Skip to main content

Fiction and Substance. Start-Up Support: An Analysis on Interaction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Entrepreneurship

Abstract

Most forms of economic actions involve uncertainty insofar as these actions are future-oriented. Ambiguities coming along with business formations result for example from unpredictably changing market demands or the changing of the competitive situation. Handling uncertainties is therefore part of the entrepreneurial process. Following Jens Beckert’s concept of “imagined futures”, we refer to fictionalisation as a conscious stylisation of an unknown entrepreneurial future as a market success. Simultaneously, there is a need for substantiating strategies during the entrepreneurial process, which means signalising the feasibility of the business idea through certificates, analysis and data. In our research we analysed counselling talks between case workers and recipients of social benefits who aim to end their dependency on social welfare by becoming self-employed. Referring to eight case studies on interaction, fictionalisation and substantiation are analysed as practices of dealing with economic uncertainties. We interpret our findings as a distinctive form of business planning, which allows a rather flexible form of business development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Germany the “GEM—Global Entrepreneurship Monitor” (Sternberg et al. 2013), the “Gründer-Panel” released by the Institut für Mittelstandsforschung Bonn (Kranzusch & Kay 2011) and the “KFW-Gründungsmonitor” (Metzger & Ullrich 2013) document the developments of self-employment within various sectors and groups. In addition the “ALLBUS” (German General Social Survey), the “SOEP” (socioeconomic panel) or the “Mikrozensus” (published by the Federal Office of Statistics) deliver further data. Qualitative surveys analyse, for example, intentions to become self-employed and terms of business foundation (e.g. Bührmann et al. 2010).

References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of entrepreneurship research. An interdisciplinary survey and introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J. (1996). Was ist soziologisch an der Wirtschaftssoziologie? Ungewissheit und die Einbettung wirtschaftlichen Handelns. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 25, 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J. (2013). Imagined futures. Fictional expectations in the economy. Theory and Society, 42, 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J. (2014). Capitalist dynamics. Fictional expectations and the openness of the future. MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/7. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard, S., Pongratz, H. J., & Wolff, H. J. (2013). Das Einstiegsgeld: Gedämpfte Erwartungen in den Jobcentern. IAB Kurzbericht Nr. 27. Nürnberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bögenhold, D. (2002). Theoriepfade und -traditionen der Gründungsforschung: Auf dem Weg zu einer einheitlichen Theorie. In R. G. Heinze & F. Schulte (Eds.), Unternehmensgründungen: Zwischen Inszenierung, Anspruch und Realität (pp. 25–44). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bührmann, A. D., Fischer, U. L., & Jasper, G. (Eds.). (2010). Migrantinnen gründen Unternehmen. Empirische Analysen des Gründungsgeschehens und innovative Beratungskonzepte. München: Hampp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W., West, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29, 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Reynolds, P. D. (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. S., Hartog, J., Jonker, N., & van Praag, C. M. (2002). Low risk aversion encourages the choice for entrepreneurship: An empirical test of a truism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, S. (2005). The social construction of entrepreneurship: Narrative and dramatic processes in the coproduction of organizations and identities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (2007). Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, S. (2010). Risk and uncertainty. In Z. J. Acs & D. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 303–318). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, S., Wolff, J., & Zabel, C. (2010). Einstiegsgeld als Gründungsförderung. Teilnehmerstrukturen und Determinanten der Förderleistung. IAB Forschungsbericht 9/2010. Nürnberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (1996). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofert, S. (2007). Praxisbuch Existenzgründung. Erfolgreich selbständig werden und bleiben. Frankfurt am Main: Eichborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irsch, N., & Witt, P. (Eds.). (2011). Gründungsförderung in Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: KFW-Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1946). Risk, uncertainty and profit (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranzusch, P., & Kay, R. (2011). Das Gründerpanel des IfM Bonn. Konzeption und Nutzungsmöglichkeiten. IfM-Materialien Nr. 208. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. In S. Campbell & S. Fainstein (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (pp. 288–304). Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2009). Social constructionism and entrepreneurship: Basic assumptions and consequences for theory and research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 15, 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, A., & Schuch, M. (2011). Existenzgründung. Was Sie wirklich wissen müssen. Die 50 wichtigsten Fragen und Antworten. Wien: Linde Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, G., & Ullrich, K. (2013). KfW-Gründungsmonitor 2013. Gründungsgeschehen auf dem Tiefpunkt—kein Anstieg in Sicht. KfW Bankengruppe:Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroz, P. W., & Hindle, K. (2012). Entrepreneurship as a process: Toward harmonizing multiple perspectives. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 36, 781–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pflüger, J., Pongratz, H. J., & Trinczek, R. (2010). Fallstudien in der deutschen Arbeits- und Industriesoziologie. Eine Bestandsaufnahme. In H. J. Pongratz & R. Trinczek (Eds.), Industriesoziologische Fallstudien. Entwicklungspotentiale einer Forschungsstrategie (pp. 23–67). Berlin: edition sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pongratz, H. J., Bernhard, S., Wolff, J., & Promberger, M. (2013). Selbständig statt leistungsberechtigt. Eine Implementationsstudie zur Handhabung des Einstiegsgeldes in den Jobcentern. IAB-Forschungsbericht. Nürnberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26, 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, F. (1983). Biographieforschung und narratives interview. Neue Praxis, 13, 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., Vorderwülbecke, A., & Brixy, U. (2013). . Unternehmensgründungen im weltweiten Vergleich. Länderbericht Deutschland 2012. Hannover: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert, C. (2007). ‘Entrepreneuring’ as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19, 453–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, R. (2003). Economic and sociological approaches to markets. In R. Swedberg (Ed.), Principles of economic sociology (pp. 104–131). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer, P. (2007). Businessplan und Markterfolg eines Geschäftskonzepts. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzel, A. (2000). The Problem-centered interview [26 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1: Art. 22. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0001228

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research. Design and method (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Abbenhardt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abbenhardt, L., Pongratz, H.J., Bernhard, S. (2016). Fiction and Substance. Start-Up Support: An Analysis on Interaction. In: Bögenhold, D., Bonnet, J., Dejardin, M., Garcia Pérez de Lema, D. (eds) Contemporary Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28134-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics