Skip to main content

Feature Line Parallelization for Enhanced Registration of Post-implant CT and MRI Prostate Image Volumes

  • Conference paper
World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2006

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 14))

  • 48 Accesses

Abstract

The utility of feature line parallelization as the initial step in manual or semi-automatic 3D rigid-body registration of post-implant CT and MR prostate image volumes is investigated. Image data consisted of CT and 1.5T MRI (balanced fast-field echo, Te = 4.8 ms, Tr = 9.6 ms) axial images of the pelvis for 3 patients acquired approximately 4 weeks after implantation with I-125 seeds. Axial slices were 3 mm thick and spaced 3 mm apart (no gap), with a pixel pitch of ∼0.3 mm for both imaging modalities. Registration was performed in two stages. The first involved obtaining a transformation to parallelize straight lines fit to corresponding features running primarily in the sup-inf (Z) direction in the image volumes. Features selected for analysis were seed trains for CT and needle tracks/seed voids for MR. The second stage consisted of using a combination of the Procrustes algorithm and manual registration, or a normalized mutual information (NMI) algorithm, to obtain the remaining relative X, Y and Z translations and Z-axis rotation required to complete registration. Image registration performed using the Procrustes algorithm and manual approach alone when there are 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) was found to be challenging and time consuming, while 6 DOF NMI registration proved not to be consistently reliable. Feature line parallelization facilitates 3D rigid-body registration by reducing it to a 4 DOF problem involving a single rotation in the information-rich axial planes, and thereby enables successful completion by either manual or semi-automatic methods, as evidenced by comparison of target registration errors. As the initial step in CT and MRI prostate image volume registration for post-implant quality assessment, feature line parallelization affords opportunity to improve both the accuracy and speed of manual and semi-automatic image registration methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nath R, Anderson LL, Luxton G, Weaver KA, Williamson JF, Meigooni AS (1995) Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: Recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43. Med Phys 22:209–234; and Rivard MJ, Coursey BM, DeWerd LA, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Ibbott GS, Mitch MG, Nath R, Williamson JF. (2004) Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations. Med Phys 31:633–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffelt SC, Marshall LM, Garzotto M, Hung A, Holland J, Beer TM (2003) A comparison of CT scan to transrectal ultrasound-measured prostate volume in untreated prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Narayana V, Roberson PL, Pu AT, Sandler H, Winfield RH, McLaughlin PW (1997) Impact of differences in ultrasound and computed tomography on treatment planning of permanent prostate implants. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:1181–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindsay PE, Van Dyk J, Battista JJ (2003) A systematic study of imaging uncertainties and their impact on 125I prostate brachytherapy dose evaluation. Med Phys 30:1897–1908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haw BH, Wallner K, Merrick G, Badiozamani K, Butler W (2003) The effect of interobserver differences in post-implant prostate CT image interpretation on dosimetric parameters. Med Phys 30:1096–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McLaughlin PW, Narayana V, Drake DG, Miller BM, Marsh L, Chan J, Gonda R, Winfield RJ, Roberson PL (2002) Comparison of MRI pulse sequences in defining prostate volume after permanent implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:703–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois DF, Prestidge BR, Hotchkiss LA, Bice WS, Prete JJ (1997) Source localization following permanent transperineal prostate interstitial brachytherapy using magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 39:1037–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kagawa K, Lee RW, Schultheiss TE, Hunt MA, Shaer AH, Hanks GE (1997) Initial clinical assessment of CT-MRI image fusion software in localization of the prostate for 3D conformal radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38:319–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Servois V, Chauveinc L, El Khoury C, Lantoine A, Ollovier L, Flam T, Rosenwald Cosset LM, Neuenschwander S (2003) CT and MR image fusion using two different methods after prostate brachytherapy: Impact on post-implant dosimetric assessment. (2003) Cancer Radiother 7:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  10. Amdur RJ, Gladstone D, Leopold KA, Harris RD (1999) Prostate seed implant quality assessment using CT and MR image fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43:67–72

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taussky D, Auston L, Toi A, Yeung I, Williams T, Pearson S, McLean M, Pond G, Crook J (2005) Sequential evaluation of prostate edema after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy using CT-MRI fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:974–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McLaughlin PW, Narayana V, Kessler M, McShan D, Troyer S, Marsh L, Hixson G, Roberson PL (2004) The use of mutual information in registration of CT and MRI datasets post permanent implant. Brachyther 3:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberson PL, McLauglin PW, Narayana V, Troyer S, Hixson GV, Kessler ML (2005) Use and uncertainties of mutual information for computed tomography/magnetic resonance (CT/MR) registration post permanent implant of the prostate. Med Phys 32:473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Herk M, Bruce A, Guus Kroes AP, Shouman T, Touw A, Lebesque JV (1995) Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33:1311–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parker CC, Damyanovich A, Haycocks T, Haider M, Bayley A, Catton CN (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tomography co-registration. Radiother & Oncol 66:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hajnal JV, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ (2001) Medical Image Registration. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  17. Camp J, Robb R (1999) A novel binning method for improved accuracy and speed of volume image coregistration using normalized mutual information. Proc. Medical Imaging 1999: Image Processing, Vol. 3661, pp 24–31, SPIE, Bellingham

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taussky D, Yeung I, Williams T, Pearson S, McLean M, Pond G, Crook J (2006) Rectal-wall dose dependence on postplan timing after permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Article in Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron S. Sloboda .

Editor information

R. Magjarevic J. H. Nagel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sloboda, R.S., Vidakovic, S. (2007). Feature Line Parallelization for Enhanced Registration of Post-implant CT and MRI Prostate Image Volumes. In: Magjarevic, R., Nagel, J.H. (eds) World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2006. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36841-0_472

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36841-0_472

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36839-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36841-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics