Skip to main content

Assessing the Application Potential of Selected Ecosystem-Based, Low-Regret Coastal Protection Measures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Adaptation in Practice

Abstract

Climate change and subsequent processes triggered by climate change demand novel assessments and protection schemes in coastal environments, as frequency and intensity of extreme events as well as mean sea water levels are expected to rise. Most often, conventional coastal engineering approaches are solely built for protection purposes, but often come with negative side-effects to the coastal environment and communities. During the last decade, new concepts in coastal engineering have started emerging. Several technical measures with an ecosystem-based design have been developed and, in some places, already implemented over the last decade. These low-regret measures, for instance green belts, coir fibers and porous submerged structures, reveal their full potential as stand-alone coastal protection or when used in combination with each other. They are believed – and in some cases documented – to be a better alternative or potential complement to conventional “hard” coastal engineering protection. Concrete examples are taken from the densely populated coastal area of Jakarta Utara (North Jakarta) and the National Capital Integrated Coastal Development (NCICD), showing benefits and further opportunities, but also challenges for applied low-regret coastal protection measures and ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction. An assessment of the application potential of three “soft” protection measures is given and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lignocellulose: Cell walls of wooden plants, which consist of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin.

  2. 2.

    Morphodynamics: The dynamic interaction of seabed material with hydrodynamic processes as waves, tides and currents, which leads to erosion or sedimentation.

References

  • Akhwady R (2012) Kinerja terumbu buatan silinder berongga (bottle reeftm) sebagai pemecah gelombang ambang terbenam. Ph.D. dissertation, Insititute of Tenth November Surabaya Indonesia (in Indonesian language)

    Google Scholar 

  • Andayani A, Soejarwo PA, Indriasari VY (2013) Uji Coba Pemasangan Karung Geotekstil Memanjang (KGM) di Pantai Kamal Muara. (Trial test of longitudinal geotextile tube installation in Kmal Muara coastal area). Unpublished report. Pusat Pengkajian dan Perekayasaan Teknologi Kelautan dan Perikanan – BADAN LITBANGKP-KKP (in Indonesian language)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnouil DS (2008) Shoreline response for a Reef Ball™ submerged breakwater system offshore of Grand Cayman Island. Master thesis, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustin LN, Irish JL, Lynett P (2009) Laboratory and numerical studies of wave damping by emergent and near-emergent wetland vegetation. Coast Eng 56:332–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baine MSP (2001) Artificial Reefs: a review of their design, application, management and per-formance. Ocean Coast Manag 44(3–4):241–259. doi:10.1016/S0964-5691(01)00048-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balan K, Venkatappa Rao G (1996) Erosion control with natural geotextiles. In: Rao GV, Banergee K (eds) Environmental geotechnology with geosynthetics. The Asian Society for Environmental Geotechnology and CBIP, New Delhi, pp 317–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao TQ (2011) Effect of mangrove forest structures on wave attenuation in coastal Vietnam. Oceanologia 53(3):807–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Georgiou IY, Enchelmeyer B, Reed DJ (2013) The value of wetlands in protecting southeast Louisiana from hurricane storm surges. PLoS One 8(3), e58715. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black K, Mead S (2009) Design of surfing reefs. Reef J 1(1):177–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleck M, Omeraci H (2004) Analytical model for wave transmission at artificial reefs. In: Proceedings 29th international conference on Coastal Engineering (ICCE), ASCE, Vol 1, Lisbon, pp 269–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg MR, Burden AM (2013) Coastal climate resilience – urban waterfront adaptive strategies. Department of City Planning, The City of New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bou-Zeid E, El-Fadel M (2002) Climate change and water resources in Lebanon and the Middle East. J Water Resour Plan Manag 128(5):343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burcharth HF, Hawkins SJ, Zanuttigh B, Lamberti A (2007) Environmental design guidelines for low crested coastal structures. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Cánovas V, Medina R (2012) A long-term equilibrium beach planform model for coastal work design. Coast Eng Proc 1(33) doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.9753/icce.v33.sediment.43

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle JR, Turner CH, Ebert EE (1964) Artificial habitat in the marine environment. California Department of Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 124, 93 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Carus M, Gahle C, Pendarovski C et al (2008) Studie zur Markt- und Konkurrenzsituation bei Naturfasern und Naturfaser-Werkstoffen (Deutschland und EU). Gülzower Fachgespräche 26, Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V. (Hrsg.), Gülzow 2008, S. 126

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave ID, Walker JFC (1994) Stiffness of wood in Farown plantation softwood: the influence of microfibril angle. For Prod J 44(5):43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesar H (1996) Economic analysis of Indonesian coral reefs. World Bank Environment Department Paper Department, Environmentally Sustainable Development Vice Presidency. The World Bank, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasten MA, Rosati JD, McCormick JW, Randall RE (1993) Engineering design guidance for detached breakwaters as shoreline stabilization structures, Technical report CERC-93-19. US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheong SM, Silliman B, Wong PP et al (2013) Coastal adaptation with ecological engineering. Nat Clim Chang 3(9):787–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 26:152–158. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dattatri J, Raman H, Shankar N (1978) Performance characteristics of submerged breakwaters. Coast Eng Proc 1(16). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.9753/icce.v16.%p

  • De Vriend HJ, van Koningsveld M (2012) Building with nature: thinking, acting and interacting differently. EcoShape, Building with Nature, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean RG, Chen R, Browder AE (1997) Full scale monitoring study of a submerged breakwater, Palm Beach, Florida, USA. Coast Eng 29(3–4):291–315. ISSN 0378–3839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EAK 2002 (2007) Empfehlungen für die Ausführung von Küstenschutzbauwerken – Korrigierte Ausgabe 2007. Recommendations for coastal protection works – Ammended Edition 2007 Herausgeber (ed) Kuratorium für Forschung im Küsteningenieurwesen. Die Küste, Heft 65

    Google Scholar 

  • EJF (2006) Mangroves: nature’s defence against Tsunamis – a report on the impact of mangrove loss and shrimp farm development on coastal defences. Environmental Justice Foundation, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci 37(11):1552–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedan KB, Kirwan ML, Wolanski E et al (2011) The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: Answering re-cent challenges to the paradigm. Clim Chang 106:7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GIZ (2011) Mangroves. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez M, Medina R (2001) On the application of static equilibrium bay formulations to natural and man-made beaches. J Coast Eng 43:209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goreau TJ, Trench RK (2012) Innovative methods of marine ecosystem restoration. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 5–10

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guannel G, Ruggiero P, Faries J et al (2015) Integrated modeling framework to quantify the coastal protection services supplied by vegetation. J Geophys Res Oceans 120:324–345. doi:10.1002/2014JC009821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habel R (2001) Künstliche Riffe zur Wellendämpfung. Berlin (Deutschland, Bundesrepublik). Dissertation, Mensch und Buch Verlag, Berlin 2001, 128 S.; TU Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadi S, Latief H, Muliddin M (2013) Analysis of surface wave attenuation in mangrove forest. Proc ITB Eng Sci 35:89–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harada K, Imamura F, Hiraishi T (2002) Experimental study on the effect in reducing tsunami by the coastal permeable structures. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Kita-Kyushu, Japan, May 26–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris LH (2002) Submerged reef structures for habitat enhancement and shoreline erosion abatement. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal & Hydraulic Engineering Technical Note (CHETN), Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris LE, Turk G, Mead S (2004) Combined recreational amenities and coastal erosion protection using submerged breakwaters for shoreline stabilization. Beach Preservation Technology 2004, FSBPA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashim AM, Catherine SMP, Takaijudin H (2013) Effectiveness of mangrove forests in surface wave attenuation: a review. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 5(18):4483–4488

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiraishi T, Harada K (2003) Greenbelt tsunami prevention in south-pacific region. Rep Port Airport Res Inst 42:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu JRC, Evans C (1989) Parabolic bay shapes and applications. Proc Inst Civ Eng (Part 2) 87:557–570. Thomas Telford, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IFRC (2014) Viet Nam: country case study report – how law and regulation support disaster risk reduction. From: IFRC-UNDP Series on Legal Frameworks to support Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2012) In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner G-K, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, 582 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Irzal F (2013) Grey solutions for urban water management: Jakarta case. Presented on “C40 workshop on climate adaptation and risk assessment” Rotterdam, the Netherlands June 3–6, 2013. http://www.deltacities.com/documents/presentations/04%20Jakarta_CDC%20website.pdf

  • Kathiresan K, Rajendran N (2005) Coastal mangrove forests mitigated tsunami. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 65:601–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komar PD (1976) Beach processes and sedimentation. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacambra C, Friess DA, Spencer T, Möller I (2013) Bioshields: mangrove ecosystems as resilient natural coastal defenses. In: Fabrice R, Rieux KS, Marisol E (eds) The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 82–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekha KR (2004) Field instrumentation and monitoring of soil erosion in coir geotextile stabilized slopes: a case study. Geotext Geomembr 22:399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekha KR, Kavitha V (2006) Coir geotextile reinforced clay dykes for drainage of low-lying areas. Geotext Geomembr 24(1):38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe RJ, Falter JL, Bandet MD et al (2005) Spectral wave dissipation over a barrier reef. J Geophys Res 110:C04001. doi:10.1029/2004JC002711

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques AR, de Oliveira Patrício PS, dos Santos FS et al (2014) Effects of the climatic conditions of the southeastern Brazil on degradation the fibers of coir-geotextile: evaluation of mechanical and structural properties. Geotext Geomembr 42(1):76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin D, Bertasi F, Colangelo MA (2005) Ecological impact of coastal defence structures on sediment and mobile fauna: evaluating and forecasting consequences of unavoidable modifications of native habitats. Coast Eng 52(10–11):1027–1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason MA, Keulegan CH (1944) A wave method for determining depths over bottom discontinuities, U.S. Army Beach Erosion Board. Tech. Memo. 5. Beach Erosion Board, Washington, DC, 29 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Massel SR, Gourlay MR (2000) On the modelling of wave breaking and set-up on coral reefs. Coast Eng 39:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazda Y, Magi M, Kogo M, Hong PN (1997a) Mangrove as a coastal protection from waves in the Tong King delta, Vietnam. Mangrove Salt Marshes 1:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazda Y, Wolanski E, King B et al (1997b) Drag force due to vegetation in mangrove swamps. Mangrove Salt Marshes 1:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazda Y, Magi M, Ikeda Y et al (2006) Wave reduction in a mangrove forest dominated by Sonneratia sp. Wetlands Ecol Manag 14:365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIvor AL, Möller I, Spencer T, Spalding M (2012) Reduction of wind and swell waves by mangroves. Natural coastal protection series: report 1. Cambridge coastal research unit working paper 40. Published by The Nature Conservancy and Wetlands International. 27 p. ISSN 2050–7941

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez FM, Losada IJ (2004) An empirical model to estimate the propagation of random breaking and non-breaking waves over vegetation fields. Coast Eng 51:103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonca A, Fortes CJ, Capitao R et al (2012) Hydrodynamics around an artificial surfing reef at Leirosa, Portugal. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 138:226–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DE, Hoitsma TR, White DJ (1998) Degradation rates of woven coir fabric under field conditions. In: Hayes DF (ed) Engineering approaches to ecosystem restoration. Proceedings of the 1998 wetlands engineering and river restoration conference, Denver, Colorado, March 22–27, 1998. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 266–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan S, Suzuki T, Stive MJF, Verhagen HJ, Ursem WNJ, Ranasinghe R (2010) On the effectiveness of mangroves in attenuating cyclone-induced waves. In: Proceedings of the international conference on coastal engineering 32 (no page numbers). URL: http://journals.tdl.org/ICCE/article/view/1250

  • NCICD (2014) Draft master plan. National Capital Integrated Coastal Development Project, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Oumeraci H, Clauss GF, Habel R, Koether G (2001) Unterwasserfiltersysteme zur Wellendämpfung. Abschlussbericht zum BMBF-Vorhaben “Unterwasserfiltersysteme zur Wellendämpfung” (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering H, Whitmarsh D (1997) Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the ‘attraction versus production’ debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fish Res 31:39–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quartel S, Kroon A, Augustinus PGEF et al (2007) Wave attenuation in coastal mangroves in the Red River delta. Vietnam J Asian Earth Sci 29(4):576–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal A, Ramakrishna S (2009) Coir Geotextiles as separation and filtration layer for low intensity road bases. Indian Geotechnical Conference (IGC-2009), Guntur, India. Vol II, pp 941–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranasinghe R, Turner IL (2006) Shoreline Response to submerged structures: a review. Coast Eng 53:65–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RBF (The Reefball Foundation) (2014) Webpage: http://www.reefball.org/. Accessed 20 Nov 2014

  • Roeber V, Cheung KF, Kobayashi MH (2010) Shock-capturing Boussinesq-type model for nearshore wave processes. Coast Eng 57(4):407–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig C, Solecki WD, Blake R et al (2011) Developing coastal adaptation to climate change in the New York City infrastructure-shed: process, approach, tools, and strategies. Clim Chang 106:93–127. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-0002-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlurmann T, Bleck M, Oumeraci H (2003) Wave transformation at artificial reefs described by the Hilbert-Huang Transformation. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Coastal Engineering (ICCE2002). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 2:1791–1803

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurholz H (1991) Use of woven coir geotextiles in Europe. Coir XXXV(2):18–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Scyphers SB, Powers SP, Heck KL Jr, Byron D (2011) Oyster reefs as natural breakwaters mitigate shoreline loss and facilitate fisheries. PLoS One 6(8), e22396. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva GG, De Souza DA, Machado JC, Hourston DJ (1999) Mechanical and thermal characterization of native brazilian coir fiber. J Appl Polym Sci 76(7):1197–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvester R, Hsu JRC (1997) Coastal stabilization. World Scientific Publ. Co, Singapore, 578 pp. (Reprint of Silvester and Hsu, 1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding M, McIvor A, Tonneijck FH et al (2014) Mangroves for coastal defence. Guidelines for coastal managers & policy makers. Wetlands International and The Nature Conservancy, Wageningen, 42 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Strusinska-Correia A, Husrin S, Oumeraci H (2013) Tsunami damping by mangrove forests: a laboratory study using parameterized trees. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:483–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subaida EA, Chandrakaran S, Sankar N (2009) Laboratory performance of unpaved roads reinforced with woven coir geotextiles. Geotext Geomembr 27:204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki T, Zijlema M, Burger B et al (2012) Wave dissipation by vegetation with layer schematization in SWAN. Coast Eng 59(1):64–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka N, Sasaki Y, Mowjood MIM et al (2007) Coastal vegetation structures and their functions in tsunami protection: experience of the re-cent Indian Ocean tsunami. Landsc Ecol Eng 3:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taubenböck H, Goseberg N, Lämmel G et al (2013) Risk reduction at the “Last-Mile”: an attempt to turn science into action by the example of Padang. Nat Hazard 65:915–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temmerman S, Meire P, Bouma TJ et al (2013) Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature 504(12):79–83. doi:10.1038/nature12859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo FY, Falconer RA, Lin B (2009) Modelling effects of mangroves on tsunamis. Water Manag 162:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton EB, Guza RT (1983) Transformation of wave height distribution. J Geophys Res 88:5925–5938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuyen NB, Hung HV (2009) An experimental study on wave reduction efficiency of mangrove forests. In: Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Asian Pacific Coasts (APAC2009). Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Oct 13–16, Singapore, 4:336–343

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2010) Linking ecosystems to risk and vulnerability reduction. The case of Jamaica. UNEP, Geneva. See also: http://postconflict.unep.ch/publications/RiVAMP.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • USACE-U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2002) Coastal engineering manual. Engineer manual 1110-2-1100. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC. (in 6 volumes)

    Google Scholar 

  • USACE-U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2005) National Erosion Control Development and Demonstration Program (Section 227) Miami Beach, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedharajan B, Gross O (2007) MANGREEN – Mangrove ecology and restoration in India. Report 2006/07 (DEEPWAVE Report 09/07), 40 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Vo-Luong P, Massel SR (2006) Experiments on wave motion and suspended sediment concentration at Nang Hai, Can Gio mangrove forest, Southern Vietnam. Oceanologia 48(1):23–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Vo-Luong P, Massel S (2008) Energy dissipation in non-uniform mangrove forests of arbitrary depth. J Mar Syst 74(1–2):603–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehkamp S, Fischer P (2013) Crustaceans and fish abundances and species at and around artificially introduced tetrapod fields in the southern North Sea, 2013. Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research – Biological Institute Helgoland. doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.821916

  • Whitmarsh D, Santos MN, Ramos J, Monteiro CC (2008) Marine habitat modification through artificial reefs off the Algarve (southern Portugal): an economic analysis of the fisheries and the prospects for management. Ocean Coast Manag 51:463–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Keenan R (2012) Adapting to flood risk under climate change. Prog Phys Geogr 36(3):348–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanagisawa H, Koshimura S, Goto K et al (2009) The reduction effects of mangrove forest on a tsunami based on field surveys at Pakarang Cape, Thailand and numerical analysis. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young IR (1989) Wave transformation over coral reefs. J Geophys Res 94:9779–9789

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors appreaciate the support of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), who funded this work within the TWIN-SEA project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Gabriel David .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

David, C.G., Schulz, N., Schlurmann, T. (2016). Assessing the Application Potential of Selected Ecosystem-Based, Low-Regret Coastal Protection Measures. In: Renaud, F., Sudmeier-Rieux, K., Estrella, M., Nehren, U. (eds) Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Adaptation in Practice. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43633-3_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics