Skip to main content

Zusammenfassung

Beim faktoriellen Survey (Vignettenanalyse) handelt es sich um ein experimentelles Design (Eifler, Kapitel 11 in diesem Band), bei dem der Forscher variierende Situationsoder Personenbeschreibungen, die sogenannten Vignetten, zu einem Thema erstellt und unter einem bestimmten Gesichtspunkt beurteilen lässt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alexander, Cheryl S./Becker, Henry Jay (1978): The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, Klaus/Erichson, Bernd/Plinke, Wulff/Weiber, Rolf (2000): Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. 9. Auflage. Berlin: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomé, Edurne/Dülmer, Hermann (2013): Decomposing the Determinants of (Dis-) Trust in Germany and Spain. Results from an Experimental Design Using the Factorial Survey. Vortrag auf der ESRA-Konferenz 2013. Ljubljana, 15.-19. Juli 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Michael/Opp, Karl-Dieter (2001): Der faktorielle Survey und die Messung von Normen. In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 53: 283–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dülmer, Hermann (2013): The Factorial Survey: Design Selection and its Impact on Reliability and Internal Validity. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript

    Google Scholar 

  • Dülmer, Hermann (2007): Experimental Plans in Factorial Surveys: Random or Quota Design? In: Sociological Methods & Research 35: 382–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eifler, Stefanie (2007): Evaluating the Validity of Self-Reported Deviant Behavior Using Vignette Analysis. In: Quality & Quantity 41: 303–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E./Srinivasan, V. (1978): Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook. In: Journal of Consumer Research 5: 103–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunst, Richard/Mason, Robert L. (1991): How to Construct Fractional Factorial Experiments. Volume 14. The Basic References in Quality Control: Statistical Techniques. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, Guillermina (2006): Factorial Survey Methods for Studying Beliefs and Judgments. In: Sociological Methods & Research 34: 334–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, Guillermina (1988): Whom Shall We Welcome? Elite Judgments of the Criteria for the Selection of Immigrants. In: American Sociological Review 53: 919–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, Roger E. (1995): Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. 3. Auflage. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhfeld, Warren F./Tobias, Randall D./Garrat, Mark (1994): Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications. In: Journal of Marketing Research 21: 545–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebig, Stefan/Mau, Steffen (2002): Einstellungen zur sozialen Mindestsicherung. Ein Vorschlag zur differenzierten Erfassung normativer Urteile. In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 54: 109–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, Milton (1981): Magnitude Scaling. Quantitative Measurement of Opinions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Peter H./Anderson, Andy B. (1982): The Factorial Survey Approach: An Introduction. In: Rossi/Nock (Hg.): 15–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Peter H./Nock, Steven L. (Hrsg.) (1982): Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, Tom A. B./Bosker, Roel J. (2012): Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Analysis. 2. Auflage. Los Angeles: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Peter M./Atzmüller, Christiane (2006): Experimentelle Vignettendesigns in faktoriellen Surveys. In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 58: 117–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Brian J. (2006): Factorial Surveys: Using Vignettes to Study Professional Judgement. In: British Journal of Social Work 36: 1187–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallander, Lisa (2009): 25 Years of Factorial Surveys in Sociology: A Review. In: Social Science Research 38: 505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermann Dülmer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dülmer, H. (2014). Vignetten. In: Baur, N., Blasius, J. (eds) Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18939-0_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18939-0_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17809-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-18939-0

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics