Skip to main content

On Blind Tests and Spatial Prediction Models

  • Chapter
Progress in Geomathematics

Abstract

This contribution discusses the usage of blind tests, BT, to cross-validate and interpret the results of predictions by statistical models applied to spatial databases. Models such as Bayesian probability, empirical likelihood ratio, fuzzy sets, or neural networks, were and are being applied to identify areas likely to contain events such as undiscovered mineral resources, zones of high natural hazard, or sites with high potential environmental impact. Processing the information in a spatial database, the models establish the relationships between the distribution of known events and their contextual settings, described by both thematic and continuous data layers. The relationships are to locate situations where similar events are likely to occur. Maps of predicted relative resource potential or of relative hazard/impact levels are generated. They consist of relative values that need careful quantitative scrutiny to be interpreted for taking decisions on further action in exploration or on hazard/impact mitigation and avoidance. The only meaning of such relative values is their rank. Obviously, to assess the reliability of the predicted ranks, tests are indispensable. This is also a consequence of the impracticality of waiting for the future to reveal the goodness of our prediction. During the past decade only a few attempts have been made by some researchers to cross-validate the results of spatial predictions. Furthermore, assumptions and applications of cross-validations differ considerably in a number of recent case studies. A perspective for all such experiments is provided using two specific examples, one in mineral exploration and the other in landslide hazard, to answer the fundamental question: how good is my prediction?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agterberg FP, Bonham-Carter GF (2005) Measuring the performance of mineral potential maps. Nat Resour Res 14 (1): 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur JD, Wood HAR, Baker AF, Cichon JR, Raines GL (2007) Development and implementation of a Bayesian-based aquifer vulnerability assessment in Florida. Nat Resour Res 16 (2): 93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begueria S (2006) Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management. Nat Hazards 37: 315–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnia P (2007) Application of Radial Basis Functional Link Networks to exploration for Proterozoic mineral deposits in central Iran. Nat Resour Res 16 (2): 147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown W, Groves D, Gedeon T (2003) Use of fuzzy membership input layers to combine subjective geological knowledge and empirical data in a neural network method for mineral-potential mapping. Nat Resour Res 12 (3): 183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Q (2004) Application of weights of evidence methods for assessment of flowing wells in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada. Nat Resour Res 13 (2): 77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF (2003) Use of airborne geophysical surveys for constructing mineral potential maps. Econ Geol Monogr 11: 879–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF (2006) Using likelihood ratio functions for modeling the conditional probability of occurrence of future landslides for risk assessment. Comput Geosci 32 (8): 1052–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJ, Bonin D, Fannin RJ, Fabbri AG, Journeay M (2006) Uncertainty in predicting landslide hazard in the Coquitlam reservoir area, B.C., Canada. In: Proceedings of IAMG’06, Liege, Belgium, 3–8 Sept 2006, Session S09-07, p 4, CD

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG (1993) Representation of geoscience data for information integration. J Nonrenew Res 2 (2): 122–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG (1998) Three Bayesian prediction models for landslide hazard. In: Buccianti A (ed) Proceedings of international association for mathematical geology 1998 annual meeting (IAMG’98), Ischia, Italy, 3–7 October 1998, pp 204–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG (1999) Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 65 (12): 1389–1399

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. In: Chacon J, Corominas J (eds) Special issue on landslides and GIS. Nat Hazards 30 (3): 451–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG (2004) Systematic procedures of landslide hazard mapping for risk assessment using spatial prediction models. In: Glade T, Anderson MG, Crozier MJ (eds) Landslide hazard and risk. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 139–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG (2005) On mineral potential maps and how to make them useful. In: Cheng Q, Bonham-Carter G (eds) GIS and spatial analysis, proceedings of IAMG ’05, vol 1, Toronto, Canada, 21–26 August 2005, pp 533–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG (2008) Predicting future landslides for risk analysis – spatial models and cross-validation of their results. Geomorphology 94 (3–4): 438–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG, Chi KH (2002a) A strategy for sustainable development of nonrenewable resources using spatial prediction models. In: Fabbri AG, Gäal G, McCammon RB (eds) Geoenvironmental deposit models for resource exploitation and environmental security. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 101–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG, Jang DH, Scholten HJ (2005a) Risk assessment using spatial prediction model for natural disaster preparedness. In: van Oosterom P, Zlatanova S, Fendel EM (eds) Geo-informastion for disaster management. Springer, Berlin, pp 619–640. Proceedings of Gi4DM, the first symposium on geo-information for disaster management, Delft, Netherlands, 21–23 March 2005, pp 619–640

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Fabbri AG, van Westen CJ (1995) Multivariate regression analysis for landslide hazard zonation. In: Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 107–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Harris JR, Keating P, Kjarsgaard B, Parsons S (2005b) Preliminary report on developing a mineral potential map for diamond exploration in Lac de Gras area, NWT. Unpublished manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CF, Kojima H, Fabbri AG (2002b) Stability analysis of prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. In: Allison RJ (ed) Applied geomorphology: theory and practice. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., New York, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolbaugh MF, Raines GL, Zehner E (2007) Assessment of exploration bias in data-driven predictive models and the estimation of undiscovered resources. Nat Resour Res 16 (2): 199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corominas J, Copons R, Vilaplana JM Altimir J, Amigó J (2003) Integrated landslide susceptibility analysis and hazard assessment in the principality of Andorra. In: Chacon J, Corominas J (eds) Special issue on landslides and GIS. Nat Hazards 30 (3): 421–435

    Google Scholar 

  • de Quadros TFP, Koppe JC, Strieder AJ, Coste JFCL (2006) Mineral potential mapping: a comparison of weights-of-evidence and fuzzy methods. Nat Resour Res 15 (1): 49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabbri AG, Chung CF, Cendrero A, Remondo J (2003) Is prediction of future landslides possible with a GIS? In: Chacon J, Corominas J (eds) Special issue on landslides and GIS. Nat Hazards 30 (3): 487–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbri AG, Chung CF, Jang DH (2004) A software approach to spatial predictions of natural hazards and consequent risks. In: Brebbia CA (ed) Risk Analysis IV. WIT Press, Southampton, Boston, pp 289–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris DV, Zurcher L, Stanley M, Marlowe J, Pan G (2003) A comparative analysis of favorability mapping by Weights of Evidence, Probabilistic Neural Networks, Discriminant Analysis and Logistic Regression. Nat Resour Res 12 (4): 241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Lee MJ, Won JS (2006) The application of artificial neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping at Jangshung, Korea. Mat Geol 38 (2): 199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masetti M, Poli S, Sterlacchini S (2007) The use of Weights-of-Evidence modeling technique to estimate the vulnerability of groundwater to nitrate contamination. Nat Resour Res 16 (2): 109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson EP, Connors KA, Suárez CS (2007) GIS-based slope stability analysis, Chuquicamata open pit copper mine, Chile. Nat Resour Res 16 (2): 171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nykauml;nen V, Ojala VJ (2007) Spatial analysis techniques as successful mineral-potential mapping tools for orogenic gold deposits in the northern Fennoscandian Shield, Finland. Nat Resour Res 16 (2): 85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli S, Sterlacchini S (2007) Landslide representation strategies in susceptibility studies using Weights-of-Evidence modeling technique. Nat Resour Res 16 (2): 121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porwal A, Carranza EJM, Hale M (2003a) Knowledge-driven and data-driven fuzzy models for predictive mineral potential mapping. Nat Resour Res 12 (1): 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porwal A, Carranza EJM, Hale M (2003b) Artificial neural networks for mineral-potential mapping: a case study from Aravalli province, western India. Nat Resour Res, 12 (3): 155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porwal A, Carranza EJM, Hale M (2006a) Bayesian network classifiers for mineral potential mapping. Comput Geosci 32: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porwal A, Carranza EJM, Hale M (2006b) A hybrid fuzzy weights-of-evidence model for mineral potential mapping. Nat Resour Res 15 (1): 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raines GL (1999) Evaluation of weights of evidence to predict epithermal-gold deposits in the great basin of the western United States. Nat Resour Res 8 (4): 257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remondo J, González-Díez A, Díaz de Terán JR, Cendrero A (2003a) Quantitative landslide susceptibility models by means of spatial data analysis techniques; a case study in the lower Deva valley, Guipuzcoa (Spain). In: Chacon J, Corominas J (eds) Special issue on landslides and GIS. Nat Hazards 30 (3): 267–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Remondo J, Gonzälez-Díez A, Díaz de Terän JR, Cendrero A, Fabbri AG, Chung CF (2003b) Validation of landslide susceptibility maps; examples and applications from a case study in Northern Spain. In: Chacon J, Corominas J (eds) Special issue on landslides and GIS. Nat Hazards 30 (3): 437–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GR Jr, Larkins PM (2007) Probabilistic prediction models for aggregate quarry siting. Nat Resour Res 16 (2): 135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santacana N, Baeza C, Corominas J, de Paz A, Marturiäp J (2003) A GIS-based multivariate statistical analysis for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping in La Pobla de Lillet Area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). In: Chacon J, Corominas J (eds) Special issue on landslides and GIS. Nat Hazards 30 (3): 281–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer DA, Kouda R (1999) A comparison of weight-of-evidence method and probabilistic neural networks. Nat Resour Res 8 (4): 287–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Skabar AA (2005) Mapping mineralization probabilities using multilayer perceptrons. Nat Resour Res 14 (2): 109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tissari S, Nykänen V, Lerssi J, Kolehmainen M (2007) Classification of soil groups using Weights-of-Evidence method and RBFLN-neural nets. Nat Resour Res 16 (2): 159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R (2003) Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. In: Chacon J, Corominas J (eds) Special issue on landslides and GIS. Nat Hazards 30 (3): 399–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Zêzere JL, Reis E, Garcia R, Oliveira S, Rodrigues ML, Vieira G, Ferreira AB (2004) Integration of spatial and temporal data for the definition of different landslide hazard scenarios in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4: 133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fabbri, A.G., Chung, CJ. (2008). On Blind Tests and Spatial Prediction Models. In: Bonham-Carter, G., Cheng, Q. (eds) Progress in Geomathematics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69496-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics