Abstract
In mineral exploration, resource assessment, or natural hazard assessment, many layers of geoscience maps such as lithology, structure, geophysics, geochemistry, hydrology, slope stability, mineral deposits, and preprocessed remotely sensed data can be used as evidence to delineate potential areas for further investigation. Today's PC-based data base management systems, statistical packages, spreadsheets, image processing systems, and geographical information systems provide almost unlimited capabilities of manipulating data. Generally such manipulations make a strategic separation of spatial and nonspatial attributes, which are conveniently linked in relational data bases. The first step in integration procedures usually consists of studying the individual charateristics of map features and interrelationships, and then representing them in numerical form (statistics) for finding the areas of high potential (or impact).
Data representation is a transformation of our experience of the real world into a computational domain. As such, it must comply with models and rules to provide us with useful information. Quantitative representation of spatially distributed map patterns or phenomena plays a pivotal role in integration because it also determines the types of combination rules applied to them.
Three representation methods—probability measures, Dempster-Shafer belief functions, and membership functions in fuzzy sets—and their corresponding estimation procedures are presented here with analyses of the implications and of the assumptions that are required in each approach to thematic mapping. Difficulties associated with the construction of probability measures, belief functions, and membership functions are also discussed; alternative procedures to overcome these difficulties are proposed. These proposed techniques are illustrated by using a simple, artificially constructed data set.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agterberg. F.P., Chung, C.F., Fabbri, A.G., Kelly, A.M., and Springer, J.S., 1972, Geomathematical evaluation of copper and zinc potential of the Abitibi area, Ontario and Quebec: Geological Society of Canada Paper 71-41, 55 p.
Aronoff, S., 1989, Geographic information systems—A management perspective: Ottawa, Canada, WDL Publications, 294 p.
Bellman, R.E., Kalaba, R., and Zadeh, L.A., 1966, Abstraction and pattern classification: Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, v. 13, p. 1–7.
Bellman, R.E., and Zadeh, L.A., 1970, Decision-making in a fuzzy environment: Management Science, v. 17, no. 4, p. 141–164.
Brodaric, B., 1992, Map compilation with CAD for geological field mapping,in Proceedings of Computer and Mineral Exploration Symposium on “Mapping to Mining”: Toronto, March 1992, p. 16–25.
Butler, K., and Carter, J., 1986, The use of psychometric tools for knowledge acquisition: A case study,in Gale, W., ed., Artificial intelligence and statistics: Reading, Mass., Addison Wesley, p. 295–319.
Chung, C.F., 1978, Computer program for the logistic model to estimate the probability of occurrence of discrete events: Geological Society of Canada Paper 78-11, 23 p.
—, 1983, SIMSAG—Integrated computer system for use in evaluation of mineral and energy resources: Mathematical Geology, v. 15, no. 1, p. 47–58.
Chung, C.F., and Agterberg, F.P., 1980, Regression models for estimating mineral resources from geological map data: Mathematical Geology, v. 12, no. 5, p. 473–488.
Chung, C.F., and Moon, W.M., 1991, Combination rules of spatial geoscience data for mineral exploration: Geoinformatics, v. 2, p. 159–169.
Green, A.A., and Craig, M., 1984, Integrated analysis of image data for mineral exploration,in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment, 3rd Thematic Conference on Remote Sensing and Exploration Geology, Colorado Springs, April 16–19, 1984, p. 131–137.
Heckerman, D., 1986, Probabilistic interpretations for MYCIN's certainty factors,in Kanal, L.N., and Lemmer, J.F., eds., Uncertainty in artificial intelligence: New York, Elsevier, p. 167–196.
Katz, S., 1991, Emulating the PROSPECTOR expert system with a raster GIS: Computers and Geosciences, v. 17, no. 7, p. 1033–1050.
Luttig, G.G., 1987, Conclusions: Geology versus mineral, groundwater and soil resources' management—Approach to the public—Education and training questions—Types and acceptance of geopotential maps,in Arndt, P., and Luttig, G.W., eds., Mineral resources' extraction, environmental protection and land-use planning in the industrial and developing countries: Stuttgart, E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlags-buchhandlung (Nagele u. Obermiller), p. 319–331.
McGraw, K.L., and Harbison-Briggs, K., 1989, Knowledge acquisition—Principles and guidelines: Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 376 p.
McMaster, R.B., 1991, Conceptual frameworks for geographic knowledge,in Butterfield, B.P., and McMaster, R.B., eds., Map generalization—Making rules for knowledge representation: Harlow, Essex, England, Longman Scientific & Technical, p. 21–39.
Moon, W.M., Chung, C.F., and An, P., 1991, Representation and integration of geological, geophysical and remote sensing data: Geoinformatics, v. 2, p. 177–182.
Shafer, G., 1976, A mathematical theory of evidence: Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 297 p.
Shortliffe, E.H., and Buchanan, B.G., 1975, A model of inexact reasoning in medicine: Mathematical Biosciences, v. 23, p. 351–379.
Varnes, D.J., 1974, The logic of geological maps, with reference to their interpretation and use for engineering purposes: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 837, 48 p.
Wally, P., 1987, Belief function representations of statistical evidence: Annals of Statistics, v. 15, p. 1439–1465.
van Westen, C.J., 1992, Medium scale landslide hazard analysis using a PC-based GIS. A case study from Chinchina, Colombia,in van Westen, C.J., van Duren, I., Kruse, H., and Terlien eds., UNESCO-ITC project on mountain hazard mapping in the Andean environment, using geographical information systems. Part I—Theoretical introduction, training package: Enschede, The Netherlands, ITC, p. 100–115.
Zadeh, L.A., 1965, Fuzzy sets: IEEE Information and Control, v. 8, p. 338–353.
—, 1968, Probability measures of Fuzzy events: Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, v. 10, p. 421–427.
— 1978, Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility: Fuzzy Sets and Systems, v. 1, p. 3–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chung, CJ.F., Fabbri, A.G. The representation of geoscience information for data integration. Nat Resour Res 2, 122–139 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02272809
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02272809