Skip to main content

Families, Prisoner Reentry, and Reintegration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Boys and Men in African American Families

Abstract

Since the mid-1970s the US has experienced an enormous rise in incarceration, which has been disproportionately experienced by minorities, particularly young black men, and those with low levels of education. The effects of incarceration are felt not just by the individuals who go to prison but by their families as well. In this chapter we explore the role of family, broadly defined, in prisoner reintegration using administrative data and in-depth interviews with former prisoners in Michigan. More specifically, we attempt to understand what kinds of family supports, obligations, and conflicts enhance or hinder reentry and reintegration after prison. Our results indicate that families play a critical role in reintegration, but that their effects are complex and often countervailing. Families provide essential material resources without which former prisoners would struggle to meet even basic material needs for food and stable housing, but whether and how family members enhance or threaten reintegration and desistance from crime depends on their social and economic resources, their own substance use and criminal behavior, their own health and caregiving needs, and the nature of their relationships with the former prisoner. Implications for future research and policy are discussed.

The original version of this chapter was revised. An erratum to this chapter can be found at DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43847-4_17

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43847-4_17

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, W. D., & Mears, D. P. (2008). Inmate social ties and the transition to society: Does visitation reduce recidivism? Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 45(3), 287–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, B. E., Laub, J. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2009). Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: Do gender and socio-historical context matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, K. H., Oliver, R. B. M., Richardson, N. C., & Slayter, E. M. (2001). No place like home: Housing and the ex-prisoner. Community Resources for Justice. Retrieved from http://www.crj.org/cji/entry/publication_noplacelikehome

  • Braman, D. (2004). Doing time on the outside. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brayne, S. (2014). Surveillance and system avoidance: Criminal justice contact and institutional attachment. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 367–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, M., Cullen, F. T., & Vander Ven, T. (2002). Coercion, social support, and crime: An emerging theoretical consensus. Criminology, 40(1), 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, M. (2007). Doing time together. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2015). What works in reentry clearinghouse. Retrieved from https://whatworks.csgjusticecenter.org/

  • Cullen, F. T. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology: Presidential address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Justice Quarterly, 11(4), 527–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derkzen, D., Gobeil, R., & Gileno, J. (2009). Visitation and post-release outcome among federally-sentenced offenders. Correctional Service Canada. Retrieved from http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/research/r205-eng.shtml

  • Donovan, S. (2011, June 17). Letter to Public Housing Authority executive directors. Retrieved from http://usich.gov/resources/uploads/asset_library/Rentry_letter_from_Donovan_to_PHAs_6-17-11.pdf

  • Ganem, N. M., & Agnew, R. (2007). Parenthood and adult criminal offending: The importance of relationship quality. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(6), 630–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2001). Mass imprisonment: Social causes and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, A. (2014). On the run: Fugitive life in an American city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, L. A., & Snell, T. L. (1999). Women offenders (NCJ 175688). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/wo.pdf

  • Grinstead, O., Faigekes, B., Bancroft, C., & Zack, B. (2001). The financial cost of maintaining relationships with incarcerated African-American men: Results from a survey of women prison visitors. Journal of African-American Men, 6(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, D. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Herbert, C. W. (2013). Home is hard to find: Neighborhoods, institutions, and the residential trajectories of returning prisoners. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647(1), 214–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, D. J., Wyse, J., Dobson, C., & Morenoff, J. D. (2014). Making ends meet after prison. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(2), 440–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O., & Miller, R. R. (Eds.). (2003). Impacts of incarceration on the African-American family. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, A. R. (2014). Unintended consequences: Effects of paternal incarceration on child school readiness and later special education placement. Sociological Science, 1, 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, A. R. (2015). Paternal incarceration and child-reported behavioral functioning at age 9. Social Science Research, 52, 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, C. W., Morenoff, J. D., & Harding, D. J. (2015). Homelessness and housing insecurity among former prisoners. Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 44–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, H. J., Offner, P., & Sorensen, E. (2005). What explains the continuing decline in labor force activity among young black men? Labor History, 46(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, H. J., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. A. (2004). Will employers hire former offenders? Employer preferences, background checks, and their determinants. In B. Western, M. E. Patillo, & D. F. Wiman (Eds.), Imprisoning America: The social effects of mass incarceration (pp. 205–243). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, H. J., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. A. (2007). The effect of an applicant’s criminal history on employer hiring decisions and screening practices: Evidence from Los Angeles. In S. D. Bushway, M. A. Stoll, & D. Weiman (Eds.), Barriers to reentry?: The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America (pp. 117–150). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R., Massoglia, M., & MacMillan, R. (2007). The context of marriage and crime: Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology, 45(1), 33–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, D. S. (2009). A natural experiment on residential change and recidivism: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 484–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63(2), 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leverentz, A. (2014). The ex-prisoner’s dilemma: How women negotiate competing narratives of reentry and desistance. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1986). Conceptualizing social support. In N. Lin, A. Dean, & W. Edsel (Eds.), Social support, life events, and depression (pp. 17–30). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lutze, F. E., Rosky, J. W., & Hamilton, Z. K. (2014). Homelessness and reentry: A multisite outcome evaluation of Washington State’s Reentry Housing Program for high risk offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(4), 471–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-offenders reform and reclaim their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Massoglia, M., Firebaugh, G., & Warner, C. (2013). Racial variation in the effect of incarceration on neighborhood attainment. American Sociological Review, 78(1), 142–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauer, M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (Eds.). (2002). Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metraux, S., & Culhane, D. P. (2004). Homeless shelter use and reincarceration following prison release. Criminology and Public Policy, 3(2), 139–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morenoff, J. D., & Harding, D. J. (2011). Final technical report: Neighborhoods, recidivism, and employment among returning prisoners. National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/236436.pdf

  • National Research Council of the National Academies. (2007). Parole, desistance from crime and community integration. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council of the National Academies. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 635–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pager, D. (2007). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pager, D., Western, B., & Bonikowski, B. (2009). Discrimination in a low-wage labor market: A field experiment. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 777–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004). Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Center on the States. (2008). One in 100: Behind bars in America 2008. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/reports/sentencing_and_corrections/onein100pdf.pdf.

  • Pew Center on the States. (2009). One in 31: The long reach of American corrections. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from http://www.convictcriminology.org/pdf/pew/onein31.pdf.

  • Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. A. (2009). Why are so many Americans in prison? In S. Raphael & M. A. Stoll (Eds.), Do prisons make us safer? The benefits and costs of the prison boom (pp. 27–72). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rios, V. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of black and Latino boys. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, C. G., & Travis, J. (2006). Where will I sleep tomorrow? Housing, homelessness, and the returning prisoner. Housing Policy Debate, 17(2), 389–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royster, D. (2003). Race and the invisible hand: How white networks exclude black men from blue collar jobs. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. D., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. D., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44(3), 465–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2015, April 23). Household living arrangements. Retrieved August 2015, from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/concepts/definitions/hla

  • Steele, F. (2008). Multilevel models for longitudinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 171(1), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, J. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turney, K. (2014a). The intergenerational consequences of mass incarceration: Implications for children’s co-residence and contact with grandparents. Social Forces, 93(1), 299–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, K. (2014b). Stress proliferation across generations? Examining the relationship between parental incarceration and childhood health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55(3), 302–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, K. (2014c). The consequences of paternal incarceration for maternal neglect and harsh parenting. Social Forces, 92(4), 1607–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, K. (2015a). Liminal men: Incarceration and relationship dissolution. Social Problems, 62(4), 499–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, K. (2015b). Paternal incarceration and children’s food insecurity: A consideration of variation and mechanisms. Social Service Review, 89(2), 335–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, K., & Haskins, A. R. (2014). Falling behind? Children’s early grade retention after paternal incarceration. Sociology of Education, 87(4), 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, K., & Wildeman, C. (2013). Redefining relationships: Explaining the countervailing consequences of paternal incarceration for parenting. American Sociological Review, 78(6), 949–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., Chen, M. D., House, J. S., Hopkins, K., & Slaten, E. (1996). The effect of social relationships on psychological well-being: Are men and women really so different? American Sociological Review, 61, 837–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera Institute of Justice, Center on Sentencing and Corrections. (2015). Public housing for people with criminal histories (Fact Sheet). Retrieved from http://www.vera.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/public-housing-criminal-histories-fact-sheet.pdf

  • Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2001). Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishment & Society, 3(1), 95–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, S., & Uggen, C. (2010). Incarceration and stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, S., & Wildeman, C. (2013). Children of the prison boom: Mass incarceration and the future of American inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36(2), 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, H. C., Sabol, W. J., & Greenman, S. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009 (NCJ 231675). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildeman, C., Schnittker, J., & Turney, K. (2012). Despair by association? The mental health of mothers with children by recently incarcerated fathers. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 216–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildeman, C., & Turney, K. (2014). Positive, negative, or null? The effects of maternal incarceration on children’s behavioral problems. Demography, 51(3), 1041–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyse, J. J. B., Harding, D. J., & Morenoff, J. D. (2014). Romantic relationships and criminal desistance: Processes and pathways. Sociological Forum, 29(2), 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Office of the Vice President for Research, Rackham Graduate School, Department of Sociology, Joint Ph.D. Program in Sociology and Public Policy, National Poverty Center, University of Michigan Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy, the Russell Sage Foundation, the National Institute of Justice (2008-IJ-CX-0018), the National Science Foundation (SES-1061018, SES- 1060708), and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1R21HD060160 01A1) and by center grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to the Population Studies Centers at the University of Michigan (R24 HD041028) and at UC Berkeley (R24 HD073964), and by the National Institute on Aging to the Population Studies Centers at the University of Michigan (T32 AG000221). We thank Charley Chilcote and Paulette Hatchett at the Michigan Department of Corrections for facilitating access to the data and for advice on the research design. We thank Steve Heeringa and Zeina Mneimneh for advice on the sample design. Brenda Hurless, Bianca Espinoza, Andrea Garber, Jonah Siegal, Jay Borchert, Amy Cooter, Jane Rochmes, Claire Herbert, Jon Tshiamala, Katie Harwood, Elizabeth Sinclair, Carmen Gutierrez, Joanna Wu, Clara Rucker, Michelle Hartzog, Tyrell Connor, Madie Lupei, Elena Kaltsas, Brandon Cory, and Elizabeth Johnston provided excellent research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Harding .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.

Table 6 Description of outcomes and episodes for discrete-time event-history analysis
Table 7 Multinomial logit event history models of residential moves
Table 8 Multinomial logit event history models of arrests
Table 9 Multinomial logit event history models of substance use tests (reference outcome is negative test)
Table 10 Multinomial logit event history models of employment

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harding, D.J. et al. (2016). Families, Prisoner Reentry, and Reintegration. In: M. Burton, L., Burton, D., M. McHale, S., King, V., Van Hook, J. (eds) Boys and Men in African American Families. National Symposium on Family Issues, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43847-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics