Skip to main content

Intraoperative Cultures for the Suspected Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Infection of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be difficult to accurately diagnose with multiple factors potentially affecting the result. Here we discuss factors associated with microbiological and histological sampling, transport, storage and analysis, all of which can be improved upon to maximise diagnostic accuracy. Much of this adheres to published guidelines, such as those from the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), but also expands upon them using the most recent and relevant research studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parvizi J, Della Valle CJ. AAOS clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:771–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ, Crook DW, Simpson H, Peto TE, McLardy-Smith P, Berendt AR. Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2932–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2992–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Minassian AM, Newnham R, Kalimeris E, Bejon P, Atkins BL, Bowler IC. Use of an automated blood culture system (BD BACTECTM) for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: easy and fast. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Cockerill FR, Osmon DR. Unusual aerobic and anaerobic bacteria associated with prosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:55–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schäfer P, Frommelt L. The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:874–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meermans G, Haddad FS. Is there a role for tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1410–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams JL, Norman P, Stockley I. The value of hip aspiration versus tissue biopsy in diagnosing infection before exchange hip arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplast. 2004;19:582–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burnett RS, Kelly MA, Hanssen AD, Barrack RL. Technique and timing of two-stage exchange for infection in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:164–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med. 2007;35:654–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Malekzadeh D, Osmon DR, Lahr BD, Hanssen AD, Berbari EF. Prior use of antimicrobial therapy is a risk factor for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2039–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Baron EJ, Miller JM, Weinstein MP, et al. A Guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases: 2013 recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)(a). Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:e22–e121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. www.bd.com/ds/technicalCentre/inserts/L004300(201001).pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 17.

  14. Barrack RL, Jennings RW, Wolfe MW, Bertot AJ. The Coventry Award: the value of preoperative aspiration before total knee revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dory MA, Wautelet MJ. Arthroscopy in septic arthritis. Lidocaine and iodine containing contrast media are bacteriostatic. Arthritis Rheum. 1985;28:198–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Font-Vizcarra L, García S, Martínez-Pastor JC, Sierra JM, Soriano A. Blood culture flasks for culturing synovial fluid in prosthetic joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2238–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hughes JG, Vetter EA, Patel R, et al. Culture with BACTEC Peds Plus/F bottle compared with conventional methods for detection of bacteria in synovial fluid. J Clinical Microbiol. 2001;39:4468–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peel TN, Dylla BL, Hughes JG, et al. Improved diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection by culturing periprosthetic tissue specimens in blood culture bottles. MBio. 2016;7(1):e01776–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Peel TN, Spelman T, Dylla BL, Hughes JG, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Cheng AC, Mandrekar JN, Patel R. Optimal periprosthetic tissue specimen number for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;55:234–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gehrke T, Alijanipour P, Parvizi J. The management of an infected total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(10 Suppl A):20–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson JA, Christie MJ, Sandler MP, Parks PF Jr, Homra L, Kaye JJ. Detection of occult infection following total joint arthroplasty using sequential technetium-99 m HDP bone scintigraphy and indium-111 WBC imaging. J Nuclear Med. 1988;29:1347–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Duff GP, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS. Aspiration of the knee joint before revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:132–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fuerst M, Fink B, Rüther W. The value of preoperative knee aspiration and arthroscopic biopsy in revision total knee arthroplasty [in German]. Zeitschr Orthop Grenzg. 2005;143:36–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Müller M, Morawietz L, Hasart O, Strube P, Perka C, Tohtz S. Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection following total hip arthroplasty – evaluation of the diagnostic values of pre- and intraoperative parameters and the associated strategy to preoperatively select patients with a high probability of joint infection. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Virolainen P, Lähteenmäki H, Hiltunen A, Sipola E, Meurman O, Nelimarkka O. The reliability of diagnosis of infection during revision arthroplasties. Scand J Surg. 2002;91:178–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Somme D, Ziza JM, Desplaces N, Chicheportiche V, Chazerain P, Leonard P, Lhotellier L, Jacquenod P, Mamoudy P. Contribution of routine joint aspiration to the diagnosis of infection before hip revision surgery. Joint Bone Spine. 2003;70:489–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kordelle J, Klett R, Stahl U, Hossain H, Schleicher I, Haas H. Infection diagnosis after knee-TEP-implantation [in German]. Zeitschr Orthop Grenzg. 2004;142:337–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Malhotra R, Morgan DA. Role of core biopsy in diagnosing infection before revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2004;19:78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bourbeau P, Riley J, Heiter BJ, Master R, Young C, Pierson C. Use of the BacT/Alert blood culture system for culture of sterile body fluids other than blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:3273–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Levine BR, Evans BG. Use of blood culture vial specimens in intraoperative detection of infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;382:222–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Spangehl MJ, Younger ASE, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Diagnosis of infection following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1578–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Morgan PM, Sharkey P, Ghanem E, Parvizi J, Clohisy JC, Burnett RS, Barrack RL. The value of intraoperative Gram stain in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2124–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ko PS, Ip D, Chow KP, Cheung F, Lee OB, Lam JJ. The role of intraoperative frozen section in decision making in revision hip and knee arthroplasties in a local community hospital. J Arthroplast. 2005;20:189–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dinneen A, Guyot A, Clements J, Bradley N. Synovial fluid white cell and differential count in the diagnosis or exclusion of prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(4):554–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Sharkey P, Aggarwal A, Burnett RSJ, Barrack RL. Diagnosis of infected total knee: findings of a multicenter database. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2628–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ghanem E, Parvizi J, Burnett RS, Sharkey PF, Keshavarzi N, Aggarwal A, Barrack RL. Cell count and differential of aspirated fluid in the diagnosis of infection at the site of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1637–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McGillicuddy DC, Shah KH, Friedberg RP, Nathanson LA, Edlow JA. How sensitive is the synovial fluid white blood cell count in diagnosing septic arthritis? Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25:749–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ruzbarsky JJ, Gladnick BP, Dodwell E. Diagnosing septic arthritis in the synovial white cell count “gray zone”. Health Social Service J. 2016;12:190–2.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Geller JA, MacCallum KP, Murtaugh TS, Patrick DA Jr, Liabaud B, Jonna VK. Prospective comparison of blood culture bottles and conventional swabs for microbial identification of suspected periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:1779–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Aggarwal VK, Higuera C, Deirmengian G, Parvizi J, Austin MS. Swab cultures are not as effective as tissue cultures for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3196–203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Perry JL, Ballou DR, Salyer JL. Inhibitory properties of a swab transport device. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:3367–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Stoodley P, Ehrlich GD, Sedghizadeh PP, et al. Orthopaedic biofilm infections. Curr Orthop Pract. 2011;22:558–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bémer P, Léger J, Tandé D, et al. How many samples and how many culture media to diagnose a prosthetic joint infection: a clinical and microbiological prospective multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:385–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Athanasou NA, Pandey R, de Steiger R, Crook D, Smith PM. Diagnosis of infection by frozen section during revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:28–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bori G, Muñoz-Mahamud E, Garcia S, Mallofre C, Gallart X, Bosch J, Garcia E, Riba J, Mensa J, Soriano A. Interface membrane is the best sample for histological study to diagnose prosthetic joint infection. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:579–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Muñoz-Mahamud E, Soriano A, Combalia A, Medrano C, Bosch J, García S, Bori G. Comparison of bacterial results from conventional cultures of the periprosthetic membrane and the synovial or pseudocapsule during hip revision arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134:577–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. UK standards for microbiology investigations: investigation of orthopaedic implant associated infections. Standards unit, microbiology services, PHE. Bacteriology, B44(2). Issue date 23.02.16. Accessed 3 Jan 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mirra JM, Amstutz HC, Matos M, Gold R. The pathology of the joint tissues and its clinical relevance in prosthesis failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;117:221–40.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pandey R, Drakoulakis E, Athanasou NA. An assessment of the histological criteria used to diagnose infection in hip revision arthroplasty tissues. J Clin Pathol. 1999;52:118–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Feldman DS, Lonner JH, Desai P, Zuckerman JD. The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1807–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kataoka M, Torisu T, Tsumura H, Yoshida S, Takashita M. An assessment of histopathological criteria for infection in joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid synovium. Clin Rheumatol. 2002;21:159–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Inoue K, Nishioka J, Hukuda S, Shichikawa K, Okabe H. Rheumatoid nodules at the cement-bone interface in revision arthroplasty of rheumatoid patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:455–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Butler-Wu SM, Burns EM, Pottinger PS, et al. Optimization of periprosthetic culture for diagnosis of propionibacterium acnes prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2490–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. G T, Maduka-Ezeh A, Inwards CY, Mabry T, Erwin PJ, Murad MH, Montori VM, West CP, Osmon DR, Berbari EF. Utility of intraoperative frozen section histopathology in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1700–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Morawietz L, Classen R, Schröder JH, et al. Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59:591–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Pandey R, Berendt AR, Athanasou NA. Histological and microbiological findings in non-infected and infected revision arthroplasty tissues. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group Oxford Skeletal Infection Research and Intervention Service. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:570–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Stroh DA, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, Mont MA. Discrepancies between frozen and paraffin tissue sections have little effect on outcome of staged total knee arthroplasty revision for infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1662–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Tohtz SW, Müller M, Morawietz L, Winkler T, Perka C. Validity of frozen sections for analysis of periprosthetic loosening membranes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:762–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bori G, Soriano A, García S, Mallofre C, Riba J, Mensa J. Usefulness of histological analysis for predicting the presence of microorganisms at the time of reimplantation after hip resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1232–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Roux AL, Sivadon-Tardy V, Bauer T, Lortat-Jacob A, Herrmann JL, Gaillard JL, Rottman M. Diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection by beadmill processing of a periprosthetic specimen. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:447–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. www.Biologicalsafetycabinet.co.uk. Accessed 10 Mar 2017.

  62. Hughes HC, Newnham R, Athanasou N, Atkins BL, Bejon P, Bowler IC. Microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a prospective evaluation of four bacterial culture media in the routine laboratory. Clin Microb Infect. 2011;17:1528–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Stokes EJ. Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Br Med J. 1971;2(5763):707.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Van Belkum A, Durand G, Peyret M, et al. Rapid clinical bacteriology and its future impact. Ann Lab Med. 2013;33:14–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Neut D, van Horn JR, van Kooten TG, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Detection of biomaterial-associated infections in orthopaedic joint implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;413:261–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Schäfer P, Fink B, Sandow D, Margull A, Berger I, Frommelt L. Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1403–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Looney WJ. Small-colony variants of Staphylococcus aureus. Br J Biomed Sci. 2000;57:317–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. AN M-E, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Karau MJ, Berbari EF, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Patel R. Antimicrobial susceptibility and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis small colony variants associated with prosthetic joint infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;74:224–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Oethinger M, Warner DK, Schindler SA, Kobayashi H, Bauer TW. Diagnosing periprosthetic infection: false-positive intraoperative gram stains. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:954–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Cockerill FR, Osmon DR. Fungi, mycobacteria, zoonotic and other organisms in prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:64–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wadey VM, Huddleston JI, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Maloney WJ, Baron EJ. Use and cost-effectiveness of intraoperative acid-fast bacilli and fungal cultures in assessing infection of joint arthroplasties. J Arthroplast. 2010;25:1231–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Duffy MC, Steckelberg JM, Osmon DR. Prosthetic joint infection due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a case series and review of the literature. Am J Orthop. 1998;27:219–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Gebauer M, Frommelt L, Achan P, Board TN, Conway J, Griffin W, Heidari N, Kerr G, McLaren A, Nelson SB, Nijhof M, Zahar A. Management of fungal or atypical periprosthetic joint infections. J Orthop Res. 2014;32(Suppl 1):S147–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Oussedik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raymond, A.C., Oussedik, S. (2018). Intraoperative Cultures for the Suspected Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection. In: Rodríguez-Merchán, E., Oussedik, S. (eds) The Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66730-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66730-0_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66729-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66730-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics