Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Combined Hybrid Microscopic and Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery: Anatomy, Instrumentation, and Technique

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transsphenoidal Surgery

  • 1646 Accesses

Abstract

Surgical management of pituitary tumors has evolved considerably since the first report by Victor Horsley in the early 1900s. Made largely possible by advancing technology, various approaches have been used including a lateral rhinotomy, sublabial, transcranial, and transnasal to name a few. Presently the transnasal approach is the most popular and has evolved to rely heavily upon the endoscope for visualization though historically it was the operating microscope that made the operation possible. The merits of endoscopic-transnasal versus microscopic-transnasal have been debated much like the clip-versus-coil debate for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Similar to the vascular debate, no one instrument or technique is superior in all regards. This chapter describes the utility of a hybrid approach combining both endoscopic and microsurgical techniques which are used as individual circumstances dictate. As no single surgical approach is perfect, surgeons should not limit themselves to only one technique or approach, but rather use all options available.

Portions of this chapter have been reproduced with permission from https://events.houstonmethodist.org/PeakCenterPituitarySurgery

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Horsley V. Address in surgery: delivered at the seventy-fourth annual meeting of the British Medical Association. BMJ. 1906;2(2382):411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schloffer H. Further report on the patient operated upon for a pituitary tumor. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1907;20:1075–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu JK, Das K, Weiss MH, Laws ER, Couldwell WT. The history and evolution of transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 2002;95(6):1083–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gandhi CD, Post KD. Historical movements in transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;11(4):E7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Landolt AM. History of pituitary surgery from the technical aspect. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2001;12(1):37–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Prevedello DM, Doglietto F, Jane JA, Jagannathan J, Han J, Laws ER. History of endoscopic skull base surgery: its evolution and current reality. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(1):206–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirsch O. Endonasal method of removal of hypophyseal tumors with report of two successful cases. JAMA. 1910;55(9):772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cushing H. Intracranial tumours: notes upon a series of two thousand verified cases with surgical-mortality percentages pertaining thereto. JAMA. 1933;100(4):284.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosegay H. Cushing’s legacy to transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 1981;54(4):448–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jelliffe WR. The pituitary body and its disorders. Clinical states produced by disorders of the hypophysis cerebri. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1912;39(12):848.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Patel SK, Husain Q, Eloy JA, Couldwell WT, Liu JK. Norman Dott, Gerard Guiot, and Jules Hardy: key players in the resurrection and preservation of transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(2):E6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffith HB, Veerapen R. A direct transnasal approach to the sphenoid sinus. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1987;66(1):140–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Christian E, Harris B, Wrobel B, Zada G. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: implementation of an operative and perioperative checklist. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(4):E1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laws ER, Wong JM, Smith TR, de Los Reyes K, Aglio LS, Thorne AJ, et al. A checklist for endonasal transsphenoidal anterior skull base surgery. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(6):1634–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Buyuklu F, Cakmak O, Hizal E, Donmez FY. Outfracture of the inferior turbinate: a computed tomography study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(6):1704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moss WJ, Lemieux AJ, Alexander TH. Is inferior turbinate lateralization effective? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul 17;136(5):710e–1e.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Legler U. Lateroposition of the lower concha--a simple procedure to improve nasal air passage. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1970;49(6):386–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scheithauer MO. Surgery of the turbinates and “empty nose” syndrome. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Apr 27;9:Doc03.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Laws ER. Vascular complications of transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary. 2000;2(2):163–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Solari D, Chiaramonte C, Di Somma A, Orabona GD, de Notaris M, Angileri FF, et al. Endoscopic anatomy of the skull base explored through the nose. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(6 Suppl):S164–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tubbs RS, Griessenauer C, Loukas M, Cohen-Gadol AA. The circular sinus: an anatomic study with neurosurgical and neurointerventional applications. World Neurosurg. 2013;82(3–4):e475–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aquini MG, Marrone AC, Schneider FL. Intercavernous venous communications in the human skull base. Skull Base Surg. 1994;4(3):145–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ross DA, Norman D, Wilson CB. Radiologic characteristics and results of surgical management of Rathkeʼs cysts in 43 patients. Neurosurgery. 1992;30(2):173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Lillehei KO, Stears JC. The pathologic, surgical, and MR spectrum of Rathke cleft cysts. Surg Neurol. 1995;44(1):19–26. discussion 26-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hsu HY, Piva A, Sadun AA. Devastating complications from alcohol cauterization of recurrent Rathke cleft cyst. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(6):1087–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liebelt BD, Huang M, Baskin DS. Sellar floor reconstruction with the medpor implant versus autologous bone after transnasal transsphenoidal surgery: outcome in 200 consecutive patients. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(2):240–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Donna and Kenneth R. Peak Foundation, The Kenneth R. Peak Brain and Pituitary Treatment Center at Houston Methodist Hospital, The Taub Foundation, The Blanche Green Estate Fund of the Pauline Sterne Wolff Memorial Foundation, The Verelan Foundation, The John S. Dunn Foundation, The Houston Methodist Hospital Foundation, The Kelly Kicking Cancer Foundation, The American Brain Tumor Association, the senior author’s referring physicians who have allowed us to gain knowledge of the many nuances of this surgery, and the many patients and families who have been impacted by the devastating effects of brain and pituitary tumors. We also thank Nyla Ismail, Ph.D. and Megan Fulin for editorial support and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, 77030, TX, USA

    David S. Baskin MD, FACS, FAANS (Professor, Vice Chair, Program Director, Director)

  2. Kenneth R. Peak Brain and Pituitary Tumor Treatment Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, 77030, TX, USA

    David S. Baskin MD, FACS, FAANS (Professor, Vice Chair, Program Director, Director)

  3. Kenneth R. Peak Brain and Pituitary Tumor Treatment Center and Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, 77030, TX, USA

    Robert A. Scranton MD

Authors
  1. David S. Baskin MD, FACS, FAANS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert A. Scranton MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David S. Baskin MD, FACS, FAANS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Edward R. Laws, Jr

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Indianapolis Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol

  3. Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA

    Theodore H. Schwartz

  4. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Jason P. Sheehan

Electronic Supplementary Material

Endoscopic approach (MP4 191,611 kB)

Entry into the sella (MP4 166,365 kB)

Tumor resection (MP4 78,854 kB)

Use of lumbar drain (MP4 191,859 kB)

Skull base reconstruction (MP4 62,875 kB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baskin, D.S., Scranton, R.A. (2017). Combined Hybrid Microscopic and Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery: Anatomy, Instrumentation, and Technique. In: Laws, Jr, E.R., Cohen-Gadol, A.A., Schwartz, T.H., Sheehan, J.P. (eds) Transsphenoidal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56691-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56691-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56689-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56691-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation