Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Small States in the UNSC and the EU: Structural Weaknesses and Ability to Influence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Small States in a Legal World

Part of the book series: The World of Small States ((WSS,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter enquires into the methods and tools that small states can use to influence decision-making in the EU and the UNSC. It examines the structural weaknesses of small states within these organisations, and how they can compensate for them in order to have a say within these organisations. While the UNSC and EU are very different organisations, small states can adopt similar strategies to exert influence in these bodies. To overcome their structural weaknesses, small states need to acknowledge their limitations, have the political will to try to exert influence, set priorities, develop diplomatic skills and knowledge, develop a positive image, build coalitions, take initiative and exploit the special characteristics of their small public administrations. Due to the small size of their public administrations, small states can rely on the informality, flexibility, and the autonomy of their diplomatic forces. A strategy based on these features can bring negotiating success in these organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Small state studies use a wide variety of definitions of state size. For the purposes of this chapter an expansive definition of small states is used in order to examine a larger pool of states to draw more robust conclusions about the challenges and opportunities facing small states. Six states are most often regarded to be part of the ‘larger states’ category within the European Union whereas the others are regarded as small states though they vary greatly in size based on the traditional variables defining size of states. The traditional variable, population, most often used to define the size of states is a useful tool in making a distinction between smaller and larger states within the UN. This chapter regards states with less than 11 million inhabitants as part of the smaller group category within the UN.

  2. 2.

    Archer and Nugent (2002).

  3. 3.

    Vital (1967).

  4. 4.

    Keohane (1969).

  5. 5.

    See Morgenthau (1972), Waltz (1979), Wight (1991).

  6. 6.

    Mearsheimer (2001), p. 20.

  7. 7.

    Schweller (2003), p. 323.

  8. 8.

    Mearsheimer (1995), p. 7.

  9. 9.

    Ibid, p. 13.

  10. 10.

    Waltz (1959).

  11. 11.

    Keohane and Martin (1995), p. 42.

  12. 12.

    Ikenberry (2001).

  13. 13.

    Habeeb (1988), Tallberg (2008).

  14. 14.

    Magnúsdóttir (2009), Ulriksen (2006), Jakobsen (2009).

  15. 15.

    Ingebritsen (2006), Jakobsen (2009), Grön and Wivel (2011), Kronsell (2002).

  16. 16.

    Thorhallsson (2000, 2006a), Panke (2010).

  17. 17.

    Panke (2010).

  18. 18.

    Thorhallsson (2006b), Grön and Wivel (2011), Katzenstein (2003).

  19. 19.

    Grön and Wivel (2011).

  20. 20.

    Thorhallsson (2004).

  21. 21.

    Thorhallsson (2000).

  22. 22.

    For instance, see the Government of Poland (2014).

  23. 23.

    Thorhallsson (2006a).

  24. 24.

    Grön (2014).

  25. 25.

    Tallberg (2008).

  26. 26.

    Panke (2010).

  27. 27.

    Thorhallsson (2000), Panke (2010).

  28. 28.

    Lægreid (2000).

  29. 29.

    Thorhallsson (2000).

  30. 30.

    Van den Berg (1994), Thorhallsson (2006b).

  31. 31.

    Thorhallsson (2004).

  32. 32.

    Thorhallsson (2000).

  33. 33.

    Thorhallsson and Wivel (2006), Arter (2000), Maes and Verdun (2005), Wivel (2005), Duke (2001).

  34. 34.

    Panke (2010).

  35. 35.

    Thorhallsson (2000).

  36. 36.

    Ibid.

  37. 37.

    Ibid.

  38. 38.

    Grön (2014).

  39. 39.

    Thorhallsson (2000), Panke (2010).

  40. 40.

    Thorhallsson (2000).

  41. 41.

    Grön (2014).

  42. 42.

    Thorhallsson (2006b).

  43. 43.

    Ingebritsen (2006).

  44. 44.

    Magnúsdóttir (2009).

  45. 45.

    Thorhallsson (2012, 2013).

  46. 46.

    Grön (2014).

  47. 47.

    Thorhallsson (2006b).

  48. 48.

    Thorhallsson (2000).

  49. 49.

    Toplak (2014).

  50. 50.

    Grön (2014).

  51. 51.

    Thorhallsson (2006b).

  52. 52.

    Petersen (1998).

  53. 53.

    Grön and Wivel (2011), p. 533; Tallberg (2008), p. 697.

  54. 54.

    European Council on Foreign Relations (2016).

  55. 55.

    Hurd (2007), p. 12.

  56. 56.

    United Nations Charter 1945, art 23.

  57. 57.

    Ibid.

  58. 58.

    Krisch (2008), pp. 135–136.

  59. 59.

    Ibid, p. 136.

  60. 60.

    Bourantonis (2005), pp. 61–62. However, there are not good reasons to expect that the vote of any single non-permanent member will matter much. Situations where a single vote either breaks or makes a resolution are scarce [Vreeland and Dreher (2014), pp. 7–8]. But the increase in non-permanent members can matter when it comes to unanimous UNSC resolutions. Since UNSC resolutions are desired for reasons of legitimacy [Claude (1966); Voeten (2005); Hurd (2007)], resolutions carry more weight when there is unanimous support for them [Krisch (2008), p. 139]. This may give non-permanent members the ability to put an imprint on proceedings.

  61. 61.

    Hurd (2002), p. 40.

  62. 62.

    Dreher et al. (2013).

  63. 63.

    Dreher et al. (2009a).

  64. 64.

    Dreher et al. (2009b).

  65. 65.

    Kuziemko and Werker (2006).

  66. 66.

    Dreher et al. (2013).

  67. 67.

    Lim and Vreeland (2013).

  68. 68.

    Research suggests that vote-buying also occurs in the UN General Assembly. Studies show that voting in the UNGA is influenced by Chinese trade [Flores-Macias and Kreps (2013)], IMF and WB programs and loans [Dreher et al. (2013)] and US aid [Dreher et al. (2008)].

  69. 69.

    Voeten (2005), p. 537.

  70. 70.

    Thorhallsson (2006b).

  71. 71.

    Danish Institute for International Studies (2005).

  72. 72.

    Ulriksen (2006), p. 14.

  73. 73.

    Utanríkisráðuneytið (2009).

  74. 74.

    Cited in Ulriksen (2006), p. 10.

  75. 75.

    Ingebritsen (2006).

  76. 76.

    Nye (1990).

  77. 77.

    Whitfield (2007), pp. 35, 268.

  78. 78.

    United Nations (2008b).

  79. 79.

    United Nations (2010b).

  80. 80.

    Novosad and Werker (2014).

  81. 81.

    United Nations (1983).

  82. 82.

    Hulton (2004), p. 245.

  83. 83.

    United Nations (2010a).

  84. 84.

    United Nations Security Council (2003, 2007).

  85. 85.

    Ulriksen (2006), pp. 11–12.

  86. 86.

    Whitfield (2007), p. 42.

  87. 87.

    Ingebritsen (2006).

  88. 88.

    Ulriksen (2006).

  89. 89.

    Ulriksen (2006), p. 14.

  90. 90.

    Ulriksen (2006).

  91. 91.

    Hansson (2007).

  92. 92.

    Odén (2010), p. 273.

  93. 93.

    Odén (2010), pp. 273–27 citing the Nordic United Nations Project.

  94. 94.

    Gylfason (2004).

  95. 95.

    United Nations Security Council (2004).

  96. 96.

    Gillissen (2006), p. 37.

  97. 97.

    Ryan cited in Gillissen (2006), p. 34.

  98. 98.

    Rydberg (1998).

  99. 99.

    Gísladóttir (2008).

  100. 100.

    Buhaug and Voldhagen (2001).

  101. 101.

    United Nations (2005a).

  102. 102.

    United Nations (2005b).

  103. 103.

    United Nations (2008a).

  104. 104.

    Osvald, cited in Hansson (2007). See also Keating (2008), Rydberg (1998).

  105. 105.

    Gillissen (2006), p. 36.

  106. 106.

    Kolby (2003).

  107. 107.

    Claude (1966), Voeten (2005), Hurd (2007).

  108. 108.

    United Nations Security Council (2004).

  109. 109.

    Gillissen (2006), p. 34.

  110. 110.

    Doyle cited in Gillissen (2006), p. 36.

  111. 111.

    Melvern (2000).

  112. 112.

    Ibid.

  113. 113.

    Ross (2001).

  114. 114.

    Laatikainen (2002).

  115. 115.

    Malone (2000).

  116. 116.

    British Broadcasting Corporation (2009).

  117. 117.

    Hurd (2002), p. 42.

  118. 118.

    Keating (2008).

  119. 119.

    Gísladóttir (2008).

  120. 120.

    Hansson (2007).

  121. 121.

    Malone (2000).

References

  • Archer C, Nugent N (2002) Small states and the European Union. Curr Polit Econ Eur 11:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Arter D (2000) Small state influence within the EU: the case of Finland’s northern dimension initiative. J Common Mark Stud 38:677–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Broadcasting Corporation (2009) Profile: non-aligned movement. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/2798187.stm. Accessed 28 June 2016

  • Bourantonis D (2005) The history and politics of UN Security Council reform. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug H, Voldhagen ET (2001) Norge i sikkerhetsraadet. Rapport by Utenriskdepartementet [Norwegian Foreign Department] in collaboration with NTNU. Available at http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/ud/dok/rapporter_planer/rapporter/2001/norge-i-sikkerhetsradet-utvidet-sikkerhe.html?id=105680. Accessed 28 June 2016

  • Claude I (1966) Collective legitimization as a political function of the United Nations. Int Organ 20:367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish Institute for International Studies (2005) Nordic peace diplomacy, looking back, moving forward. Background note for a Conference which was part of Norway’s Centennial celebrations. Available at https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/nordic_peace_diplomacy-looking/id269243. Accessed 28 June 2016

  • Dreher A, Nunnenkamp P et al (2008) Does US aid buy UN General Assembly votes? A disaggregated analysis. Public Choice 136:139–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A, Sturm J-E et al (2009a) Development aid and international politics: does membership on the UN Security Council influence World Bank decisions? J Dev Econ 88:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A, Sturm J-E et al (2009b) Global horse trading: IMF loans for votes in the United Nations Security Council. Eur Econ Rev 53:742–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A, Gould M et al (2013) The determinants of election to the United Nation Security Council. Public Choice 158:51–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke SW (2001) Small states and European security. In: Reiter E, Gartner H (eds) Small states and alliances. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council on Foreign Relations (2016) European foreign policy scorecard 2016. European Council on Foreign Relations, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Macias GA, Kreps SE (2013) The foreign policy consequences of trade: China’s commercial relations with Africa and Latin America, 1992–2006. J Polit 75:357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillissen C (2006) The back to the future? Ireland at the UN Security Council, 2001–2002. Nord Ir Stud 5:23–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Gísladóttir IS (2008) Address on foreign affairs by Iceland’s Minister for Foreign Affairs and External Trade. Available at www.iceland.is/iceland-abroad/jp/.../address_on_foreign_affairs_8_april_2008.doc. Accessed 28 June 2016

  • Government of Poland (2014) 10 PL-UE: Poland 10 Years in the European Union. Available at http://www.msz.gov.pl/resource/ef26c779-74e4-4a0c-aa73-0a9d3c8b695c:JCR. Accessed 28 June 2016

  • Grön C (2014) Small states seeking influence in the European Commission: opportunities and constraints, research consortium, small state briefs. Centre for Small State Studies, Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence, University of Iceland. Available at http://ams.hi.is/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Small-State-Briefs-5_Gron.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2016

  • Grön C, Wivel A (2011) Maximizing influence in the European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: from small state policy to smart state strategy. J Eur Integr 33:523–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gylfason ÞF (2004) The distinctive characteristics and behaviour of small states which have been elected members to the United Nations Security Council. Thesis (BA), University of Iceland

    Google Scholar 

  • Habeeb W (1988) Power and tactics in international negotiations: how weak nations bargain with strong nations. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson P (2007) Against all odds: small state candidature and membership of the United Nations Security Council. Thesis (MA), University of Iceland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulton SC (2004) Council working methods and procedures. In: Malone D, Boulder DM (eds) The UN Security Council: from the Cold War to the 21st century. Lynne Rienner Publisher, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Development Report (HDR) (2007/2008) Human development index 2005: monitoring human development, enlarging people’s choices. Fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Development Report (HDR) (2009) Human development index 2007 and its components. Overcoming barriers

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd I (2002) Legitimacy, power, and the symbolic life of the UN Security Council. Glob Gov 8:35–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd I (2007) After anarchy: legitimacy and power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry GJ (2001) After victory: institutions, strategic restraint and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingebritsen C (2006) Norm entrepreneurs: Scandinavia’s role in international relations. In: Ingebritsen C, Neumann I et al (eds) Small states in international relations. University of Washington Press/University of Iceland Press, Seattle/Reykjavik

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen PV (2009) Small states, big influence: the overlooked nordic influence on the civilian ESDP. J Common Mark Stud 47:81–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein P (2003) Small states and small states revisited. New Polit Econ 8:9–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating C (2008) The United Nations Security Council: options for small states. Speech by the Executive Director, Security Council Report. Available at www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C8CD3CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Media%20Small%20States%20Reykjavik.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane RO (1969) Lilliputians’ dilemmas: small states in international politics. Int Organ 23:291–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane RO, Martin L (1995) The promise of an institutional theory. Int Secur 20:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolby OP (2003) Norge i FNs Sikkerhetsrad 2001–2002. Internasjonal Politikk 61:277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Krisch N (2008) The security council and the great powers. In: Lowe W, Roberts A et al (eds) The United Nations Security Council and war: the evolution of thought and practice since 1945. University Press Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronsell A (2002) Can small states influence EU norms? Insights from Sweden’s participation in the field of environmental politics. Scand Stud 74:287–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuziemko I, Werker E (2006) How much is a seat on the Security Council worth? Foreign aid and bribery at the United Nations. J Polit Econ 114:905–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laatikainen KV (2002) Norden’s eclipse: the impact of the European Union’s common foreign and security policy on the nordic group in the United Nations. Coop Conf 38:409–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim DYM, Vreeland JR (2013) Regional organisations and international politics: Japanese influence over the Asian Development Bank and the UN Security Council. World Polit 65:34–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid P (2000) Implications of europeanization on central administration in the nordic countries. Paper presented at IASIA Annual Conference, Working Group III: Public Service Reform, Beijing, 10–13 July 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes I, Verdun A (2005) Small states and the creation of the EMU: Belgium and the Netherlands, pace-setters and gate-keepers. J Common Mark Stud 43:327–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnúsdóttir GL (2009) Small states’ power resources in EU negotiations: the case of Sweden, Denmark and Finland in the environmental policy of the EU. Thesis (PhD), University of Iceland

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone D (2000) Eyes on the prize. Glob Gover A Rev Multilateralism Int Org 6:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer JJ (1995) The false promise of international institutions. Int Secur 19:5–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer JJ (2001) The tragedy of great power politics. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Melvern L (2000) Behind closed doors. World Today 56:9–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau HJ (1972) Politics among nations, 5th edn. Alfred A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Novosad P, Werker E (2014) Who runs the international system? Power and the staffing of the United Nations Secretariat. Center for Global Development Working Paper 376. Available at www.cgdev.org/publication/who-runs-international-system-power-and-staff-united-nations-secretariat-working. Accessed 28 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye JS (1990) Soft power. Foreign Policy 80:153–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odén B (2010) Review essay. Forum Dev Stud 37:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panke D (2010) Small states in the European Union: coping with structural disadvantages. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen FA (1998) The international situation and Danish foreign policy 1997. In: Heurling B, Mouritzen H (eds) Danish foreign policy yearbook, 1998. Danish Institute of International Affairs, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross K (2001) Power in numbers. World Today 57(5):23–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydberg R (1998) Sverige i Sakerhetsradet-arbete och organisation i Stockholm. In: Promemoria 1998-12-28. Regjeringskansliet Utenriksdepartementet, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweller RL (2003) The progressiveness of neoclassical realism. In: Elman C, Elman MF (eds) Progress in international relations theory: appraising the field. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg J (2008) Bargaining power in the European Council. J Common Mark Stud 46:685–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorhallsson B (2000) The role of small states in the European Union. Ashgate, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorhallsson B (2004) Can small states influence policy in an EU of 25 members? In: Busek E, Hummer W (eds) Liechtenstein Politische Schriften, vol 39. Verlag der Liechtensteinischen Akademischen Gesellschaft

  • Thorhallsson B (2006a) The size of states in the European Union: theoretical and conceptual perspectives. J Eur Integr 28:7–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorhallsson B (2006b) Iceland’s involvement in global affairs since the mid-1990s: what features determine the size of a state. Icel Rev Polit Adm 2:197–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorhallsson B (2012) Small states in the UN Security Council: means of influence? Hague J Dipl 7:135–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorhallsson B (2013) The Icelandic economic collapse: how to overcome constraints associated with smallness? Eur Polit Sci 12:320–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorhallsson B, Wivel A (2006) Small states in the European Union: what do we know and what would we like to know? Camb Rev Int Aff 19:651–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toplak C (2014) Small states in Europe: Slovenia and its position within the European Union. Lecture at the Centre for Small States Studies, University of Iceland, 27 October 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulriksen S (2006) Deployments for development? Nordic peacekeeping efforts in Africa. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Publication, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1983) Provisional rules of procedure of the Security Council. UN Doc S/96/Rev. 7

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2005a) Press release: effective protection of civilians in armed conflict requires stronger partnerships. Available at www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2005/sc8575.doc.htm. Accessed 28 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2005b) Press release: Security Council stresses urgency of full, effective implementation of ‘landmark? Resolution 1325 (2000) on women, peace and security. Available at www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2005/sc8538.doc.htm. Accessed 28 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2008a) Press release: Security Council hears 60 speakers, asks Secretary-General to advise organization within one year of best ways to support national peacebuilding efforts. Available at www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2008/sc9333.doc.htm. Accessed 28 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2008b) Biographical note: Secretary-General appoints Kai Eide of Norway as special representative for Afghanistan. Available at www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2008/sga1123.doc.htm. Accessed 28 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2010a) Contributors to United Nations Peacekeeping Operations – Aug 2010. Peacekeeping Department, New York Available at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/resources/statistics/contributors_archive.shtml. Accessed 28 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2010b) Biographical note: Secretary-General appoints Staffan de Mistura of Sweden as special representative for Afghanistan. Available at www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2010/sga1217.doc.htm. Accessed 28 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau (2010) Countries and Areas Ranked by Population. Available at http://www.census.gov/population/international/data/countryrank/rank.php. Accessed 28 June 2016

  • United Nations Security Council (2003) Repertoire of the practice of the Security Council 2000–2003. Participation in the proceedings of the Security Council, Chapter 3. Available at www.un.org/en/sc/repertoire/. Accessed 28 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Security Council (2004) United Nation Security Council. UN Doc S/2004/135

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Security Council (2007) Repertoire of the practice of the Security Council 2004–2007. Participation in the proceedings of the Security Council, Chapter 3. Available at www.un.org/en/sc/repertoire/. Accessed 28 June 2016

  • Utanríkisráðuneytið (2009) Skýrsla um framboð Íslands og kosningabaráttu til sætis í öryggisráði Sameinuðu þjóðanna, 2009–2010. Available at https://www.utanrikisraduneyti.is/media/PDF/Lokaskyrsla_um_oryggisradsframbodid_2008.PDF. Accessed 28 June 2016

  • Van den Berg DJ (1994) The Netherlands and Luxembourg: smaller countries in an ever-larger Europe. EISPASCOPE 3:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Vital D (1967) The inequality of states: a study of small power in international relations. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Voeten E (2005) The political origins of the UN Security Council’s ability to legitimize the use of force. Int Organ 59:527–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vreeland JR, Dreher A (2014) The political economy of the United Nations Security Council money and influence. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz KN (1959) Man, the state, and war. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz KN (1979) Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield T (2007) Friends indeed? The United Nations, groups of friends, and the resolution of conflict. US Institute of Peace Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight M (1991) The three traditions. In: Porter B, Wight G (eds) International theory: the three traditions. Leicester University Press, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Wivel A (2005) The security challenge of small EU member states: interests, identity and the development of the EU as a security actor. J Common Mark Stud 3:393–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Political Science, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

    Baldur Thorhallsson

Authors
  1. Baldur Thorhallsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baldur Thorhallsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Law, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Petra Butler

  2. School of Law, Queen Mary University of London , London, United Kingdom

    Caroline Morris

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thorhallsson, B. (2017). Small States in the UNSC and the EU: Structural Weaknesses and Ability to Influence. In: Butler, P., Morris, C. (eds) Small States in a Legal World. The World of Small States, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39366-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39366-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39365-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39366-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation