Skip to main content

General Discussion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution and Transitions in Complexity

Abstract

The general discussion focuses on some aspects that are of overarching relevance for all the preceding chapters. The first subject that is discussed is the relationship between systems theory and the philosophy of science. After a short summary of the principles of system science and the philosophy of science, the criteria are discussed that a ranking must meet in order to be viewed as a scientific ranking. The second subject concerns the relationship between the objects-based graph-pattern of Darwinian evolution and the extended evolutionary synthesis. Thirdly, attention is paid to the question of how to deal with the new terminology about patterns of Darwinian evolution, compared to the classical terminology about evolution as a process. It is proposed that the concept of generational morphing could be used as an alternative term for the use of evolution as a process. The discussion of these general subjects serves as a stepping stone towards the detailed discussions (in Chap. 18) of the points that are raised by our reviewers.

“Science is a vast fiduciary system. Scientists know what they do by finding trustworthy sources and then trusting them. It is also what Polanyi called a polycentric system, in which autonomous and only loosely coordinated groups of specialists—mildly sceptical and mainly trusting—periodically keep an eye out for what is going on next door. The coherence and integrity of the body of scientific knowledge arise through these processes of mutual adjustment. Finally the bases of scientific judgment cannot be completely articulated because the ‘tacit’ dimension is ineliminable. It is not a fly in the formal ointment; it is what makes science science. You would understand that, Polanyi suggested, if you knew what it was like to be ‘confronted with the anxious dilemma of a live scientific issue. The further away ywou are from the quotidian life of scientific practice, the more you tend to be infatuated with myths of method.” (Michael Polanyi’s idea of “tacit knowledge” as espoused by Steven Shapin in The London Review of Books, 15th December 2011: Polanyi, M. 1962. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Psychology Press)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bak P (1996) How nature works: the science of self-organised criticality. Copernicus Press, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bejan A (1997) Advanced engineering thermodynamics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejan A (2016) The physics of life. The evolution of everything. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard C (1865) Introduction à l’étude de la médicine expérimentale. Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs K (1991) A precise calculation of the Feigenbaum constants. Math Comput 57:435–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brysbaert M, Rastle K (2009) Historical and conceptual issues in psychology. Pearson Education Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft systems methodology in action. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester, West Sussex, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1876) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, 6th edn. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C, Wallace AR (1858) On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Zool J Linn Soc 3:46–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew DJ, Weber BH (2013) Challenging Darwinism: expanding, extending, replacing. In: Heylighen F (1989) Self-organization, emergence and the architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on System Science, AFCET, Paris, pp 23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • DiRienzo N, Montiglio P-O (2015) Four ways in which data-free papers on animal personality fail to be impactful. Front Ecol Evol 3:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichte JG (1794) Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre (Foundations of the entire science of knowledge). Christian Ernst Gabler, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Heylighen F (1989) Self-organization, emergence and the architecture of complexity. In: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on System Science (AFCET, Paris) p 23-32

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant E (1781) Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Critique of Pure Reason). Hartknoch, Riga

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland K, Uller T, Feldman M, Sterelny K, Müller GB, Moczek A, Jablonka E, Odling-Smee J, Wray GA, Hoekstra HE, Futuyma DJ, Lenski RE, Mackay TFC, Schluter D, Strassmann JE (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature 514:161–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Uller T, Feldman MW, Sterelny K, Müller GB, Moczek A, Jablonka E, Odling-Smee J (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proc R Soc Biol Sci 282(1813):20151019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz EN (1963) Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20(2):130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. W.H. Freeman Spektrum, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JG (1985) General living systems theory. In: Pichot P et al (eds.) Biological Psychiatry. Higher Nervous Activity. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GE (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics. Retrieved 22 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1726) Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy), 3rd edn. William & John Innys, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp Phys 46:323–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagels HR (1985) Perfect symmetry: the search for the beginning of time. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1878) How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly 12:286–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M (2007) Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution 61:2743–2749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M (2009) Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton studies in complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer H (1891) Essays: Scientific, political, and speculative. Library Edition, vol 2. Containing Seven Essays not before republished, and various other Additions. Williams and Norgate, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL, Ayala FJ (1981) Is a new evolutionary synthesis necessary? Science 213:967–971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stikker A (1992) The transformation factor. Towards and ecological consciousness. Element, Rockport

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin VE (1977) The phenomenon of science, a cybernetic approach to human evolution. Colombia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Young AM (1976) The reflexive universe, A Merloyd Lawrence book. Delacorte, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerard A. J. M. Jagers op Akkerhuis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jagers op Akkerhuis, G.A.J.M. (2016). General Discussion. In: Jagers op Akkerhuis, G. (eds) Evolution and Transitions in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43802-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics