Abstract
In this chapter, we discuss the use of some common mixed finite elements in the context of a locally anisotropic remeshing strategy, close in philosophy to “immersed” approaches for interface problems. A characteristic of the present method is the presence of highly flat triangles. Such a distinctive feature may imply stability issues for mixed elements with incompressible flow problems. First, we present a review of the literature dealing with interface problems and we illustrate these results with a simple 1D framework alongside of numerical tests. Second, we present the locally anisotropic remeshing approach for interface problems in 2D with a focus on the incompressible Stokes problem. We then present numerical tests to show stability issues of common mixed elements, as well as possible stable ones. We also deal with conditioning issues. Finally, we illustrate the results with two applications, including the fluid–structure interaction of a rotational rigid bar.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acosta, G., & Durán, R. G. (1999). The maximum angle condition for mixed and nonconforming elements: Application to the stokes equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 37, 18–36.
Ainsworth, M., Barrenechea, G. R., & Wachtel, A. (2014). Stabilisation of high aspect ratio mixed finite elements for incompressible flow. Brown: Technical report.
Amdouni, S., Moakher, M., & Renard, Y. (2014). A local projection stabilization of fictitious domain method for elliptic boundary value problems. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 76, 60–75.
Apel, T. (1999). Anisotropic finite elements: Local estimates and applications. Teubner.
Apel, T., & Nicaise, S. (2004). The inf-sup condition for low order elements on anisotropic meshes. Calcolo, 41, 89–113.
Apel, T., & Randrianarivony, H. M. (2003). Stability of discretizations of the stokes problem on anisotropic meshes. Journal Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 61, 437–447.
Auricchio, F., Brezzi, F., & Lovadina, C. (2004). Mixed finite element methods. Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, Chapter 9. New York: Wiley.
Auricchio, F., Boffi, D., Gastaldi, L., Lefieux, A., & Reali, A. (2014). A study on unfitted 1d finite element methods. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 68, 2080–2102.
Auricchio, F., Brezzi, F., Lefieux, A., & Reali, A. (2015a). An “immersed” finite element method based on a locally anisotropic remeshing for the incompressible stokes problem. Computer Methods In Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 294, 428–448.
Auricchio, F., Lefieux, A., Reali, A., Veneziani, A. (2015b). A locally anisotropic fluid-structure interaction remeshing strategy for thin structures with application to a hinged rigid leaflet. International Journal For Numerical Methods In Engineering. doi:10.1002/nme.5159.
Babuška, I. (1970). The finite element method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients. Computing, 5, 207–213.
Babuška, I., & Aziz, A. K. (1976). On the angle condition in the finite element method. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 13, 214–226.
Babuška, I., & Strouboulis, T. (2001) The finite element method and its reliability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baiges, J., Codina, R., Henke, F., Shahmiri, S., & Wall, W. A. (2012). A symmetric method for weakly imposing dirichlet boundary conditions in embedded finite element meshes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 90, 636–658.
Barrenechea, G. R., & Chouly, F. (2012). A local projection stabilized method for fictitious domains. Applied Mathematics Letters, 25(12), 2071–2076.
Barrett, J. W., & Elliott, C. M. (1987). Fitted and unfitted finite-element methods for elliptic equations with smooth interfaces. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 7, 283–300.
Basting, S., & Weismann, M. (2013). A hybrid level set-front tracking finite element approach for fluid-structure interaction and two-phase flow applications. Journal of Computational Physics, 255, 228–244.
Bazilevs, Y., & Hughes, T. J. R. (2007). Weak imposition of dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 36, 12–26.
Béchet, É., Moës, N., & Wohlmuth, B. (2009). A stable Lagrange multiplier space for stiff interface conditions within the extended finite element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 78, 931–954.
Beirão da Veiga, L., Brezzi, F., Cangiani, A., Manzini, G., Marini, L. D., & Russo, A. (2013). Basic principles of virtual element methods. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 23, 199–214.
Beirão da Veiga, L., Brezzi, F., Marini, L. D., & Russo, A. (2014). The hitchhiker’s guide to the virtual element method. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 24, 1541–1573.
Bern, M., Eppstein, D. (1992) Mesh generation and optimal triangulation. In Computing in Euclidian geometry, Lecture Notes Series on Computing, (vol. 1, pp. 23–90). Singapore, World Scientific.
Bhalla, A. P. S., Bale, R., Griffith, B. E., & Patankar, N. A. (2013). A unified mathematical framework and an adaptive numerical method for fluid-structure interaction with rigid, deforming, and elastic bodies. Journal of Computational Physics, 250, 446–476.
Boffi, D., Gastaldi, L., Heltai, L., & Peskin, C. S. (2008). On the hyper-elastic formulation of the immersed boundary method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197, 2210–2231.
Boffi, D., Cavallini, N., & Gastaldi, L. (2011). Finite element approach to immersed boundary method with different fluid and solid densities. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 21, 2523–2550.
Boffi, D., Brezzi, F., & Fortin, M. (2013). Mixed finite element methods. Heidelberg: Springer.
Burman, E., & Hansbo, P. (2010). Fictitious domain finite element methods using cut elements: I. A stabilized Lagrange multiplier method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199, 2680–2686.
Burman, E., & Hansbo, P. (2011a). Fictitious domain finite element methods using cut elements: II a stabilized Nitsche method. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 62(4), 328–341.
Burman, E., Hansbo, P. (2011b). Fictitious domain methods using cut elements: III. a stabilized nitsche method for Stokes’ problem. Technical report, Jönköping University.
Carey, G. F. (1982). Derivative calculation from finite element solutions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 35, 1–14.
Carey, G. F., Chow, S. S., & Seager, M. K. (1985). Approximate boundary-flux calculations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 50, 107–120.
Chin, E. B., Lasserre, J. B., & Sukumar, N. (2015). Numerical integration of homogeneous functions on convex and nonconvex polygons and polyhedra. Computational Mechanics.
Court, S., Fournier, M., & Lozinski, A. (2014). A fictitious domain approach for the Stokes problem based on the extended finite element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 74, 73–99.
Demkowicz, L. (1991). A note on symmetry boundary conditions in finite element methods. Applied Mathematics Letters, 4(5), 27–30.
Diniz dos Santos, N., Gerbeau, J.-F., & Bourgat, J.-F. (2008). A partitioned fluid-structure algorithm for elastic thin valves with contact. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197, 1750–1761.
Elman, D., Silvester, H., & Wathen, A. (2005). Finite elements and fast iterative solvers with applications in incompressible fluid dynamics. Oxford: Oxford Press.
Ern, A., & Guermond, J.-L. (2004). Theory and practice of finite elements. Heidelberg: Springer.
Fabrèges, B. (2012). Une méthode de prolongement régulier pour la simulation d’écoulements fluide/particules. PhD thesis, Université Paris-Sud.
Frei, S., & Richter, R. (2014). A locally modified parametric finite element method for interface problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 52(5), 2315–2334.
Fries, T.-P., & Belytschko, T. (2010). The extended/generalized finite element method: An overview of the method and its applications. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 84, 253–304.
Gerstenberger, A., & Wall, W. A. (2008). An eXtended Finite Element Method/Lagrange multiplier based approach for fluid-structure interaction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197, 1699–1714.
Girault, V., & Glowinski, R. (1995). Error analysis of fictitious domain method applied to a dirichlet problem. Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 12, 487–514.
Glowinski, R. (2003). Handbook of numerical analysis: Numerical methods for fluids (Part 3) (vol. 9), chapter VIII. North-Holland.
Glowinski, R., Pan, T., & Périeux, J. (1994). A fictitious domain method for external incompressible viscous flow modeled by navier-stokes equations. Computer Methods In Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 112, 133–148.
Hachem, E., Feghali, S., Codina, R., & Coupez, T. (2013). Immersed stress method for fluid-structure interaction using anisotropic mesh adaptation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 94(9), 805–825.
Hannukainen, A., Korotov, S., & Křížek, M. (2012). The maximum angle condition is not necessary for convergence of the finite element method. Numerical Mathematics, 120, 79–88.
Hansbo, A., & Hansbo, P. (2002). An unfitted finite element method, based on Nitsche’s method, for elliptic interface problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 191, 5537–5552.
Hansbo, P., Larson, M. G., & Zahedi, S. (2013). A cut finite element method for a Stokes interface problem. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 85, 90–114.
Haslinger, J., & Renard, Y. (2009). A new fictitious domain approach inspired by the extended finite element method. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 47, 1474–1499.
Hautefeuille, M., Annavrapu, C., & Dolbow, J. E. (2012). Robust imposition of dirichlet boundary conditions on embedded surfaces. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 90, 40–64.
Heltai, L., & Costanzo, F. (2012). Variational implementation of immersed finite element methods. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 229, 110–127.
Hyman, M. A. (1952). Non-iterative numerical solution of boundary-value problems. Applied Scientific Research, Section B, 2, 325–351.
Ilinca, F., & Hétu, J.-F. (2011). A finite element immersed boundary method for fluid flow around rigid objects. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 65, 856–875.
Jamet, P. (1976). Estimations d’erreur pour des éléments finis droits presque dégénérés. RAIRO. Analyse Numérique, 10, 43–60.
Kamenski, L., Huang, W., & Xu, H. (2014). Conditioning of finite element equations with arbitrary anistropic meshes. Mathematics of Computations, 83(289), 2187–2211.
Kellogg, R. B. (1971). Singularities in interface problems. Numerical solution of partial differential equations (pp. 351–400). Cambridge: Academic Press.
Křížek, M. (1991). On semiregular families of triangulations and linear interpolation. Applications of Mathematics, 36(3), 223–232.
Lefieux, A. (2014). On the use of anisotropic triangles in an immersed finite element approach with application to fluid-structure interaction problems. PhD thesis, Istituto Universitario degli Studi Superiori di Pavia.
Lemrabet, K. (1977). Régularité de la solution d’un problème de transmission. Journal de Mathèmatiques Pures et Appliquèes, 9(56): 1–38.
Lew, A. J., & Buscaglia, G. C. (2008). A discontinuous-Galerkin-based immersed boundary method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 76, 427–454.
Li, J., Melenk, J. M., Wohlmuth, B., & Zou, J. (2010). Optimal a priori estimates for higher order finite elements for elliptic interface problems. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 60, 19–37.
Li, Z., & Ito, K. (2006). The immersed interface method. SIAM.
Liao, Q., & Silvester, D. (2013). Robust stabilized stokes approximation methods for highly stretched grids. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 33, 413–431.
Massing, A., Larson, M. G., Logg, A., & Rognes, M. E. (2012). A stabilized Nitsche fictitious domain method for the stokes problem. Journal of Scientific Computing, 61(3), 604–628.
Maury, B. (2001). A fat boundary method for the poisson problem in a domain with holes. Journal of Scientific Computing, 16, 319–339.
Maury, B. (2009). Numerical analysis of a finite element/volume penalty method. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 47(2), 1126–1148.
Melenk, J. M., & Babuška, I. (1996). The partition of unity finite element method: basic theory and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 139, 289–314.
Micheletti, S., Perotto, S., & Picasso, M. (2004). Stabilized finite elements on anisotropic meshes: A priori error estimates for the advection-diffusion and the stokes problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 41(3), 1131–1162.
Moës, N., Dolbow, J., & Belytschko, T. (1999). A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 46, 131–150.
Nicaise, S. (1993). Polygonal interface problems. Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Parvizian, J., Düster, A., & Rank, E. (2007). Finite cell method. Computational Mechanics, 41, 121–133.
Pedrizzetti, G. (2005). Kinematic characterization of valvular opening. Physical Review Letters, 95, 194502.
Peskin, C. (1977). Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. Journal of Computational Physics, 25, 220–252.
Peskin, C. S. (2002). The immersed boundary method. Acta Numerica, 11, 1–39.
Rand, A. (2009). Delaunay refinement algorithms for numerical methods. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.
Sanders, J. D., Laursen, T. A., & Puso, M. A. (2012). A Nitsche embedded mesh method. Computational Mechanics, 49, 243–257.
van Brummelen, E. H., van der Zee, K. G., Garg, V. V., & Prudhomme, S. (2011). Flux evaluation in primal and dual boundary-coupled problems. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 79, 010904.
van Loon, R., Anderson, P. D., & van de Vosse, F. N. (2006). A fluid-structure interaction method with solid-rigid contact for heart valve dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 217, 806–823.
Yu, Z. (2005). A DLM/FD method for fluid/flexible-body interactions. Journal of Computational Physics, 207, 1–27.
Ženíšek, A. (1969). The convergence of the finite element method for boundary value problems of a system of elliptic equations (in czech). APL Materials, 14, 355–377.
Zlámal, M. (1968). On the finite element method. Numerical Mathematics, 12, 394–409.
Zunino, P., Cattaneo, L., & Colciago, C. M. (2011). An unfitted interface penalty method for the numerical approximation of contrast problems. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 61, 1059–1076.
Acknowledgments
This work is partially funded by iCardioCloud project by Cariplo Foundation (No. 2013-1779)) and Lumbardy Region (No. 42938382; No. 46554874); ERC Starting Grant through the Project ISOBIO: Isogeometric Methods for Biomechanics (No. 259229); The authors would also like to acknowledge the support of Franco Brezzi and Alessandro Veneziani in the realization of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Auricchio, F., Lefieux, A., Reali, A. (2016). On the Use of Anisotropic Triangles with Mixed Finite Elements: Application to an “Immersed” Approach for Incompressible Flow Problems. In: Schröder, J., Wriggers, P. (eds) Advanced Finite Element Technologies. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 566. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31925-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31925-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31923-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31925-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)