1423–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2004) A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432:218–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuji K, Tsuji N (2005) Why is dominance hierarchy age-related in social insects? The relative longevity hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:517–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veiberg V, Loe LE, Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Stenseth NC (2004) Social rank, feeding and winter weight loss in red deer: any evidence of interference competition? Oecologia 138:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH, Rabenold KN (1984) The evolution of cooperative breeding by delayed reciprocity and queuing for favourable social positions. Evolution 38:609–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank E. Almond, S. Brace, G. Shreeves and D. Stevens for the help with the fieldwork. Thanks also go to E. Hornett for the help with genotyping and K. Durai, H. Rosli and A. Sofian for their hospitality in Malaysia. A. Cronin kindly gave us access to the 2003 datasets. We thank E. Almond, E. Lucas, L. Zanette and A. Pomiankowski for the useful discussion and the Natural Environment Research Council for funding. The experiments conducted in this study comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University College London,Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London, NW1 2HE, UK

    Catherine Bridge & Jeremy Field

Authors
  1. Catherine Bridge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeremy Field
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Bridge.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Ross

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bridge, C., Field, J. Queuing for dominance: gerontocracy and queue-jumping in the hover wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61, 1253–1259 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0355-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0355-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation