Skip to main content

Interpersonales Vertrauen als Management-Aufgabe in Organisationen

  • Chapter
Interpersonales Vertrauen

Zusammenfassung

Effektive Zusammenarbeit innerhalb einer Organisation, aber auch zwischen Organisationen ist nur möglich, wenn sich die handelnden Personen (Akteure) aufeinander verlassen können. Dies gilt für Unternehmen mit wirtschaftlicher Zielsetzung ebenso wie für Nonprofit-Organisationen. Angesichts einer Globalisierung der Märkte und eines verschärften Wettbewerbs, der durch die weltweit zu beobachtende Tendenz der Privatisierung von Dienstleistungen eine zunehmende Dynamik erhält, fand in den letzten Jahren die Untersuchung von Bedingungen und Auswirkungen des Vertrauens im Rahmen organisationspsychologischer Forschungen ein wachsendes Interesse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Atwater, L.E. (1988). The relative importance of situational and individual variables in predicting leader behavior. In: Group and Organization Studies, 13, 290–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H.W. (1992). Trust and trustworthiness. In: Montada, L., Filipp, H.-S. & Leiner, M.J. (eds.). Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood. Hillsdale, NJ, 411-433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, R.W. (1978). Trust and managerial problem solving revisited. In: Group and Organization Studies, 3, 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckemoff, A. (1982). Vertrauen. Versuch einer phanomenologisch-idiographischen Näherung an ein Konstrukt. Uhveröff. Dissertation. Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J.K. (1983). Redprocity of trust between professionals and their secretaries. In: Psychological Reports, 55, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J.K. (1991). Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust. Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. In: Journal of Management, 17, 643–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J.K. & Cantrell, R.S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. In: Psychological Reports, 55, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, T.Z. & Sievert, H.W. (Hrsg.) (1995). Joint Ventures im chinesischen Kulturkreis. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment, and personal need nonfulfillment. In: Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L.L. (1983). Performance-evaluation systems in context of individual trust and commitment. In: Landy, F.J, Zedrick, S. & Cleveland, J. (eds.). Performance measurement and theory. Hillsdale, NJ, 89-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curall, S.C. & Judge, T.A (1995). Measuring trust between organizational boundary persons. In: Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes, 64, 151-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley, D.M. (1991). Management practices and the uninvolved manager. The effect of supervisory attitudes on perception of organizational trust and change orientation. In: Public Personel Management, 20, 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1976). Konfliktregelung. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, J.W. (1978). Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction. In: Academy of Management Journal, 21, 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P.C. (1986). Trust, perceived importance of praise and criticism, and work performance. An examination of feedback in the United States and England. In: Journal of Management, 12, 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., Hutchinson, S. & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. In: Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Konfuzius und Marktwirtschaft. Der Konflikt der Kulturen. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J, Brief, A.P. & Barr, S.H. (1987). Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations. In: Journal of Business Research, 13, 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabarro, J.J. (1978). The development of trust, influence, and expectations. In: Athos, A.G. & Gabarro, J.J. (eds.). Interpersonal behavior. Communication and understanding in relationships. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 290-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D.G. (1988). Can we trust trust? In: Gambetta, D.G. (ed.). Trust. New York, 213-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to an theory of interpersonal trust in the communication department. In: Psychological Bulletin, 68, 104–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golombiewski, B. & McConkie, M. (1975). The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes. In: Cooper, C.L. (ed.). Theories of group process. New York, 131-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeff, P. (1992). Vertrauen und Handlungsspielraum bei Mitarbeitern. Unveröff. Diplomarbeit. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G.B. & Schiemann, W. (1978). Leader-member-agreement. A vertical dyad linkage approach. In: Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 206–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, T.H. & Berman, M. (1981). The role of noneconomic factors in faculty union voting. In: Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 415–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimovics, R.D. (1984). Trust and influence in an ambiguous group setting. In: Small Group Behavior, 15, 545–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, E. & Kochen, M. (1987). Perceived acquaintanceship and interpersonal trust. The cases of Hong Kong and China. In: Social Networks, 9, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollon, C.J. & Gemmil, G.R. (1977). Interpersonal trust and personal effectiveness in the work environment. In: Psychological Reports, 40, 454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L.T. (1995). Trust. The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. In: Academy of Management Review, 20, 379–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W.K. & Kupersmith, W.J. (1985). The meaning and measure of faculty trust. In: Educational and Psychological Research, 5, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-George, C. & Swap, W. (1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal trust. Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1306–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, H.S.R. & Sek-Hong, N. (1993). Organisational commitment. From trust to altruism at work. In: Psychology and Developing Societies, 5, 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kegan, D.L. & Rubenstein, AH. (1973). Trust, effectiveness, and organizational development. A field study in R & D. In: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 9, 498–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimofski, R. J. & Karol, B.L. (1976). The impact of trust on creative problem solving groups. In: Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 630–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R.M. (1994). The sinister attribution error. Paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations. In: Motivation and Emotion, 18, 199–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. (1992). The ultimate advantage. Creating the high-involvement organization. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1967). The human organization. Its management and value. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H.R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self. Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. In: Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. & Schoorman, S.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. In: Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnies, E. & Ward, C.D. (1980). Better liked than right Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 467–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R.M & Hunt, S.D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. In: Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J.H. & Moberg, D.J. (1994). Work organizations as contexts for trust and betrayal. In: Sarbin, T.R., Carney, R.M & Eoang, C. (eds.). Citizen espionage. Westport, CT, 163-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, W. (1988). Prozesse der sozialen Kategorisierung in der Beziehung zwischen Vorgesetzten und Mitarbeitern. In: Schäfer, B. & Petermann, F. (Hrsg). Vorurteile und Einstellungen. Köln, 281-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, W. (1990). Vertrauen zwischen Vorgesetzten und Mitarbeitern — eine Illusion? In: Höfling, S. & Butollo, W. (Hrsg.). Psychologie für Menschenwürde und Lebensqualität. Bericht über den 15. Kongreß für Angewandte Psychologie. Bd. 2. Bonn, 117-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, W. (1991). Bedingungen des dyadischen Vertrauens bei der Zusammenarbeit in Industrie und Verwaltung. In: Baumgartner, E., Sauter, F.C. & Trolldenier, HP (Hrsg.). Ich und Gruppe. Göttingen, 105-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C.A (1978). The intentional distortion of information in organizational communication: A laboratory and field investigation. In: Human Relations, 31, 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C.A. & Roberts, K.H. (1974). Information filtration in organizations. Three experiments. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 253–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C.A & Roberts, K.H. (1976). Relationships among components of credibility and communication behaviors in work units. In: Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petermann, F. (1985). Psychologie des Vertrauens. Salzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P.M, MacKenzie, S.B., Moorman, R.H & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. In: Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P.S. & Van de Ven, A. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. In: Academy of Management Review, 19, 90–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J.B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. In: American Psychologist, 26, 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, S.M (1994). Building trust in democratic organizations. In: Psychology, 31, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, T.A., Graen, G.B. & Novak, M.A. (1986). When managers decide not to decide autocratically. An investigation of leader-member exchange and decision influence. In: Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 579–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, P.L. & Thomas, C.C. (1993). The structure of interpersonal trust in the workplace. In: Psychological Reports, 73, 563–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C. (1994). Einführung von Gruppenarbeit in der Fließfertigung in der Automobilindustrie. Unveröff. Diplomarbeit, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneidewind, D. (1995). Interkulturelles Management strategischer Allianzen im globalen Wirtschaftsgeschehen. In: Chung, T.Z. & Sievert, H.W. (Hrsg.). Joint Ventures im chinesischen Kulturkreis. Wiesbaden, 23-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (1980). The causal relationship between trust and the assessed value of management by objectives. In: Journal of Management, 6, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S.B. & Roth, N.L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. In: Organization Science, 4, 367–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarter, C.J. & Hoy, W.K. (1988). The context of trust. Teachers and the principal. In: High School Journal, 72, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R. (1993). The social psychology of authority. In: Murnighan, J.K. (ed.), Social psychology in organizations. Advances in theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 141-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, J.A. (1975). The effects of constituent trust and representative bargaining visibility on intergroup bargaining. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 244–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1963). Die protestantischen Sekten und der Geist des Kapitalismus. In: Weber, M. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. Bd. 1. Tübingen, 207-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A.F. (1992). Two key factors that belong in a macroergonomic analysis of electronic monitoring. Employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust. In: Applied Ergonomics, 23, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. In: Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zand, D.E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Martin Schweer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen/Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neubauer, W. (1997). Interpersonales Vertrauen als Management-Aufgabe in Organisationen. In: Schweer, M. (eds) Interpersonales Vertrauen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90301-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90301-3_7

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-13033-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-90301-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics